Emma Garlett: No amount of money can heal the wounds of Stolen Generations
These were the Stolen Generations — thousands of Aboriginal children forcibly removed from their homes, denied access to their mothers and fathers, their communities and their culture.
They were stolen, and they were stolen from. They were robbed of the basic right to live with their loved ones.
The impact from that injustice has rippled out for generations.
And now, the WA Government has put a dollar figure on their suffering.
Under a redress scheme announced by Premier Roger Cook during Reconciliation Week, surviving members of the Stolen Generation are eligible for a one-off payment of $85,000.
Mr Cook said the payments were an acknowledgement of a great injustice.
'It acknowledges the Stolen Generations era represents a sorrowful and shameful part of our history, and recognises that it has caused cycles of disadvantage and intergenerational trauma,' he said.
'No amount of money could ever make up for the experience of Stolen Generations members and their families, and the ongoing effects on people's lives.'
He is right that it is inadequate. Australia's median annual income is about $72,500. In return for lifetimes of trauma and suffering, victims will receive a little over a year's wages.
What of those Stolen Generation members who are no longer living? They receive nothing, their families receive nothing.
Intergenerational trauma is exactly that: intergenerational.
The death of a person who was stolen doesn't end the suffering. It continues in their own children and grandchildren, handed down through families.
It almost seems convenient that we should wait so long to repay the victims of direct government action and then give no heed to the impacts the stolen generations had on their families.
That said, there's no way money could ever heal those wounds.
Instead, the Government needs to step up on other initiatives which will help to acknowledge the sins of the past and make real steps towards reconciliation.
Labor has said it intends to 'partner with Aboriginal stakeholder organisations to develop measures for healing and truth telling'.
When it does so, these healing and truth telling measures need to be enshrined in law. They need to be locked in, made more difficult to abolition should a future government have a change of heart.
Emma Garlett is a legal academic and Nyiyaparli- Yamatji-Nyungar woman
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
West Australian
6 minutes ago
- West Australian
Nationwide protests planned after Harbour Bridge march
Protest laws could be repealed or expanded following a march across an iconic national landmark, as activists plan for more demonstrations. The pro-Palestine movement, boosted by a march across the Sydney Harbour Bridge which made news across the nation and around the world, hopes to build on its momentum. The march across the bridge and back in pouring rain came after opposition from police, and a court's overruling approval that has politicians worrying about the rare occurrence becoming common. Further protests are planned on August 24 in Sydney, Melbourne, Canberra, Adelaide and Perth with hopes more can be organised in other cities. Ahead of the state's parliament resuming on Tuesday, NSW Premier Chris Minns says his government is examining whether a legal precedent has been set by the Supreme Court judgment that allowed the protest to proceed. "No one should believe it's open season on the bridge," he told reporters on Monday. But new laws might be needed to stop future bridge protests. Mr Minns was "not ruling anything out" but said any legislation could not be rushed. Federal Opposition Leader Sussan Ley encouraged the premier to look at "what might happen next". "Because we can't continue to have these protests that shut down such an important area of a major city," she told reporters. In her determination declining to prohibit the march, Justice Belinda Rigg said the bridge would have been closed to traffic regardless of whether the protest was authorised or not. Prime Minister Anthony Albanese said demonstrations were an important part of democracy and highlighted the peaceful nature of the Sydney march. "Australians want people to stop killing each other, they want peace and security ... they don't want conflict brought here," he said. Mr Minns has faced some internal dissent from other Labor MPs over protest legislation. NSW Greens MP Sue Higginson has also flagged plans to seek the repeal of laws limiting protest, first introduced by the previous coalition government but expanded under Labor. Palestine Action Group organiser Josh Lees, defendant of the court action NSW Police took in an unsuccessful attempt to have the demonstration ruled unlawful, says nationwide protests are being planned for August 24. "We want to build on this massive momentum we have now," he told reporters. Despite concerns of regular marches across the bridge, Mr Lees said the group has no plans for a repeat crossing any time soon and accused the premier of having an anti-protest agenda. "His stance is pretty clear and he's passed a raft of anti-protest legislation already," Mr Lees said. "We're going to have to keep fighting for our rights to demonstrate."
