A Wartime Diary From Tehran
Translated by Salar Abdoh
On June 13, 2025, Israel launched air strikes on nuclear and military sites in Iran. Over the 12 days that followed, the Israeli campaign expanded to include energy and other infrastructure; Iran retaliated with drone and missile strikes inside Israel; and the United States entered the conflict with strikes on Iranian nuclear facilities on June 22. Alireza Iranmehr is a novelist and an essayist who lives in the north of Iran but returned to Tehran to witness and document the bombardment. He sent the following series of short dispatches to his translator throughout the conflict.
The enormous roundabout at Azadi Square was full of cars, yet still felt somehow deserted. Then it dawned on me: Humans—they were mostly missing. Where normally tens of thousands of pedestrians thronged, now there were only a scattered few. Even many of the cars sat empty.
Azadi Square is commonly the first place one sees upon arriving in Tehran and the last upon departure; several major expressways pass through it, and it is not far from Mehrabad Airport, which serves domestic flights. The airport reportedly had been bombarded a couple of days before, but I could not discern any sign of destruction from where I stood—just the smell of burned plastic cutting through the usual city smog.
Earlier that day, in Bandar Anzali, on the Caspian shore, I had been lucky to find a cab driver willing to bring me all the way to Tehran. The driver told me that he'd made the opposite trip with three young women in the middle of the night—and charged them 25 times the going rate. 'You can see what's going on,' he said. 'There's no gas. All the cars are stuck on the road. This is a five-hour trip, and it took us 15 hours.'
He wasn't lying: The stream of cars trying to get out of Tehran appeared endless. Some vehicles were stranded on the sides of the road, having run out of fuel. Men banded together to move huge concrete barriers out of the way, so that they could turn their vehicles around to head back into the city. My driver pointed to the rear of his car and said, 'I had an extra four 20-gallon cans of gasoline just in case. I didn't want to get stranded.'
I asked why he didn't just stay in Bandar Anzali after dropping off the women.
'And stay where? My wife and kids are back in Tehran,' he said. 'And you? Why are you going to Tehran?'
I wanted to tell him that I was going back to Tehran to witness the most important event in Iran's recent history, so that I could write about it. But that suddenly seemed ridiculous and unbelievable. I said instead, 'I'm going to see some of my friends.'
He nodded. 'Be careful,' he said, with a note of suspicion. 'There are a lot of spies around these days in Tehran.'
Was he suggesting that I might be one of those spies? It rubbed me the wrong way, but I didn't say anything.
Now, nearly alone in the middle of Azadi Square, I was seized with doubt, and then fear. The streets and sidewalks seemed wider than before, and newly ominous. I started to walk toward Azadi Boulevard when an ear-splitting sound threw me suddenly off balance.
I looked up at the sky: Anti-aircraft fire and tracers appeared, clusters of little dots that ascended and then turned into flashes of white. There was nothing else in that sky. No airplanes. Down the road, I saw another man standing, looking up with intense curiosity, as though mesmerized.
[Read: The invisible city of Tehran]
No sirens sounded. No crowds ran looking for shelter. There was only the vacant expanse above, and an eerie noise like the buzzing of flies after the anti-aircraft guns went quiet. I'd heard somewhere that this was the sound of Israeli drones searching for their targets. Somewhere far away, an explosion boomed, and then came the anti-aircraft fire again, even farther away.
Strange to say, but my fear lifted. I felt calm as I headed for the home of a friend on Jeyhoon Street—one who had decided to remain in Tehran and said I could spend the night. So I strolled, knowing the sky would light up again before long.
At 2 a.m., after a long break, explosions came, one after another. I had left Jeyhoon Street and was now staying with Mostafa and Sahar, two of my best friends, in an apartment on the top floor of a building at the Ghasr Crossroad. This area of the city was packed with military and security sites that made likely targets for bombardment.
Mostafa worked for the Tehran municipality. Sahar, after years of trying, was finally pregnant. When I'd called to ask if I could stay the night, they were delighted—at last, company in their anxiety. They'd remained in Tehran because Sahar had been prescribed strict bed rest.
'If we stay, we may or may not get killed,' Mostafa told me. 'But if we leave, our child will definitely not make it. So we've stayed.'
