Thousands of pensioners missing out on DWP income boost due to ‘long and difficult' process
Older people find applying for crucial benefits 'long and difficult', according to the research from Independent Age, with excess complexity locking them out of some major entitlements.
Researchers found that for just four of the key older-age benefits, applicants would need to answer 450 questions, many covering similar areas.
These include Attendance Allowance, Council Tax reduction, and Pension Credit which could add up to nearly £500 before the latter's 'passported' benefits. This includes things like mortgage support, a free TV licence and, since last July, the Winter Fuel Payment, all adding up to as much as £4,300.
Even more valuable is Housing Benefit, which for many pensioners is uncapped and could provide up to 100 per cent of their rent. The take up of this benefit for pensioners is relatively high, at 83 per cent, but this still represents 270,000 households missing out on £1.1 billion a year – an average of £3,700 a household.
The take up of Pension Credit increased slightly following Labour's decision to link the benefit to the Winter Fuel Payment for the first time from 2024. Following a campaign to boost by the DWP last year, over 120,000 more pensioners have begun receiving it since July.
The department also says it is consulting on ways to get the benefit to those who need it, with plans to jointly administer Housing Benefit and Pension Credit set to come into force 'as soon as possible'. But more must be done to ensure pensioners are able to access all the benefits they are entitled to, Independent Age argues.
The charity's chief executive Joanna Elson CBE said: 'It is clear that the UK has a social security system that is far too complex and difficult to navigate, and while there are numerous entitlements available, many people in later life are often unable to access potentially life-changing support as a result. Something has to change.
'There are currently around two million older people living in poverty, and a further one million are precariously on the edge. The UK Government and local authorities must work together to drive take-up for benefits such as Pension Credit and Housing Benefit.'
Reflecting on her experience with the system, Susan, 69, told Independent Age: 'Applying for Attendance Allowance was awful. Reducing me to tears and even making me feel suicidal several times. Not only were the questions difficult to understand, dwelling on all of the things that I am no longer capable of doing sent me into a very dark place.'
'Applying for help in way of benefits is extremely difficult in the end, one just gives up and continues to struggle,' added Alan, age 80.
A DWP spokesperson said: 'We have made the process of applying for benefits as accessible as possible – such as completing the Pension Credit claim form online now takes on average just 16 minutes while figures published last week show nearly 120,000 more pensioners are receiving it since July.
'Our new initiative of joining up State Pension and Pension Credit is supporting more people onto the benefit as soon as they become eligible, and we have written to over 120,000 pensioner households in receipt of Housing Benefit about Pension Credit to better join up the offer and further improve uptake.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
3 hours ago
- Yahoo
Labour Can't Decide What It's Doing With The Internet
Labour seems to be in two minds over how to handle the internet. While Keir Starmer's comms team is now briefing influencers on government policies, his ministers are cracking down on harmful online content – and facing accusations of mass censorship at the same time. On Thursday afternoon, the prime minister will be hosting a reception for up to 90 influencers in Downing Street, who reportedly have a combined following of a quarter of a billion followers and have already been chatting to No.10 over the last year. Invitees allegedly include cookbook author Chetna Makan and former Love Island contestant now anti-revenge porn campaigner Georgia Harrison, along with other TikTok stars and YouTubers. This move has been criticised and praised in equal measure. While a handful of online users claim no serious influencer would want to be associated with this government, some political pundits claim it is a sign that Downing Street is finally getting with the 21st Century. And that may be true: Ofcom recently found 82% of 16 to 24-year-olds use social media for news, along with 28% of people aged over 55. This online-first attitude also seems to be rewarding their largest electoral threat, Nigel Farage, who has 1.3 million followers on TikTok and is currently leading in the opinion polls by a healthy margin. But, at the same time, the government has just rolled out its Online Safety Act, rather undermining their new approach to the web, as critics have pointed out. Meant to protect children by putting age restrictions on various sites, the legislation has created an uproar in some quarters over fears it would create mass censorship and political debate – while also making it harder to monitor online risks for kids. That's because there's been a huge uptick in the use of virtual private networks (VPNs), which allow people to circumvent the age restrictions by masking