&w=3840&q=100)
Global trade rebound may fade as export orders lose momentum, warns WTO
Global goods trade saw a notable rise in early 2025, but the outlook for the rest of the year remains subdued, the World Trade Organisation (WTO) said on Thursday.
According to the WTO's latest Goods Trade Barometer, the index rose to 103.5 from 102.8 in March, signalling above-trend trade volumes. The increase was largely driven by importers accelerating purchases in anticipation of higher tariffs.
However, the WTO cautioned that the momentum may be short-lived. Its forward-looking new export orders index fell to 97.9, indicating that trade growth could slow in the months ahead.
The barometer is a composite leading indicator that provides real-time insights into global merchandise trade trends. Values above 100 suggest stronger-than-average growth, while those below 100 imply weakness.
The organisation also maintained its forecast of flat merchandise trade growth at just 0.1 per cent for the year. It warned that global trade could contract if the United States reinstates "reciprocal tariffs" or if policy uncertainty spreads more broadly.
(Only the headline and picture of this report may have been reworked by the Business Standard staff; the rest of the content is auto-generated from a syndicated feed.)
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
United News of India
6 hours ago
- United News of India
WTO key to resolving global trade tensions: Italian economist
Rome, June 29 (UNI) The global tariff tensions initiated by the United States (U.S.) should be addressed through the multilateral platform of the World Trade Organization (WTO), an Italian economics expert has said. Mario Tirelli, a professor of economics at the University of Roma Tre, said on Friday that the current U.S.-led trade disputes have broadened to affect nearly the entire world, including the European Union (EU), and are causing heightened uncertainty, something he described as "bad for the EU." "The most important sectors of international trade between the EU and the U.S. are machinery and transportation equipment, which accounted for nearly 40 percent of all EU exports to the U.S. in 2024," Tirelli noted. These sectors, he added, are among the most severely affected by the newly imposed tariffs. He criticized the Trump administration's approach to trade relations, describing it as fundamentally opposed to multilateralism. "We have to try to move this type of negotiation back to multilateral platforms," he said, adding that the WTO remains the ideal venue where countries' concerns can be addressed openly and fairly. As the U.S. has shown declining interest in supporting multilateral institutions such as the WTO, Tirelli called on the EU, China, and other like-minded countries to work together to uphold the multilateral framework. He said this collective support could serve as leverage to encourage the U.S. to return to multilateral negotiations. As a professor of game theory, Tirelli acknowledged that reaching a trade agreement between the EU and the U.S. would be difficult, but emphasized that the EU is not necessarily in a weak position, provided its member states maintain unity. "European countries have to understand that negotiation power will be really weak if they are divided," he said. Tirelli also highlighted the importance of maintaining cooperation between China and the EU, noting that the 50th anniversary of EU-China diplomatic ties presents an opportunity to deepen bilateral trade and investment. "Through trade with China, the EU can achieve highly competitive gains in sectors like green energy, including electric batteries and cars," he said. According to Tirelli, China could likewise benefit from the EU's expertise in areas such as aerospace, machinery, and financial technology, sectors he views as critical to China's continued development. UNI/XINHUA BM
Hindustan Times
11 hours ago
- Hindustan Times
India-US trade talks need political push for final leg
The fine print of a preliminary trade deal between India and the US has mostly been worked out by negotiators from both sides but the ball is now in the court of the political leadership to break a stalemate, people aware of the parleys told HT, disclosing two of the topmost sticking points that remain. Trade experts said an interim trade deal between India and the US is possible by July 9, provided both respect practical and political sensitivities of each other. (AFP File) According to these people, these issues are: an unequivocal assurance that New Delhi seeks from Washington that all punitive levies will be repealed, and a freer access to India's politically sensitive agriculture sector that the American side has sought. 'The two-day deliberation that started in Washington on Thursday will likely stretch over to next week,' one of these people, who has direct knowledge of the talks, told HT. Both sides are in a sprint to announce a breakthrough, which will be a preliminary deal covering some portion of the trade between two nations, with a larger bilateral trade deal expected to be signed by October. Once the deal is done, India wants America to withdraw all existing and potential retaliatory tariffs, including the 26% reciprocal tariff — this comprises a 10% baseline tariff imposed from April 5 and an additional 16% country-specific levy set to trigger from July 9. India also wants the US to revoke all safeguard duties disputed at the World Trade Organisation—50% on Indian steel and aluminium and 25% on automobiles and auto parts—and to reciprocate New Delhi's move by proportionately slashing its most favoured nation tariffs. 'Washington has not yet given any unequivocal commitment on these matters, which are crucial for Indian interests,' another person said. American negotiators have been suggesting India replicate the US-UK Economic Prosperity Deal model, where Britain accepted continued 10% baseline tariffs on most goods while securing relief from additional sectoral tariffs. However, Indian negotiators have rejected this approach. The other sticking point is the US insistence on India opening its agriculture and farming sector. While the American side is open to tariff rate quotas (TRQ) — a mechanism under which concessional duty or duty-free access of any specified item applies to a limited quantity — their insistence on some sensitive sectors is a challenge. 