
Legacy media faces uphill battle amid rise of AI-driven digital advertising platforms
'These channels offer advertisers advanced tools for audience targeting and engagement via the application of AI-driven programmatic advertising,' said Kenanga Research.
This technology leverages on machine learning algorithms to enable real-time bidding, precise audience segmentation, and dynamic ad placements.
Additionally, by analyzing vast datasets, these platforms can customize ads to individual user behaviors and preferences; thereby enhancing the efficiency and effectiveness of ad campaigns.
In contrast, for traditional media, measuring return on investment (ROI) is more challenging due to less granular audience data and slower feedback mechanisms.
On a more positive note, we observe a growing shift among legacy media companies in Malaysia toward the development and commercialization of original local content.
This strategic pivot reflects a broader effort to diversify revenue streams and reduce reliance on traditional advertising income.
Increasingly, these companies are channelling resources into the production of Malaysian dramas, feature films, news programming, documentaries, and entertainment formats such as talent competitions, reality shows, and game shows.
Content development is being driven through a mix of in-house capabilities as well as co-productions and partnerships with local creative studios.
Native Malaysian media companies possess a distinct competitive edge in the local content landscape, an area that remains relatively under-penetrated by international over-the-top (OTT) platforms.
Local media players are uniquely equipped with an intimate understanding of Malaysian cultural nuances, social dynamics, and language preferences.
This deep-rooted familiarity enables them to craft stories, characters, and formats that resonate more authentically with domestic audiences.
Whether through culturally relevant themes, vernacular dialogue, or the portrayal of everyday Malaysian experiences, these companies are able to build stronger emotional connections and viewer loyalty which global players may struggle to replicate at scale.
We retain our UNDERWEIGHT outlook on the sector – reflecting the structural headwinds that continue to undermine its profitability.
Legacy media players are grappling with ongoing revenue erosion – stemming from heightened adex share erosion to modern digital platforms, that are capturing both audience attention and advertising spend.
These challenges are exacerbated by the burden of high fixed operating costs tied to traditional infrastructure, including broadcasting towers, printing facilities, physical distribution network and an aged workforce with dated skillsets.
Although media players have made efforts to trim expenses, profitability remains under strain.
As such, we believe the sector is in need of bold, transformative change which could take the form of regional market expansion, entry into adjacent or high-growth segments, consolidation via mergers and acquisitions, or even a full strategic divestment.
Meanwhile, in the near term, we anticipate that traditional media players will continue to pursue asset disposals or monetization to shore up balance sheets and boost liquidity buffers. —July 7, 2025
Main image: Barron's

