Ryanair's booking practices ‘an absolute disgrace', says District Court judge
Ryanair's
booking practices 'an absolute disgrace' in a small claims case taken by a woman who was seeking €950 from the airline.
On January 9th, Katie Graham booked return flights through the Ryanair app for her family to visit Turin, Italy, for a week-long skiing holiday in February.
She received a reservation number, a prompt to check in for the flight and instructions to get to the airport.
'I genuinely thought everything was okay. There were only three weeks between booking the flights and leaving for the holiday and I was very busy. I did not check back into anything until the day before when I went to check in and an error message saying 'Oops, there's a problem with your booking' came up,' Ms Graham said.
READ MORE
She drove to the airport with her husband at 11pm for the departure and tried to check in at the Ryanair desk. They told her that her booking was not successful and the flight to Turin was now full.
'We had a hotel booked, a car booked. The kids' bags were packed. We were travelling with another family. It was an absolute nightmare,' she said.
Graham and her husband found an alternative: to fly to Milan, then drive to Turin, at a cost of €1,301.98.
'It did put a strain on the holiday, but we got on with it', she told the court at Balbriggan, Co Dublin.
Ms Graham said when she went to book the Turin flight in January she did not receive a pop-up message to say her payment had been denied and that as such her booking was not complete.
She told the court she wanted €950 for the cost of the Milan flights – which she said she booked arising from Ryanair's error – to be returned to her.
Counsel for Ryanair said 'ordinarily' a pop-up message would appear when the payment failed. However, the defence could not 'definitively' say if there had been a technical error when Ms Graham was booking her flights.
Judge Stephanie Coggans noticed the 'complete imbalance of power' between Ryanair and the claimant. She said her job was to 'ensure as level a playing field as possible' in these matters.
It seemed reasonable to the judge that Ms Graham believed she had booked the Turin flights. She said Ms Graham's claim 'absolutely succeeds on the basis of not receiving the error message'.
However, a technical issue with Ms Graham's banking app that had required her to use a family member's card instead to book the flights to Milan meant the judge could not grant the relief sought as it was not Ms Graham's bank account in question. 'I want to do it, but I can't', Judge Coggans said.
Although Ms Graham said she was 'quite disappointed', she said the court was 'really well run' and admired the judge's attitude towards claimants.
In a separate hearing, passengers Joanna and Keith Troughton argued they should have received a last call when waiting at the gate in Dublin Airport to board their morning flight to London.
They were unaware of the boarding process and missed their Ryanair flight, costing them an extra €300 to buy new flights later that morning.
While again the judge disapproved of the way Ryanair had dealt with their complaint, she said the claimants should have double checked the flight was boarding at the gate.
'Something I see in the paperwork is Ryanair constantly using forceful methods of enforcement,' she said.
Speaking to the airline's counsel, the judge said: 'It wouldn't kill [Ryanair] to be halfway polite to people.'
