Sanctions to be introduced to target people-smuggling gangs
The Foreign Secretary announced on Tuesday a raft of sanctions that will be introduced to target anyone involved in assisting illegal immigration to the UK.
This ranges from those involved in supplying and financing small boats, fake passports, and 'middlemen' putting cash through the Hawala system, a legal money transfer system, which is also used in payments linked to Channel crossings.
The first wave of sanctions comes into force on Wednesday, and will publicly name anyone sanctioned, so it will be illegal for UK businesses and banks to deal with them.
The measure is expected to include more than 20 designations, and could include corrupt public officials and police officers in steps to tackle the multi-billion-dollar industry.
Foreign Secretary David Lammy said: 'For too long, criminal gangs have been lining their corrupt pockets and preying on the hopes of vulnerable people with impunity as they drive irregular migration to the UK. We will not accept this status quo.
'That's why the UK has created the world's first sanctions regime targeted at gangs involved in people smuggling and driving irregular migration, as well as their enablers.
'From tomorrow, those involved will face having their assets frozen, being shut off from the UK financial system and banned from travelling to the UK.'
It follows legislation being introduced under the Border Security, Asylum and Immigration Bill to ramp up enforcement powers for police forces and partners to investigate and prosecute people smugglers.
Fresh sanctions aim to target organised crime gangs wherever they are in the world and disrupt their flow of cash, including freezing bank accounts, property and other assets, to hinder their activities.
Home Secretary Yvette Cooper said: 'It will allow us to target the assets and operations of people smugglers wherever they operate, cutting off their funding and dismantling their networks piece by piece.
'Through the Border Security Command and key partners like the National Crime Agency, we are strengthening our ties with other nations to tackle this global problem.
'Together, we are sending a clear message that there is no hiding place for those who exploit vulnerable people and put lives at risk for profit.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Independent
22 minutes ago
- The Independent
David Lammy's condemnation of the atrocities in Gaza is an important breakthrough
The images coming out of Gaza of emaciated, dying children are, as the foreign secretary David Lammy says, appalling and sickening. They cannot be dismissed as propaganda, and even the Israeli authorities have not sought to do so. They are, in human terms and by any standard, atrocities – just as surely as those inflicted on innocent people by Hamas terrorists on 7 October 2023 were also atrocities. This latest wave of human suffering should evoke yet more anguish among all civilised peoples. It is time, as Mr Lammy and his colleagues from 27 other nations plead in an open letter, for the war in Gaza to end. Realistically, it will not – at least not immediately. The Israeli government, with unconscious irony, dismisses the calls for an end to the fighting as 'disconnected from reality' and 'sending the wrong message to Hamas'. As opposed, critics might wonder, to the 'message' the Netanyahu government is currently sending to Hamas, which is that peace will never come, the IDF is set on the literal destruction of Gaza as a place of human habitation, and that they, Hamas, as terrorists, therefore have nothing to lose, whether they release the remaining hostages or not (and which they should do, in any case, without delay). So there is no change yet in Israeli policy. It has even opened up a new front by intervening in Syria, unleashing more agonies, as The Independent 's Bel Trew reports. The Israeli Defence Force is engaged in another major military offensive, this time in central Gaza, and the shelling goes on. Tens of thousands of people have been told, yet again, to move to safety, when there is no sanctuary anywhere, not least because of the terrible shortages of the means of life – clean water, food, shelter. There are credible reports that Israeli forces are systematically destroying what few structures remain standing across Gaza. In planned demolitions, to already damaged buildings and ones that appear largely intact, former homes, schools and other civilian infrastructure are being blown up. The plan to crush millions of people into a cynically labelled 'humanitarian city', which will be anything but safe, is still in place. The equally misnomered Gaza Humanitarian Foundation (GHF), backed by Israel and the United States, is failing to deliver aid; instead, people are dying in the ensuing chaos. One witness, the British doctor Nick Maynard, says people at aid sites are being used as target practice (a claim rejected by the IDF). Philippe Lazzarini, commissioner general with the UN Palestine