
How are businesses are preparing for the August 1 tariff deadline? They can't
Thousands of US businesses will also learn their fates. However, after months of whipsaw trade policy, planning with any sort of certainty has proven near impossible.
'I don't think I'll know that I'm out of the chess pieces until I'm right there, but it's clear that I'm getting closer,' said Sarah Wells, founder of Sarah Wells Bags, designer bags for breast pumps that are imported.
Ninety-seven percent of US businesses that import products are small businesses, according to the Commerce Department. Owners have been trying to navigate the complexities of shifting trade policy all while trying to run their businesses, leaving them confused, financially strapped or worse – forced out of business.
'Not knowing if certain key suppliers will have new trade deals or frameworks at lower or higher tariff rates has made it incredibly difficult for retailers of all sizes to properly plan and forecast what the next buying and selling season will look like,' said Jonathan Gold, the National Retail Federation's vice president of supply shain and customs policy. 'As a result, consumers may be subject to higher costs as well as less product availability.'
Currently, imports from most countries (except China) face a 10% universal tariff. But in the last few weeks, dozens of countries have received warning letters from the Trump administration that they will face higher rates unless they negotiate a deal before August 1. That has run as high as 36% for Cambodia, 40% for Myanmar and 50% for Brazil. To date, seven countries have reached a framework for a trade deal. That includes the US's largest trading partner, the EU, which agreed Sunday to a 15% levy on most imports.
'It feels like it's chasing me,' Wells said of the tariffs.
Wells started to move the production of her bags out of China in February, when Trump kicked off his trade war. Cambodia, with a 10% tariff rate, seemed like a much better deal than the 145%, then later 30%, rate on China.
That is, until the Trump administration threatened Cambodia with a 36% tariff this month. That letter came just days before she placed her first $100,000 order with her new manufacturer in Phnom Penh.
If the higher tariff on Cambodia sticks, she will be paying more than she was in China.
'I've tried to manufacture in the United States, but I can't. China, the policies chased me there. Now I am financially invested in Cambodia with the prospect of an incredibly high insurmountable tariff looming this August,' said Wells.
It's not just small businesses – retailers of all sizes are feeling paralyzed by the on-and-off-again trade war.
According to a survey released this month by global accounting firm KPMG, business leaders are pausing investment for up to a year amid tariff uncertainty.
'Tariffs are forcing companies to rethink their supply chains and investment timelines, but strategic change takes time. Nearly half of businesses reported it takes 7 to 12 months to implement significant supply chain adjustments, and more than half are already working to reconfigure their supply chains in response,' the survey, which polled 300 US-based business leaders at companies with more than $1 billion in revenue, noted.
'Companies are just waiting to see how the new playing field will land in order for them to make important decisions, economically,' said Pedro Casas Alatriste, CEO and executive vice president of the American Chamber of Commerce in Mexico.
The American Chamber of Commerce in Mexico represents 1,500 US-based companies that operate in Mexico, including Apple, Coca-Cola and General Motors. Trump has threatened a 30% tariff on imports from Mexico on August 1.
Large corporations can and do advocate behind the scenes in Washington, DC. Meanwhile, small businesses have less power and influence on trade policy— and are often more vulnerable to the impacts of tariffs.
'Many small and medium-sized companies are literally fighting for their lives. And then there are the other big ones, let's call it the GMs of the world, that are pursuing a more active strategy in DC, calling out different stakeholders that are capable of influencing President Trump, while at the same time being extremely cautious on how to do this,' said Casas Alatriste.
Even when a trade agreement is announced by Trump, for some companies, the uncertainty still remains.
'It is all very uncertain because as we know, he changes his mind or negotiates deals, adds delays. We don't really know what exactly is coming,' said Max Rohn, CEO of Wölffer Estate Vineyard.
Mid-sized winemaker Wölffer Estate Vineyard manufactures wine in the farmlands of Long Island, New York. It also imports blends from Germany, France, and Argentina.
The winery currently pays tariffs on its wine imports from the EU and Argentina, as well as on glassware, labels and barrels. Wölffer cannot move its supply chain, and its Long Island vineyard only has a limited amount of acreage to grow grapes.
'With wine, it's very difficult because champagne is from Champagne, and that's not a product you can substitute,' said Rohn.
But while Sunday's framework raising tariffs on products from the EU to 15% isn't 'as bad' of the previously threatened 30%, the cost still hurts, according to Rohn.
The company is currently rushing in 20,000 cases of wine from Europe to the US before August 1. The vineyard has enough product to sell through the end of the year, but after that, it will have to import next year's vintage.
So far, the vineyard has absorbed the tariff cost and avoided raising prices, which Rohn said would almost certainly deter customers.