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Irish Sun
6 hours ago
- The Irish Sun
The little-known European sun spot where only locals holiday – with fewer crowds, island beaches & €35 Ryanair flights
And you can go on incredible wildlife tours FAR-GO The little-known European sun spot where only locals holiday – with fewer crowds, island beaches & €35 Ryanair flights EUROPE is home to hundreds of tiny islands just waiting to be discovered - and they're perfect for holidaymakers who don't love crowds. The Parque Natural da Ria Formosa is a coastal lagoon and natural park located in the Algarve region of southern Portugal, and its islands are accessible by a short boat ride from Faro. Advertisement 5 The Ria Formosa is a nature reserve of canals, islands, marshland and sandy beaches Credit: Alamy 5 The natural park extend 60km along the Algarve coast Credit: Getty 5 And it is home of five barrier islands Credit: Alamy 5 Holidaymakers can also book themselves onto guided Flamingo Spotting tours Credit: Getty The Ria Formosa Natural Park is a nature reserve of canals, islands, marshland and sandy beaches that extend 60km along the Algarve coast. And it has been protected under Portuguese law since 1978. The nature reserve is home to five barrier islands - Cabanas Island, Tavira Island, Armona Island, Culatra Island and Barreta Island. For nearly 50 years, the five inlets have created a unique ecosystem where both plants and animals thrive. Advertisement Despite being protected under Portuguese law, holidaymakers can visit the island. It's located right above Africa on the southern tip of the country, with the Mediterranean Sea to separate them. One of the island's biggest draws is its beaches, which are said to be some of the most beautiful in the Algarve. And the islands are accessible by public ferries or tourist boats, located less than 30 minutes' travel from mainland Algarve. Advertisement According to Algarve Portugal Tourism, some of the island white sand beaches are "completely deserted." They added: "The designation as a natural park means that it's protected from development, so visitors shouldn't expect beachfront hotels. Inside the luxury resort that offers anti-ageing programmes - and it costs from £309 for two nights "These beaches are heaven for those who prefer peace and quiet, and there are spots officially recognized as nude beaches. "On the way there, it's possible to see a variety of wildlife, including chameleons, the world's largest concentration of seahorses, flamingos, storks and other resident and migratory birds." Advertisement Cabanas Island is a barrier island within the natural park, located off the coast of Cabanas de Tavira in the Algarve. It is known for its variety of wildlife and it offers plenty of space and tranquillity as it is almost deserted. Tavira Island is an uninhabited island divided into four beaches, and it is one of the easiest to reach from the mainland. In the 19th and 20th centuries, Tavira Island was an important centre for tuna fishing. Advertisement FLAMINGO TOURS Holidaymakers can also book themselves onto guided Flamingo Spotting tours from Tavira, which cost €30 per person. Another island is Isla Armona, which is a bit more built up with houses and cafes. And another popular spot is Culatra Island, which is home to a few hundred people and also has empty beaches and clean waters, Tourists will land at a small village with bungalows and cafes, but with no roads, will have to walk through to explore. Advertisement Another island is Isla Armona, which is a bit more built up with houses and cafes. Barreta Island, also known as Desert Island, is often called the Caribbean of Portugal thanks to its crystal clear waters and golden sandy beaches. It takes only 20 minutes to get there, with ferries costing less than €5 for a round trip. Irish holidaymakers can also enjoy a boat tour in the Ria Formosa Natural Park to see dolphins in their natural habitat. Advertisement You'll be on the lookout for the most commonly sighted species, including the short-beaked common dolphin and the common bottlenose dolphin. And the guided spotting tour costs around €30 per person. Ryanair flights from Dublin to Faro Airport start at just €34.99. 5 The Parque Natural da Ria Formosa is located in the Algarve, Portugal Credit: Alamy
Irish Times
9 hours ago
- Irish Times
Inheritance, relatives and blended families: what does it mean for tax-free thresholds?
Could you clarify a passing comment that you made in your article last week. You used the phrase 'by blood'. Are you drawing a distinction with uncle or aunt by marriage versus an uncle or aunt 'by blood'? In other words, are you saying that a child can inherit under Class B from their parent's sibling, but not the spouse of that sibling? Are you sure that is correct as I do not see any such distinction in Revenue guidance ? It also raises the question of who is 'the parent' in the case of a divorce and remarriage. Does the birth parent for Class A purposes cease to be a parent on remarriage or can the step-parent become one? Mr DL READ MORE I always wonder when I write 'by blood' whether it is clearly understood. As with many recurring items, I have set out clearly what that means at one point or another but often revert to the shorthand. And yes, it can be counterintuitive if, like me, you grew up in a family where aunts were regarded as aunts regardless of whether they were my parents' siblings or had married