aid agency, calls the sites a 'sadistic death trap'. There was a time when combatants in any war would not target United Nations agency posts and personnel. Not in the case of the Israeli occupying forces in Gaza, where the World Health Organisation's staff residence, main warehouse and health hub were attacked. The WHO reports that 'Israeli military forces entered the premises, forcing women and children to evacuate on foot toward al-Mawasi amid active conflict. Male staff and family members were handcuffed, stripped, interrogated on the spot, and screened at gunpoint.' The suffering of the people of Gaza is on an apocalyptic scale, bombarded and besieged virtually without respite, and visited by conquest, war, famine and death. It seems hopeless – but the last thing the Palestinian people need from the West is a counsel of despair. Mr Lammy has called out what Israel has been doing, taken some, as yet inadequate action, and come as close as he can to condemning Israel for war crimes: 'Permanent forced displacement is a violation of international humanitarian law.' Many would urge him to go further. Lord Sumption, a universally respected lawyer, has argued that 'the conduct of Israel in Gaza is grossly disproportionate and there's at least an arguable case that it's genocidal '. Mr Lammy and the other 27 foreign ministers have the option to echo that kind of language. He is urged to do so – but he is right to hold back, and, for the time being, await the International Court to come to a judgment. Why? Because the only consideration about what to do next should be whether it will have any appreciable impact on what's happening on the ground. Recognising a Palestinian state and setting up a British embassy in Ramallah wouldn't save the life of single Palestinian baby. Nor would an outright charge of genocide. Not yet, at any rate. What would matter is if the Americans can be persuaded to put pressure on Israel to end the war and the famine: after all, this is Donald Trump 's declared policy. Loyal as he is to Benjamin Netanyahu, the Israeli leader has been testing President Trump's patience in recent months. When Karoline Leavitt, the forthright White House spokesperson, reveals that the president has been 'caught off guard' by recent Israeli bombings in Syria and of a church in Gaza, and called his friend Bibi to 'rectify' the situation, it does at least show that action is possible. In May, Mr Trump expressed concern about people starving, and perhaps, as with Vladimir Putin and the war in Ukraine, the president may slowly be coming to realise that Mr Netanyahu has also been playing him along; he might take decisive action that would stop the killings in a day. But if Washington remains impassive, then once again a ' coalition of the willing ' must be formed to do whatever it takes to pressure Israel – diplomatic recognition of Palestine, a full arms embargo, trade sanctions and economic pressure. Especially if this is done in concert with Israel's influential regional neighbours, such as Egypt, Turkey, Jordan, the UAE and Saudi Arabia. ends the war in Gaza – now.
Scottish Sun
23 minutes ago
- Scottish Sun
Major crackdown on migrants working illegally as firms will be given locations of asylum hotels to axe riders' accounts
Click to share on X/Twitter (Opens in new window) Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window) MIGRANT hotel locations will be handed to delivery firm bosses to stop illegal riders using their apps. The Home Office has struck a deal with Deliveroo, Just Eat and Uber Eats in a major win for The Sun. Sign up for Scottish Sun newsletter Sign up 3 Hot-spots for delivery riders working illegally will be flagged up for raids to immigration enforcement officers Credit: Ray Collins 3 A masked rider challenges an immigration enforcement officer about his rights Credit: Chris Eades 3 Officers speak to a migrant delivery rider We revealed asylum seekers were raking in up to £1,000 a week within days of arriving in Britain. They are not legally allowed to work but have used shared accounts to dodge checks. Last night PM Sir Keir Starmer said: 'The Sun has rightly put the spotlight on migrants working illegally as food delivery riders. "And we're tackling the problem. If a rider is staying at this accommodation, the companies will know and can close down the rider's account. 'We will do what it takes to uphold the law and to ensure fairness for the British people.' Under the agreement, hot-spots for such riders will be flagged up for raids by to immigration enforcement officers. And delivery companies — who insist that they are already investing heavily in security systems to prevent abuse — will be hauled in again in the coming weeks to give updates on what progress they have made. Home Secretary Yvette Cooper said: 'Illegal working undermines honest business, exploits vulnerable individuals and fuels organised immigration crime. 