logo
CBS is canceling ‘The Late Show With Stephen Colbert'

CBS is canceling ‘The Late Show With Stephen Colbert'

Chicago Tribune4 days ago
CBS is axing 'The Late Show With Stephen Colbert' in May 2026, the host told an audience at a taping Thursday.
The announcement came two days after Colbert spoke out against CBS Global settling with President Donald Trump over a '60 Minutes' story.
The news was also announced in a press release sent from CBS with a link to a clip of Colbert's announcement on Instagram.
The comedian and TV personality began by telling the audience he was sharing something he learned the night before, that 'Next year will be our last season. The network will be ending the Late Show in May… it's the end of the Late Show on CBS. I'm not being replaced. This is all just going away.'
The most recent ratings from Nielsen show Colbert as winning his timeslot, with about 2.417 million viewers across 41 new episodes. It also said his late night show was the only one to gain viewers so far this year.
'The Late Show with Stephen Colbert' was broadcast from the Auditorium Theatre in Chicago during the Democratic National Convention last year.
Stephen Colbert broadcasts from Chicago's Auditorium Theatre for DNC, a late 'Late Show' of very local love
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Trump is stacking wins, voters reject Dems' left turn and other commentary
Trump is stacking wins, voters reject Dems' left turn and other commentary

New York Post

time22 minutes ago

  • New York Post

Trump is stacking wins, voters reject Dems' left turn and other commentary

GOP watch: Trump Is Stacking Wins Republican 'hand-wringing' over President Trump's performance, character and temperament is overdone, asserts Ingrid Jacques at USA Today. Trump's 'detractors on the right' need to take a deep breath and 'consider what this president has accomplished.' His 'wins' surpass those of any 'other Republican president in modern history.' Defunding the Corporation for Public Broadcasting tops the list, with Trump making clear there is no 'First Amendment requirement for the government (taxpayers) to fund any specific outlet.' He's also dismantling the Department of Education, a 'behemoth' that's done 'nothing to improve education in the country.' Finally, his judicial choices 'sealed the court's conservative majority for years to come,' making it foolish for anyone to say Trump's been 'bad news for the Republican Party.' From the right: Voters Reject Dems' Left Turn A new I&I/TIPP poll shows 'the Democratic Party's attempt to 'resist' President Donald Trump is backfiring,' as 'a plurality of American adults now believe the one-time party of the center has gone too far to the left,' reports Issues & Insights' Terry Jones. The poll found 'more than one-in-five Democrats believe their party is too radical, sharply reducing the number of reliable votes for the party come election time.' Also, 'among Democrats, those who want to work with Trump (19%) plus those who want to work with him depending on the issue (37%) form a significant 56% majority, exceeding the still substantial share of the Dems who prefer to 'resist' Trump on all things (38%). So outright Trump rejectionism is a minority even within the Democratic Party.' Antisemitism beat: Resist Anti-Israel Hate 'Silence' in the face of attacks on Israelis and surging antisemitism 'has become all too familiar to American Jews' laments Yael Bar Tur at the City Journal. And antisemites have gone even further, speaking out to 'accept or even condone violence against Jews, Zionists, and the people of Israel.' Indeed, for some New Yorkers, 'anti-Israel sentiment has become a routine part of their social media feeds and conversations,' as they 'dismiss' anti-Jewish attacks as part of 'the cosmic struggle for justice.' Yet others are unwilling to 'normalize the Intifada.' Good: 'New Yorkers shouldn't be fooled by activists' efforts to present the anti-Israel cause as mainstream.' New Yorkers need to do what they do best: 'Think for themselves and resist the pull of propaganda.' Culture critic: Stephen Colbert's Big Mistake Stephen Colbert's 'The Late Show won't continue in any form,' cheers Joe Concha at the Washington Examiner. The show often hosted liberal darlings like Elizabeth Warren, Bernie Sanders, Adam Schiff and Rachel Maddow. After its cancellation, many lefties 'immediately cried foul and pointed the finger at Trump.' 'Here's the actual story: The Late Show lost $40 million last year,' and 'Colbert's show is, by far, the most expensive to produce at CBS.' He was able to ride the wave of Trump-hating to gain ratings success during the first term. 'But as Colbert found out by napalming Letterman's legacy at CBS, making Trump the sole focus while inviting (tedious) Democrats on as featured guests was a recipe for disaster.' 'The only question is . . . who will be the next to fall?' 'Here's looking at you, Jimmy Kimmel.' Mideast desk: Israeli Hack Attack 'The 12-day war between Israel and Iran featured an unprecedented cyber campaign against the Islamic Republic's financial system,' observe Michael Doran and Zineb Riboua at The Wall Street Journal. 'Predatory Sparrow, a hacker group linked to the Israeli government, claimed credit for erasing Bank Sepah's banking data and rendering its systems inoperable.' 'As panic spread, a run on all banks ensued.' Tehran's stock market crashed, and Iran's private currency exchange was shut down. 'Israel's success offers the Trump administration new tools for confronting the Iranian threat.': Use economic sanctions and shift US cyber policy 'from passive support to active partnership in offensive operations.' 'The more Washington and Jerusalem operate together in combat, the stronger their alliance grows.' — Compiled by The Post Editorial Board

