Senate makes changes to Ohio's budget proposal
Ohio Gov. Mike DeWine introduced an executive budget at the start of the year, which became House Bill 96. The House worked on it, made changes and passed it in April. Since then, the Senate has been hearing testimony on different aspects of the proposal; Tuesday marked the Senate's first round of changes, with another likely coming next week.
After that, Senate and House members will have until the end of June to come to an agreement on the multi-billion-dollar spending bill.
Some of the Senate's key changes target property tax relief, school funding, Cleveland Browns stadium funding, and iGaming.
Ohio Senators added a provision in the budget to create a flat income tax rate. If passed, the flat income tax rate of 2.75% would become effective starting in tax year 2026.
Right now, income tax rates are in three brackets. This is the second budget in a row to change the state's income tax structure.
'We are going to continue down that path and finally get to a flat income tax rate here in the state of Ohio,' Senate President Rob McColley (R-Lima) said.
The income tax debate has long been had at the Ohio Statehouse, with some even proposing eliminating the tax completely.
On the property tax front, Ohio Senate leaders increased a budget carry-over cap for public school districts to 50% as a way to provide Ohioans property tax relief.
'However, there is going to be an ability for school districts to go over and above and beyond that 50% cap, put money into a capital fund that they can use for maintenance of their buildings, they can use for debt service, they can use for a variety of things,' McColley said.
This is how it works: if the school district you are living in carries over more than 50% of its budget from year to year, then the excess money will go back to homeowners in a new form of property tax relief. This is estimated to help Ohioans in 292 of the state's 600+ districts.
The Ohio House first added this provision to the budget, but House leaders initially wanted the cap to sit at 30%.
While Democratic leaders in the Senate said 30% is certainly better than 50%, Ranking Member of Senate Finance Paula Hicks-Hudson (D-Toledo) said too many school districts have urged lawmakers 'not to impose any cap.' Senate Minority Leader Nickie Antonio (D-Lakewood) added that this is the legislature 'micromanaging' school districts and punting the responsibility of property tax relief off to public schools.
There is another form of property tax relief in the budget, through an expansion of the homestead exemption program. Homestead exemption decreases the total taxable amount of someone's home. If the Senate budget passes as written, the reduction amount goes from $28,000 to $32,000 and increases the income threshold to qualify from $40,000 to $42,500.
'We are taking steps to reduce this trauma that higher valuations are causing,' Ohio Senate Finance Chair Jerry Cirino (R-Kirtland) said.
Public school funding is also a big piece of the budget. Senators decided to reimplement what has become known as the 'fair school funding plan' after House members stripped it, calling it unsustainable.
'That was something that many of our members of our caucus thought was important, they felt it was a deal we entered into years ago and we owed it to the communities to continue with the implementation,' McColley said.
In the Senate's plan, K-12 public schools in the state will see an increase in funding of more than $600 million over the next two years.
'There are districts that will get less as they did in 2025, but no one will get less as they did in 2021, as the fair school funding plan was meant to do,' Cirino said.
The fair school funding plan was created back in 2021 to be phased in over three budget cycles.
Antonio said the Senate bill is following some of the ideas of fair school funding plan, 'but it is very much manipulated.'
The Cleveland Browns asked lawmakers for money for a new stadium early on in the process. Senate members gave the greenlight for a $600 million to the Browns through the use of unclaimed funds.
The state has $3.7 billion in unclaimed funds. Cirino said $1.7 billion of that will be taken out now, to be used for stadium and other development/culture projects. Out of that $1.7 billion will come the $600 million for the Cleveland Browns.
Cirino said the funds will only be removed if and put into that pot of money if they have not been claimed for ten years. About $100 million gets added into unclaimed funds each year, so Cirino said this will always be solvent.
'With the addition coming in every year, we'll be able to support other projects going forward in the state,' Cirino said. 'What this does is it takes idle money and puts it to work.'
The Browns will still need to make an investment in order to get that money – a deposit of $50 million to start as well as a $50 million line of credit in case it is needed to make up for lost costs.
As for something that did not make the cut: iGaming. Lawmakers have been working on a proposal to legalize iGaming in the state. Despite work in both chambers, no proposal ended up in this version of the budget. Still, McColley said it is not completely out of the picture.
'No expansion of gambling is in the bill; it remains to be seen whether it will be put in the budget at all,' he said. 'We would rather take the time to get this right if we are going to do it at all. It's obviously a big policy shift. We don't need [to legalize iGaming] to balance our budget as it currently stands, so I wouldn't view [this] as an indication one way or another, other than we need more time.'
Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

Yahoo
15 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Obama, sedition and Trump's urgent need to distract
To any American with an extremely short memory or perhaps a desire only to see the world through Donald Trump's eyes, the recent memo from Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard and the call from President Trump to investigate former President Barack Obama over the memo's claims of 'treasonous conspiracy' over claims of Russian interference in the 2016 election must be alarming. Talk of 'overwhelming evidence' and a 'yearslong coup,' 'seditious conspiracy' and 'treason' sure sound pretty serious. Well, they do until you quickly review your notes and recognize that A, President Trump has an urgent need for distraction given his ties to Jeffrey Epstein and the administration's failure to — despite big promises to the conspiracy-hungry during the presidential campaign — release details of the investigation into the late American financier and sex offender. And B, this is a subject that has been investigated to death with no fewer than four official inquiries, including a 2020 U.S. Senate Intelligence Committee report (written while the GOP had Senate control) and the special report authored by Trump-appointed special counsel John Durham that came out in 2023. And what did they find? There was ample reason to worry about Russian interference in the 2016 race, and it was clear the Kremlin didn't want Democrat Hillary Clinton in the Oval Office. Was then-candidate Trump complicit in these efforts? Nope, not in a manner those various investigators could prove. But Russian interference? There was ample evidence of computer hacking, of digging through emails and of using intermediaries to undermine Clinton (remember WikiLeaks?). Or how about simply remembering Robert S. Mueller III? The special counsel indicted a dozen Russians, none of whom has ever stood trial because they could not be extradited. Even then-U.S. Sen. Marco Rubio (now Trump's U.S. secretary of state) observed that interference signing off on that 2020 report, which concluded 'the Russian government inappropriately meddled in our 2016 general election in many ways but then-Candidate Trump was not complicit.' Hopefully, most people aren't taking these claims of treason seriously. They serve only to diminish Trump and Gabbard. Think those criminal referrals Gabbard has sent to the U.S. Department of Justice will result in a successful prosecution? Even Las Vegas will surely refuse wagers on that long shot. Those who still harbor doubts can go peruse those various reports (and their thousands of pages of findings). The rest of us will just have to be content to recognize that the current president and his cronies lie like rugs when it serves their purpose. Peter Jensen is an editorial writer at The Baltimore Sun; he can be reached at pejensen@
Yahoo
17 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Trump administration delves into MAGA distractions in deviation from the so-called Epstein files
President Donald Trump and his administration have been delving into distractions for their Make America Great Again base in deviation from its handling of documents related to the late convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein. Epstein died in his jail cell in 2019 while awaiting trial on federal charges related to the trafficking and sexual abuse of dozens of minor girls. His life and death have been the center of conspiracy theories, notably among Trump's base, as the feds have been tight-lipped about the evidence collected. The Trump administration has been facing backlash after the Justice Department and FBI said in a memo released earlier this month there was no client list of Epstein's associates who may have partaken in his crimes and Epstein did indeed die by suicide. Trump announced last week he had requested Attorney General Pam Bondi to release certain Epstein files, 'subject to court approval.' 'Based on the ridiculous amount of publicity given to Jeffrey Epstein, I have asked Attorney General Pam Bondi to produce any and all pertinent Grand Jury testimony, subject to Court approval. This SCAM, perpetuated by the Democrats, should end, right now!' he wrote on Truth Social. Trump and his administration have instead worked to focus on other issues, from civil rights leader Martin Luther King Jr.'s assassination to the names of Washington and Cleveland sports teams, to one of his Democratic foes, former President Barack Obama. The White House denied these moves are a distraction, telling the Independent, 'It's absurdly rich for the media to speculate about attempts to distract the American people when that has been their modus operandi for decades.' On Sunday, Trump took to social media to attack Senator Adam Schiff, a California Democrat, Samantha Power, former administrator of the U.S.A.I.D., and he also posted a bizarre AI-generated video of Obama being arrested and thrown in jail. Regarding the fake Obama video he posted, Trump appeared to have been referring to comments made by Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard, who told host Maria Bartiromo on Fox News' Sunday Morning Futures Obama had orchestrated a 'years-long coup' to keep Trump from the White House. On Friday, Gabbard announced she was referring Obama administration officials, including ex-FBI Director James Comey, to the Justice Department for prosecution over allegations they had 'manufactured' intelligence to substantiate the idea that Russia meddled in the 2016 presidential election to help Trump beat former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton. Trump won the election over Clinton and became president in 2017. House Intelligence Committee ranking member Jim Himes, a Connecticut Democrat, rebuked Gabbard's claims. 