Antisemitism an ‘urgent issue' for all of British society, Penny Mordaunt warns
Writing in the Telegraph newspaper, the pair described themselves as 'hard-nosed politicians' who are 'used to dealing with the extremes of human emotions and catastrophe'.
But they added: 'Even with decades of these experiences, we were still stunned into silence by the evidence that we received as independent chairs of the Board of Deputies Commission on Antisemitism, particularly from young people in the Jewish community.'
'This is an urgent issue not just for the Jewish community but for the United Kingdom as a whole,' the pair added.
They also said: 'We are all harmed if we tolerate the abuse of some of our fellow citizens by those who hold warped or extreme views.'
Their warnings of growing antisemitic prejudices across British society, from the NHS to arts organisations and the police, comes as the report they authored is set to be published on Tuesday.
Among its recommendations are that the NHS should hold a summit to tackle the 'specific unaddressed issue of antisemitism' within the health service.
Lord Mann and former defence secretary Dame Penny set out 10 recommendations calling for educators, public services and trade unions to do more to tackle antisemitism.
Among them was a recommendation for every NHS trust to have 'basic training on contemporary antisemitism'.
They stated: 'From evidence that we heard, we can identify that there is a specific unaddressed issue of antisemitism within the NHS. We recommend that a summit should be held with NHS leaders across the UK to begin to address this.'
They noted an 'identifiable lack of consistency and capacity in antisemitism training' and recommended the creation of a specific antisemitism training qualification, adding that such training should be included within equality, diversity and inclusion (EDI) in organisations and institutions.
Efforts to teach primary school teachers how to avoid passing on antisemitism and anti-Jewish tropes in their lessons should be rolled out in faith schools across the UK, the commission said.
It added that professional organisations and trade unions should ensure that all Jewish members are treated equally and with respect, while there must be a consistent approach taken by police when dealing with antisemitic crimes.
The commission said it had seen evidence of 'hidden barriers being put in front of Jewish involvement within the arts' and said there must always be a 'robust response for those who choose to discriminate and government at every level should ensure this'.
Lord Mann said: 'It is unacceptable that the Jewish community has faced an onslaught of antisemitism since October 7th.
'Whilst this is not new, the commission heard shocking experiences that we will not ignore. Antisemitism is racism and it must be treated as such. We hope these recommendations will provide additional guidance and action for civil society.'
Dame Penny said: 'No person should face abuse or discrimination whilst going about their business, whether it is pursuing the career of their choice or accessing public services.
'We wanted to suggest some very practical things that can be dealt with swiftly and will dramatically improve people's experiences.'
Board of Deputies president Phil Rosenberg said: 'Overall, the challenge in civil society can be summarised as one of a failure to apply the protections rightly afforded to different vulnerable groups equally to Jewish people in the same positions.
'Many sectors promote strong Equality, Diversity and Inclusion (EDI) processes, which are very important, but too often, these protections seem to exclude Jews.'
He said the board will insist that 'Jews must count' and will use the recommendations of the commission's report 'to ensure that they do'.
An NHS spokesperson said: 'It is completely unacceptable for anyone to experience racism, discrimination or prejudice in the health service, whether staff or patient, and the NHS takes any instance of antisemitism or discrimination extremely seriously.
'The NHS provides care and treatment for everyone regardless of race, faith, or background and all NHS healthcare providers should have policies in place to address issues like this in the workplace.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
BBC News
19 minutes ago
- BBC News
Targeted breast cancer treatment 'transformational', say experts
More targeted and less aggressive radiotherapy for low-risk breast cancer could spare thousands of women the harsh side effects of the treatment, a trial has Import Low trial, led by The Institute of Cancer Research, London, and the University of Cambridge, found limiting radiation to the tumour area, rather than treating the whole breast, was just as study included 2,018 women across 30 radiotherapy centres in the UK, who were monitored for 10 years after technique, which has since been adopted by the NHS, has "transformed" the way the disease is treated in its early stages, researchers said. More than 37,000 women have radiotherapy for breast cancer in the UK every treatment uses radiation to kill cancer cells and is usually given after surgery to reduce the risk of the disease coming back but has a number of side Import Low trial compared three radiotherapy approaches - whole breast, partial breast and a reduced a decade, cancer recurrence rates in the group given partial radiotherapy was 3%, the same proportion as those who had been treated with a more aggressive who had targeted radiotherapy were also less likely to experience long-term changes in breast 15% reported noticeable changes at five years compared with 27% in the whole-breast radiotherapy group. Hilary Stobart, now 70, was diagnosed with breast cancer in December 2008, with a 2cm tumour in her left Stobart, who was 54 at the time, was offered the chance to take part in the trial after surgery and was treated with partial radiotherapy."I had three weeks of radiotherapy but suffered no side effects, other than some soreness in my breast and nipple in the first few weeks," she said."Ten years on, I am doing fine. "Whilst I may have had some niggling worries in the early days, having seen the results of the trial, I feel positive and optimistic now. "I know that I was lucky enough back then to have had the best treatment, a treatment that other women will be routinely offered now."Charlotte Coles, chief investigator of the Import Low study, said the trial had "transformed" how early breast cancer is treated."By targeting the area around the tumour, rather than the whole breast, we have demonstrated that patients can achieve the same outstanding long-term outcomes with fewer complications," Prof Coles said."This approach is now widely adopted across the NHS, sparing thousands of women from unnecessary radiation exposure, the professor of breast cancer clinical oncology at the University of Cambridge added. Dr Anna Kirby, consultant clinical oncologist at The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, said: "The long term results of this study confirm that a less aggressive approach, limiting radiotherapy to the tumour rather than the whole breast, is just as effective as traditional whole breast radiotherapy."Patients receiving partial breast radiotherapy experience fewer side effects while maintaining excellent cancer control."It is hoped that more than 9,000 women in the UK could benefit from more targeted treatment. Follow Cambridgeshire news on BBC Sounds, Facebook, Instagram and X.