Stephen Colbert fans' cancellation hysteria takes Trump Derangement Syndrome to the max
Stephen Colbert fans' cancellation hysteria takes Trump Derangement Syndrome to the max

New York Post

timean hour ago

  • New York Post

Stephen Colbert fans' cancellation hysteria takes Trump Derangement Syndrome to the max

Stephen Colbert is at the center of a conspiracy theory. It was born last week, when news broke of CBS canceling Colbert's late-night talk show. The network's move wasn't hard to understand: 'The Late Show with Stephen Colbert' reportedly loses $40 million a year, and Colbert is already in the final year of his contract. Viewership for all the late-night gabfests is evaporating — there's no recovery in sight. Colbert is No. 1 in his timeslot, but his show costs $100 million a year to produce and doesn't bring in nearly enough eyeballs to attract the ad revenue to cover that. So in what universe does CBS renew Colbert and keep losing tens of millions of dollars? The conspiracy theory instantly popular among Democrats and many in the media who ought to know better, however, says Colbert is really being taken off air to please Donald Trump. If the Federal Communications Commission allows it, Paramount Global, owner of CBS, will soon merge with Skydance, a company owned by David Ellison, whose father is a major Trump supporter. The president doesn't like being lampooned by Colbert; he's happy to see his show end. Trump benefits, so Trump must be to blame — right? For those who suffer from Trump Derangement Syndrome, there are no coincidences. The truth is as clear as if Trump had been caught with his arms around the president of CBS Studios at a Coldplay concert. You see, if not for Trump's FCC leverage over the network, CBS would have been content to keep losing millions on Colbert for years to come. That's the crackpot view, and it's politically convenient for Democrats, who've done their utmost to promote it. Sen. Adam Schiff was a guest on the show the night Colbert announced its cancellation, and along with fellow Democratic Sens. Bernie Sanders and Elizabeth Warren, he took to X that evening to plant the seeds of conspiracy. 'If Paramount and CBS ended the Late Show for political reasons, the public deserves to know. And deserves better,' Schiff wrote, feeling no need to offer evidence for the insinuation. 'CBS canceled Colbert's show just THREE DAYS after Colbert called out CBS parent company Paramount for its $16M settlement with Trump — a deal that looks like bribery,' Warren posted, referring to CBS's settlement of a lawsuit over '60 Minutes.' 'Do I think this is a coincidence? NO,' Sanders chimed in. The party instantly had its line, with shouty caps to drive it home. It worked — Bluesky and Facebook lit up with liberals saying free speech was under attack by Trump, while CNN's Brian Stelter, even as he reported the dismal financial reality of the 'unfortunately unprofitable' show, packed his story with the conspiracy narrative. Stelter devoted more than a third of his report — titled 'Inside CBS' 'agonizing decision' to cancel Colbert's top-rated late-night show' — to speculation about how the pending sale to Skydance might have influenced CBS, with heavy emphasis on the Trump angle. Stelter even added his own spin, attempting to patch up one of the conspiracy tale's obvious holes by suggesting CBS could have kept Colbert on air by cutting costs, since Colbert had produced a much cheaper show, 'After Midnight with Taylor Tomlinson,' that CBS was willing to renew. But that's absurd — 'After Midnight' is already canceled; CBS canned it when Tomlinson announced her departure to return to stand-up comedy. And while she might well love the live stage, it's obvious that running a late-night show on the cheap means paying hosts less, too little to keep Tomlinson. How little would Colbert, currently raking in a reported $15 to $20 million a year, settle for? Colbert loses viewers and advertisers even with a $100 million budget — how poorly would a Colbert show more than 40% cheaper do? Hollywood Reporter notes the average age of Colbert's viewers is 68. According to CNBC, the average age of David Letterman's viewers when he handed his timeslot to Colbert in 2015 was 60. All the data points in the same direction: 'The Late Show with Stephen Colbert' was a long time dying. That's true of late-night talk as a whole, too. 'I hear Jimmy Kimmel is next,' Trump predicted on Truth Social. The president doesn't have to pressure ABC to make that happen — the market will do that on its own, as it did with Colbert. Colbert had a hit when he played a parody conservative on Comedy Central. Once he stopped playing and presented his true face and politics to the country, he crashed. Donald Trump didn't get Stephen Colbert canceled — everything Democrats like about Colbert did. And the late-night host's fate will also be theirs if they don't heed this market lesson. Daniel McCarthy is the editor of Modern Age: A Conservative Review and editor-at-large of The American Conservative.

