Spies and SAS personnel among 100-plus Britons included in Afghan data leak
Defence sources said the highly sensitive document contained names and email addresses belonging to people sponsoring or linked to some individual cases. Personal information about MI6 officers was also included.
The identities of members of the SAS and MI6 are a closely guarded secret, and the possibility that such information could have ended up in the public domain was a source of significant official concern.
SAS and other special forces officers were involved in assessing whether Afghans who said they were members of the elite 333 and 444 units, known as the Triples, were allowed to come to the UK.
Defence sources said the dataset also referred to a 'secret route' that Afghans could use to come to the UK.
This week it emerged that the Ministry of Defence had obtained a superinjunction preventing the disclosure of the leak and that a £2bn-plus scheme had been created to relocate some Afghans affected by the breach to the UK to protect them from the Taliban.
That superinjunction lapsed on Tuesday, when a high court judge, Mr Justice Chamberlain, concluded after a government review that the threat to the 18,700 Afghans was no longer very significant.
Some of the remaining restrictions were relaxed on Thursday after another court hearing. The MoD said it would be possible to publish additional descriptions about contents of the database.
In a statement on Tuesday, after the unprecedented superinjunction was lifted, the defence secretary, John Healey, offered a 'sincere apology' on behalf of the government for the data breach.
He later told the Commons that the spreadsheet contained 'names and contact details of applicants and, in some instances, information relating to applicants' family members, and in a small number of cases the names of members of parliament, senior military officers and government officials were noted as supporting the application'.
'This was a serious departmental error,' he added.
Parliament's intelligence and security committee (ISC), which monitors the UK spy agencies, said it would scrutinise the affair, following on from an inquiry announced by the Commons defence select committee.
The ISC asked that all intelligence assessments that had been shared with high court in secret now be shared with the committee. Its chair, Lord Beamish, asked why 'material relating to the data loss' could not be shared with the committee early given that it routinely reviews classified material.
The MoD welcomed the proposed review. 'Defence intelligence and the wider department have been instructed by the defence secretary to give their full support to the ISC and all parliamentary committees,' a spokesperson said.
The decision to seek an injunction preventing the disclosure of the data breach was first taken by Ben Wallace, then the Conservative defence secretary, in August 2023, when the MoD first became aware that the personal information had leaked to a Facebook group.
A judge then ordered that the injunction remain secret, turning it into a rarely used superinjunction. Wallace's immediate successor, Grant Shapps, sought to maintain the gagging order until the general election in July 2024 while developing a secret relocation scheme for about 15,000 Afghans affected.
The day-to-day task for developing the scheme was handed to one of Shapps's deputies, James Heappey, the then minister for the armed forces. On Thursday, in a social media posting, Heappey said the scheme was discussed in the cabinet's domestic an economic affairs committee.
He said the committee 'tried to extend entitlements by smallest number possible', as led by legal advice, with little resistance from other members of the government. 'I don't recall fierce opposition. There was frustrated resignation that it was necessary,' he said.
It can now be reported that the leaked data included the names, email addresses and phone numbers for thousands of Afghans who had applied to come to the UK under an existing relocation scheme designed for those who had helped the British military.
In some instances the data contained further written information about their case and status of their application – focused on whether they had in fact helped the UK or British forces in Afghanistan – but it did not contain addresses or photographs.
This week Afghans affected by the breach received a message addressed from the UK government, sent in English, Pashto and Dari, that warned the recipient's email address had been used to make a resettlement application and that some personal data may have been compromised.
Details of the breach were limited, but recipients of the email – some of whom remain in hiding from the Taliban in Afghanistan – were advised 'not to take phone calls or respond to messages or emails from unknown contacts' and to limit who could see their social media profiles.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Independent
14 minutes ago
- The Independent
Trial date set for alleged Palestine Action members accused of damaging planes at RAF base
Four people accused of damaging two Voyager aircraft at RAF Brize Norton in a demonstration allegedly carried out by members of Palestine Action will face trial in January 2027. Amy Gardiner-Gibson, 29, Jony Cink, 24, Daniel Jeronymides-Norie, 36, and Lewis Chiaramello, 22, appeared at the Old Bailey on Friday, and spoke only to confirm their names. Police previously said the incident in Oxfordshire on 20 June had caused about £7 million worth of damage to the aircraft. It has previously been alleged the defendants had been heavily involved in Palestine Action at the time. On the same day they were charged, MPs backed the Government's move to ban the direct action group Palestine Action as a terrorist organisation. Legislation passed in the Commons as MPs voted 385 to 26, majority 359, in favour of proscribing the group under the Terrorism Act 2000. Counter Terrorism Policing South East (CTPSE) charged the defendants with conspiracy to enter a prohibited place knowingly for a purpose prejudicial to the safety or interests of the United Kingdom, and conspiracy to commit criminal damage, under the Criminal Law Act 1977. On Friday, the defendants appeared at the Old Bailey amid heightened security, with a timetable set for the course of the case. Watched by members of the public in a packed public gallery, the defendants spoke only to confirm their identities, with one mouthing 'I love you' to his supporters. As the prosecution have claimed the case has a 'terrorist connection', it was heard in the terrorism list before Mrs Justice Cheema-Grubb, with the court told a provision trial date had been identified for 18 January 2027. Prosecutor Jonathan Polnay KC accepted that was 'obviously a considerable distance away' and there was uncertainty at this stage how long any trial would take. Mrs Justice Cheema-Grubb said the 2027 trial date meant an 'inordinately long time' for the four young people to wait in custody. She said: 'The sooner the real issues in this case are identified the better for everyone, particularly in fixing the trial date.' The senior judge confirmed the 2027 trial date at the Old Bailey but said she would review it at a plea hearing on January 16 next year.
