Sierra and Plumas County Officials Say Gray Wolves Have Become A Public Safety Hazard
The California Department of Fish and Wildlife says there are at least seven packs.
'It's an incredibly inspiring story that wolves, the symbol of the wild, can reclaim the state, their native land,' Peter Tira, spokesperson for the California Department of Fish and Wildlife, says.
However, this enthusiasm isn't shared by all.
The Modoc, Sierra, and Plumas County Board of Supervisors have all declared a local state of emergency due to the confirmed presence of gray wolves in the Northeastern California cattle-grazing mecca region.
Sierra County Sheriff Mike Fisher says they've reached a tipping point. He has sent a letter to state officials, including the Governor, requesting permission to declare wolves a public safety risk and authorize certain wolves removal.
'One thing that I am not advocating for, nor have any of the sheriffs that I've spoken with, you know, mass killing of wolves,' Sheriff Fisher says. 'It is the ability for the local law enforcement to deal with a specific animal that is causing havoc and to be able to euthanize that particular problem animal, and that is after an investigation is complete.'
Dave Stix is the owner of DS Ranch and tells Fox40 that 30% of his calves did not breed last year, leading to a $300,000 loss.
DS Ranchers moved their cattle back to the Sierra Valley on March 30th, and as of Friday, April 18th, there have been 11 wolf attacks on their calves, two of which were fatal.
'They just started tearing up calves,' Stix says. 'They had all these rips and teeth marks left all over, which I've never seen.'
In the three hours FOX40 spent at DS Ranch, we witnessed a pair of wolves stalking cattle not once, but twice. Sheriff Fisher has since confirmed that 2 calves were attacked on the ranch while we were present, highlighting their lack of fear of humans.
'We've had this place for about 30 years, and we really don't know what to do at this point,' Stix tells FOX40. 'We don't know whether it is a good idea to get out of here and sell [the ranch], or what to do.'
A new study by UC-Davis found that cattle exposed to wolves had an increase in stress, leading to issues with eating, lactating, nursing calves, and pregnancy, which has had devastating repercussions.
'It was anywhere from 1.4-3.6 million dollars in total losses,' UC-Davis researcher Ken Tate says.
With this spring comes the birth of more pups and calves.
'The more predators you have, the more kills you're going to have,' Chad Hermann, Undersheriff of Plumas County, tells FOX40.
Rick Roberti, President of the Plumas-Sierra California Cattle Association, says all Californians should be prepared for the influx of wolves entering their communities.
'Cattlemen are not the bad guys,' Roberti says. 'We just want to be able to protect our private property.'
CDFW's wolf compensation plan has already awarded $3 million to ranchers, but a representative tells FOX40 their hands are otherwise tied.
'Gray wolves in California are listed as an endangered species under both the federal and state endangered species acts,' Tira adds, meaning any form of lethal removal without special authorization is illegal.
The Governor's Office says they second CDFW but would not provide a comment on the matter.
Paul Roen with the Sierra County Board of Supervisors says state agencies are falling short.
'They claim they want to collaborate and cooperate, well, we're getting none of that currently,' Roen, who voted to declare the state of emergency within the county, tells Fox40.
Sheriff Fisher agreed.
'I can also only hope that Sierra County isn't the first county that has a wolf-human wildlife encounter that results in either injury or death,' The Sheriff adds.
FOX40 reached out to several wolf and other endangered species animal rights groups to get their perspective, but they were unable to comment.
Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


San Francisco Chronicle
4 hours ago
- San Francisco Chronicle
How can California stop ICE overreach? The answer might lie in a 1972 case from Humboldt County
Might the answer to Los Angeles' present emergency — how to stop masked federal agents from seizing its people — lie in a half-century-old story from Humboldt County? On April 4, 1972, a young hippie couple — Dirk Dickenson and Judy Arnold — were in their remote cabin near unincorporated Garberville when federal drug agents and county sheriff's personnel, assisted by a U.S. Army helicopter, launched a raid. The sheriff promised reporters, who came along, that this would be the 'biggest bust' in California history. 'Looks like an assault on an enemy prison camp in Vietnam,' one reporter wrote in his notebook. Lloyd Clifton, an agent with the new federal Bureau of Narcotics and Dangerous Drugs (now the Drug Enforcement Agency), broke down the cabin door without knocking or announcing himself as law enforcement. He and other agents wore jeans and tie-dyed shirts instead of uniforms and kept their hair long. Dickenson and Arnold thought they were being robbed. Dickenson, unarmed, ran out the back door. Clifton gave chase and shot him in the back. Dickenson died on the way to a Eureka hospital. What happened next caused a scandal. The agents couldn't find the sought-after PCP lab or any evidence of a drug enterprise on the property or inside a cabin without electricity or running water. The U.S. Department of Justice defended the federal agent, quickly declaring Dickenson's execution a 'justifiable homicide.' But Humboldt County District Attorney William Ferroggiaro, noting that federal agents must obey state and local laws, investigated and took his case to a grand jury, which charged Clifton with second-degree murder and voluntary manslaughter. Clifton's indictment spared a court fight, which ended up establishing a legal path for holding federal agents accountable for abuses. The existence of such a path may surprise today's Californians. That's because our police insist that they are powerless to challenge unlawful actions or abuses by federal agents. Los Angeles Police Department Chief Jim McDonnell advised officers that, when called to a scene where citizens allege federal abuses, all they can do is verify the identities of federal agents. In this position, McDonnell and police are not just wrong — they are violating their oaths to enforce state and local laws. The Clifton case makes this plain. In 1973, Clifton first asked state courts to drop the prosecution, but multiple judges refused. With the trial about to start, Clifton appealed to U.S. District Courts, arguing that as