logo
Tina Satchwell's cause of death could not be determined, jury hears

Tina Satchwell's cause of death could not be determined, jury hears

Independent20-05-2025
Tina Satchwell's cause of death could not be determined due to the skeletal nature of the remains recovered from a grave in her home, the jury in her murder-accused husband's trial has heard.
Richard Satchwell, of Grattan Street in Youghal, is accused of murdering his wife between March 19 and 20, 2017.
The 58-year-old, who is originally from Leicester in England, denies the charge.
The jury in Satchwell's trial at the Central Criminal Court in Dublin has heard details of the post-mortem examination of Mrs Satchwell after her remains were found under the stairs in the living room of their Co Cork home in October 2023, six years after Satchwell reported her missing.
On Tuesday, assistant state pathologist Dr Margaret Bolster told the jury that she was asked to attend the scene where Mrs Satchwell's remains were found on October 12, 2023.
She said she observed that a wall had been removed and a hole at a depth of approximately 62cm had been dug.
She said Mrs Satchwell's remains, which looked to be in a considerable state of 'longstanding disarray', were found in what was effectively a grave.
Dr Bolger, who told the jury she had completed some 30,000 post-mortem examinations, said she began the examination of Mrs Satchwell's remains in the Cork City mortuary that evening, before finishing her work the following morning.
She said she was given information that Mrs Satchwell had been in previous good health.
The body was received in a black body bag, and a layer of black plastic which was put on the scene to keep the remains together and preserve and trace evidence.
Beneath that, the body was in another layer of black plastic and also wrapped in a heavily stained, soiled sheet – which appeared to be a bed sheet.
She said the soiling of the bed sheet was to be expected due to the earth and the decomposition of the body.
There was debris and soil present on the body and bones could be seen protruding through the bed sheet.
The body was received lying face down and was dressed in pyjamas and a dressing gown.
A gold-coloured Playboy branded purse was removed from the left hand pocket of the dressing gown.
It contained a Tesco clubcard, a Public Services Card, a Holland and Barrett rewards card, an Xtravision premium membership card, a Rathcormack car boot sale card, and a Boots advantage card in Mrs Satchwell's name.
Dr Bolger outlined details of the post-mortem examination, stating that the body was rotated onto its back for the examination.
She told the jury the skull had separated from the rest of the body as a result of the natural process of decomposition, while one of the arms and femurs had also been disarticulated.
She explained there was formation of 'adipocere' on parts of the remains, which forms in decomposing tissue in warm and moist environments.
Dr Bolger said there were also pieces of what could be glass found on the scalp and body but added she could not say where the pieces had come from.
Asked if it was possible the glass came from the sheet, she said she could not say.
Dr Bolger said she could not examine for external marks or injuries due to the length of time between death and the post-mortem examination.
She said examiners would normally document every single marking on the head, neck and body to get an understanding of what may have been the cause of death.
She said an internal examination was not possible because there were no organs remaining after decomposition.
Therefore, she added that no comment on natural disease could be made.
Dr Bolger said a toxicology report was also not possible, although a small amount of head hair was examined and showed that prescribed or illicit drugs had not been consumed in the previous 90 days.
On the small amount of muscle that was available for examination, she said she could not identify any signs of hemorrhage or bleeding.
There was no evidence of any fractures – or previous fractures – to any of the remaining bones throughout the skeletal remains, including in x-rays of Mrs Satchwell's hands.
There was no evidence of fracture to the hyoid bone.
Dr Bolger said this was like a chicken wishbone at the top of the voice box, which had 'not much more' of a consistency than a matchstick.
She explained that this bone is fractured in roughly 9% of hangings, 24% of ligature strangulations, and 73% of manual strangulations or incidences of throttling.
She said that Mrs Satchwell's larynx could not be identified in the decomposing remains.
Dr Bolger said the dressing gown cord was in a 'very unusual position' and was not threaded through the loops of the gown itself.
The jury was shown a video of a garda with a different dressing gown cord tied around his body to demonstrate how it appeared on the remains.
The cord of the gown in the reconstruction was wrapped over the shoulder of the garda, across the chest under the other arm, and wrapped around the back to be tied on the front of the body.
She said this was done over the dressing gown.
The original gown and belt was explained to be in a brittle and hazardous state.
Under cross-examination by Brendan Grehan SC, for Mr Satchwell, Dr Bolger was asked if the tying of the gown was like something used to carry a body.
She replied: 'That's exactly my thoughts.'
She explained from her experience it was difficult to move a deceased body and very often ligatures are used to move a body from one area to another.
Also under questioning from Mr Grehan, Detective Garda David Kelleher told the court that the dressing gown had been photographed and searched for Mrs Satchwell's wedding ring in February of this year.
He said this was done as Satchwell had said he placed the ring in a pocket of the gown.
The ring has not been recovered, the jury heard.
The jury previously heard evidence from a forensic scientist who said the gown and cord were not suitable for examination as they were too damp, mouldy and brittle.
Mr Grehan asked if it was possible the ring fell out of the gown, which had partially disintegrated.
Det Gda Kelleher, the garda in the reconstruction video, said he could not be sure.
The trial continues.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Police finally make arrest after newborn twins were found dumped in rat-infested alley in New York City
Police finally make arrest after newborn twins were found dumped in rat-infested alley in New York City

