logo
Taylor Fritz overcomes medical timeout and rogue tech to reach Wimbledon semis

Taylor Fritz overcomes medical timeout and rogue tech to reach Wimbledon semis

Leader Livea day ago
In a big-hitting battle between the two tallest players to reach the last eight, 6ft 5ins Fritz overcame a third-set wobble, a medical timeout and a rogue line call to triumph 6-3 6-4 1-6 7-6 (4) against 6ft 6ins Khachanov.
The American will face either back-to-back champion Carlos Alcaraz or Britain's Cameron Norrie for a place in Sunday's final.
Soaking it all in 🙌#Wimbledon pic.twitter.com/lpnqhwgSsy
— Wimbledon (@Wimbledon) July 8, 2025
'I'm feeling great to get through it,' Fritz said in his on-court interview.
'The match was going so well for me for two sets. I've never had a match really just flip so quickly, so I'm really happy with how I came back in the fourth set and got it done.
'I felt I couldn't miss and then all of sudden I'm making a ton of mistakes.
'Momentum was definitely not going to be on my side going into a fifth.'
In another embarrassing episode for tournament organisers, Wimbledon's faltering electronic line calling system suffered a further malfunction during the quarter-final.
'Fault' was incorrectly called by the technology in the opening game of the fourth set when a Fritz backhand landed well inside the baseline.
With the system still tracking the initial serve, chair umpire Louise Azemar-Engzell ordered the point be replayed.
Khachanov had won the previous two meetings between the pair but those victories came three months apart more than five years ago when he was the higher-ranked player.
Fritz has been a US Open finalist since then and demonstrated his prowess on grass with three Eastbourne titles.
A break of serve in game two paved the way for the Californian to cruise to the opening set in 33 minutes.
"I'm really happy with how I've turned my career around."
After losing in the #Wimbledon QF twice, Taylor Fritz is now in his first semi-final at SW19 👏 pic.twitter.com/x5OZbeNrGu
— Wimbledon (@Wimbledon) July 8, 2025
Khachanov barely had sniff on his opponent's serve and, after surviving four break points earlier in the set, he crucially failed to hold in game nine as Fritz won 12 points in a row to move 2-0 in front.
With the finish line coming into view, Fritz began to waver.
Underdog Khachanov finally broke in game two of set three and then sparked hope of a fightback by promptly repeating the feat en route to emphatically halving his deficit.
Fritz underwent treatment on his right foot ahead of the fourth set, which began in farcical fashion due to the inaccurate line call.
A decider then looked on the cards when Khachanov broke immediately as his rival continued to make mistakes.
Taylor's Triumphant 😤
Fritz wins in four and awaits the winner of Alcaraz and Norrie in the SF 👀#Wimbledon pic.twitter.com/W1Sunqie0E
— Wimbledon (@Wimbledon) July 8, 2025
But Fritz regained his poise to hit back in game four before holding his nerve in the tie-break, which he secured with a smash, leading to a roar of delight, mixed with relief.
'Having played the quarter-finals here twice and lost in five (sets) twice, I don't think I could've taken another one,' he said.
The 27-year-old also allayed fears about the severity of his foot issue.
'It's totally fine, it's pretty common, a lot of players do this tape job so your foot doesn't get irritated,' he said.
'I think I ripped it off at some point in the second so I just needed to get it re-done.'
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Novak Djokovic reveals biggest 'concern' about facing Jannik Sinner at Wimbledon
Novak Djokovic reveals biggest 'concern' about facing Jannik Sinner at Wimbledon

