
How a teenage kiss at a funfair led to Jack Woodley being kicked and stabbed by a pack of bloodthirsty yobs... and the 'chilling' detail that stunned the court
Punched, kicked, stamped upon and fatally wounded with a Rambo knife, the 5ft 7in, 10st 8lb victim was completely defenceless as the vicious gang murdered him 'like zombies attacking an animal' in front of horrified onlookers on October 16 2021.
Jack's grieving mother, Zoey McGill, previously released a heartbreaking video of herself cradling her dying son and singing to him in his final moments while he was on life support. He tragically died in hospital a day after the attack.
The unarmed 18-year-old, from Newton Aycliffe in County Durham, had done nothing to provoke the killers, only coming to the group's attention by chance when a random row broke out over a girl kissing a boy at the funfair.
For four years, most of the teenagers, aged between 14 and 17 at the time of the sickening attack, have been protected by a reporting restriction banning their identity from being revealed until their 18th birthdays.
But on Wednesday, Lewis Rose, the youngest of the ten murderers, became an adult, paving the way for the twisted mob to finally be unmasked as one. Their mugshots were finally released, allowing the public to see the faces of evil.
Rose, Calum Maddison, Sonny Smith, Leighton Mayo, Blaine Sewell, Grant Wheatley, Clayton Owen, Joe Lathan, Tyler Brewis and Rhys Wear, were the boys handed life sentences with a combined minimum term of more than 124 years.
Tragically, it was these 10 animals against one. Jack was hunted down and stabbed in the back during an 80-second attack while making his way home from the Houghton Feast funfair, in Houghton-le-Spring near Sunderland.
The 10 boys who murdered Jack Woodley
All of the killers, who can now be named after turning 18, were handed life sentences with the following minimum terms:
Calum Maddison, 17 years
Blaine Sewell, 13 years and five months
Sonny Smith, 15 years
Grant Wheatley, 15 years
Lewis Rose, eight years
Tyler Brewis, 13 years
Rhys Wear, 10 years
Leighton Mayo, 11 years
Joe Lathan, 11 years
Clayton Owen, 11 years
It was Maddison, who had recently turned 15, who delivered the fatal stab wound, but all ten were convicted of Jack's murder under the principle of joint enterprise as they were deemed to be equally responsible.
Most of the boys lied to police in a desperate bid to deflect their involvement. Yet none of them even attempted to suggest Jack had provoked the savage assault that has plunged his family into unimaginable grief.
As one of the boys' lawyers suggested, it would have been easy for the 10-strong group to pin the blame on Jack as being the aggressor. But the truth was, he simply did nothing wrong that night.
He had simply gone to the Houghton Feast funfair with friends when the atmosphere became hostile.
Jack was challenged to a fight by a stranger, but sensibly walked away thinking better of it.
But as he neared the crowded Britannia Inn, then 16-year-old Sewell ran up and punched him and seized him in a headlock, triggering a terrifying ten on one melee before Maddison plunged his 9in (25cm) knife into Jack's back.
He was left to die in an alleyway and tragically died in hospital the following day - his life cut short by a random 'mob attack'.
The 11-week trial at Newcastle Crown Court heard he was targeted for a 'trivial reason' - something not one of the 10 defendants ever explained.
Jack's family were forced to sit through weeks of evidence and recounting their son's brutal death - but have been left no nearer to understanding why he was targeted.
During one moment in the trial, the 16-year-old who attacked Jack from behind, triggering scenes of anarchy, was asked by prosecutors: 'Why did you attack Jack?'
'I can't remember', he replied in a final insult to his victim and Jack's family.
Had he seen Jack 'do anything wrong?' 'No,' he replied.
The teenager said he did not know if there was a reason Jack was attacked but that there probably was one that he couldn't remember.
When asked if he was angry, the boy said: 'A little bit yeah. I must have been to actually hit him.'
Pressed why he was angry, he reverted to being unable to remember. So asked again why he attacked Jack, he said: 'I just can't remember.'
Quizzed by prosecutors how it could have been forgotten after just a few months, he said: 'Dunno. It just went out my head, I can't remember it.'
The boy's lack of memory was described as 'particularly chilling' by prosecutor Mark McKone QC.