Daily Mail​

timean hour ago

  • Daily Mail​

Police finally make arrest after newborn twins were found dumped in rat-infested alley in New York City

A Bronx mother accused of dumping her newborn twins in a rat-infested alley has been arrested, five years after she committed the heinous crime. Stephanie Castillo, 36, was taken into custody Friday morning and charged with multiple counts of murder and manslaughter in connection with the deaths of her infant sons, law enforcement sources confirmed. The arrest follows a years-long investigation that recently linked Castillo to the crime through DNA evidence. On November 9, 2020, the babies were discovered in a filthy alley behind a College Avenue apartment building, near East 171st Street, in the Claremont section of the Bronx. One of the newborn babies was partially wrapped in a pet training pad with visible head trauma and an umbilical cord tied around his neck. The other was found about 20 feet away, tucked inside a black plastic bag. Both were less than 24 hours old and had been born alive, according to police. Castillo was arrested at a nearby shelter, just blocks from the apartment where she had previously lived - and from which police believe she may have thrown the babies out a fourth-floor window. 'The perpetrator in this case resided on the fourth floor of this apartment building, and we believe that the babies were disposed of out the window,' NYPD Assistant Chief Michael Baldassano told CBS New York. The twins, later named Zeke and Zane by detectives, were buried after officers raised money for their funeral. The case remained unsolved for years despite a $10,000 reward and repeated public pleas, according The New York Times. Castillo is now charged with two counts of murder and manslaughter. She is being held at the 44th Precinct and is expected to be arraigned in Bronx Criminal Court. 'This is exactly why we come to work every day. The NYPD, we don't give up. Our detectives are the best in the world,' Baldassano said.

Murder trial shown haunting footage of dentist 'poisoning' wife he took out $4million in life insurance policies on
Murder trial shown haunting footage of dentist 'poisoning' wife he took out $4million in life insurance policies on

Daily Mail​

timean hour ago

  • Daily Mail​

Murder trial shown haunting footage of dentist 'poisoning' wife he took out $4million in life insurance policies on