Glasgow Times
31 minutes ago
- Glasgow Times
'What are patients going to do when faced with a five-week wait?'
As almost every Glaswegian knows, this refers to the race you have to take part in if you want an appointment at your local doctor, hitting the phones right on 8am – often waiting for quite some time and redialling repeatedly – in the faint hope of getting through. But there's another timestamp which is becoming increasingly synonymous with securing an appointment – the five-week wait. Constituents have told me repeatedly, from all over the city, that they often have to wait this length of time to see a GP, even if the appointment itself is crucial in accessing new medication. I've discovered myself that this is the case, both in my own experience in the north of Glasgow trying to get an appointment, and indeed for my 81-year-old mother. Back in October, when my mother's health was deteriorating, we were told it would be five weeks before a doctor would see her. Then, over this summer, on a separate issue, we were told exactly the same thing: five weeks until someone will be available. So it's not a short-term blip; this seems to now be the accepted waiting time for a doctor appointment. I know there are myriad reasons for the challenges GP clinics are facing, from an ageing and expanding population to the pressures of a retirement boom among the GP ranks. And of course, Scotland is not alone in facing a range of difficulties when it comes to the health service. But these particular failings don't just put patients in danger; they place an unnecessary strain on the rest of the NHS. What does the Scottish Government think many of these patients are going to do when faced with a five-week wait? Sit quietly at home and wait for the day of the appointment? In reality, they will seek alternatives, often at accident and emergency - a department already under significant pressure and struggling to come even close to hitting targets – or somewhere else in the healthcare system. And if they don't do that, their condition might actually become worse, making them harder and more difficult to treat as a consequence. Another unplanned impact on the NHS. The Scottish Government has come up with a range of excuses over the years as to why it's struggling to sort out primary care. But the fact is, the SNP has been in sole charge of health in Scotland for more than 18 years. GPs have been flagging up fears over resources and workforce throughout that time. But some patients are beginning to ask if there's more that the GP practices themselves could be doing. Across the board, the service patients receive can be shocking, from vague instructions via frustrating phone lines to outright confusion about test results, prescriptions, and appointments. Why is it GP practices with several doctors need five weeks before they can see someone, and yet when you go into these places, they are like a ghost town? Yes, the Scottish Government must take ultimate responsibility for all this. However, for genuine improvement, the GP network itself is going to have to get on board with some solutions too.
The Herald Scotland
36 minutes ago
- The Herald Scotland
Why have we let the RMT wreck our ferry services?
Generous pay can be justified where high-level skill and responsibility is called for or work is onerous, dangerous, or living conditions unpleasant. Is the level of skill and responsibility of a CalMac steward or cook, for example, greater than, say, a care worker, nurse, teacher, bus driver, or many others? I suggest not. CalMac's fortnight on, fortnight off plus up to 10 weeks' paid holiday works out at a 21-week working year, which may be enhanced by overtime as sickness cover kicks in. The state-funded pension is infinitely more generous than any other in the public service. Why so? The single en-suite staterooms for each crew member, coupled with gym, messroom and steward-served meals, on a ship that ties up at night, is a level of luxury unheard of elsewhere. On a Royal Navy frigate, ratings share six or nine to a room with tiered bunks. Only lieutenant commanders and above have a tiny cabin to themselves. Only the commanding officer has an en suite. Yet those vital ships can be at sea for months on end. But that's not the worst of it. Successive Scottish governments have so long appeased the RMT, that, to vast public expense, the larger CalMac ships carry twice the crew actually required, terminals are grossly over-manned and the RMT dictates that no alternative be allowed to operate within the state-funded network. Why? They love nationalised industries, because they know they can run rings round generalist civil servants and ministers in a way they cannot with hard-nosed commercial managers. They know that if communities ran their own ferry services, the whole rotten system of privilege and excess would collapse to be replaced with something vastly more efficient to the great benefit of our island communities. Roy Pedersen, Inverness. Read more letters Don't blow a fortune on EVs The Government is poised to announce a £700 million fund to encourage people to buy more electric cars, which will include cash for infrastructure such as pavement gullies for cables to enable roadside charging and grants to make them cheaper to buy. I fully agree that the climate is changing, whether it is due to mankind's pollution or natural causes, and whether we believe and accept the most dire predictions of flooding, drought, mass migration and death the impact will be, as Ed Miliband warns, a massive impact on the British way of life. But how will blowing £700m on a few thousand more