Jack had only come to the group's attention by chance. The trial heard how when a girl kissed a boy, the boy's ex-girlfriend kicked off and a minor scuffle broke out between the pair.
Jack witnesses the girls fighting and asked another boy - one of his would-be killers - what it was about. They joked about it and went their separate ways.
Less than an hour later, that boy would be part of the gang who so brutally set upon Jack.
Rumours spread that Jack had threatened to 'punch the head in' of one of the boys - lie that had been completely fabricated.
This, in the eyes of the prosecutors, was their plot to 'create a conflict with Jack so they could attack him'.
When challenged to a one-on-one fight, Jack sensibly decided to walk off.
But he was followed and set upon by the bloodthirsty gang. Mobile phone footage of the attack showed there were shouts of 'get the chopper out' - referring to the knife - heard.
One of the mob was 'armed with a very dangerous knife', while another admitted taking a knuckle duster out that night.
One witness said the youths were like a 'herd of lions' when they attacked.
Another witness who saw the violence said: 'Jack got down on the floor so he could curl up in a ball.
'He was so scared. There were so many punches raining down on him. They were brutal.
'Everyone in the group was just kicking the life out of Jack, stamping on his head
'The lads were savagely kicking Jack, like zombies attacking an animal.
'I remember the terrified look on Jack's face as he was being kicked, punched and stamped on.'
For all the brutality that led to the death of an 18-year-old boy, none of the 10 killers could say why they did what they did that night.
Most said they could not remember or said it happened too fast. The incident lasted around 80 seconds and there was only a small amount of CCTV and mobile footage.
Questions were asked over why so many of the boys had their hoods up. One claimed it was because he felt anxious about his hair.
But the main element to dissect was why the teenage knifeman - who admitted the stabbing but denied intent - was armed.
Jurors were told he had bought it six months prior out of fear of living in a city plagued with knife crime. He wanted it to be a deterrent.
But on that night, he hadn't taken it out with him. In fact, he went home to get the knife just 20 minutes before launching a fatal attack on Jack.
He claimed he'd gone home to get his coat because it was cold - and decided at the last minute to take the knife back out due to the supposed trouble brewing.
Ultimately, he would go on to use it to murder Jack Woodley. He would stand trial alongside nine others - despite claiming they were not responsible for Jack's death.
While Jack suffered multiple injuries as he lay helpless on the floor, he was killed by the single knife wound.
The nine others were charged as the prosecution argued the fatal blow would not have been delivered if the other members hadn't launched the frenzied attack.
By targeting Jack outside the Britannia Inn, each of them contributed to the killing even if their involvement was less than the other.
'The prosecution say all ten defendants participated in this joint attack, using violence themselves or intentionally encouraging others to use violence,' Mr McKone QC said.
The reason, argued by the prosecution, for Jack's death was that this was simply a gang of boys wanting to inflict harm on an individual.
In a heartbreaking tribute, Jack's mother, Zoey McGill, said: 'Jack was my reason to live and succeed in life. From the moment Jack was born he brought light and love to us all.
'The devastation of losing Jack is immense and far reaching. The trauma of reliving this whole incident over a long trial has had a devastating effect on us all. We cannot see a way of recovering from this.
'We feel imprisoned by our grief and trauma. No parent, loved one or friend should suffer someone going to a fair and losing them forever. We will never be able to share treasured family moments with our cheeky chappy blue-eyed boy ever again.'