'We are going to take a wait and see regarding raising prices on our European imports. We will try as best as we can to hold off,' he said, adding that 'we know it is still fluid. There are more discussions and deals and changes can always happen.'
For Wells, she is running out of options. She's already raised prices and is running low on the inventory she has in the United States. Soon, she'll have no choice but to bring in some of her order from Cambodia at whatever tariff rate is imposed on August 1.
'I've already cut all of those extraneous expenses. I stopped taking any kind of salary in May as the CEO, she said. 'We've cut everywhere we can cut. So do we start laying people off to free up a little bit of cash?'
And in an environment where businesses are competing for every consumer dollar, businesses are turning to one another to try to make sense of how to plan for what comes next.
The answer is not always comforting.
'It's one of those things that it's out of your control. When I ask around, it's just a lot of hands in the air. 'I don't know. There's nothing, what can we do?'' said Rohn.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
5 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Endeavour Group exec chair leaves over board disagreements
Endeavour Group's executive chairman Ari Mervis has resigned from the Australian retail, wine and spirits business following a dispute with its board. "Endeavour Group today announces that Mr Ari Mervis has resigned as Executive Chairman effective 3 August 2025, citing disagreements with the board," an announcement on the ASX read today (4 August). Mervis had been promoted to executive chairman in February, following the departure of Endeavour Group's CEO Steve Donohue in March. Duncan Makeig, lead independent director, will take on the interim chair position and manage the search for a new independent chair. The chair position is expected to be filled before the start of next year, Endeavour said. Endeavour's chief financial officer Katie Beattie has also been appointed interim CEO. Jayne Hrdlicka was picked to take the reins as CEO of Endeavour in May. She starts the role in March next year. Group deputy CFO Tali Ross is to become interim CFO of the company. Makeig said: 'Kate has worked closely with the management team to ensure that operational performance and momentum is maintained across our business. We are confident in Kate's ability to continue leading the business as interim CEO through to Jayne's commencement in January.' 'The Board and management are undertaking a strategy refresh which will include a portfolio-wide examination of the Group's performance, key business drivers and execution across Retail, Hotels and the Pinnacle business, with the clear aim of maximising long term shareholder value.' Commenting on Mervis' departure, Makeig added: 'The board acknowledges Ari's service to Endeavour Group, a company we all agree has an irreplaceable asset base and unique opportunities in the future.' In the same announcement, Endeavour also revealed its preliminary estimates for its full-year results for 2025. It expects its full-year sales for 2025 to reach A$12.1bn. The group booked A$12.3bn in sales in 2024. Statutory net profit after tax is anticipated to sit between A$420m and $425m, which would be a dip on last year, where the company saw profit for the period after tax sit at A$512. Endeavour attributed the predicted 2025 figure to "a number of one-off items" in the period, such as "restructuring and redundancy costs and an impairment" linked to shutting its Prowine bottling site in South Australia. Endeavour's final full-year results for 2025 will be published on 25 August. "Endeavour Group exec chair leaves over board disagreements" was originally created and published by Just Drinks, a GlobalData owned brand. The information on this site has been included in good faith for general informational purposes only. It is not intended to amount to advice on which you should rely, and we give no representation, warranty or guarantee, whether express or implied as to its accuracy or completeness. You must obtain professional or specialist advice before taking, or refraining from, any action on the basis of the content on our site. Sign in to access your portfolio
Yahoo
5 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Is Nvidia Stock Still a Buy?