By 2:30 a.m., the sound of anti-aircraft fire was relentless. I saw a shadow moving in the hallway: Mostafa. He asked if I was awake, then made for my window, opening it. Now the sounds were exponentially louder, and a pungent odor of something burning entered the room. He'd come in here to smoke a cigarette, and in the effort to keep the smoke away from Sahar and their bedroom, he had allowed the entire apartment to be permeated by the scorching smell of war.
'Sahar isn't afraid?' I asked him.
'Sahar is afraid of everything since the pregnancy,' he replied.
A flash brightened the sky, and a few moments later, the sound of a distant blast swept over us. Mostafa left his half-smoked cigarette on the edge of the sill and hurried to check on Sahar. I saw a bright orange flame to the east of us outside. Apropos of nothing, or everything, I thought of 'The Wall,' Jean-Paul Sartre's short story set during the Spanish Civil War: Several prisoners huddle in a basement, waiting to be shot and wondering about the pain to come—whether it would be better to take a bullet to the face or to the gut. I imagined myself in the midst of that explosion, wondered whether shattered glass or falling steel beams and concrete would be what killed me.
Mostafa reappeared. I asked how Sahar was doing.
'She's still reading,' he said. 'I think it was the Tehranpars district they just hit.'
'No, it looked to me like it was Resalat,' I said. Then, after a pause: 'You remember how during the war with Iraq, if anyone ever smoked in front of a window they'd say the guy is suicidal? For years, my father had blankets nailed over all our windows, to make sure our lights weren't visible from outside.'
'They say the same thing now,' Mostafa said. ''Don't stand in front of windows.' But I think it makes no difference. The more advanced technology gets, the less room you have to hide. Window or no window means nothing.'
I'd imagined that getting inside Shariati Hospital without a press ID would be impossible. But as with just about everything else in Iran, access was a matter of having a contact.
The hallways were packed with injured people, staff running every which way—more than one TV crew looked utterly lost on first entering the building. At one point, someone announced that the hospital was full and would have to redirect the newly injured elsewhere.
I stuck my head into rooms, as though looking for someone I'd lost. That was plausible enough under the circumstances that no one paid me any mind. After a while, I began to feel as though I really had lost somebody. The hospital had become a field of haphazard body parts, the smell of Betadine infusing everything.
A man sat quite still in the hallway, most of his face seemingly gone and wrapped in gauze. Another man had lost a hand. He stared quietly at the ceiling with a strangely beatific look, as though his face was made of clay that was now drying with the impression of an old smile that wouldn't go away.
In one room, a TV crew interviewed a woman. She described the moment her home exploded. First, she'd heard multiple blasts in the distance. She told her husband and child to get away from the window. Then a flash, and the entire building trembled. Their apartment had been on the third floor, but when she opened her eyes, she was in the first-floor parking lot. Rescue workers still hadn't found a trace of her husband or child. She began to cry, and I retreated back into the hallway, where an old man sat on his knees, praying. He was wearing a thick, black winter skullcap despite the heat. He looked up at me and said, 'Half the house is gone. The other half remains. My son and daughter-in-law were in the other half.'
'Are they all right?' I asked him.
The old man didn't answer and went back to his praying. After a while, he started to weep. A half minute later came the sounds of air defenses. A woman screamed, pointing at the window, while several others tried to calm her down.
Outside, an ambulance wailed into the lot. Two days earlier, ambulances had been directed to turn off their sirens so as not to add to the general anxiety. But today, the alarms were back. I was in no special hurry to get to my next destination, but somehow I found myself speed-walking, even running, toward the address.
[Arash Azizi: Iran's stunning incompetence]
The woman people had been calling the 'cat lady' stood at her door, looking past me as though into a burning forest. I followed her to the kitchen, where she handed me a glass of lemonade. There had to be several dozen cats in that house—maybe 60 or more. The woman tiptoed among them like someone walking in a shallow pool of water. 'Only 12 are mine,' she said. 'The rest—their owners have been dropping off here the past few days.'
'How come they don't fight with each other?' I asked. I've had my share of cats and know that they don't readily share space with their own kind.