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Telegraph
2 minutes ago
- Telegraph
Council leader accuses police of covering up rape of girl, 12, by asylum seekers
A council leader has accused police of 'covering up' an alleged rape of a 12-year-old girl by Afghan asylum seekers. Ahmad Mulakhil, 23, was charged last week with the rape of the girl in Nuneaton, while Mohammad Kabir, 23, was charged with kidnap and strangulation. Warwickshire Police reportedly advised local councillors and officials not to reveal the asylum-seeker background of the two suspects, for fear of 'inflaming community tensions'. Reform UK's George Finch, the leader of the county council, said in a letter to the force's chief constable: 'The continued cover-up of the true nature of Ahmad Mulakhil's immigration status risks public disorder breaking out on the streets of Warwickshire. 'The same detail has been covered up today concerning Mohammed Kabir. I am disgusted that one year on from the social unrest that we saw in parts of the UK in 2024, the Home Office and police have clearly not learnt any lessons from the handling of similar incidents last year. 'I strongly believe that the only risk to public order from this case in Warwickshire comes from the cover-up itself.' Warwickshire Police has not denied reports that Mr Mulakhil and Mr Kabir are both asylum seekers. The pair have appeared at Coventry magistrates' court and were both remanded in custody until an appearance at Warwick Crown Court on Aug 26. It comes after protests outside a migrant hotel in Epping, Essex, after it emerged an asylum seeker staying there had been charged with sexual assault, harassment and inciting a girl to engage in sexual activity. One man, from Warwickshire, told the Mail on Sunday: 'They're hushing it up because they don't want an Epping situation on their hands.' In a statement, the force said that once someone is charged with an offence, they follow national guidance, which 'does not include sharing ethnicity or immigration status'. Farage: Police acting against British people Nigel Farage, the leader of Reform UK, which runs Warwickshire county council, said: 'I am afraid police and elected officials are acting against the British people.' In his letter, which was also sent to Yvette Cooper, the Home Secretary, Mr Finch claimed the council's chief executive told him Mr Kabir was an asylum seeker. He said: 'Residents can see they have not been told the full story. If these accusations turn out to be true, it indicates that organised crime centring around the abuse of young girls is present in Warwickshire. This is unacceptable.' He also called for all asylum seekers living in houses of multiple occupation (HMO) in Warwickshire to be rehoused. Mr Finch said: 'Our community has had enough of the Home Office breaking planning regulations to turn sections of local communities into unrecognisable, ghetto-like areas. 'Having my ear to the ground locally, it is clear that there is much appetite for protests to take place across the county. 'Let me be clear, I do not want to see protests taking place outside migrant hotels and HMOs in Warwickshire. Nor do I want to see any form of violent disorder.' The victim is now said to be receiving specialist care after the attack. Mr Mulakhil, who reportedly crossed the Channel on a small boat, is said to have raped the victim in the Cheverel Street area of Nuneaton, between 8.30pm and 9.45pm on July 22. The Mail on Sunday published CCTV footage from a resident's house near the street, which appears to show a man walking with the girl. The pair walked past the property at 8pm, about half an hour before the alleged assault. Accused pair lived on adjoining streets Warwickshire Police said Mr Mulakhil was arrested four days after the incident, and charged the following day. He appeared before Coventry magistrates' court on Monday charged with two counts of vaginal and oral rape of the victim. Kabir was arrested on Thursday, and charged with aiding and abetting rape of the 12-year-old, as well as strangulation and kidnap. He appeared before Coventry magistrates' court on Saturday. Warwickshire Police said in a statement: 'At this stage, we do not believe there to be anyone else involved but we continue to appeal for witnesses who were in the Cheverel Street area between 8.30pm and 9.45pm on Tuesday 22 July and who saw anything of interest to please come forward.' The Mail on Sunday said Mr Mulakhil and Mr Kabir lived in two tax-payer-funded rented houses about 70 yards from each other on adjoining streets. Both properties are managed by Serco, which has accommodated about five asylum seekers in each house. Serco has a £1.9bn contract with the Home Office to house asylum seekers across the country. When the paper contacted the owner of the property in which Mr Mulakhil lived, she said she was 'sickened to the stomach' when hearing about the incident. She said: 'I don't know anything because Serco manage the house completely.' Serco said in a statement: 'We do not confirm individual addresses, nor the names of people in properties we manage.'