electric cars on UK roads avoid, or mitigate, the "climate disaster" when the UK only contributes to 1% of global warming? We should be focusing on resilience. Surely the money would be better spent on planning and constructing proper defences for the predicted weather impacts? As well as avoiding the impacts of other countries' carbon profligacy it would be better way of achieving the economic growth we keep getting told is required to fix the other – in my view greater – day to day threats to our way of life such as poor education, obesity, lack of cheap housing, policing social media, immigration and defence. This is what other countries are doing. For example Indonesia is moving its capital from Djakarta to Nusantara because of the threat of flooding, a huge project which will boost its construction industry by 8.5% every year until 2028. Or is this more about shoring up Ed Miliband's increasingly loopy environmental policy defences and providing an "off ramp" for car manufacturers who face a £15k fine for every internal combustion car sold above their quota limit? Allan Sutherland, Stonehaven. • George Herraghty (Letters, July 12) is upset because his local wind turbines are not turning (Herald 12/7/25) He should be comforted when they are whizzing round and the excess electricity generated is used in the various pump-storage facilities, which can be switched on at short notice as required – for example when "the wind industry is on holiday". David Hay, Minard. Social security: mind the language The piece by Citizens Advice Scotland's Jonathan Boyd ('Why it's vital to get social security right', The Herald, July 12) resonated deeply with me on several levels. As part of my 30 years of service with the now Department of Work and Pensions, I spent several years in the 1980s striving enthusiastically to introduce plain English into the department's communications at all levels so that the maximum number of people could read, understand and respond to them. Those efforts, while initially successful, have now palpably dissipated, not only within DWP but within the public sector at large. Meanwhile, the average reading age in the UK, at 9-11 years, has remained stubbornly and shamefully unimproved since the 1980s. Coincidentally, during the 1980s and 1990s, I worked as a voluntary adviser with the Citizens Advice Bureaux in Blackpool and later in Perth, where I witnessed at first hand how a lack of basic literacy skills and comprehension contributed so directly and fundamentally to the day-to-day difficulties of so many clients. Sadly, in this respect also, the comprehensibility of so many official communications seems not to have improved in the last three decades. At a purely personal level, I am gratified that the CAB's Help to Claim service also recognises the importance of the disadvantages people with hearing difficulties face; a hidden, but nonetheless very real, disability which many like myself are loath to acknowledge. Jonathan Boyd is right; social security should be simple and accessible to all. It should not need bodies such as CAB – worthy as they are – to help navigate clients through a needlessly incomprehensible and hostile nightmare. Iain Stuart, Glasgow. Library assistants and economics With regard to the decision taken by North Ayrshire Council to employ four library assistants to do the work of five librarians ("Second council cuts school librarian posts", The Herald, July 12), perhaps it would make sense to put library assistants in charge of every aspect of the council's work. We would need fewer binmen, fewer teachers and if we elected library assistants we would need fewer politicians. Now that would be a saving. Graeme Arnott, Stewarton. Tariff trouble for US citizens It is widely reported that the US Customs take has surpassed $100 billion for the first time and only nine months into a fiscal year. In the main due to Donald Trump's tariffs, this could reach $300bn by the end of the fiscal year when President Trump applies yet more tariffs on August 1. Whilst this may boost treasury receipts, do the American electorate realise that it is they who are paying? The last major increase in tariffs exacerbated the negative effect of the Great Depression of the 1930s. Let us hope that the MAGA brigade wake up before it is too late. Peter Wright, West Kilbride. Should Keir Starmer get tough with Benjamin Netanyahu? (Image: PA) Who could vote for Starmer now? On the 10 o'clock BBC News on Sunday (July 13) there was yet another report on the suffering in Gaza imposed on the Palestinians by the Israeli government. I don't need to describe the horrendous scenes. Your readers will be only too well aware of the horrors the Gazans and their children are going through. Israel's former prime minister Ehud Olmert is reported online as having said: 'The 'humanitarian city' Israel's defence minister has proposed building on the ruins of Rafah would be a concentration camp, and forcing Palestinians inside would be ethnic cleansing ... Israel was already committing war crimes in Gaza and the West Bank and construction of the camp would mark an escalation.' What is unacceptable from the UK's perspective is Keir Starmer's failure to make a statement along the following lines: 'Enough is enough! I have told the inconceivably malign Benjamin Netanyahu that I no longer support his criminal actions in Gaza. And what is more I will do everything I can to stop him building his concentration camp in Gaza for the few Gazans that are left alive.' How can any voter in the UK so much as contemplate ever voting for Keir Starmer again until he does so? John Milne, Uddingston.