The adulterous Colorado dentist accused of fatally poisoning his wife had taken out life insurance policies totaling $4 million on her, the lead detective in his case testified on Friday. Aurora Police Det. Bobbi Jo Olson took the stand for the second time in the murder trial of father-of-six Dr James Craig, who was arrested on March 19, 2023 - the day after his 43-year-old wife, Angela, was taken off life support. Craig has also been charged in relation to an alleged jailhouse plot to order a hit on Olson – calling her 'the worst, dirtiest detective in the whole world' – along with other victims, jurors have heard during nearly two weeks of testimony. He's pleaded not guilty to murder, solicitation to commit murder and solicitation to commit perjury. Prosecutors argue Craig poisoned his wife's shakes and administered fatal doses of arsenic, cyanide and tetrahyrdrozoline, a chemical found in eye drops, amidst mounting financial struggles and multiple affairs – particularly a budding romance with a Texas orthodontist. Olson testified on Friday that the dentist had several policies with Kansas City and Lincoln Life insurance companies totaling $4 million in the event of Angela's death. The detectives also outlined Craig's alleged movements in the days before and after his wife first got sick on March 6 – as the court was shown in-home surveillance footage from the family's kitchen. Angela's relatives alternately smiled, wiped tears and laughed as they watched their late loved one interact with her children on camera. But all lightness faded from the courtroom as footage showed Craig get up before 5am on March 6 – the date Angela first exhibited mystery symptoms after drinking a shake he prepared – to mix something in the kitchen and use the microwave. He'd ordered arsenic to the family home two days earlier, Olson testified on Friday - and footage showed Angela consuming the drink he appeared to have made her. Craig affectionately dog-whistled at his wife twice on the morning of March 6, and they discussed their child's car seat before he left the home, footage showed. Angela began feeling ill and went to the hospital later that day, feeling 'heavy' and like her body wasn't working properly, jurors heard earlier in the trial. On Friday, they watched as Angela accused Craig of 'failing' her the day after that first futile hospital visit - when doctors simply sent her home and told her to speak to her primary care physician. 'It may not be your call that they didn't do their due diligence or anything like that, but it's your fault they treated me differently,' she said. 'It's your fault … they treated me like I was suicidal … like I did it to myself.' She complained that Craig 'didn't actually defend me' and his behavior was '100% selfish and had nothing to do with being there for me. 'You ask all the details, in every medical … everything, everywhere you go, and you didn't even ask. 'You didn't try to do anything,' she said. 'You just brought me home.' Olson testified on Friday that records showed Craig had also ordered oleander and cyanide in the days after Angela first fell ill. Date and time stamps from footage shown in court on Friday of Craig's trips to and from the family residence matched up with previous evidence about trips he made to the supermarket - where receipts showed his credit card purchased Visine - and the loading dock of a medical company from which he'd ordered cyanide. An expert testified on Thursday that Craig's phone had pinged off towers corresponding to the locations. Jurors also watched footage on Friday from the hospital on March 15 - the date of Angela's final admission - in which Craig appears to have what Olson called a 'thin white or clear object in his left hand.' He later entered his wife's room for 'exactly 60 seconds,' she testified, before coming out and telling the nurse's station that Angela's arm hurt and her condition was deteriorating. Doctors told Angela's family later that day that all brain activity had ceased - and she was taken off life support on March 18. Craig's defense team - his third, after two others dropped out as the dentist racked up more charges from behind bars - argues that Angela was 'manipulative' and suicidal. The jury has heard evidence about how Craig repeatedly claimed Angela wanted to end her own life, asked him to obtain poisons for her and engaged him in a game of 'chicken.' Angela's friends and family have steadfastly testified that she loved life and being a mother - and was neither suicidal nor a risk-taker. There was also no mention of the 'game of chicken' in a four-page explanatory timeline Craig detailed himself the day after Angela was declared brain dead, Olson testified. Reading Craig's own words, she told the court how he claimed to have returned from the Vegas conference where he met his latest paramour on February 25 - then asked Angela for a divorce. 'She said she was just going to end her life,' Craig wrote in the timeline Olson read out. 'I begged her not to do that, but she said she couldn't get a divorce. 'She talked about driving her car into a pylon but was worried she wouldn't die but just be maimed,' he continued. 'That's when she started talking about poisons ... she asked me to research some poisons for her to find one that would kill fastest with high accuracy and the broadest spectrum.' Angela asked him to poison her shakes and voluntarily consumed arsenic and tetrahydrozoline, he claimed. Olson testified there was no evidence Angela ever searched for poisons. The court previously heard, however, of her desperate searches of her symptoms as she tried to figure out what was making her so sick. The court has also heard that searches about poisons and their lethality were found on an exam room computer at Craig's dental practice. Witnesses, including a former cellmate, another inmate and even Craig's 20-year-old daughter, have testified about his attempts to plant evidence and bribe witnesses to lie for him. Annabelle Craig told the court last how week how her father, soon after his arrest, asked her to create a deep-fake video to clear him showing her mom asking for the lethal substances. Four of Craig's mistresses from the months before Angela's murder have also testified at the trial. That included three 'sugar babies' he met on - and lavished with gifts like cars, money and out-of-state trips - and a Texas orthodontist he love-bombed and exchanged 4,000 texts with in under three weeks after meeting at a Las Vegas dental conference. Two 'sugar babies' testified that Craig told them a divorce would financially cripple him.