BBC News
14 minutes ago
- BBC News
'Merciless' killer jailed for murdering ex-partner's father
Derek Thomas would have turned 56 this week. But instead of a celebration, his family held a small gathering in his much-loved grandfather and bus driver was murdered last had been walking home from his late shift in Stoke Newington, north-east London, when he was repeatedly killer was Kamar Williams, the ex-boyfriend of Mr Thomas's daughter 34, has now been jailed for life with a minimum term of 29 years. In sentencing, Judge Angela Rafferty KC said Williams, who had 13 previous convictions, had been "simmering with rage" after arguing with his ex partner and Mr Thomas had been unarmed and completely told him: "You alone are responsible for this killing. This was a merciless and determined attack."You killed him even though at one time you saw him as a father figure."You knew that targeting him would hurt them all. " In a victim impact statement, Carron said she lived every day with "overwhelming guilt"."I once loved and trusted this person. I welcomed him into my life and my family's home, never imagining he would do something so heartless and cruel."Mr Thomas's sister read out her victim impact statement, which said her brother had been "cruelly and brutally ripped away"."I will never hear his words, 'I love you, sis,' again."The judge told her she had "done her brother proud." Ms Thomas described her brother as "a kind-hearted, dedicated, committed family man. He took his role as a parent absolutely seriously."She said she'd been very close to Derek, who was the youngest of 19 siblings, an avid Arsenal fan who loved his job as a bus driver for Go-Ahead London."He loved serving people, working with the elderly, disabled people, women getting on the bus with buggies. He was so committed, even during Covid."She said a number of his colleagues had also paid tribute to him on Wednesday, marking what would have been his birthday. The Old Bailey heard that on the evening of 30 July, Carron had received threatening and abusive texts from Williams, one of which warned her to "watch this space." She called police twice before her father was attacked, but when officers went to look for him Williams had had gone on the run after the attack, before being caught at Notting Hill Carnival where he was arrested after crashing a hired BMW and attempting to flee on from the Isle of Dogs in east London, claimed he had acted in self-defence after Mr Thomas produced a jury did not believe him and unanimously found him guilty of murder, and guilty of having a bladed article by an 11-to-one majority. 'Manipulative and cruel' "He spouted a pack of lies," Ms Thomas was "quite manipulative, and sometimes very cruel to my niece"."My whole family are angry with him. We've had the court case, but we haven't really had any answers. "It leaves me with a bitter taste in my mouth that my brother's life was taken, and what for?"She said she has not been able to sleep properly since her brother's death. "I sometimes have nightmares, wondering what it would have been like if I was there? Could I have prevented it from happening?" The Thomas family hope Derek would be remembered for his community spirit, and how, even after ill health had prevented him from playing football, he had continued to coach young people in Stoke Newington. "I think society has gone downhill," Ms Thomas said. "They're not being the village that should raise a child, instead people are left to their own devices. But there are people, like my brother, like myself, who take an interest in younger lives, who want the best for them."If we could do it as a brother and sister, we could do it as a community."He was a special person, I miss him immensely. "Life will never be the same."