She said, 'In normal times, yes. They'd fight. But it's as if they know what's going on. When they first get here, they take one look around and then find a corner and sit quietly and wait.' During explosions, the cats would huddle together or hide under the furniture.
I asked her whether she was also afraid. She smiled. 'When you have to take care of this many cats, you don't have time to be afraid.'
A tabby with big, orange eyes rubbed against her ankles. She bent down to pick up the animal and caress it. Some people had abandoned their house pets on the streets when they left the city, she told me. They had little chance of surviving. She'd become the cat lady by posting an ad: For absolutely free, she was willing to take care of anyone's cat.
'My biggest problem right now is finding enough litter and dry food for them,' she told me. 'All the pet shops are closed. I try to give them wet food that I cook myself. But a lot of them are not used to it and get diarrhea.'
She told me that one pet-shop owner she knew had promised to come back to Tehran that night with supplies. I contemplated that as I finished a second lemonade: A pet-shop owner returning to Tehran under bombardment to make sure these cats have litter and food.
Back outside, the sky was quiet. Moving through the back alleys of the Yusefabad neighborhood, I found myself hurrying again, although I had no idea why.
A seemingly continuous flood of cars was returning to the city. Here and there, an anti-aircraft gun would go off for a second, but no one looked up at the sky anymore. Taxicabs were still rare and very expensive, but the metro and buses had been made free for everyone, at all hours.
I decided to visit my publisher, Cheshmeh bookstore, on Karim Khan Avenue. My latest book came out just a month ago, but the war froze everything, book launches especially.
Cheshmeh had hung a white banner outside. It read: Our shelter is the bookstore. The words gave me a warm feeling after days of fear. Inside, the store smelled of paper. Several of my old writer friends were there, amid a crowd talking about politics.
A young man with tired eyes was showing his cellphone screen to two others and saying, 'Look at what they're writing about me. 'He's in the regime's pay.' Look at all these horrible emojis and comments. And why? Just because I posted something saying, 'I pity our country and I'm against any foreigners attacking it.''
'They write this sort of garbage about all of us,' a middle-aged man offered. 'Don't take it seriously. For all we know, they're just pressure groups and bots.'
The young man didn't want to hear it. 'If I was in the pay of the government, don't you think I should own a home by now at least? I've lost count of how many pages of my books they've censored over the years. Folk like us, we take beatings from both sides.'
A gray-haired woman with a blue shawl over her shoulders said to him, 'Do and say what you think is right, my son. Some people want to mix everything together.' She had a kindly voice that seemed to calm the young man down a little bit.
From behind me, someone said, 'I fear this cease-fire is a hoax.'
Another voice replied, 'No, it's really over. America entered to make sure they wrap it up.'
I bought a newly translated book by a Korean author, chatted a little more with friends, and left, taking one last look at that miraculous white banner: Our shelter is our bookstore.
I had hardly slept since the U.S. attack on Iran's nuclear sites two days earlier. At my friend Nasser's house, during the long night of explosions, I'd fixed my gaze on a small chandelier that never stopped quivering. The last night of the war was the absolute worst. A few hours after the world had announced an imminent cease-fire, Nasser's windows were open. The familiar flash, the ensuing rattle and jolt. Nasser ran out of the kitchen with wet hands, shouting, 'Didn't the fools announce a cease-fire?'
The explosions came in seemingly endless waves. I was in the bathroom when one shook the building to what felt like the point of collapse. The lights went out, and there was a sound of shattering glass. I spotted Nasser in the living room. He was trying to stand up but couldn't. That chandelier had finally broken into a hundred little pieces. Nasser said nothing, which was strange. I turned on my phone's flashlight and shone it at him. He didn't look right and kept his hand over the side of his abdomen. I turned the light to that area and saw blood.
'What happened?'
'I have little pieces of glass inside me.'
'We have to go to the hospital.'
'We can't go now. Let's go sit under the stairway. It's safer there.'
[Arash Azizi: A cease-fire without a conclusion]
The building was empty. Everyone else seemed to have left the city. Nasser couldn't: He was an electrical engineer for the national railway and had to remain at his post.