'The problem lies in wanting India to also open its sensitive sectors. Dairy imports are restricted for two reasons. First, India's dairy farming is at a subsistence level with one or two cows or buffaloes. The livelihoods of millions of farmers are at stake as they could not compete with America's commercial-scale dairy farms. Secondly, the US cattle feed includes non-vegetarian products, something against religious sentiments of Indian consumers,' a third person said. Similarly, India is unable to accept the US demand to allow unrestricted access to American agricultural items such as corn and soybean because Indian law does not permit genetically modified crops. 'America is unwilling to accept an institutional mechanism which would certify that its India-bound agriculture produce are not genetically modified, saying there is a practical problem in segregating GM and non-GM products,' this person said. This person added that solving such issues now require a political directive from the highest levels of the government. 'While majority of issues have been resolved with near consensus, including on removing tariff and non-tariff barriers on most of the items of interest for both countries, certain sensitive matters require political directives from the two leaders. An interim India-US trade deal, mainly involving goods, is possible to conclude before July 9, depending on political resolution of the stalemate,' the second person said. The Indian negotiating team could extend its stay in Washington next week and the two parties would discuss contentious issues, depending on any political directive, according to the first person. The Indian negotiating team led by chief negotiator and special secretary-commerce Rajesh Agrawal was still in Washington on Saturday, indicating that talks may extend into next week. Trade experts said an interim trade deal between India and the US is possible by July 9, provided both respect practical and political sensitivities of each other. Global Trade Research Initiative founder Ajay Srivastava outlined a likely scenario: 'The more likely outcome is a limited trade pact—styled after the US-UK mini trade deal announced on May 8. Under such a deal, India is expected to cut MFN tariffs on a wide range of industrial goods, including automobiles, a persistent demand from Washington. In agriculture, India may offer limited market access through tariff reductions and TRQs on select US products such as ethanol, almonds, walnuts, apples, raisins, avocados, olive oil, spirits, and wine.' 'However, India is unlikely to budge on sensitive sectors. No tariff cuts are expected for dairy products or key food grains like rice and wheat, where farm livelihoods are at stake. These categories are politically and economically sensitive, affecting over 700 million people in India's rural economy,' he added. Srivastava warned that 'the talks may collapse' if the US continues to insist on opening India's core agriculture sectors or allowing entry of GM products. The prudent move for Washington would be to respect Indian sensitivities and forge a deal for stronger strategic cooperation in future, he said, noting that 'agricultural goods account for less than 5% of US exports to India.' Another expert working in a multinational consulting firm said: 'Now it is the time for America to act as India has already given several concessions, making its intent clear for stronger and everlasting economic cooperation with the US.' After a week where tariffs took a back seat to the US strike on Iran's nuclear facilities and the massive tax and spending bill in the US Congress, the Trump administration's trade negotiations have picked up. News agency Reuters reported Washington had sent a new proposal to the EU on Thursday and held talks with Japan on Friday. Both India and Japan are in advanced negotiations.
&w=3840&q=100)
Business Standard
a day ago
- Business Standard
Best of BS Opinion: The quiet undercurrents changing the world today
You know that moment at the lakeside when everything looks still, no wind, no ripples. And then suddenly, your feet feel something shift below? A swirl. A stirring. A current quietly turning things over beneath the calm surface. That's how change often arrives, not like a bolt of lightning, but like a whisper under the surface. That's what our world today feels like as well. On the surface, institutions still stand, celebrities still smile, the city still runs. But beneath it all, subtle forces are rearranging the landscape. Let's dive in. Shang-Jin Wei notices one such tectonic ripple: the growing financial and ecological anxiety that's unravelling the global order we've long taken for granted. With Trump's fiscal recklessness threatening the dollar's credibility and climate cooperation fraying post-Paris exit, Asia and Europe are being nudged toward deeper, alternative alliances. From stablecoin diplomacy to carbon tariffs and WTO rewiring, a new architecture is quietly forming, not in resistance, but in response. In the shadows of this global churn, R Gopalakrishnan spotlights India's own deep-sea innovators — Suhas Patil and Anjan Bose — whose life-long work in chips and grid technology never grabbed headlines but shaped industries. They're the hidden champions, steadying the foundation even as waves crash up top. They built not for the quarter but for the quarter-century and India's future may well depend on unearthing and honouring many more like them. Then comes the political tremor from New York. Devangshu Datta writes about Zohran Mamdani, the unlikely mayoral frontrunner whose democratic socialist platform has stirred the status quo. His agenda, rent freezes, public transit, tax-the-rich, may sound radical, but it's tapping into real pain. And if implemented well, it might just recalibrate NYC's urban engine. The current he rides on? Economic justice wrapped in a rejection of capitalist excess. But as Shekhar Gupta reminds us, Mamdani's rise is no quiet ripple in India. It has unleashed a storm of identity debates, religion, origin, ideology, triggering unease within India's right-wing circles. Ironically, Mamdani's agenda resembles India's own socialist past, even as it tries to distance itself from that very memory. What we buried, others now revive and perhaps better dressed, perhaps better timed. And Vishal Menon watches another tide turn: Aamir Khan's shifting cinematic presence. Once the harbinger of meaningful cinema, his recent roles falter even as his vision behind the camera still gleams. Maybe it's time he lets the current carry him back to where his true strength lies. Stay tuned, and remember, sometimes, the storm isn't loud. But the undercurrent? That's what pulls the future in!
