
As Trump courts a more assertive Beijing, China hawks are losing out
China's decision to cut off access to those materials upended the dynamic between the world's largest economies. The Trump administration, which came into office determined to bully China into changing its trade behavior with punishing tariffs, appeared to realize the perils of that approach. Now, the administration has resorted to trying to woo China instead.
Officials throughout the government say the Trump administration is putting more aggressive actions against China on hold, while pushing forward with moves that the Chinese will perceive positively. That includes the reversal on the H20 chip.
Advertisement
The H20 decision was primarily motivated by top Trump officials who agreed with Nvidia's arguments that selling the chip would be better for American technology leadership than withholding it, people familiar with the move say.
But Trump officials have also claimed that it was part of the trade talks. After telling Congress in June that there was 'no quid pro quo in terms of chips for rare earths,' Scott Bessent, the treasury secretary, reversed those comments Tuesday, saying that the H20 move was 'all part of a mosaic' of talks with China. 'They had things we wanted, we had things they wanted, and we're in a very good place,' he said.
Advertisement
A Chinese Ministry of Commerce official seemed to reject that Friday, saying that the United States had 'taken the initiative' to approve the H20 sales. China believes the United States should continue to remove its trade and economic restrictions, the official said.
A person familiar with the talks, who spoke on the condition of anonymity because he was not authorized to speak publicly, said that the H20 chip was not specifically discussed in meetings between Chinese and US officials in Geneva and London this spring. But the reversal was part of a more recent cadence of warmer actions the United States and China have taken toward each other. For instance, Beijing agreed in recent weeks to block the export of several chemicals used to make fentanyl, an issue Trump has been concerned about.
Recent events have underscored the influence that China has over the US economy. When Trump raised tariffs on Chinese exports in April, some top Trump officials thought Beijing would quickly fold, given its recent economic weakness. Instead, Beijing called Trump's bluff by restricting rare earths needed by American makers of cars, military equipment, medical devices, and electronics.
As the flow of those materials stopped, Trump and other officials began receiving calls from CEOs saying their factories would soon shut down. Ford, Suzuki, and other companies shuttered factories because of the lack of supply.
Advertisement
Trump and his top advisers were surprised by the threat that Beijing's countermove posed, people familiar with the matter say. That brought the United States back to the negotiating table this spring to strike a fragile trade truce, which Trump officials are now wary of upsetting. That agreement dropped tariffs from a minimum 145 percent to 30 percent, with the Chinese agreeing to allow rare earths to flow as freely as before.
The administration's caution when it comes to China has been amplified by Trump's desire for an invitation to Beijing later this year. The president, who has been feted on other foreign trips, wants to engage in face-to-face trade negotiations with Chinese leader Xi Jinping. Howard Lutnick, the commerce secretary, has begun recruiting chief executives for a potential delegation, setting off a competition over who will get to ride in Air Force One, according to people familiar with the plans.
The Commerce Department declined to comment. The White House, the Treasury Department, and the Office of the United States Trade Representative did not respond to a request for comment.
'The government understands that forcing the world to use foreign competition would only hurt America's economic and national security,' said John Rizzo, a spokesperson for Nvidia.
Opposition to China has fueled bipartisan action for the past decade. Now, Trump's more hawkish supporters are quietly watching as the president remakes the party's China strategy.
Though few are willing to speak out publicly, officials in the Trump administration and in Congress have privately expressed concern that the trade war has given China an opening to finally bring US technology controls onto the negotiating table.
Advertisement
Christopher Padilla, a former export control official in the George W. Bush administration, said the fact that the United States was now negotiating over what were supposed to be security restrictions was 'a significant accomplishment for the Chinese.'
'They've been after this for decades, and now they've succeeded,' he said. 'I assume the Chinese are going to demand more concessions on export controls in return for whatever we want next.'
This article originally appeared in
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


CNBC
13 minutes ago
- CNBC
Union Pacific in mega US railroad merger talks with rival Norfolk
Union Pacific said on Thursday it was in advanced discussions with rival Norfolk Southern for a possible mega merger that would create a transcontinental railroad behemoth. Norfolk shares were up 3.5%, while Union Pacific fell 2.3% in premarket trading. A deal, if it goes through, will combine Union Pacific's dominant position in the Western two-thirds of the U.S. with Norfolk's 19,500-mile route predominantly spanning 22 eastern states. Norfolk has a market value of about $63.2 billion, while Union Pacific was valued at around $138 billion, according to LSEG data. There can be no assurances as to whether an agreement for a transaction will be reached or as to its terms, Union Pacific said. The North American railroad industry has struggled with volatile freight volumes, rising labor and fuel costs, and growing pressure from shippers over service reliability. If the two companies agree to a deal, it would be largest-ever buyout in the sector. It would also shape up as a key test of the Trump administration's appetite for big-ticket mergers and faces a plethora of regulatory hurdles. The first challenge would be securing approval from the Surface Transportation Board (STB), the federal agency that oversees railroads, currently led by Patrick Fuchs, a Trump appointee named to the post in January. It would also require the support of worker unions and might invite scrutiny from several other federal bodies. Major railroad unions have long pushed back against consolidation, warning that such deals threaten jobs and risk throwing rail service into disarray. The last major consolidation in the industry was the $31 billion merger between Canadian Pacific and Kansas City Southern, which created the first and only single line rail network connecting Canada, the United States and Mexico. The deal, which closed in 2023, faced intense regulatory pushback over concerns it would stifle competition, eliminate jobs and disrupt service but was eventually approved.