Banishing a reporter: Trump escalates battle with Wall Street Journal over Epstein story
Banishing a reporter: Trump escalates battle with Wall Street Journal over Epstein story

Chicago Tribune

timean hour ago

  • Chicago Tribune

Banishing a reporter: Trump escalates battle with Wall Street Journal over Epstein story

President Donald Trump on Monday followed up his lawsuit against The Wall Street Journal over last week's Jeffrey Epstein story by banishing one of the newspaper's reporters from Air Force One for an upcoming Scotland trip. The moves reflect Trump's aggressiveness toward media who displease him — even a media magnate, Rupert Murdoch, with outlets that have been friendly to him in the past. Trump filed a $10 billion defamation lawsuit against the Journal and Murdoch on Friday because of the newspaper's article about a sexually suggestive letter bearing Trump's name that was included in a 2003 album compiled for alleged sex trafficker Epstein's birthday. The president has denied having anything to do with it. On Monday, the White House said it was removing a Journal reporter from the pool covering the president's trip this weekend to his golf courses in Turnberry and Aberdeen in Scotland. The Journal's Tarini Parti had been scheduled to cover him on the trip. 'Due to the Wall Street Journal's fake and defamatory conduct, they will not be one of the thirteen outlets on board,' White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt said. The Journal declined comment on the action. It's a tactic the Trump White House has used before. It restricted the access of journalists from The Associated Press to press events when the news outlet would not change its style guidelines to reflect Trump's renaming of the Gulf of Mexico. That launched a legal battle that is wending its way through the courts. The defamation lawsuit is another tool Trump has used against media outlets. He has sued CBS News for its editing of a '60 Minutes' interview with former opponent Kamala Harris; ABC News for a false statement made by George Stephanopoulos in a story regarding a New York writer who had accused Trump of sexual abuse; and Meta after it removed Trump's social media accounts following the Jan. 6, 2021, attack on the Capitol. In each of those cases, Trump won multimillion-dollar settlements. But in those instances, news was only one part of a major corporation's business. In the case of Murdoch and News Corp., news is the chief part of his business. The Journal has vowed to fight. It's also the first time Trump has sued for defamation as a sitting president, and it's not clear whether any president has done that in the past. 'There's nothing inherently wrong with a president bringing a libel suit,' said noted free speech attorney Floyd Abrams. 'But this claim certainly seems like nothing more or less than an effort to suppress speech that our president finds discomforting. That's not why we have libel law. It's why we have a First Amendment.' It's all part of a broader pattern of trying to intimidate news organizations that report stories Trump does not like, said Jameel Jaffer, executive director of the Knight First Amendment Institute at Columbia University. 'These are lawsuits that have no hope of actually succeeding as lawsuits, but nevertheless have the potential to chill media organizations from doing what all of us need them to do,' Jaffer said. Not every news organization has bowed down; '60 Minutes,' in fact, did some notably tough stories about the early days of Trump's second administration. But it's impossible to quantify stories that weren't done because of fear of a fight with the White House, he said. The Wall Street Journal leans conservative editorially, but hasn't been afraid to take Trump on in both its opinion and news sections. Other Murdoch outlets — Fox News Channel and the New York Post — are much friendlier to him. Ever since the administration announced that it would not be releasing additional government files from the case against Epstein, factions of Trump's base supporters have turned on him. That has put some normally supportive news outlets in a difficult position. Fox News largely avoided the story after Trump suggested his allies stop wasting time on it. But Fox's Howard Kurtz reported on The Wall Street Journal lawsuit on his 'Media Buzz' show Sunday, saying that by doing so, 'the president has drawn extra attention to the Journal's reporting.' The president's battle with the press has taken on several dimensions. He has been fighting to take away government support for news organizations like Voice of America, and last week the Republican-controlled Congress voted to take away federal funding from NPR and PBS because the president says their news programming is biased against conservatives.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store