logo
US Supreme Court to turns away casino mogul Wynn's bid to challenge NY Times v. Sullivan defamation rule

US Supreme Court to turns away casino mogul Wynn's bid to challenge NY Times v. Sullivan defamation rule

Reuters24-03-2025
WASHINGTON, March 24 (Reuters) - The U.S. Supreme Court turned away on Monday a bid by casino mogul Steve Wynn to roll back defamation protections established in its landmark 1964 ruling in the case New York Times v. Sullivan - a standard that has been questioned by President Donald Trump and two of its own conservative justices.
The justices declined to hear an appeal by Wynn, former CEO of Wynn Resorts (WYNN.O), opens new tab, of a decision by Nevada's top court to dismiss his defamation suit against the Associated Press and one of its journalists under a state law meant to safeguard the U.S. Constitution's First Amendment protections for freedom of speech.
The Supreme Court in its New York Times v. Sullivan ruling and subsequent decisions set a standard that in order to win a libel suit, a public figure must demonstrate the offending statement was made with "actual malice," meaning with knowledge that it was false or with reckless disregard as to whether it was false.
That standard has since been adopted in a number of state laws across the country, including in Nevada.
Wynn, the former finance chair of the Republican National Committee, filed a defamation lawsuit in 2018 accusing the AP news wire and the journalist of publishing an article falsely alleging he committed sexual assault in the 1970s.
Those claims first appeared in two separate complaints filed with police that an AP reporter obtained from the Las Vegas Metropolitan Police Department. One of the complaints, Wynn argued, was implausible on its face. A Nevada court in a separate proceeding found that complaint to have included "clearly fanciful or delusional" allegations.
Wynn has denied the sexual assault allegations.
Nevada's top court found that Wynn failed to show that a disputed 2018 AP report containing allegations of sexual assault had been published with "actual malice."
Wynn in his appeal asked the justices to assess "whether this court should overturn Sullivan's actual-malice standard," as well as a related prior court decision. Wynn also asked the court to assess whether state laws like Nevada's that impose the standard of "actual malice" at a preliminary stage of legal proceedings violate the U.S. Constitution's Seventh Amendment right to a jury trial.
The Supreme Court in recent years has turned away opportunities to revisit New York Times v. Sullivan, including a 2021 denial that drew dissents from Thomas and Gorsuch, who are members of the top U.S. judicial body's 6-3 conservative majority.
Citing a rapidly changing media environment increasingly rife with disinformation, Thomas and Gorsuch wrote separately that the court should take a fresh look at its precedents that make it harder for public figures to win defamation cases.
Since launching his first Republican presidential campaign in 2015, Trump has often attacked and even sued media outlets whose coverage he dislikes, and has criticized American defamation laws as too protective of the news media.
Trump for years has been fiercely critical of the news media, sometimes calling reports he does not like "fake news" and referring to the press as "the enemy of the American people." Since beginning his second term as president in January, he has limited the access of some news outlets in coverage of the White House and other parts of the U.S. government such as the Pentagon.
A federal judge in 2023 threw out Trump's $475 million defamation lawsuit against CNN in which he had claimed the news network's description of his false claims of 2020 election fraud as the "big lie" associated him with Adolf Hitler. Trump's lawyers, in a 2022 filing in that case, opens new tab, had invited the judge to reconsider the legal standard set in New York Times v. Sullivan.
"The court should reconsider whether Sullivan's standard truly protects the democratic values embodied by the First Amendment, or, instead, facilitates the pollution of the 'stream of information about public officials and public affairs' with false information," Trump's lawyers wrote.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Tom Hayes: Winning Supreme Court challenge is an incredible feeling
Tom Hayes: Winning Supreme Court challenge is an incredible feeling

South Wales Argus

time6 minutes ago

  • South Wales Argus

Tom Hayes: Winning Supreme Court challenge is an incredible feeling

On Wednesday the Supreme Court quashed the convictions of former Citigroup and UBS trader Tom Hayes. In 2015 he was found guilty of multiple counts of conspiracy to defraud over manipulating the London Inter-Bank Offered Rate (Libor) between 2006 and 2010. Speaking after his convictions were overturned, Mr Hayes, who arrived at court wearing a Kenny Rogers The Gambler t-shirt, said he was not 'bitter' about his experience. He told a press conference: 'I always believed that it would happen. I always had confidence it would happen.' Mr Hayes added: 'This wasn't a gamble for me. My trial judge called me a gambler. 'So I decided today I would wear a T-shirt, a Kenny Rogers Gambler T-shirt.' Mr Hayes added: 'I'm really very grateful to the Supreme Court. We've had a consistent set of decisions from every other tribunal, and they were all to lose, and I got asked at my last appeal how I felt after we lost, and I said: 'Well, ask me when we've won.' 'Because I knew how it feels to lose, and today I'm learning how it feels to have won, and it's an incredible feeling.' Carlo Palombo and Tom Hayes were backed by Sir David Davis (Jordan Pettitt/PA) He added that going to prison, losing all his money, and missing out on five years of his son's life has taught him not to value 'things'. Mr Hayes also said he became a Christian in prison, where he used to have the 'angry test, because the people who were angry, were innocent, because they were so annoyed about and frustrated with the miscarriage of justice they'd gone through'. He said: 'I'm a better person today than when I went into prison. My faith really helps me overcome a lot of the anger to see myself through that sentence. 'I had a lot of stuff. Money enables you to buy more stuff and more stuff on top of that and your goal is to require more stuff again. Mr Hayes was convicted of interest rate benchmark manipulation in 2015 and 2019 respectively (Jordan Pettitt/PA) 'But when all your stuff is taken away from you, and then your liberty is taken away from you, and your dignity gets taken away from you, and your family gets taken away from you and your children get taken away from you, what are you left with, and do you miss the stuff? 'When I got to my open prison, being able to walk on the grass barefoot and see the stars in the sky was such an amazing thing. 'Going on a train, crossing the road, and then when I got released after five-and-a-half years into Covid, walking around Regent's Park in the snow and hearing a lion's roar, those were just amazing things for me, it was so powerful. 'I've really learned what you should value in your life as a result of what's happened to me. I'm not chasing stuff anymore.' Mr Hayes said he did not know what he would do next, but that suddenly the 'vista of freedom and choice' had opened up to him, and he would like to go and live near a large body of water.