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Malaysiakini
24 minutes ago
- Malaysiakini
Worth bending knees to 'emperor' Trump?
YOURSAY | 'Nearly every country has been threatened by him.' Trump sends letter to PM, Agong, imposes 25pct tariff on all M'sian products Milshah: First of all, this policy has not been implemented yet. It is a tactic to force countries to make deals with the United States until the new Aug 1 deadline is reached. Whether it will be implemented or not is another story. With US President Donald Trump, things change like changing people, and changing clothes. There is no certainty. Remember, those deals cost an arm and a leg for the countries involved. Trump wants full access to the countries' market, while at the same time, not allowing countries access to the US market. Is it worth it? Is it worth bending the knee to 'Emperor' Trump? Typical bullying tactic. On top of that, if countries were to increase their own tariffs, the US tariffs would go even higher. It goes back to the basic question: does the US need the countries more than the countries need the US? How should Malaysia respond? I am not in favour of Malaysia increasing tariffs on its own. Any increase will affect our imports; they will be more expensive. This will hit the rakyat who are already burdened with the high cost of living. However, I am in favour of 'Buy US last'. Malaysia should as much as possible reduce or not buy from US companies. Government procurements, such as military aircraft and equipment, should put US companies last. This should be the unwritten rule. The issue now is Malaysia's exports and not Malaysia's imports. Malaysia simply needs to increase their exports to other countries. More can be done through China, Japan, South Korea, Asean, Brics, the EU, the Middle East nations, Africa, and so on. We have to accept the fact that the US is now an expensive country to trade with. We must stop being addicted to the US market and go for greater cooperation with other countries. OrangeMouse9413: Do you think Trump cares about anything we have to do or say, save for caving in and bending our knees like a colonised country to the coloniser? Perhaps the majority of Malaysiakini commenters need to get their heads out of the usual standard 'condemn Malaysia' mentality and see that nearly every country in the world has been threatened by Trump. But if you want to continue viewing the issue myopically, then please do not let me stop you from your enjoyment. GrayEagle1207: If only current and past Malaysian governments had focused on developing the local economy, education, and medical care, and training high-skilled workers. If only we instilled fair trade policies, increased equal opportunities for the local populace, curbed wasteful spending, reduced the cabinet size, curbed corruption, nepotism, and cronyism, and wasteful government offices. If we do all that, I am pretty sure Malaysia will be a viable trade partner and will have the skills to negotiate better. As of now, Malaysian politicians, government officials, and influential persons in politics have stolen billions in taxpayer funds for self interest, spent taxpayer monies on failed military equipment, projects, taxing the people even more, justifying wasteful spending, spending time and resources on foreign disputes, sidelining local talents, the list goes on. America, China, and the Middle East countries may be bullies on a global scale, but Malaysia is bullying its own people. Oct: Prime Minister Anwar Ibrahim is useless in getting any reduction after all the self-trumpeting that Malaysia had two rounds of trade negotiation in the US, with our Malaysian delegation contingent comprising the Investment, Trade, and Industry Minister Tengku Zafrul Abdul Aziz and senior officers. They were a waste of money and resources, as the result shows Malaysia is worse off than the initial proposal. In short, it was a holiday trip for the delegation. By right, Anwar should have called Trump directly to negotiate with him via the phone. Unfortunately, nobody in the US government wants to talk to him. This is a high-profile incident as the tariff affects Malaysian products exported to the US. When Malaysia needs Anwar to resolve national interests, he is not around. Anwar prefers to jet around to give lectures, show solidarity with a foreign country, and wants the limelight for fame and glory at the expense of Malaysia's trade and economy. Just look at the Vietnam PM who called up Trump and managed to get a big reduction in tariffs without even having to send a delegation to the US. This is what a good statesperson who loves their country is made of. Anwar is a big disappointment to Malaysia in managing international matters, as it seems nobody listens to rhetorical support for a foreign country. Where in the world does one see a PM who keeps shouting about a foreign crisis when Anwar cannot resolve any of his country's crises? Time to get Anwar out. US tariffs: Opposition hits out, jibes minister's White House run TheAxman: This is nothing but Trump's chaotic management. He was under pressure to do 90 deals in 90 days, but as he ran out of time, he simply decided to copy and paste a number of letters to a number of countries, thus resulting in an arbitrary 25 percent. One can say that Zafrul was ineffective. I just saw it all as a futile exercise in the first place, as Trump's deadline was ridiculous and he was always going to be unpredictable. GanMu: Why should the president of the US meet or entertain the Malaysian delegation when it was headed by a minister? The PM should have been the one to lead the delegation as head of the government. Unfortunately for Malaysia, he is far too busy gallivanting all over the world promoting his religion and visiting mosques under the guise of bringing in investments. Why did he not meet Trump when the Singapore PM met him? He owes us an answer. Our PM's shortcomings have become good brownie points for the opposition. Pink: Zafrul's lackadaisical attitude in the negotiation process is disappointing. All we got from the negotiation is to pay an extra one percent tariff after paying expensive flight and hotel bills for his large entourage. It reminds me of my silly classmate who went to see my maths teacher for an extra mark in a test, but got his mark reduced instead. The above is a selection of comments posted by Malaysiakini subscribers. Only paying subscribers can post comments. In the past year, Malaysiakinians have posted over 100,000 comments. Join the Malaysiakini community and help set the news agenda. Subscribe now. These comments are compiled to reflect the views of Malaysiakini subscribers on matters of public interest. Malaysiakini does not intend to represent these views as fact.


The Star
43 minutes ago
- The Star
Cabinet to weigh US tariff impact
PETALING JAYA: The Cabinet will discuss in its meeting today issues and relevant matters relating to the 25% tariff imposed by the United States. Revealing this, Plantation and Commodities Minister Datuk Seri Johari Abdul Ghani said Malaysia was not the only country hit with the tariff. 'We have to adjust and be agile on this,' he said after attending the inaugural Malaysian Palm Oil Council Trade Networking Visit dialogue here yesterday, Bernama reported. He said the US' move to impose a higher tariff on Malaysia meant that American importers of Malaysian palm oil products will have to bear the extra cost. He said Malaysia exports palm oil-based products such as oleochemicals to the United States, along with other key commodities including rubber gloves, timber, furniture and cocoa products. Johari said Malaysia's commodity exports to the United States amounted to only RM20bil out of the total annual commodity exports worth RM186bil. He said as there were no alternatives to some of the commodity products exported, it is 'all right' if a tariff is imposed.


BusinessToday
an hour ago
- BusinessToday
Bursa Opens Steady As Key Indices Inch Higher
The Malaysian stock market opened on a steady note this morning, with the benchmark FBM KLCI rising marginally by 0.38 points or 0.02% to 1,530.52 as of 9.01am. Broader market indices also saw modest gains. The FBM 70 added 5.96 points to 16,543.86, while the FBM Emas ticked up 3.10 points to 11,471.24. The F4GBM index inched up 0.26 points to 927.81, and the FBM Shariah Index gained 1.22 points to 11,433.66. Market sentiment was mixed, with trading volume led by PM Consolidated Holdings (PMCK), which saw 160.5 million shares exchanged as the stock rose 0.5 sen to 22.5 sen. Pharmaniaga gained 1 sen to 15.5 sen, while TWL Holdings dipped 0.5 sen to 2.5 sen. Borneo Oil and Scope remained unchanged at 0.5 sen and 9 sen respectively. Overall, the cautious tone reflected investors' wait-and-see approach ahead of key economic data and policy signals. Related