The Guardian
2 minutes ago
- The Guardian
Prince Harry denies giving Prince Andrew bloody nose at family gathering
Prince Harry has denied that he gave Prince Andrew 'a bloody nose' during a fight at a family gathering in 2013. According to an excerpt from a new biography of the disgraced Duke of York, published in the Daily Mail on Saturday, the pair had a heated argument that escalated into a physical altercation. 'Punches were thrown over something Andrew said behind Harry's back', the author Andrew Lownie claimed. The alleged fight began when 'Harry told [his uncle] he was a coward not to say it to his face. Harry got the better of Andrew by all accounts, leaving him with a bloody nose before the fight was broken up.' Lownie's biography, Entitled: The Rise and Fall of the House of York, also claimed that Andrew told his nephew marrying Meghan Markle, now the Duchess of Sussex, would 'not last more than a month'. He allegedly 'accused Meghan of being an opportunist and thought she was too old for Harry, adding that his nephew was making the biggest mistake ever,' and told his nephew he had gone 'bonkers', accusing him of not doing 'any due diligence into her past' before they got engaged in 2017. Late on Saturday, a spokesperson for Harry and Meghan said: 'I can confirm Prince Harry and Prince Andrew have never had a physical fight, nor did Prince Andrew ever make the comments he is alleged to have made about the Duchess of Sussex to Prince Harry.' The duke and duchess have also sent a legal letter to the Daily Mail over the publication of what their spokesperson described as 'gross inaccuracies, damaging and defamatory remarks'. The Guardian has approached Buckingham Palace and representatives for the Duke of York for comment. Prince Andrew fell from grace after a disastrous Newsnight interview in 2019 about his friendship with Jeffrey Epstein, the late American financier and convicted sex offender. The duke was stripped of his royal and military titles in 2021. The book claims that Harry and his brother William had 'problematic' relationships with Andrew for years, and that Andrew was also rude about William's wife Catherine, the Princess of Wales. King Charles has allowed his younger brother to stay in the Royal Lodge, a 30-room mansion in Windsor Great Park owned by the crown estate. However, last year the king ended Andrew's allowance, estimated at £1m annually, raising questions about future arrangements. The source quoted in Lownie's biography claims that the Prince of Wales is keen to 'evict' the duke and his ex-wife, Sarah Ferguson, who lives with Andrew though the couple divorced in 1996. According to Entitled's source: '[William] also loathes Sarah … and can't wait for the day when his father throws them both out. If Charles doesn't, I guarantee you the first thing William does when he becomes king is to get them evicted.' Harry broke ties with his family citing the 'toxicity' of royal life and alleged racism towards his wife, moving with his young family to Canada and then the US in 2020. In 2022, he published a memoir, Spare, in which he detailed strains in his relationships with his father and brother. Earlier this year, he told the BBC he had 'forgiven' his family and would 'love a reconciliation'.


Telegraph
2 minutes ago
- Telegraph
Naked man in gimp mask hunted by police
A man who was filmed naked but for a gimp mask and black and white trainers on residential streets is being hunted by police. Video shared widely online shows the individual walking among homes in Lytham, Lancs, in the early hour of the morning. Lancashire Constabulary said the incident took place at about 12.50am on July 18 in the area of Westby Street, Cleveland Road and Bannister Street. 'We are aware of a concerning video circulating on social media of a naked male wearing a face covering walking around Lytham in the early hours of the morning,' a force spokesman said. 'This incident was not initially reported to police and has only been brought to our attention after it has been viewed on Facebook. 'Fylde Rural Task Force are currently conducting CCTV and house-to-house inquiries and would like to reassure you that we are taking this matter seriously.' 'Panther man'and the 'Somerset Gimp' Last month, there were sightings of a mysterious black-clad figure wearing a mask prowling outside a pub in a Merseyside seaside town last month. The figure, dubbed 'panther man' by residents, was filmed wriggling under fences near the Derby Pool Harvester in Wallasey on the Wirral. Some residents said they believed he could be similar to Joshua Hunt, known as the 'Somerset Gimp', who menaced residents in the county on at least 25 separate occasions over five years before he was stopped in 2023. In November that year, Hunt was banned from 'crawling, wriggling or writhing on the ground' in a full-body suit for five years. In Wallasey, the mysterious 'panther man' was described as an 'urban jaguar', 'banshee', and a 'gimp', dressed in a dark figure-hugging suit and a cat mask. Abbie Gilbert told The Telegraph how she 'heard a man making cat noises' and shone her torch to find the figure 'waving his arms at me before crawling up the hill' while she was out walking her dog. 'I didn't really find him to be a threat, just a bit bizarre. He didn't approach me, he just made some weird poses and then scarpered off,' she said.