Rep. Mike Lawler won't run for governor in New York as Elise Stefanik's decision looms
Rep. Mike Lawler won't run for governor in New York as Elise Stefanik's decision looms

NBC News

time7 minutes ago

  • NBC News

Rep. Mike Lawler won't run for governor in New York as Elise Stefanik's decision looms

Rep. Mike Lawler, R-N.Y., is skipping a bid for governor and will instead run for re-election after President Donald Trump urged him to do just that, giving Republicans a battle-tested incumbent in one of the most competitive House races in the country — and clearing the way for one of Lawler's House colleagues to run for governor if she so chooses. Lawler made his announcement Wednesday morning in an interview with The New York Times and an appearance on Fox News, noting that 'keeping the House majority is critical' and that his seat has been 'determinative of control of the House' during recent elections. 'I'm proud to run for re-election on my record and win next November and keep the House Republican majority,' he said. In a post on social media, he added that he's skipping a gubernatorial bid despite the fact that "I fundamentally believe I am best positioned to take on" Democratic Gov. Kathy Hochul. Republicans are protecting a narrow House majority in the 2026 midterms. Democrats would need to a net gain of just three seats to flip the chamber, and Lawler represents one of the three House Republican districts carried by then-Vice President Kamala Harris over Trump in the 2024 election. Lawler had been openly considering a gubernatorial bid for some time, but Trump endorsed him for re-election in May, before the congressman made his announcement. That endorsement came weeks after reporting that Rep. Elise Stefanik, R-N.Y., a Trump ally who had been tapped to become his United Nations ambassador before that nomination was pulled amid concerns about the slim GOP majority in the House, was weighing a gubernatorial bid of her own. Stefanik responded to Lawler's decision by praising the congressman's commitment to "protecting the House Republican majority," adding she'd announce her plans after the fall elections. Stefanik started a political action committee last month aimed at supporting "Republican candidates across New York in 2025, and laying the groundwork to save New York by firing Kathy Hochul in 2026." Hochul is running for re-election and faces a primary challenge from her lieutenant governor, Antonio Delgado. Addressing Lawler's decision not to run on social media, Hochul criticized Lawler for having "caved to Trump" by supporting the GOP's major tax cut and spending bill, and posting a photo of a box of dog bones, calling Lawler " Donald Trump's Good Boy." Lawler's decision helps House Republicans defend their narrow majority next year, as they'll be able to rally behind the incumbent in a difficult district that Harris narrowly won in 2024. But Lawler is expected to face significant competition as Democrats look to win back control of the House.

Tom Hayes: Winning Supreme Court challenge is an incredible feeling
Tom Hayes: Winning Supreme Court challenge is an incredible feeling

North Wales Chronicle

timean hour ago

  • North Wales Chronicle

Tom Hayes: Winning Supreme Court challenge is an incredible feeling

On Wednesday the Supreme Court quashed the convictions of former Citigroup and UBS trader Tom Hayes. In 2015 he was found guilty of multiple counts of conspiracy to defraud over manipulating the London Inter-Bank Offered Rate (Libor) between 2006 and 2010. Speaking after his convictions were overturned, Mr Hayes, who arrived at court wearing a Kenny Rogers The Gambler t-shirt, said he was not 'bitter' about his experience. He told a press conference: 'I always believed that it would happen. I always had confidence it would happen.' Mr Hayes added: 'This wasn't a gamble for me. My trial judge called me a gambler. 'So I decided today I would wear a T-shirt, a Kenny Rogers Gambler T-shirt.' Mr Hayes added: 'I'm really very grateful to the Supreme Court. We've had a consistent set of decisions from every other tribunal, and they were all to lose, and I got asked at my last appeal how I felt after we lost, and I said: 'Well, ask me when we've won.' 'Because I knew how it feels to lose, and today I'm learning how it feels to have won, and it's an incredible feeling.' He added that going to prison, losing all his money, and missing out on five years of his son's life has taught him not to value 'things'. Mr Hayes also said he became a Christian in prison, where he used to have the 'angry test, because the people who were angry, were innocent, because they were so annoyed about and frustrated with the miscarriage of justice they'd gone through'. He said: 'I'm a better person today than when I went into prison. My faith really helps me overcome a lot of the anger to see myself through that sentence. 'I had a lot of stuff. Money enables you to buy more stuff and more stuff on top of that and your goal is to require more stuff again. 'But when all your stuff is taken away from you, and then your liberty is taken away from you, and your dignity gets taken away from you, and your family gets taken away from you and your children get taken away from you, what are you left with, and do you miss the stuff? 'When I got to my open prison, being able to walk on the grass barefoot and see the stars in the sky was such an amazing thing. 'Going on a train, crossing the road, and then when I got released after five-and-a-half years into Covid, walking around Regent's Park in the snow and hearing a lion's roar, those were just amazing things for me, it was so powerful. 'I've really learned what you should value in your life as a result of what's happened to me. I'm not chasing stuff anymore.' Mr Hayes said he did not know what he would do next, but that suddenly the 'vista of freedom and choice' had opened up to him, and he would like to go and live near a large body of water.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store