Under the stairs did not feel safer. The building was old and flimsy. I had the feeling that one more blast would send the whole thing crashing down on us. I examined Nasser's wound under the flashlight. It was about eight inches long, but not very deep and not bleeding too much. I closed my eyes and tried to imagine that we were somewhere else when, from outside, I started to hear laughter and voices. I looked at Nasser to see whether I was imagining things. His face was chalk white, but he, too, had heard them.
I opened the door to the outside. Four teenagers were standing right there, in the middle of the street, watching the fireworks in the skies over Tehran with excitement. One of the boys was holding a huge sandwich, and the girls were decked out in the regalia of young goth and metal fans the world over. If it hadn't been for the sound of explosions, I would have imagined I'd been thrown into another time and dimension altogether.
The kids looked thrilled to have run into us. One of the boys asked, 'What's happening, hajji?'
'My friend's been injured.'
'Dangerous?'
'I'm not sure. I'm thinking I should take him to a hospital.'
'You need help?'
I backed Nasser's car out of the garage. It was caked with dust and bits of chipped wall. The kids helped us, and two of them even volunteered to ride along to the hospital. The sounds of explosions retreated as we drove, but the silence that followed was deep and somehow foreboding.
Nasser got stitched up fairly quickly. Dawn light was filtering into the emergency-room waiting area as we prepared to leave, people murmuring to one another that the cease-fire had begun. I looked around for the kids who'd come with us to the hospital. They were gone. I thought about how, years from now, they'd think back on that night, and I wondered how their memories would compare with Nasser's and mine.
That was the last night. Now, leaving the bookstore, I went to the bus terminal at Azadi Square. Tehran was back in full swing; coming and going were easy too. I bought a ticket to Bandar Anzali and, as I boarded, took one last look at the Azadi Square monument—an elegant testimonial to the long suffering of modern Iran. The very next day, June 25, the Tehran Symphonic Orchestra was set to hold a free concert in the square. It was already hard to believe that this city had just experienced a war.
*Photo-illustration by Jonelle Afurong / The Atlantic. Source: PATSTOCK / Getty; duncan1890 / Getty; fotograzia / Getty; natrot / Getty; Morteza Nikoubazl / NurPhoto / Getty; Getty.
Article originally published at The Atlantic
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Axios
an hour ago
- Axios
"You could never have enough": Militaries scramble for air defense interceptors
The wars in Ukraine and the Middle East are diminishing supplies of air defenses and raising concerns at the Pentagon, and around the world, about insufficient stockpiles. The big picture: Militaries are burning through interceptors, and everyone wants more. But demand outstrips production. Ukraine bats down Russian salvos. Israel counters Iranian barrages. The U.S. and allies such as France swat away bombardments from Yemen. Meanwhile, worries about stateside stashes were apparently so severe that they necessitated a review of weapons deliveries worldwide. The Pentagon recently froze shipments of Patriot interceptors to Ukraine, citing inventory concerns, before Trump at least partially reversed that move. Driving the news: The U.S. Army in its fiscal 2026 budget blueprint increased its acquisition goal for the most advanced variant of Patriot interceptors to almost 14,000. That's quadruple the previous level for those interceptors, the Lockheed Martin-made PAC-3 Missile Segment Enhancement. What they're saying: " The Biden administration was doing way too much 'playing catch' with the Houthis, and now the Trump administration is doing the same thing," Tom Karako, an expert at the Center for Strategic and International Studies, told Axios. "It's a bipartisan sin to treat our missile-defense interceptors as expendable and attritable assets," he added. "These are scarce national resources. We need to treat them as such." Friction point: Industry can only pump out so many interceptors annually. "Part of the bad news is that we're not going to be able to flip a switch and get all of this overnight," Karako said. Specialty munitions like PAC-3 MSE, Israel Aerospace Industries' Arrow 3 and RTX's Standard Missiles (proving popular in Red Sea and Gulf of Aden battles) cost millions of dollars a pop. Large exchanges can burn through weeks of work. The U.S. reportedly used 30 interceptors in one night shielding Al Udeid Air Base in Qatar from an Iranian attack. Ukraine typically uses multiple countermeasures for each incoming Russian ballistic missile. Yes, but: Lockheed is on track to produce more than 600 PAC-3 MSEs this year, a first for the world's largest defense contractor, and is eyeing 650 annually by 2027. "Demand for PAC-3 MSE has surged following its proven performance in real-world operations," a spokesperson told Axios. "Our new Camden facility, built in 2022, has capacity to increase production rates and enable the program to continue its critical production ramp-up." Lockheed last year signed a $4.5 billion contract with the Army for interceptors and associated hardware. Then-Army acquisition chief Doug Bush described the deal as "vital" to equipping the service "along with Ukraine and other allies around the world." The bottom line: " It seems like the [combatant commands] line up outside the factory doors when PAC-3 MSEs are being produced," retired Army Lt. Gen. Daniel Karbler said at a CSIS event Tuesday. "They're stealing them and they're grabbing them to get them out into their particular areas of responsibility."