Metro

time19 minutes ago

  • Metro

Novak Djokovic reveals biggest 'concern' about facing Jannik Sinner at Wimbledon

Novak Djokovic has revealed his main 'concern' heading into his Wimbledon semi-final battle with world No.1 Jannik Sinner on Friday. Djokovic defeated Flavio Cobolli to book his spot in the last four on Wednesday as he continues his hunt for a historic 25th Grand Slam title. The 38-year-old is set for a massive test against Sinner, with the Italian having beaten the Serbian the last four times they've met on the ATP Tour. Djokovic triumphed over Sinner in the 2023 Wimbledon semi-finals but it's all changed since then with the veteran now behind in their head-to-head. Since that clash at the All England Club two years ago, Djokovic has landed just one major trophy – at the 2023 US Open – while Sinner has won three. There has been talk of Djokovic being on his 'last legs' before retirement while John McEnroe accused him of playing his 'worst set in years' during his win over Alex de Minaur in the last 16. Speaking ahead of his showdown with Sinner, who leads the head-to-head 5-4, Djokovic said his biggest concern was about his own physicality. 'It is and it has always been my greatest goal to do well in Slams,' Djokovic said as he looks to move past Margaret Court for the most major singles trophies in the history of the sport. 'I'm, again, in another great position. Let's see. Sinner and [Carlos] Alcaraz, we know they're the dominant force right now in the tennis. 'If I want to at least go step further, I have to beat the No.1 in the world and eventually play Alcaraz in the final. 'Physically I hope that I'll be able to sustain that. That's more of a concern than game-wise. 'I think game-wise, the way I'm feeling the ball when I'm fit and ready, I feel like I can go toe-to-toe with those guys and even beat them if I'm playing my best.' Djokovic, who lost to Sinner in the French Open semi-finals earlier this year, feels the 23-year-old is the best tennis player on the planet right now. More Trending 'I lost straight sets to Jannik in the semis of Roland-Garros,' Djokovic added. 'I think I played a solid match. I could have played better, but he was just better player when the moments were important. 'So I get another opportunity. For me, this is what counts actually the most… Being in the last stages of Grand Slams and playing against the best player in the world right now. 'Him next to Alcaraz are the leaders of the tennis today, men's tennis.' MORE: Queen Camilla speaks with Novak Djokovic ahead of Wimbledon quarter-final clash MORE: 'I cried' – Boris Becker reaches out to Wimbledon player after 'incredibly sad' moment MORE: Scott McTominay reveals connection to 'one of the best Wimbledon clips of all time'

Shelton's need for speed proves costly against Sinner
Shelton's need for speed proves costly against Sinner

Reuters

time30 minutes ago

  • Reuters

Shelton's need for speed proves costly against Sinner

LONDON, July 9 (Reuters) - American Ben Shelton said he paid the price for trying to serve too fast after losing 7-6(2) 6-4 6-4 to Jannik Sinner in the Wimbledon quarter-finals on Wednesday. The 22-year-old left-hander cranked out some huge firepower as he tried to knock the ice-cool Sinner off his stride but in the big moments his big weapons failed him. Top seed Sinner won seven successive points from 0-2 in the first set tiebreak, then broke Shelton's serve for the first time to capture the second set and repeated the trick as the 10th seed served to stay in the match. "You feel consistent pressure playing a guy like him, who returns as well as him throughout the match," Shelton, who was also beaten by Sinner in this year's Australian Open semi-final and has now lost 15 successive sets to the Italian, said. "I think possibly trying to go a little bit too big on the first serve in those moments or hitting it too hard. "Being able to stay calm and keep my emotions the exact same and know that my normal service motion where I go after a first serve, it's going to show up at 140mph on the clock. "It's not like when I go and hit my smooth service motion, it's going to come off 122mph. If I go from a flat serve with a smooth motion, it's going to come off 140, but chasing 147 sometimes in those moments is stupid." Shelton did not do much wrong against world number one Sinner but said playing him was like being on fast-forward. "His ball speed is really high. Never seen anything like it. You don't see anything like it when you're going through the draw. When you play him, it's almost like things are in two times speed," he said. Shelton reached a career-best fourth round at last month's French Open, losing to eventual champion Carlos Alcaraz, and leaves Wimbledon with another personal best run. But he is hungry for more. "I know that I can play at the Grand Slams at this point. I know that I have the ability to be deep in the tournament when it's three-out-of-five sets," he said. "I could sit here and be like, 'wow, 22 years old and I've been able to do these things and achieve these things.' "But my mind is critical. I'm a critical thinker. I'm trying to solve problems," he said. "I know that I'm not where I want to be. That's kind of what I'm focusing on."

Wimbledon line-calling system leaves spectators in dark
Wimbledon line-calling system leaves spectators in dark