a user's identity. Data from the Age Verification Providers Association also found an additional five million online age checks a day are being carried out because of the new legislation. Fears that the Act is too broad and vague in its definitions of 'harmful content' have fuelled further concerns that it will force adults to share personal data with global porn sites – paving the way for mass data breaches in a dangerous overreach. Then there's the ramifications that come with putting up barriers online. Starmer even had to laugh off warnings from Donald Trump earlier this week over fears the new law would limit access to his website, Truth Social. Reform UK have leapt on the opportunity to attack Labour, claiming it would completely tear up the legislation – although the party has confirmed it has no new ideas to protect children from the worst corners of the internet. Still, their debate spiralled out of control when the technology secretary Peter Kyle claimed Farage's criticism indicated he would have been on the same side as the late prolific sexual predator Jimmy Savile. The Reform UK leader has since asked for an apology. Of course, plenty of people are in favour of the legislation, which has been quietly worked on by successive governments. The suicide prevention group, the Molly Rose Foundation, noted: 'The Online Safety Act will help save young lives.' The organisation's CEO Andy Burrows pointed out there has been strong cross-party consensus to protect children online in the past. Scrapping it altogether would actually 'go against what Reform voters think,' he told LBC, noting that more than seven in 10 people who voted Reform at the last election want to keep and even strengthen the Act. Meanwhile, Chris Sherwood from the charity NPSCC wrote in PoliticsHome that 'it's deeply concerning to see the rhetoric around the Online Safety Act shift toward loss of free expression.' The Department of Science, Innovation and Technology told HuffPost UK: 'The Online Safety Act is the biggest step change in children's online safety since the internet began. 'It protects young people from harmful content and holds platforms and tech companies to account. 'This is about creating a safer internet – not censoring it – where children can explore, learn and connect without fear of what's behind the next swipe.' But can Labour really expect a positive reception by using influencers to spread its message while fending off accusations of censorship? Only time will tell if the government can have its cake and eat it too. Related... If You Think Adolescence Is Just About Online Incel Groups, You Missed The Point This 1 Hidden iPhone Feature Could Instantly Make Your Online Data Safer – And It's So Easy To Activate Sorry, The Emoji-Over-Face Parents Might Be Right About Online Privacy
Yahoo
5 hours ago
- Yahoo
"Although he wasn't very big, he had a big heart"
Tributes have been paid to a 'well liked' councillor who suddenly died. George Davies sadly passed away in his sleep on Thursday morning (July 31).Davies, who had decades of experience was the ward councillor for Wigan Central. His first stint in the Wigan Council was when he was elected as a Liberal Democrat in 1995 he lost his seat in Aspull-Standish, where he lives, before making a return the following election as a Labour 2009, he was appointed Honorary Alderman, before returning to serve as a councillor for Wigan Central ward since avid historian and great fan of the NHS, Davies worked as porter at the Royal Albert Wigan to the M.E.N, fellow councillor, Lawrence Hunt, who had known George for 15 years, said: "He was well known in the community, a jolly chap, although he wasn't very big, he had a big heart."George was very much a man of the community, he engrossed himself with projects. He was a local historian so he did a number of pamphlets focused on the history and old maps of Wigan."We called him Mr Likeable and Gorgeous George because he had his photos taken that many times. He was looking to stand in the local election, he had every intention to stand."In a tribute to Paul, Wigan's labour division said: "It is with deep regret and shock that we are informing you of the sudden death of Councillor George Davies, who passed away earlier today."Councillor George Davies was first elected to Wigan Council in 1987."He was appointed Honorary Alderman in 2009, before returning to serve as a councillor for Wigan Central Ward since 2010. We send our love and prayers to his wife Tina & son Paul, and all family and friends at this sad time."The flags across the borough have been lowered as a mark of respect in his honour."Local charity, Armed Forces Community, whose headquarters George was known to hold surgeries at, wrote: "At this difficult time, our hearts go out to his beloved wife, son, family, and friends."The loss of such a devoted individual leaves a significant void not just in their lives, but also in the fabric of our community. "As a gesture of respect and remembrance, the flag at the Armed Forces Community HQ has been lowered in his honour - a fitting acknowledgment of his support for AFCHQ."He actively held workshops there and championed various events that aimed to enhance our borough. "Let us come together to celebrate George's legacy and support one another as we navigate through this sorrowful moment. Our deepest condolences to all who were touched by his kindness and leadership." READ MORE: Royal Family 'delighted' as they announce engagment news READ MORE: Cult Manchester fashion brand announces first ever music festival - and they've roped in some big names