Axios
an hour ago
- Axios
Scoop: Putin urges Iran to take "zero enrichment" nuclear deal with U.S., sources say
Russian President Vladimir Putin has told both President Trump and Iranian officials that he supports the idea of a nuclear deal in which Iran is unable to enrich uranium, sources familiar with those discussions tell Axios. Why it matters: Russia has been Iran's main diplomatic backer on the nuclear issue for years. But while Moscow publicly advocates for Iran's right to enrich, Putin has taken a tougher position in private in the wake of the 12-day war between Israel and Iran. Behind the scenes: Moscow has encouraged the Iranians to agree to "zero enrichment," according to three European officials and one Israeli official with knowledge of the issue. Two sources said the Russians also briefed the Israeli government about Putin's position regarding Iran's uranium enrichment. "We know that this is what Putin told the Iranians," a senior Israeli official said. Putin also expressed that position in calls last week with Trump and French President Emmanuel Macron. State of play: Israeli and U.S. strikes seriously damaged Iran's nuclear facilities but did not destroy all of Iran's highly enriched uranium. It's unclear whether any of Iran's centrifuges survived. Trump has made clear he wants a new nuclear deal with Iran. If negotiations take place in the coming weeks, zero uranium enrichment on Iranian soil will be one of the key U.S. demands, sources say. Iran has long insisted that it must retain the ability to enrich under any deal. The intrigue: Putin and other Russian officials have conveyed their support for a "zero enrichment" deal to the Iranians several times of the last few weeks, the sources say. "Putin would support zero enrichment. He encouraged the Iranians to work towards that in order to make negotiations with the Americans more favorable. The Iranians said they won't consider it," one European official with direct knowledge of the issue said. Friction point: Putin's position is particularly notable given the extensive support Iran has provided Russia during its war with Ukraine, including by supplying hundreds of attack drones and surface-to-surface missiles. During and after the 12-day war, the Iranians were disappointed that the Russians didn't give them any significant support beyond press statements. The Kremlin and the White House didn't reply to requests for comment. The Iranian mission to the UN declined to comment. Zoom in: The Russians have made clear in public and private that if a deal is reached, they are willing to remove Iran's highly enriched uranium. Russia has said it would then supply Iran with 3.67% uranium for nuclear power and small quantities of 20% enriched uranium for the Tehran research reactor and the production of nuclear isotopes, sources say. What to watch: White House envoy Steve Witkoff has been talking to Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi about resuming nuclear negotiations.