Times

timean hour ago

  • Times

Wimbledon line-calling system leaves spectators in dark

Amid all the frenzied debate about the accuracy and reliability of Hawk-Eye's electronic line-calling (ELC) system at Wimbledon, there has been one patently obvious flaw during its use across the tennis tour: the lack of any visual indication after a ball has landed out. Those who have sat watching matches at Wimbledon this fortnight will know the feeling that this correspondent has repeatedly experienced at the biggest tournaments around the world. The awkward two to three seconds in which you are unsure about who has just won the point because it has been difficult to hear the automated audible call, perhaps because of a loud roar from the crowd or the constant din from air-conditioning units attached to roofs. It is only when the scoreboard updates that the confusion is settled. In the bygone era of human line judges, there was no issue in this regard. Even if it was challenging to pick up the shout of 'out' from the mouths of the staff standing to the back or side of the court, confirmation would immediately follow with an outstretched arm to the side. Even balls that narrowly landed in were occasionally followed with a visual signal of both hands hanging downwards in a central position. Now, it can sometimes feel like a guessing game in which you are trying to gauge the winner of the point from the reactions of the players. It is particularly challenging for those spectators who are deaf, and it is understood that both the All England Club and the LTA — which organised the warm-up tournaments at the likes of Queen's and Eastbourne — have received letters and emails pointing this out. It is surprising that this issue has never been addressed in a system that was first tested eight years ago at an under-21 tournament titled the ATP Next Gen Finals in Milan, but safe to say it will be added as feedback to 'The List' that the All England Club famously puts together after each championships to improve on the following year. One high-ranking official here privately acknowledged to The Times that it was worth considering the potential addition of a visual 'out' display on the courtside scoreboards. There are some people who go as far as suggesting that ELC be done away with completely after several controversies here, but there is no prospect of that. Tim Henman, the normally mild-mannered former world No4 who has been a member of the All England Club's board for several years, summed up the firm and impassioned defence here of the system when he described criticism of its accuracy by the likes of Jack Draper and Emma Raducanu as 'utter garbage'. Undoubtedly, however, there are flaws to iron out in tennis's use of officiating technology. The most notable incident on Sunday during the match between Sonay Kartal and Anastasia Pavlyuchenkova highlighted this, in which Kartal clearly hit a long backhand that was not picked up by ELC. The reason for this, as the All England Club later explained, was that some of the cameras had been accidentally deactivated on Pavlyuchenkova's side of the court by a human operator. Please enable cookies and other technologies to view this content. You can update your cookies preferences any time using privacy manager. A small change was subsequently made to the system in which a manual deactivation, involving the unticking of a box, was no longer possible. In the long term, though, organisers may wish to consider allowing umpires to conduct an additional video review to clear any confusion and resolve these issues. A quick check, for example, of a replay of Kartal's backhand would have clearly shown that the ball landed long. An incident on Tuesday flagged up another potential tweak when a rally between Taylor Fritz and Karen Khachanov was brought to a sudden halt when a call of 'fault' was made after the third shot, which landed inside the lines. The reason for this was that Fritz had begun his service motion when a ballboy was still running across the court, meaning that the system considered the third shot to be the start of the point rather than the serve. Perhaps then, in future, the umpire should make sure that all ballboys and ballgirls are back in their positions before the point can get under way. The irony is that this same Hawk-Eye technology has been considered successful at Wimbledon since 2007, first as the popular challenge system alongside human line judges before becoming fully integrated this year as a live officiating tool. Twelve cameras are placed around the court to capture the movement of the ball, with the computer interpreting its location in real time. This produces a 3D representation of the court, showing the trajectory and landing point of the ball. The hub for all of this is referred to as 'The Rack Room', which is tucked away in a quiet corner of the site behind the broadcast centre. Inside are approximately 50 operators — all placed on a rota system (two hours on, one hour off) — with each court covered by eight screens at specific desks. A review official is also assigned to every court. This is the person contacted by the umpire on the old-school telephone sets when an issue arises. Installation of the system started on site in mid-May and took six weeks, involving rigorous testing to meet strict certification standards. More discreet testing had also taken place during last year's championships as a part of the wargaming process. It must be said that ELC has been used largely issue-free in tennis for some time now. Its introduction to the sport was accelerated because of the Covid-19 pandemic, which forced tournament organisers to reduce the number of personnel on site. The 2021 Australian Open was the first grand-slam tournament to adopt the system in place of human line judges and it gradually spread to other events before becoming mandatory on the ATP Tour this year. Grand-slams are outside the direct jurisdiction of the ATP, meaning that the French Open was able to continue using line judges this year. A key difference is the surface of clay, which produces ball marks on the brick dust for the umpires to quickly check in the event of any close calls. The French Tennis Federation also stated its willingness to protect a national network of line judges across all levels. The retention of this form of officiating was not without controversy, either. There were several disputed calls during the tournament, including a key moment in the final set of the men's final when a shot by Carlos Alcaraz was not called out. This could not be checked by the umpire because it happened mid-rally and the technology in use for broadcasting purposes subsequently showed that the ball was considerably long and the point should have gone to Jannik Sinner. One of the main factors behind Wimbledon's decision to introduce ELC was to avoid the risk of any controversies arising as a result of not using a system that had received the support of most players on the tour. It has always been acknowledged that it is not 100 per cent accurate, with a 2.2mm margin of error on average, but this is still considered to be far more precise than a traditional crew of line judges. While several players have questioned whether it is more inaccurate than usual here, with some suggesting this is because of grass's unique status as a natural surface, officials are privately adamant this is a myth that has gathered legs. A video released by the ATP this year showed the difficulty for the human eye in properly tracking a fast-moving ball that looked as if it had landed out, with slow-motion frame-by-frame cameras showing it had actually clipped the back of the line. It means that those calling for the well-dressed line judges to return to Wimbledon are set only for disappointment. No doubt there are flaws to be addressed and some changes to be made based on what we have seen here this fortnight, but ELC is here to stay in SW19.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store