Key Points A major policy reversal on Chinese AI chip exports has significantly improved the company's revenue outlook and enhanced its competitive positioning in the world's second largest economy. The semiconductor giant's data center business has exploded from $3 billion to $115 billion in annual revenue over just five years, yet supply constraints suggest this growth story is far from over. While trading at a premium valuation, the company's wide economic moat and expanding addressable market across AI training, inference, and emerging applications provide multiple avenues for growth. 10 stocks we like better than Nvidia › Nvidia (NASDAQ: NVDA) is the epicenter of the artificial intelligence (AI) boom. In 2025, it became the most valuable company on Earth, minting millionaires and reshaping global tech. But with shares trading at 56 times trailing sales and the stock far outpacing the S&P 500, investors have a tougher question to ask now. Is Nvidia still a buy? Here's what the market is getting right -- and what it might be missing about this core AI stock. China changes everything for Nvidia's growth trajectory A major shift in U.S. policy has reopened a crucial revenue stream for Nvidia. Regulators recently approved shipments of the company's H20 graphics processors to China -- just weeks after restricting their sale. This reversal changes the calculus. Nvidia had taken a $5.5 billion write-down earlier this year, tied to unsellable China inventory, and analysts feared it had lost access to one of its largest AI markets. But with H20 shipments now cleared, Wall Street expects Nvidia to generate $5 billion in China revenue over the next two quarters -- and as much as $30 billion across fiscal 2027 and beyond. Though the H20 is throttled to comply with export rules, it remains in high demand. China's aggressive AI buildout makes even these constrained chips valuable -- and for now, irreplaceable. More strategically, this decision keeps Chinese AI firms tied to U.S. hardware and software infrastructure. Rather than pushing demand toward domestic alternatives like Huawei, the policy reversal reinforces Nvidia's dominance. It strengthens the company's competitive moat just as the global AI infrastructure buildout hits escape velocity. The data center dominance story is far from over Nvidia's evolution from a gaming chipmaker into the backbone of global AI infrastructure is one of the most successful pivots in corporate history. Its data center revenue surged from around $3 billion in fiscal 2020 to over $115 billion by fiscal 2025 -- a five-year run of hypergrowth few companies have ever matched. And it's not demand that's holding Nvidia back -- it's supply. The company remains constrained by manufacturing capacity, with graphics processing unit (GPU) availability expected to stay tight through at least December. Cloud giants such as Microsoft (NASDAQ: MSFT), Amazon (NASDAQ: AMZN), and Alphabet (NASDAQ: GOOGL) show no signs of easing their AI infrastructure spending. Several customers have said they'd buy every chip Nvidia can deliver. This demand is no longer just about training large models. While training powered Nvidia's early surge, the inference market -- where deployed models generate real-time outputs -- is emerging as a bigger, longer-term opportunity. As generative AI tools spread across industries, both training and inference workloads are growing fast, supporting Nvidia's multibillion-dollar revenue streams even as the market matures. Competitive threats are real -- but contained The most credible risk to Nvidia's dominance comes from intensifying competition, both from traditional chip rivals and cloud giants building their silicon. Advanced Micro Devices (NASDAQ: AMD) is ramping up its GPU lineup with the MI300 series, while hyperscalers such as Alphabet, Amazon, Microsoft, and Meta Platforms (NASDAQ: META) continue to roll out custom AI chips for internal use. But hardware is only part of the story. Nvidia's moat is as much about software as it is about silicon. The company's Compute Unified Device Architecture platform powers nearly every major AI model in production today, and migrating those codebases to alternative stacks is costly, complex, and time-intensive. For now, most developers simply aren't willing to switch. Then there's networking, a less flashy but equally critical layer of Nvidia's strategy. Large AI models don't run on stand-alone chips; they run on interconnected clusters of GPUs. Nvidia's NVLink interconnect and its InfiniBand-based networking gear (inherited from the Mellanox acquisition) allow these clusters to function as a single, cohesive AI engine. This integrated stack -- chips, interconnects, software, and systems -- makes Nvidia more than a parts supplier. It's the orchestrator of modern AI infrastructure, and that role is far harder to dislodge than many assume. Valuation reflects optimism, but fundamentals support a premium At 56 times trailing earnings, Nvidia's stock isn't cheap by traditional metrics. However, these multiples must be viewed against robust growth and broadening market opportunity. The company delivered $130.5 billion in total revenue in fiscal 2025, up 114% year over year, with data center revenue alone reaching $115 billion. Gross margin simultaneously expanded to 75%. The key question isn't whether Nvidia deserves a premium valuation -- it does given its dominant market position and growth prospects. Rather, investors must assess whether the current premium adequately reflects both the upside potential and inherent risks in the AI infrastructure buildout. The China policy reversal provides a concrete catalyst for near-term revenue acceleration, while growing use cases in automotive, robotics, and edge computing offer additional growth vectors beyond the core data center business. Looking ahead, Nvidia's three-year GPU roadmap through 2027 demonstrates the company's commitment to maintaining its technological edge. With new architectures planned annually and processing capabilities expanding dramatically, Nvidia appears well positioned to stay ahead of both traditional competitors and in-house alternatives from hyperscale customers. Early innings or peak hype determine the buy case For investors considering Nvidia at current levels, the investment thesis boils down to one fundamental question: Is the AI revolution in its early innings or approaching maturity? The