Yahoo
6 hours ago
- Yahoo
Starmer and Reeves should prepare UK for wealth tax, say top economists
Keir Starmer and Rachel Reeves have been urged by a group of the world's leading economists to use the autumn budget to prepare Britain for the introduction of a new wealth tax to tackle 'extreme' levels of inequality. With the government under pressure to raise taxes, the group of economists, including the French expert on wealth inequality Thomas Piketty, said the UK prime minister could raise 'tens of billions of pounds' while positioning Britain as a progressive leader on the world stage. In a letter shared with the Guardian, the experts warned that wealth in Britain – like many rich countries – had become concentrated in fewer and fewer hands in recent decades at the expense of the nation at large. Related: UK is stuck in a 'debt doom loop', says top investor It comes as the chancellor, Rachel Reeves, faces mounting pressure from senior Labour figures and trade unions to raise taxes on wealth to cover a multibillion-pound shortfall in the public finances. 'Keir Starmer and Rachel Reeves can build a tax system fit for the 21st century – that promotes fairness, first-class public services and good living standards for everyone,' the economists wrote. 'We cannot allow extreme wealth inequality to deepen while millions of people are consigned to struggle for a basic quality of life. A progressive wealth tax is a critical step forward, and one that we urge the UK government to take.' Signatories of the letter include the leading Indian development economist Jayati Ghosh, José Antonio Ocampo, a former Colombian finance minister and ex-UN undersecretary-general for economic and social affairs, and the globally acclaimed economist Ha-Joon Chang. The group of more than two dozen signatories said a 'modest' net wealth tax on assets of more than £10m could raise 'enormous sums of money' that could be used to avoid a return to austerity while tackling rampant inequality. Reeves is reportedly prepared to reject backbench Labour demands for the introduction of a new tax on wealth, although has so far publicly refused to rule out the measure. Advocates include Neil Kinnock, the former party leader. Several of her cabinet colleagues have poured cold water on the idea, including the business secretary, Jonathan Reynolds, who last week publicly denounced a new levy as a 'daft' idea that would not work. It is believed the Treasury would prefer to use existing features of the tax system – including levies on capital gains, inheritances and pensions – to raise money from rich individuals rather than dedicate resources to create and administer a new levy, which could have mixed results. The Institute for Fiscal Studies has argued that a dedicated new levy could deter investment in Britain and would be a 'poor substitute for properly taxing the sources and uses of wealth' through other means. It said that implementing a wealth tax would be difficult, requiring a new administrative apparatus to value assets, which could be open to rich, well-advised individuals shifting around their holdings to game the system. Critics also say super-rich individuals could leave the UK. While stand-alone wealth taxes are used in some European countries – including Spain, Norway and Switzerland – several other leading nations – including Austria, Denmark and Germany – have abandoned them. However, the leading economists said it would be possible to overcome the difficulties associated with the design and administration of a new wealth tax, urging the UK government to launch a consultation at the autumn budget. 'Starting at the autumn budget the pieces of the puzzle – from consultation to design – can be collected to allow the government to roll out a wealth tax within this parliament. This could improve people's lives in years to come and avoid austerity for key services we all benefit from,' they said. The campaign group Tax Justice UK, which coordinated the letter, has estimated that a 1%-2% wealth tax on assets of more than £10m would affect only 0.04% of the population, and could raise up to £22bn for the exchequer a year. Ghosh, backing the call for a wealth tax in the UK, said: 'Not only is a net wealth tax a vital step to tackle inequality and improve living standards, but it is obviously best done with international cooperation. 'Keir Starmer and Rachel Reeves can position the UK as a progressive leader on the world stage. We urge them to work collaboratively with the international community to ensure that the super-rich pay their fair share, wherever they reside.' A Treasury spokesperson said Reeves was focused on growing the economy to strengthen the public finances. 'We are committed to keeping taxes for working people as low as possible, which is why at last autumn's budget, we protected working people's payslips and kept our promise not to raise the basic, higher or additional rates of income tax, employee national insurance or VAT,' the spokesperson said. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