Perth Now
6 minutes ago
- Perth Now
Jostling for government hots up as final votes declared
Tasmanians hope to soon gain a clearer picture of their next government, as the declaration of poll ceremony finalises results of a snap election that left the state in political limbo. With the votes counted and elected members confirmed, focus shifts to high-stakes negotiations as the major parties vie to form the next government. Tasmanian Premier Jeremy Rockliff has declared his readiness to accept the "will of the people" as he positions the Liberal Party as the strongest contenders to form government. He revealed on Sunday he intends to ask Governor Barbara Baker to recommission his government, saying he is keen to "get on with the job". "We want to work with each and every member of parliament to ensure everyone has their say," Mr Rockliff said. "Tasmanians are sick and tired of the political games. They have elected a parliament, they expect all members of parliament to work together." The final makeup of Tasmania's parliament is 14 Liberals, 10 Labor, five Greens, one Shooters, Fishers and Farmers MP and five independents. Labor's Jess Greene and independent George Razay claimed the final seats in the division of Bass on Saturday. Mr Rockliff and Labor Leader Dean Winter are intensifying negotiations with the crossbench to form another minority government as they attempt to secure the 18 parliamentary votes needed to govern. Professor Razay didn't reveal whether he would support the Liberals or Labor when speaking to ABC Radio Hobart on Monday. "Nobody knows George's views until the day of voting because I like to listen to every opinion and do my background research and then make my opinion on that day," he said. "So I said to both, 'look don't worry about me, if you are able to form a government, I am going to support whoever forms a government'." Deputy Labor Leader Anita Dow criticised Mr Rockliff's pledge, saying he had "learned nothing" from the starring role he played in the collapse of the last parliament. "The increasingly arrogant Premier claimed that without changing the way he operates, a new government he leads could last a full term,'' she said. "Despite losing the confidence of the house, he still thinks the last parliament was working well." The snap election on July 19 was triggered after Mr Rockliff lost a no-confidence motion, prompting the state's second election in 16 months. A key sticking point in negotiations to form government is the major parties backing a new stadium on Hobart's waterfront, which is a condition for Tasmania getting a side in the AFL. But the Greens and some independents are bitterly opposed to the plan.
Perth Now
6 minutes ago
- Perth Now
Nationwide protests planned after Harbour Bridge march
Protest laws could be repealed or expanded following a march across an iconic national landmark, as activists plan for more demonstrations. The pro-Palestine movement, boosted by a march across the Sydney Harbour Bridge which made news across the nation and around the world, hopes to build on its momentum. The march across the bridge and back in pouring rain came after opposition from police, and a court's overruling approval that has politicians worrying about the rare occurrence becoming common. Further protests are planned on August 24 in Sydney, Melbourne, Canberra, Adelaide and Perth with hopes more can be organised in other cities. Ahead of the state's parliament resuming on Tuesday, NSW Premier Chris Minns says his government is examining whether a legal precedent has been set by the Supreme Court judgment that allowed the protest to proceed. "No one should believe it's open season on the bridge," he told reporters on Monday. But new laws might be needed to stop future bridge protests. Mr Minns was "not ruling anything out" but said any legislation could not be rushed. Federal Opposition Leader Sussan Ley encouraged the premier to look at "what might happen next". "Because we can't continue to have these protests that shut down such an important area of a major city," she told reporters. In her determination declining to prohibit the march, Justice Belinda Rigg said the bridge would have been closed to traffic regardless of whether the protest was authorised or not. Prime Minister Anthony Albanese said demonstrations were an important part of democracy and highlighted the peaceful nature of the Sydney march. "Australians want people to stop killing each other, they want peace and security ... they don't want conflict brought here," he said. Mr Minns has faced some internal dissent from other Labor MPs over protest legislation. NSW Greens MP Sue Higginson has also flagged plans to seek the repeal of laws limiting protest, first introduced by the previous coalition government but expanded under Labor. Palestine Action Group organiser Josh Lees, defendant of the court action NSW Police took in an unsuccessful attempt to have the demonstration ruled unlawful, says nationwide protests are being planned for August 24. "We want to build on this massive momentum we have now," he told reporters. Despite concerns of regular marches across the bridge, Mr Lees said the group has no plans for a repeat crossing any time soon and accused the premier of having an anti-protest agenda. "His stance is pretty clear and he's passed a raft of anti-protest legislation already," Mr Lees said. "We're going to have to keep fighting for our rights to demonstrate."