evidence suggests we're still in the opening act. China's market reversal, persistent supply constraints, and Nvidia's roadmap dominance through 2027 with Blackwell, Rubin, and beyond point to expanding opportunities that dwarf today's already massive market. The risks are real. Demand cyclicality, intensifying competition from hyperscalers building custom chips, and geopolitical uncertainties all merit careful consideration. Yet for investors convinced that artificial intelligence represents a generational shift, Nvidia's unique positioning at the intersection of hardware, software, and AI infrastructure makes it one of the most compelling ways to capitalize on this transformation. Should you buy stock in Nvidia right now? Before you buy stock in Nvidia, consider this: The Motley Fool Stock Advisor analyst team just identified what they believe are the for investors to buy now… and Nvidia wasn't one of them. The 10 stocks that made the cut could produce monster returns in the coming years. Consider when Netflix made this list on December 17, 2004... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $624,823!* Or when Nvidia made this list on April 15, 2005... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $1,064,820!* Now, it's worth noting Stock Advisor's total average return is 1,019% — a market-crushing outperformance compared to 178% for the S&P 500. Don't miss out on the latest top 10 list, available when you join Stock Advisor. See the 10 stocks » *Stock Advisor returns as of July 29, 2025 George Budwell has positions in Microsoft and Nvidia. The Motley Fool has positions in and recommends Advanced Micro Devices, Alphabet, Amazon, Meta Platforms, Microsoft, and Nvidia. The Motley Fool recommends the following options: long January 2026 $395 calls on Microsoft and short January 2026 $405 calls on Microsoft. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy. Is Nvidia Stock Still a Buy? was originally published by The Motley Fool Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
Yahoo
5 minutes ago
- Yahoo
US tariffs put 30,000 South African jobs at risk, officials say
JOHANNESBURG (AP) — U.S. reciprocal tariffs have put an estimated 30,000 jobs at risk, South African authorities said Monday, four days before a 30% U.S. tariff on most imports from South Africa kicks in. South Africa was slapped with one of the highest tariff rates by its third-largest trading partner — after China and the EU — creating uncertainty for the future of some export industries and catapulting a scramble for new markets outside the U.S. Tariffs come into effect on Aug. 8. In an update on mitigation measures, a senior government official warned that an estimated 30,000 jobs were in jeopardy if the response to the higher tariffs was 'mismanaged'. 'We base this on the ongoing consultations that we have with all the sectors of the economy from automotive, agriculture and all the other sectors that are going to be impacted,' said Simphiwe Hamilton, director-general of the Department of Trade, Industry and Competition. South Africa is already grappling with stubbornly high unemployment rates. The official rate was 32,9% in the first quarter of 2025 according to StatsSA, the national statistical agency, while the youth unemployment rate increased from 44,6% in the fourth quarter of 2024 to 46,1% in the first quarter of 2025. In his weekly public letter on Monday, President Cyril Ramaphosa said that South Africa must adapt swiftly to the tariffs since they could have a big impact on the economy, the industries that rely heavily on exports to the U.S. and the workers they employ. 'As government, we have been engaging the United States to enhance mutually beneficial trade and investment relations. All channels of communication remain open to engage with the US,' he said. 'Our foremost priority is protecting our export industries. We will continue to engage the US in an attempt to preserve market access for our products.' President Donald Trump has been highly critical of the country's Black-led government over a new land law he claims discriminates against white people. Negotiations with the U.S. have been complicated and unprecedented, according to South Africa's ministers, who denied rumors that the lack of an ambassador in the U.S affected the result of the talks. The Trump administration expelled Ebrahim Rasool, South Africa's ambassador to Washington, in mid-March, accusing him of being a 'race-baiting politician' who hates Trump. International Relations Minister Ronald Lamola highlighted that even countries with ambassadors in the U.S. and allies of Washington had been hard hit with tariffs. However, Lamola confirmed that the process of appointing a replacement for Rasool was 'at an advanced stage'. The U.S. accounts for 7.5% of South Africa's global exports. However, several sectors, accounting for 35% of exports to the U.S., remain exempt from the tariffs. These include copper, pharmaceuticals, semiconductors, lumber products, certain critical minerals, stainless steel scrap and energy products remain exempted from the tariffs. The government has been scrambling to diversify South Africa's export markets, particularly by deepening intra-African trade. Countries across Asia and the Middle East, including the United Arab Emirates, Qatar, and Saudi Arabia have been touted as opportunities for high-growth markets. The government said it had made significant progress in opening vast new markets like China and Thailand, securing vital protocols for products like citrus. The government has set up an Export Support Desk to aid manufacturers and exporters in South Africa search for alternate markets. While welcoming the establishment of the Export Support Desk, an independent association representing some of South Africa's biggest and most well-known businesses called for a trade crisis committee to be established that brings together business leaders and government officials, including from the finance ministry. Business Leadership South Africa said such a committee would ensure fast, coordinated action to open new markets, provide financial support, and maintain employment. 'U.S. tariffs pose a severe threat to South Africa's manufacturing and farming sectors, particularly in the Eastern Cape. While businesses can eventually adapt, urgent temporary support is essential,' said BLSA in a statement. Michelle Gumede, The Associated Press