'By enhancing our data-sharing with delivery companies, we are taking decisive action to close loopholes and increase enforcement.' Last month we revealed how more than 20 cops in body armour swooped on the Thistle City Barbican hotel in central London after our investigation revealed migrants living there were working illegally. Undercover delivery driver investigation But the migrants were allowed to return to their taxpayer-funded rooms after being questioned. Tory Shadow Home Secretary Chris Philp said: 'It shouldn't take a Sun investigation to get the Government to finally take action. 'It is disgraceful that rampant illegal working has been taking place on an industrial scale at the very hotels Yvette Cooper is responsible for running. 'This is all a consequence of the Government's complete failure to control our borders. 'All illegal immigrants need to be removed immediately to their country of origin or another safe country. 'Then, the crossings would soon stop.' Labour is also planning to tighten the law, forcing gig economy firms to carry out full right-to-work checks on anyone using their platforms. And, from today, the Government is ramping up pressure on the criminals fuelling the migrant crisis. 'Plans in place to stop the gangs' By Sir Keir Starmer WE will stop at nothing to tackle illegal migration. So this week we have delivered a world first: a new sanctions regime to target the vile people-smuggling gangs. We will go after the gang leaders, those supplying boats and fake passports, and the moneymen. Their assets will be frozen. Their bank accounts will be closed. And they will be banned from the UK. We've already returned 35,000 people — way up on the year before. We're working with Germany to close a legal loophole there, allowing police to seize small boats being stored and transported in their country. By working with France, we have agreed to a totally unprecedented returns pilot. We're also taking a zero-tolerance approach to the illegal jobs which gangs promise. Under our nationwide crackdown, raids and arrests are already up 50 per cent. The Sun has rightly put the spotlight on migrants working illegally as food delivery riders. We will share asylum accommodation locations with Deliveroo, Just Eat and Uber Eats. If a rider is staying at this accommodation, the firms will know and can close down their account. We will do what it takes to uphold the law and to ensure fairness for the British people. Leaders of smuggling gangs, peddlers of fake passports and corrupt officials will be named and shamed. The first wave – expected to number around two dozen offenders – will include travel bans, asset freezes, and restrictions on access to the UK financial system. Meanwhile the Sun can reveal the Thistle City Hotel, one of the capital's biggest asylum accommodation locations, is still being used as a base for illegal riders. When The Sun returned yesterday it appeared nothing had changed — as a steady stream of migrants came and went in full delivery rider gear from a fenced-off area put up to hide them from public view. We previously revealed that owners the Clermont Hotel Group, headed by CEO Gavin Taylor, had raked in £28million in revenue since taking on asylum seekers in November 2021. But at the same time residents of a block of apartments across the road fear the value of their homes has plummeted. One, who moved in 15 years ago, told The Sun: 'It is just constant noise, every day and every night. 'They all work. 'The police are here constantly. 'It's annoying a lot of residents in the block. 'I put my place on the market last year but nothing happened and I ended up taking it off the market because I had a newborn. Staff don't quiz 'kids' SMALL boat migrants who claim to be children are being given the benefit of the doubt by staff. A report by borders inspector David Bolt found that immigration workers show a 'lack of curiosity'. An Iranian with grey hairs and black stubble had his age claim of 17 accepted despite being assessed as 22. AI technology is set to be rolled out in 2026 which can accurately assess a person's age. Last year half of the 'children' were really adults. 'I'm not against people coming here for a better life. 'And obviously asylum seekers need to be somewhere. 'But if the hotel closed it would make the area a lot better. 'I'm sure the people who own the hotel are doing really well, funded by the Home Office while we pay our service charge and our taxes.' And a 27-year-old city finance worker said the problem had 'got a lot worse' since he moved in at the start of the year. He said: 'We went over there to try to get information on how long it would be a migrant hotel. 'We were pretty much kicked out straight away. 'They said they understand the problems but once the residents are on the street, they have no control.' The owner of a coffee shop said customers were staying away and his business had been broken into three times. He added: 'I pay £8,000 every three months in taxes and business rates. 'If the hotel closed down I am sure business would improve.'