Telegraph
15 minutes ago
- Telegraph
China's ‘tank boats' and a Royal Navy carrier in the Pacific: Keys to UK security
There is a perpetual battle being fought across Whitehall between those for whom foreign policy stops at Dover and those who understand the global nature of trade and alliances and the requirement to secure them. Not surprisingly, most naval officers are in the latter group. We tend to think that the UK should be able to project power far away for many reasons. To begin with, foreign trade in goods and services represents more than 60 per cent of our GDP. Nearly all those goods move by ship or seabed connections, and nearly all those services are nowadays dependent on undersea connections too. Without maritime power, most of our economy is hostage to fortune – it can only function with the consent of others. Then there is the matter of alliances. It's best, of course, to deter enemies and not have wars. Strong alliances make for strong deterrence: but this means that allies must be able to defend each other, not just themselves. The ability to take action away from home is necessary here. And we belong to other alliances than just Nato: we have just signed a new defence treaty with Australia, for example. There are others in the Indo-Pacific who should be able to rely on our assistance, as we have been able to rely on theirs. We should not forget Michael Joseph Savage, New Zealand's prime minister in 1939, who made this statement when Britain declared war on Germany: 'Both with gratitude for the past and confidence in the future, we range ourselves without fear beside Britain. Where she goes, we go. Where she stands, we stand.' Friends like that are worth defending when it's their turn to be in trouble. Australia and New Zealand are also both part of the 'Five Eyes' intelligence alliance along with us, the US and Canada. If you don't think the Five Eyes alliance is important to the UK's security, I can only put it like this: you are wrong. But still, even today's world of daily cyber-attacks on the UK and weekly attacks on undersea infrastructure in UK waters and in the Baltic has yet to convince many people of our need to be able to take action at a distance. Even the war in Europe and the movements of dark fleet shipping through seas near and far to fund it does not seem to have registered: most of the party in government think that welfare payments are more important. Showing that interest is inversely proportional to distance, contested sea lanes in the Black and Red Seas, the High North and most recently, the Strait of Hormuz attract even less interest. By the time you get to the Indo-Pacific, studied indifference has often been replaced by a more vocal 'nothing to do with us'. But there's a lot going on out there. Chinese People's Liberation Army 'tank boats' have just been conducting high-speed amphibious beach landings and live-fire drills across the strait from Taiwan. These appear to be ZTD-05 amphibious light tanks which can be launched from a variety of vessels out at sea and then drive up the beach. As watercraft their low freeboard and top weight would both give me sleepless nights, and as tanks they are probably not that great either. You would only have them if they were essential to some mission you wanted to carry out: and there is really only one mission for China's ZTD-05s. There are those who say that China will never invade Taiwan, but it's hard to believe this given the sheer amount of military equipment they are making which can have no other purpose. And Taiwan does matter to us, in fact. We still (just) remain among the top ten manufacturing nations in the world. One reason for this is companies like Arm of Cambridge, which expects its chips to account for more than 50 per cent of the entire world's data centre CPU market this year. Almost all mobile phones include at least one Arm chip. But Arm is a 'fabless' chip designer: its chips are actually made by other companies, an awful lot of them in Taiwan. At roughly the same time as the tank boat exercises, Taiwan was conducting the 41 st annual Han Kuang wargames designed specifically to strengthen defences against invasion from the mainland. In the longest and largest version yet, 22,000 reservists were mobilised. Initially the drills were focused on how to counter the actions of the Chinese Coast Guard and maritime militia whose harassment of ships across the region continues to get worse: this past week has just seen a People's Liberation Army Navy Type 815G electronic surveillance ship, escorted by a China Coast Guard cutter Zhaojun-class 4203, intercepted in Philippine waters. The Taiwanese exercise then simulated escalation, finishing with a full scale anti-landing operation. The PLA practising this exact operation at the same time just across the way presumably acted as a useful motivational training aid. Meanwhile the 2025 version of the biennial Exercise Talisman Sabre is underway. Some 35,000 soldiers, sailors and airmen from 19 countries, among them our very own Carrier Strike Group, are involved. Our carrier capability has its flaws and failings, but HMS Prince of Wales is still home right now to the largest carrier-borne group of fifth generation jets in the world. The exercise will include the usual array of anti-submarine, surface and air drills, live firings, amphibious landings and air combat operations. Lieutenant General Joel B Vowell, Deputy Commanding General, US Army Pacific, summarised it thus: 'It's effectively a deterrent mechanism, because our ultimate goal, part two here, is no war.' This is alliance in action. So in fact Operation Highmast – our deployment of our Carrier Strike Group to the far side of the world – is very important to our economy and our security here in Britain. Sending up to 4,500 of our service people and all their kit across the world comes with a bill, of course. Much of that cost will only appear after the deployment ends as hard worked ships, aircraft and personnel all need recuperation. If you don't get the importance of the Indo-Pacific, of Taiwan and Australia and New Zealand and so on to the UK, despite the things above I've outlined – and the thousands that I haven't – then that cost is all you will see. The point of this article is to show how interwoven the world's oceans and nations are. A Royal Navy which can (or does) only operate in the North Atlantic or the Channel is not doing the job this nation needs it to. The Houthis have successfully forced much of the world's trade out of the Red Sea onto the much longer route around Africa: that includes a lot of our trade. Even just talk of the Strait of Hormuz closing affects world oil and liquefied gas prices – and that includes a lot of gas that we (and our friends) need to replace Russian pipeline supplies. The ability of Western navies to project power not just into the Taiwan Strait but the Malacca Strait figures large in strategic thinking in Beijing: more than half of China's imports, including the great bulk of its seaborne oil, come through Malacca. This is why China is building a powerful blue-water navy: they know that such a navy is a vital part of their national security. We need to re-learn the same lesson.
