N.S. Mi'kmaq chiefs call on Ottawa to address income assistance disparity on reserves
Ta'n Etli-tpi'tmk, which represents 12 of the 13 Mi'kmaq First Nations in Nova Scotia, says Canada must raise on-reserve income assistance rates to provincial levels.
The group says there is a gap of more than $25 million a year between what First Nations people on reserve receive from Ottawa and what they would receive from Nova Scotia if they lived off reserve.
Get daily National news
Get the day's top news, political, economic, and current affairs headlines, delivered to your inbox once a day. Sign up for daily National newsletter Sign Up
By providing your email address, you have read and agree to Global News' Terms and Conditions and Privacy Policy
Sen. Paul Prosper, who is a Mi'kmaq lawyer from Nova Scotia, says First Nations in the province are asking for basic human and legal rights, and poverty-reducing support that's comparable to what others access off reserve.
James Michael, a lead negotiator with Ta'n Etli-tpi'tmk, says the disparity in income assistance rates is keeping some people on reserve in 'deep poverty,' making it impossible for some to access healthy food.
Story continues below advertisement
A representative from Crown-Indigenous Relations and Northern Affairs Canada was not immediately available for comment.
This report by The Canadian Press was first published July 29, 2025.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Winnipeg Free Press
5 hours ago
- Winnipeg Free Press
Settlement dollars paying for broken promises, missed opportunities, devastated lives
This week, the federal government agreed to a $99-million settlement with Muscowpetung Saulteaux Nation, a First Nation approximately 60 kilometres northeast of Regina, for Canada's failure to provide agricultural support and materials as promised under Treaty 4. That seems like a lot of money, but it's really not. And, far more important, is the profit from the opportunity gained when justice is finally served. Under Treaty 4, signed in 1874, 35 First Nations across what is now northwestern Manitoba, almost all of southern Saskatchewan and southeastern Alberta were promised farming tools including plows, seeds and animals to rebuild their lives after losing their traditional territories — and, indeed, their livelihoods — due to urbanization and settlement. The federal government didn't keep its promises, resulting in massive poverty, starvation and death as communities struggled to build economies, feed themselves and stave off sickness due to weakened immune systems. Add in the fact First Nations had to endure laws such as the Indian Act, which forbade movement, provided substandard education and prevented economic growth, and you get — in many cases — the dire situations that exist now. Farming is the financial and cultural bedrock of life in Manitoba, Saskatchewan and Alberta, and First Nations didn't even get a chance to participate. So, how much does it cost to compensate 151 years of suffering and lost opportunities? Much more than $99 million. Meanwhile, the other 34 First Nations in Treaty 4 are owed the same thing. This week, alongside the agreement with Muscowpetung Saulteaux Nation, the federal government also announced settlements with two other Treaty 4 communities: Big River First Nation ($208 million) and One Arrow First Nation ($124 million). The claims don't end at Treaty 4. Agricultural materials and opportunities were promised to virtually every First Nation from northwestern Ontario to B.C. to the Northwest Territories in what is often called the (11) 'numbered' treaties, negotiated between 1871 and 1921. Those promises weren't kept, either. In fact, more than 50 specific such 'cows and plows' claims against the federal government have now been negotiated with First Nations. The total so far is $6.9 billion. There are another 100 or so additional cases under negotiation and about 150 legitimate claims yet to come. In Manitoba, there are 24 in process, which leaves 39 more First Nations— including my home community of Peguis First Nation — with claims they can (and likely will) pursue. Most Manitoba claims are currently in the 'assessment' or 'negotiation' stage, according to information provided by the Government of Canada. Five Manitoba claims have been settled: Gambler First Nation, Pine Creek First Nation, Sapotaweyak Cree Nation, Tootinaowaziibeeng Treaty Reserve and Wuskwi Sipihk First Nation, each in the hundreds of millions of dollars. Don't get caught up in the numbers. It's about new opportunities. This is why many don't like the term 'cows and plows' when describing these agreements; treaty promises of agricultural materials and support wasn't about providing First Nations with one-time payments, but opportunities to grow their economies, thrive and live like anyone else. This is why some communities choose different paths when obtaining a settlement. In some cases, First Nations governments provide their members a 'per-capita' payment. Muscowpetung, for example, approved a $40,000 one-time payment for each member. Ironically, it's probably more a benefit passed on to Canadian businesses and citizens, as First Nations beneficiaries will spend their settlement dollars buying things for themselves and their families. Most First Nations governments have set up trust funds to pay for community infrastructure projects and programs — a long-missed opportunity to build the lives of residents, provide employment and facilitate the growth of educational and cultural paths. It's easy to get caught up in the money when it comes to settling legitimate claims First Nations have with the Canadian government over failed promises. What's harder to see are the opportunities that should have been, and the ones now possible when justice is finally served. Status report on specific claims Niigaan SinclairColumnist Niigaan Sinclair is Anishinaabe and is a columnist at the Winnipeg Free Press. Read full biography Our newsroom depends on a growing audience of readers to power our journalism. If you are not a paid reader, please consider becoming a subscriber. Our newsroom depends on its audience of readers to power our journalism. Thank you for your support.