The Independent
26 minutes ago
- The Independent
Controversial AI technology will assess disputed ages of UK Asylum seekers
New Artificial intelligence technology will be used to assess disputed ages of asylum seekers who say they are children, the Home Office has said. The facial age estimation system will be rolled out on an initial trial basis. Ministers hope to launch it for use on migrants arriving in the UK on small boats and lorries in 2026, subject to further testing of the technology to go ahead this year. The technology, trained on millions of images of people with confirmed ages, has been decided as the 'most cost-effective option' to assess ages in such cases where it is unknown or disputed, according to border security minister Dame Angela Eagle. The announcement on Tuesday comes as the borders watchdog report into Home Office age assessments said it is 'inevitable' that some decisions will be wrong without a 'foolproof test' of chronological age. The watchdog added this is 'clearly a cause for concern, especially where a child is denied the rights and protections to which they are entitled'. Currently initial age decisions are made by Home Office staff based on a migrant's physical appearance and demeanour. Announcing the move, Dame Angela said in a written statement: 'Accurately assessing the age of individuals is an incredibly complex and difficult task, and the Home Office has spent a number of years analysing which scientific and technological methods would best assist the current process, including looking at the role that artificial intelligence (AI) technology can play. 'Early assessments suggest that Facial Age Estimation could produce workable results much quicker than other potential methods of scientific or technological age assessment, such as bone X-rays or MRI scans, but at a fraction of the cost, and with no requirement for a physical medical procedure or accompanying medical supervision.' It comes as borders watchdog David Bolt's report also published on Tuesday looked at Home Office processes into age assessments, where those crossing the English Channel and first processed at Western Jet Foil, in Dover, Kent, make up a bulk of initial age decisions. Between January 2023 and January 2025, Mr Bolt said 20 out of 59 cases where a person was sent to Manston processing centre as an adult were then later sent back to Western Jet Foil and accepted as being a child. The independent chief inspector of borders and immigration said: 'The environment at Western Jet Foil, and the physical and mental condition of the migrants after a long, arduous, and perilous journey, make the already difficult task of assessing age even more challenging.' The report, which does not cover the Home Office's fresh announcement on using artificial intelligence, calls for officials to involve interpreters, social workers and experts in the process to gain more confidence in its decisions. Mr Bolt said many organisations who advocate for children believe the initial age decision process is 'crude and cruel'. He added: 'Over the years, and again during this inspection, I have listened to young people who felt disbelieved and dismissed by the Home Office, whose hopes have been crushed, and whose mental health has suffered. 'The Home Office has an uphill task in persuading these critics that it can be trusted in this area. Committing to better communication, engagement and collaboration would be a start.' During the visit, inspectors saw examples of a lack of cultural awareness, decisions that relied on generic physical characteristics, and questioning that focused on the migrant's credibility which should not form the basis of an age decision. Mr Bolt also cited concerns from local authorities and NGOs of examples of young people who felt pressured into signing a Home Office 'statement of age' document to say they were over 18 years old, or had not understood what they had been asked to sign. The chief inspector also called for both the Home Office and its critics to agree that some initial age decisions, that are opinion, are wrong, and that some migrants lie about their age. He added that this means not having a type of initial age assessment risks incentivising more to do so, which is not in the best interests of unaccompanied asylum seeking children. Responding to the report, the Home Office accepted all recommendations, including to carry out an evaluation of initial age decision training, and publish guidance on processes needed before someone signs the 'statement of age' form. The Refugee Council welcomed the Government 's response to the report, but also called for caution over the use of AI to determine ages. Chief executive of the charity Enver Solomon said: 'We welcome the decision to abandon intrusive scientific methods like X-rays and MRI, which we have long called for, but we are not convinced that replacing them with AI tools is the answer. 'These technologies continue to raise serious questions about accuracy, ethics and fairness. 'We call on the Government to implement reforms that prioritise professional assessments led by trained social workers, which is the most accurate way to determine age and ensure that every child is properly identified, supported, and given the chance to recover and thrive.'