into the family – and similarly for uncles. But Revenue does make a distinction when it comes to inheritance. The three inheritance tax thresholds are very specifically delineated according to blood relationship between the person making the gift or leaving the inheritance in their will and the person receiving it. Category A, which offers the highest tax-free threshold – currently €400,000 – is generally referred to as covering gifts and inheritances from a parent to a child, but it is slightly wider than that. [ Inheritance tax: How to avoid leaving your loved ones with a hefty bill Opens in new window ] For instance, if it is the child that dies – as an adult or otherwise – and the parent who inherits from them, the parent will also benefit from the Category A threshold as long as they are inheriting outright – rather than, say, getting a life interest in a property. The threshold will also apply to a child – anyone under the age of 18 – where they are inheriting from their grandparent when their parent is dead. We'll come back to that Category A in a minute in relation to the second part of your query. Category B covers close blood relatives other than parents – or other scenarios covered by Category A. It is sometimes described as lineal relations – i.e. those in a direct line of descent or ancestry. Most commonly, that is seen as covering gifts and inheritance from a brother or sister, a grandparent and an uncle or aunt. And yes, it is only aunts or uncles related by blood – i.e. siblings of one or other parent. You're certainly right to query it. I used to think it covered everyone with that title but I did check with the Revenue commissioners and they did confirm that there had to be a blood relationship with the aunt or uncle for them to be covered under Category B. Category B will also cover life interest inheritance from a child to a parent or any inheritance from a child to an aunt, uncle or grandparent in the unfortunate circumstance of the child predeceasing the older relative. [ Will inheritance tax be cut again in the budget? Opens in new window ] Many people worry about what other people will pay in tax on an unexpected windfall (inheritance) after they are gone. Photograph: Getty Images There is a growing clamour – particularly from people who do not have children – for reform of this Category B. As it stands, the tax-free threshold under Category B is €40,000, just 10 per cent of the Category A threshold. An awful lot of people worry about what other people will pay in tax on an unexpected windfall (inheritance) after they are gone. Personally, I always find that odd but that's not to say it is not a thing. There is pressure either to raise this significantly or to find some other device to allow people without children nominate one or two beneficiaries who can avail of a higher threshold. It is something that has been examined in the Tax Strategy Papers published recently by the Department of Finance . These papers examine issues that might be addressed in the budget later this year or a budget further down the line. As is their wont, this review merely sets out options and, to the degree possible, their likely cost or benefit to the exchequer. Whether one approach should be favoured over another or whether any policy change should be pursued remains a political matter for decision by the Government . Finally, we have Category C which covers all other people benefiting from a gift or inheritance – sometimes called 'strangers in blood' where the current tax-free threshold is €20,000. [ I am due to inherit €30,000, is it worth my while to gift my husband half to avoid tax? Opens in new window ] The three inheritance tax thresholds are delineated according to blood relationship between the person leaving the inheritance in their will and the person receiving it. Photograph: Getty Images And you can see here why Revenue specifies that aunts and uncles in Category B must be blood relations, not relations by marriage. Apart from friends, neighbours, carers, gardeners etc, Category C also includes cousins who are, by definition, blood relatives of some sort and also in-laws, whom in many cases can be closer to the disponer (the person making the gift or inheritance) than even a niece or nephew by blood. But so it is. As regular readers will know, the other key thing to note is that these are lifetime limits on all gifts and inheritances dating back under each category to December 5th, 1991. So, under Category B, you need to tot up all large gifts and inheritances you have received from any grandparent, sibling, aunt or uncle to see if your latest windfall is tax-free or otherwise. And when we say gifts, we mean gifts valued at more than €3,000, as anything below that in any year is covered by the small gift exemption and is also tax free. Finally, once to hit 80 per cent of the relevant threshold – benefits of €320,000, €32,000 and €16,000 for each category respectively, you need to file an inheritance tax return to Revenue even though no tax is owing until you exceed the full threshold. Getting back to your second query – the position with blended families after divorce, remarriage and separation – you're quite correct to say that this is increasingly relevant in our modern society. We need to return to the question of the Category A threshold. When it states that a child can receive up to €400,000 tax-free from parents, the definition of child also refers to stepchildren and to