'It's a day that ends with 'y' and Donald Trump desperately wants to change the subject, so Director Gabbard is rehashing decade-old false claims about the Obama Administration,' Himes said in a statement Monday. Himes said every 'legitimate' probe into the matter found 'no evidence of politicization and endorsed the findings of the 2016 Intelligence Community Assessment.' Trump has also called for the Washington Commanders and the Cleveland Guardians to revert their names to the Washington Redskins and Cleveland Indians, respectively. He even went as far as to threaten the Commanders' new Washington, D.C. stadium deal, writing on Truth Social Sunday: "I may put a restriction on them that if they don't change the name back to the original 'Washington Redskins,' and get rid of the ridiculous moniker, 'Washington Commanders,' I won't make a deal for them to build a Stadium in Washington.' On Monday, the Trump administration released more than 230,000 pages of federal documents related to Martin Luther King Jr.'s 1968 assassination. Former Illinois congressman Adam Kinzinger, a Republican who has been critical of Trump, called out the irony. 'Trump releases MLK Jr files…. Didn't limit it to 'pertinent' and 'grand jury.' So do the same for Epstein,' he wrote on X late Monday. Also on Monday, the Justice Department announced it honored Senate Judiciary Committee Chairman Chuck Grassley's request for information related to the FBI's handling of its probe into Clinton's emails. The FBI had investigated Clinton's use of a private email server for official communications during her time as secretary of state under Obama. No charges were filed against Clinton. When asked if the administration is trying to distract from the Epstein drama, Harrison Fields, special assistant to the president and principal deputy press secretary, told the Independent, 'It's absurdly rich for the media to speculate about attempts to distract the American people when that has been their modus operandi for decades, which is why no one believes the garbage being spewed at them. The only distractions are the media's continued obsession with non-stories and their refusal to report on what's actually happening: the execution of the most consequential six months of any administration and the success of the President's agenda.' House Democrats have also criticized their Republican colleagues for blocking efforts to force the release of the Epstein files. House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries told progressive political YouTuber Jack Cocchiarella Monday, 'For years Republicans promised to release the Epstein files…now they have the opportunity…and they refuse to do so,' adding, 'I have a simple question for the Speaker and Republican leaders and members of the House of Representatives on the GOP side: What are you hiding from the American People?" Representative Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, a New York Democrat, wrote on X late Monday, 'Ummm so let me get this straight: Republicans have ground Congress to a halt and are considering adjourning the entire House for 6 weeks to avoid releasing the info they have on Epstein? What is going on here?' She was responding to an X post from Politico's Meredith Lee Hill, in which she wrote, citing unnamed sources, the House Rules Committee will likely not meet at all this week amid the Epstein drama and other issues. Congress will recess for August. Hill said House Majority Leader Steve Scalise, a Louisiana Republican, 'confirms to me it's 'not likely' Rules return - meaning House would leave without advancing immigration and several other bills.' Most Americans think the Trump administration is covering up evidence in the late convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein's federal case, according to a new poll. A poll conducted by The Economist and YouGov from July 11 to 14 found 67 percent of Americans believe the government is hiding evidence related to the late financier. Only 8 percent of respondents believe the government is not covering up evidence about Epstein, while 25 percent are unsure. When asked if the government should release all documents relating to the feds' Epstein case, 79 percent of respondents said it should. Only 5 percent said the government shouldn't release the files, and 17 percent were unsure.


Politico
18 minutes ago
- Politico
New York's Kathy Hochul opens the door to redrawing House lines
'I'm not surprised that they're trying to break the rules to get an advantage,' Hochul added. 'But that's undemocratic, and not only are we calling them out, we're also going to see what our options are.' Jeffries, in a podcast interview Monday, said Democrats should keep Republicans politically 'on the run.' 'I'm in conversation with members of the New York delegation, as well as the governor, to explore what, if anything else, can be done to ensure that New York does its part with respect to fair maps across the country,' Jeffries said. 'And every single state is going to have to do the same thing because Republicans are desperate.' The potential tit-for-tat move by blue New York would be a heavy lift before the midterm elections — and would almost certainly be subject to legal challenges. The state's constitution stipulates redistricting may only be done once a decade and should be based on the most recent census data. The governor's remarks drew a rebuke from statehouse Republicans. 'Kathy Hochul and Albany Democrats are experts at rigging the rules to protect their power and silence voters,' state Senate Minority Leader Robert Ortt said. A speedy redistricting of New York's House lines would be an unlikely bank shot. Legal challenges forced New York's redistricting commission to redraw the state's House map, which was finalized in early 2024. A court order following another legal challenge to the existing House map could once again reopen that process. But such a development would require an extremely tight turnaround to redraw the map ahead of the 2026 elections.