Global News
10 hours ago
- Global News
As Trump hikes tariffs, B.C. jobs minister urges Carney to ‘negotiate hard'
British Columbia's minister of jobs and economic growth is urging the federal government to stand firm and 'negotiate hard' when trying to find a solution to 35 per cent tariffs imposed by U.S. President Donald Trump's Ravi Kahlon's advice to Prime Minister Mark Carney and his negotiating team is to keep up what they're doing, and 'find a path forward the best they can.' A statement from Premier David Eby's office says he remains focused on protecting workers and businesses in B.C. from the 'deeply harmful tariffs' imposed by Trump's administration. It says Eby supports the federal government's efforts to get a 'good deal' for Canada, adding that he looks forward to speaking to the prime minister about the situation. 1:09 Scott Moe says Canada should lower or remove counter-tariffs on the U.S. The United States imposed a 35 per cent tariff on all Canadian goods outside the Canada-United States-Mexico Agreement on free trade after an agreement couldn't be reached by the Aug. 1 deadline. Story continues below advertisement Several other jurisdictions, including the United Kingdom and the European Union, have reached deals before the deadline. Get breaking National news For news impacting Canada and around the world, sign up for breaking news alerts delivered directly to you when they happen. Sign up for breaking National newsletter Sign Up By providing your email address, you have read and agree to Global News' Terms and Conditions and Privacy Policy Kahlon said Trump is 'constantly finding ways to raise the temperature' so 'they can squeeze out the most' from any agreement. He said he believes Carney and Canada-U.S. Trade Minister Dominic LeBlanc are taking the right approach, 'which is keeping their head down, continue to be at the table, continue to find solutions, and not getting distracted by the day-to-day swings of the president of the United States.' He said he would also highlight the importance of the softwood lumber industry for B.C., which is just as crucial as the auto industry is to Ontario. 'The forest sector here in British Columbia should get the same support,' Kahlon said. Both Eby and Kahlon have repeatedly argued that the long-running softwood lumber dispute with the United States should be part of a larger deal. 5:53 CCPA on new Trump tariffs against Canada Brian Menzies, executive director of the Independent Wood Processors Association of British Columbia, said he is 'not very optimistic' that a future deal would also resolve the softwood dispute as the industry already faces combined tariffs and duties of almost 35 per cent. Story continues below advertisement 'We have been at this for eight years now, and there doesn't seem to be enough of a push on the American side to resolve this,' he said. Menzies also favours ongoing negotiations with the United States to resolve the tariff dispute. 'I would say it's better to get a good deal than a bad deal,' he said. 'I'd say right now, 'Do your best to stand up for what's important for Canada,'' he said. Menzies said being 'kowtowed and pushed over' is not good for Canada or the United States. 'People respect people who stand up for what's important to them, and that's the basis for any negotiation,' Menzies said. Menzies noted that any future deal with the United States might not last long, given Trump's temperament. Kahlon agreed. 'We take nothing for granted,' he said. 'It's a sad state for us in Canada to have a partner down south that doesn't honour a handshake, an agreement,' he said. 'It's hard to do business with somebody that is hard to trust when these things come.' Kahlon added that even the United Kingdom and the European Union are not sure if they actually have agreements with the United States. Story continues below advertisement 'So the uncertainty continues,' he said.
CTV News
10 hours ago
- CTV News
Quebec lumber mill closing temporarily due to U.S. tariffs
Scierie St-Michel is closing for two months amid the trade war with the U.S. (Facebook/Scierie St-Michel Inc.) A lumber mill in Saint-Michel-des-Saints, Que., says it has to suspend all activities until October due to U.S. tariffs. The Scierie St-Michel will stop its sawmill and forestry operations as of Monday, Aug. 4, and will reopen Oct. 13. The planning mill will close on Aug. 18. The closure will impact about 250 employees. In a news release, the mill said the closure is a result of the ongoing trade war and could be extended. 'This suspension of operations is due to the increase in countervailing and anti-dumping duties to over 34.45 per cent by the U.S. government and threats of additional taxes in the future,' it said. 'We hoped until the last minute that the Canadian government would reach an agreement that would spare us the worst, but this was not possible.' The mill also said forestry management in the province must be modernized and pointed to the controversial Bill 97, which critics say would lead to major environmental and social setbacks. Indigenous activists have protested the bill and accuse the government of giving the forestry industry carte blanche to exploit the resource. Jean-François Champoux, president and CEO of Scierie St-Michel, urges the government to work with First Nations to pass the bill and '[create] a favourable business environment for our industry through this modernization.' The two-month pause is meant to 'ensure the long-term sustainability' of the business. 'When employees return in October, we will need certainty regarding a settlement on U.S. countervailing and anti-dumping duties, the modernisation of the forestry regime with Bill 97, including a settlement with First Nations on forestry, otherwise this shutdown will be extended indefinitely,' Champoux said.