adopted children. In fact, it even applies to foster children as long as those foster children spent at least five years with the family before the age of 18 at the family's expense. So does that mean that a child who is adopted or whose parents have divorced and remarried can receive category A benefits from more than two parents? Yes, it does. A stepchild qualifies for Category A on inheritance or gift from their birth parents and from any step-parent. The same is true for a child formally adopted. But birth parents are not removed from the Category A equation. A child can still avail of Category A in relation to a birth parent, even after divorce and remarriage, or where the child has been adopted elsewhere, as can a child who has been fostered under the criteria mentioned above. The one difference between the three categories of child is that if an adopted child's birth parent dies without making a will, they are not entitled to anything under intestacy where a stepchild and a fostered child would be. Please send your queries to Dominic Coyle, Q&A, The Irish Times, 24-28 Tara Street, Dublin 2, or by email to , with a contact phone number. This column is a reader service and is not intended to replace professional advice
Irish Times
10 hours ago
- Irish Times
European bank shares hit highest levels since 2008
Shares in Europe's biggest banks climbed to their highest levels since the global financial crisis this week, as a sharp rise in long-term interest rates fuels bumper earnings. Big banks have enjoyed a renaissance, with London-listed shares in HSBC hitting a record high ahead of results this week while Barclays and Santander also reached their highest levels since 2008. Italy's UniCredit touched its highest since 2011. The rally marks a turnaround for one of Europe's most unloved sectors, which has struggled to recover from past crises and compete with US peers. 'Europe's banks have shifted from pariah status to market darlings,' said Justin Bisseker, European banks analyst at fund manager Schroders. A combination of the 'transformative impact on revenues of higher interest rates', a benign economic environment and measures to improve efficiency had lifted the lenders, Bisseker added. READ MORE While HSBC's shares receded to their highest level since 2001 after the bank failed to meet analyst expectations in its second-quarter results on Wednesday, and bank stocks dropped sharply on Friday after US president Donald Trump hit dozens of countries with tariffs, banks on Europe's benchmark Stoxx 600 index are still up 34 per cent so far this year. That is ahead of their US peers, narrowly ahead of their 2021 return and on track for the strongest showing since 2009. Investors have been encouraged to pile into European banking stocks by growing economic optimism in the region, improving prospects for their loan books, as well as valuations that are below US stalwarts such as JPMorgan Chase and Goldman Sachs. Many European banks have only recently seen their valuations return to book value, compared with 2.4 times book value for JPMorgan and twice book value for Goldman, according to data from FactSet. Banks 'are cheap and uniquely positioned for a pick-up in domestic demand,' said Luca Paolini, chief strategist at Pictet Asset Management. European banks, which were undercapitalised in the run-up to the financial crisis, spent the years after it building up capital buffers imposed by regulators, which restrained shareholder payouts. Meanwhile, a decade of near or below zero interest rates made it difficult for lenders to make money. That changed after the Covid pandemic as central banks began to increase interest rates to tackle inflation, and reversed their vast bond-buying programmes. Long-term interest rates have risen quickly, with 30-year German bond yields now 1.3 percentage points above two-year yields, where just two years ago they were lower. In the UK, the gap is above 1.5 percentage points. This has led to a substantial rise in banks' net interest income — the difference between what they earn from loans and other assets and what they pay for deposits — which has been a key driver of profitability. Those with trading operations have benefited this year from a surge in market volatility from Donald Trump's economic policies. Whether European banks can continue their run without the benefit of rising long-term rates is untested. Lenders have bulked up businesses such as wealth management to help insulate them from movement in interest rates, but political resistance to mergers such BBVA's bid for Sabadell and UniCredit's tilt at BPM are viewed as limiting the sector's growth potential. Francesco Sandrini, global head of multi-asset strategies at Amundi, said 'banks appear the cleanest shirt in the basket' but that there was 'a growing feeling the best may be past'. 'Long-awaited sector consolidation is far from the catalyst that many analysts have hoped for,' he added. Investors are quick to point out that European banks are still trading at 10 times forward earnings, compared with more than 13 times for their US peers, according to Bloomberg data. Return on tangible equity, a key measure of profitability for banks, is now comfortably more than 10 per cent for many of them. 'The good news is that European bank valuations remain discounted compared with banking sectors elsewhere in the world,' said Schroders' Bisseker. 'Further convergence is likely.' — Copyright The Financial Times Limited