a federal agent, he was beyond the reach of state law. The federal courts did not accept Clifton's argument. But in 1977, Clifton succeeded in convincing the U.S. Court of Appeals in San Francisco to free him, on the theory that he 'reasonably and honestly' believed Dickenson was a dangerous drug dealer (even though Dickenson wasn't). In his Clifton v. Cox ruling, U.S. Judge Stanley Conti wrote that federal law enforcement officials could be prosecuted for state and local crimes when 'the official employs means which he cannot honestly consider reasonable in discharging his duties or otherwise acts out of malice or with some criminal intent.' Establishing malice and criminal intent is a high bar, but Californians eager to pursue Immigration and Customs Enforcement personnel are revisiting the Clifton standard. In a June YouGov poll, commissioned by the Independent California Institute, 72% of respondents said police should arrest federal immigration officials who 'act maliciously or knowingly exceed their authority under federal law.' Recent federal abuses, captured on video, would seem to meet the Clifton test for prosecution. A federal agent's repeated punching of a Santa Ana landscaper. A retaliatory attack by federal agents, using explosives, on the Huntington Park home of U.S. citizens. The Clifton case, by making clear that federal agents are not above California laws, should open the door for local police to investigate every one of these lawless ICE raids. Given the scale of the federal assault, I'd suggest that police departments create a joint task force, perhaps in collaboration with a new state authority. Some may object that 2025 Los Angeles and 1970s Humboldt are too different. But I was struck, while rereading Clifton case records and a 1973 Rolling Stone story by Joe Estzerhas, by the parallels of the two eras. In the 1970s drug raids, as with today's immigration raids, federal agents seized people based on little evidence, failed to identify themselves, received military assistance (that helicopter) and dressed like criminals rather than law enforcement. The Nixon administration, like the Trump administration, justified its lawlessness by claiming that federal agents were chasing 'radicals.' After the U.S. Court of Appeals canceled his indictment, Clifton continued his federal career. He died in 2013. Dickenson was buried in Lincoln, a Sacramento suburb in Placer County, near where he grew up. But his precedent-setting case remains very much alive.


San Francisco Chronicle
2 days ago
- San Francisco Chronicle
EPA launches probe into ‘thick, poisonous smoke' in Northern California
The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency launched an investigation into the illegal pesticides crisis plaguing Siskiyou County after the board of supervisors declared a local state of emergency and requested Gov. Gavin Newsom's support earlier this month. 'I take this very seriously; I have directed Region 9 EPA law enforcement to investigate these issues immediately,' said EPA Pacific Southwest Region Administrator Josh F.W. Cook in a statement Thursday. 'We will be working with other County, State and Federal agencies to ensure Californians are protected and our environmental laws are upheld.' The county's board of supervisors voted 5-0 to declare the emergency on July 1 due to the 'escalating threat posed by the illegal use of highly toxic pesticides associated with illicit cannabis cultivation and processing operations,' officials said. The county warned in its declaration order that unpermitted grows in the county 'are increasingly using illegal, highly toxic pesticides unlawfully as fumigants by igniting sawdust-like materials infused with a cocktail of insecticides … fungicides, and herbicides in aluminum cans placed throughout enclosed grows structures, creating thick, poisonous smoke.' The emergency proclamation identified findings from county investigations and laboratory analyses, including identification of more than 27 pesticides, foreign pesticide products imported outside of legal regulatory channels and increasing exposure risks to first responders due to unsafe conditions at contaminated sites, officials said. Some of the pesticides discovered were classified as carcinogens (substances that can cause cancer), nerve agents (chemicals that affect the nervous system) and groundwater pollutants, officials said. The county requested that Newsom issue a state of emergency proclamation to bolster local mitigation and enforcement efforts. The governor's office did not immediately respond to a request for comment on the situation.
Yahoo
2 days ago
- Yahoo
Department of Justice requests data on non-citizen inmates from California jails
Video above: This Nexstar Media video explains the process of deportation. WASHINGTON, D.C. (FOX 5/KUSI) — The Department of Justice has formally requested data from several major California counties, including Los Angeles and San Francisco, seeking detailed information on jail inmates who are not United States citizens, according to a DOJ press release issued Thursday. The request asks sheriffs to provide lists of all non-citizen inmates currently held in county jails, including their arrest or conviction details and scheduled release dates. The DOJ says the information is intended to support federal immigration enforcement efforts by identifying undocumented individuals who have committed crimes while in the U.S. 'Removing criminal illegal aliens is this administration's highest priority,' said U.S. Attorney General Pamela Bondi. 'I look forward to cooperating with California's county sheriffs to accomplish our shared duty of keeping Californians and all Americans safe and secure.' California steps in to support LGBTQ+ youth after federal lifeline cutback The DOJ claims the effort is part of a broader response to what it describes as an 'unprecedented' influx of illegal border crossings and a corresponding rise in criminal activity committed by some undocumented individuals. 'Far too many of those illegal aliens have gone on to commit crimes on American soil, including rapes, murders, and other violent crimes,' DOJ officials noted. The department emphasized it prefers voluntary cooperation from local sheriffs but stated it is prepared to use legal tools, including subpoenas, to obtain the data if necessary. It is not yet clear how California counties will respond to the request. Some jurisdictions in the state have 'sanctuary' policies that limit cooperation with federal immigration authorities. Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed. Solve the daily Crossword