Child's interview can't be used in her father's trial in killings of wife and other man, judge rules
Child's interview can't be used in her father's trial in killings of wife and other man, judge rules

The Independent

time2 hours ago

  • The Independent

Child's interview can't be used in her father's trial in killings of wife and other man, judge rules

A northern Virginia circuit judge ruled on Friday that prosecutors' case against an IRS agent charged with killing his wife and another man cannot include a recorded interview from the defendant's young daughter. Fairfax Circuit Court Chief Judge Penney Azcarate on Friday denied prosecutors' motion on the admissibility of the young child's conversation with a forensic interviewer about what she believed was happening the morning her mother was killed at her home. That child's father, Brendan Banfield, was later charged with aggravated murder in the February 2023 deaths of his wife, Christine Banfield, and Joe Ryan, a man who was invited to the house that day. Deputy Commonwealth's Attorney Eric Clingan argued that the child's interview should be admissible evidence at trial because she is a victim of her father's alleged killing. The killings occurred while the child was in the Banfields' basement, authorities have said. In December, Banfield was indicted with child abuse and felony child cruelty in connection with the case. 'It's an act of abuse against her by virtue of what her father did that morning,' Clingan said in court. Meanwhile, John F. Carroll, who represents the father, argued in court that Banfield did not consent for his child to be interviewed by authorities at the police's headquarters. Azcarate sided with the defense, citing a statute that a child's interview would be admissible only if the child was being directly victimized by the parent. She acknowledged authorities later pressed child abuse-related charges, but she said those indictments were not the basis for officials' interview of Banfield's daughter that day. 'The interview doesn't fall within the statute,' Azcarate said. Complex investigation and prosecution The evidentiary hearing is one of a series of developments in the officials' multifaceted investigation and prosecution of Christine Banfield and Ryan's killings. Carroll also moved on Friday for the court to rescind Banfield's indictment and remove Clingan, the lead prosecutor, from the case. In his arguments, Carroll argued that Clingan guided Banfield's co-defendant in an interview, though Azcarate denied both motions. That co-defendant, Juliana Peres Magalhães, was originally arrested and charged with second-degree murder in the case. At the time of the killings, Magalhães and Banfield informed authorities that they walked in on Ryan attacking Christine Banfield and both shot him with different weapons, attorneys have said in court. But last year, Magalhães pleaded guilty to manslaughter in what prosecutors have long described as a scheme led by Banfield and the au pair to frame Ryan in the stabbing of Christine Banfield. Ahead of her plea, Magalhães provided a proffer to officials and was interviewed by Clingan, attorneys have stated in court. Her proffer corroborated a catfishing theory that Ryan was lured to the home on a social networking platform for people interested in sexual fetishes. She also corroborated the theory that Magalhães, who began working for the family in 2021, and Brendan Banfield had a romantic relationship that began before the killings, and that she helped the husband in his conspiracy to kill his wife. 'I'm just so upset and heartbroken for doing this to Brendan,' the au pair wrote to her mother from the Fairfax County jail last October in a message, which has since been entered into court evidence. 'I love him and he loves me too, I have no doubts. But it's the right thing to do. For you. I want to be with you again.' Dispute arises over catfishing theory Despite her proffer, a divide appears evident among officials over the catfishing theory. Brendan Miller, a digital forensic examiner with the police department, testified earlier this month that his analysis of forensic evidence also suggested Christine Banfield was seeking to have an affair with Ryan. Miller testified that his analysis was based on multiple devices, and he concluded that Christine Banfield had connected with Ryan through a social networking platform for people interested in sexual fetishes and matched her with Ryan. His findings diverged from a theory held by other officials in the department that the messages Ryan had been receiving were actually from Brendan Banfield posing as his wife. Deputy Chief Patrick Brusch, who oversaw the department's major crimes bureau at the time, confirmed in testimony earlier this month that he said Miller would 'never be doing another digital forensics case in your major crimes bureau' after he analyzed the evidence. Carroll, Banfield's attorney, argued in court that officials were not adhering to proper investigative guidelines when building their case and backing Brusch's catfishing theory without the supporting facts. In a court filing, Carroll wrote that Brusch resigned from the department after the hearing in which he had testified. He wrote in another motion that 'there is a willfulness in the lack of recognition of the science,' adding: 'The digital forensics are facts, and the Commonwealth chooses to ignore and disregard those facts.' ___

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store