New York Post
an hour ago
- New York Post
Why the biggest domestic intelligence threats are often home-grown
Last month, Fox News reported that more than 700 Iranian nationals — some flagged for terrorism concerns — had been admitted into the United States during the Biden years by US immigration authorities. Arrested while crossing our border with Mexico, they were later released by the administration into the sprawl of American life. 6 Army intelligence officer Joseph Daniel Schmidt, one of many US military personnel who have operated against American security interests despite passing strict security clearances. But while political chatter continues to orbit the border — who crossed, when and how — the more urgent threat is hiding in plain sight. It doesn't wear foreign colors or carry a forged passport. It wears a uniform. It carries a badge. It has credentials. And it has access. The danger isn't who's trying to get in. The danger is who American authorities have already let in — and who they've long since stopped watching. One of them was Joseph Daniel Schmidt. On June 20, the former Army intelligence sergeant pleaded guilty to attempting to deliver US military secrets to China. He is currently in federal custody and scheduled for sentencing this September. This wasn't a Cold War thriller. It was a betrayal by a soldier with a security clearance and access to top-secret systems. Schmidt served at Joint Base Lewis–McChord from 2015 to 2020. After leaving the Army, he emailed Chinese government contacts offering to share information on American surveillance and intelligence capabilities. He then flew to Hong Kong, carrying a secure-access device and a set of classified military briefings. 6 Army analyst Korbein Schultz, now serving seven years behind bars. Sgt. Ryan Rayno, 181st Multifunctional Training Brigade Prosecutors haven't disclosed whether Schmidt was paid, but his communications suggested he was seeking protection or compensation in exchange for secrets. It's easy to see Schmidt as a fluke. He isn't. In April, Army analyst Korbein Schultz was sentenced to seven years for leaking 92 classified documents — including intelligence on missile defense — to someone he believed was a Chinese agent. He was paid $42,000. In March, three US soldiers were arrested for stealing and selling components from the Army's HIMARS missile system. And just weeks ago, two Chinese nationals were charged with attempting to recruit US military personnel to spy for Beijing. For decades, America's national security bureaucracy — from the Pentagon to the CIA — has operated under the assumption that once an employee is granted a security clearance, they remain trustworthy. The clearance — and access — is rarely reviewed again. Which is why so many of the most dangerous people we're failing to watch are not infiltrators. They are government employees, contractors and uniformed personnel working within our bases, intelligence hubs and encrypted networks. And the systems meant to monitor them have failed to keep pace. 6 Studies by the US General Accounting office reveal millions of US government worker who are not continuously monitored for security risks. Wiki Commons A 2023 Government Accounting Office report found that nearly 80% of the 3.6 million Americans with security clearances aren't enrolled in any kind of continuous vetting. Some go a full decade without a second look. The Defense Counterintelligence and Security Agency's vetting program covers 3.8 million individuals, but only alerts for administrative flags: arrests, bankruptcies, foreign travel. It does not monitor social media activity, encrypted communication platforms or psychological instability. We assume loyalty is permanent. It isn't. A soldier might pass a polygraph at 25 and spiral at 32 — financially, emotionally, ideologically — and no one will notice until it's too late. 6 Although the US border with Mexico has tightened greatly since Pres. Trump returned to office, terror threat analysts continues to focus on this region — despite the clearly-documented presence of home-grown risky personnel. Getty Images Our allies are adapting. In the UK, the Cabinet Office has expanded its insider-threat protocols to include behavioral risk modeling and continuous social monitoring for civil servants and defense employees. In Israel, the Shin Bet runs rolling psychological and behavioral checks on military officers and cleared intelligence personnel even after initial vetting. We aren't doing the same. Meanwhile, China's Ministry of State Security, especially Bureau 4 — which focuses on penetrating foreign governments — is well aware of the holes in our system. They use LinkedIn, WhatsApp and even job boards to target disillusioned Americans with access to secure intelligence. The pitch doesn't start with cash. It starts with a connection. 6 China's Ministry of State Security uses LinkedIn, WhatsApp and even job boards to target disillusioned Americans with access to secure intelligence. Wiki Commons Security clearance must become a living credential — reviewed and revalidated continuously, not granted once and forgotten. That means real-time risk analysis at onboarding, and long-term behavioral monitoring for anyone with access to sensitive materials — especially in the military and intelligence community. When red flags emerge, clearances should be paused within days, not buried under six months of interagency red tape. And yes, this does happen. A GAO study examining the Department of Defense's continuous evaluation pilot found that 3% of the personnel reviewed warranted revocation or suspension of access. Another GAO report found that clearance revocations could take anywhere from 220 to 375 days — even when credible concerns had already been flagged. 6 The HQ of China's notorious Ministry of Public Security — where many of its most elaborate schemes to penetrate Western government agencies are developed and implemented. Wiki Commons This isn't a theoretical gap. It's a procedural failure. The result is a security architecture that moves too slowly for the risks it's supposed to manage. Joseph Schmidt wasn't exotic. He was a soldier. Trained. Trusted. Ignored. The next breach won't come from malware or missiles. It will walk through the front door — with a badge, a login and no one watching. Kevin Cohen is the CEO and co-founder of the cyber-intelligence company