Buzz Feed
14 minutes ago
- Buzz Feed
Student Asks Charlie Kirk If He's A White Supremacist
If you haven't had the displeasure of an introduction to right-wing influencer Charlie Kirk, I'll do the honors. At 18, he founded Turning Point USA (TPUSA), a nonprofit that advocates for conservative voices on high school and college campuses and runs a watchlist of professors that, according to the organization, "discriminate against conservative students and advance leftist propaganda in the classroom." One of Charlie's favorite activities is showing up to campuses, popping a squat in front of a TPUSA banner, and having students line up to debate him. Then he makes videos that look like this: On a recent visit to a college campus, a student showed up to ask Kirk about his opinions on immigration and birthright citizenship. At the end of his time, he says he has one more question for Kirk. "I have one more question my dad wanted me to ask you," he says. "He said, 'Would you still be a white supremacist if you were in a more diverse work field?'" Charlie instantly gawks at the words "white supremacist." "So do you think I'm a white supremacist?" Kirk asks in response. "Uh, I have no idea if you're a white supremacist. My dad has watched a lot of you," the student says as Kirk-supporting onlookers snicker. "He said, 'If you weren't out here preaching hate and working on your three-pointers, do you think you would probably be better at that?" Kirk is visibly ruffled. "I'm not even gonna justify— You should be ashamed of your father," he says, nodding. "I'm definitely not. My father is an amazing man. He cares about American citizens," the student says as Kirk talks over him. "Your father peddles lies. I'm not a white supremacist," he says at the end of the clip. This is how Turning Point USA packaged the video, BTW: This person asked why Kirk never debates adults, to which the poster replied, "Because he would get annihilated." Someone applauded the student and his father, saying "Our future looks brighter today." One person said he was "doing actual journalism." "Grown ass man struggling to look a child in the eye. He really is a coward lol," someone said. And finally, this person just asked, "why is his head shaped like that." What do you think? Let us know in the comments.


The Hill
14 minutes ago
- The Hill
RFK Jr. sued over a task force by the anti-vaccine group he founded
The anti-vaccine organization founded by Health and Human Services (HHS) Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. is now funding a lawsuit against him, arguing Kennedy has failed to establish a task force on the safety of childhood vaccines. 'Our first priority will ALWAYS be children's health. Sec. Kennedy has FAILED 'to establish a task force dedicated to making childhood vaccines safer, as mandated by federal law,' so we WILL be holding him accountable,' Children's Health Defense (CHD) posted on social platform X. The lawsuit claims Kennedy is violating the National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986, which requires the HHS secretary to stand up a task force consisting of the director of the National Institutes of Health (NIH), the commissioner of the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and the director of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). The law also requires the health secretary to provide Congress with progress reports every two years. CHD contends that the steps taken to make vaccines safer has never been reported to lawmakers. Kennedy and his allies have been interested in the panel for years, arguing that its absence shows the government has not taken appropriate steps to ensure vaccines are safe for children. While he was part of Children's Health Defense in 2018, Kennedy — along with fellow vaccine critic and adviser Del Bigtree — filed a Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) request for copies of the reports from HHS. When no reports were found, Kennedy and Bigtree sued HHS to produce them, part of an effort to bolster their misleading narrative about vaccine safety A task force was created in the wake of the law's passage and produced reports. It was short-lived and made its final report to Congress in 1998. During a 2019 Senate hearing about vaccines and rising rates of preventable disease, then-Sen. Lamar Alexander (R-Tenn.) noted the Health, Education Labor and Pensions (HELP) Committee received two reports from HHS about vaccine safety in 1988 and 1989. Alexander said the law only required HHS to submit a report to Congress 'within two years.' The former lawmaker during the hearing blasted 'internet fraudsters' for 'preying on the unfounded fears and daily struggles of parents' by convincing them vaccines aren't safe. Dorit Reiss, a law professor at UC Law San Francisco and expert on vaccine litigation, said she thinks the CHD lawsuit is 'performative,' and doesn't mean Kennedy's former group has turned on him. Reiss noted that the lawsuit could be a way to give Kennedy cover to set up the vaccine safety panel he's been floating for years. Ray Flores, the CHD attorney who filed the complaint, indicated that is exactly what the group wants to do. 'It may appear as though we are being unfriendly to Mr. Kennedy. On the contrary, we're helping him to have an excuse to do his job,' Flores said in an interview with CHD TV.