logo
Opinion: SB197 threatens the financial stability of Utah seniors

Opinion: SB197 threatens the financial stability of Utah seniors

Yahoo14-02-2025
In five years, low-income seniors throughout Utah, many on fixed incomes, would no longer be able to get any tax relief on their property taxes if Sen. Dan McCay gets his way with SB 197. That's right. Read that sentence again and let it sink in.
Almost 10,000 senior households in the state rely on this relief to help them get by. That could easily be 15-20,000 people. They are your parents, your elderly friends and neighbors, struggling to keep up with rising prices and medical costs while living on fixed incomes.
This is the first time legislation has been proposed to destroy this senior benefit in the over 40 years it's been working for low-income senior Utahns in danger of being taxed out of their homes, which is the reason it was created by the Legislature.
If SB197 passes, the fiscal note says taxpayers might save $4.55 per year in taxes, while costing seniors $930 per year in critical help. What's smarter and more compassionate? That $4.55 per year gets 204 times the return to support our seniors. I think Utahns, with a history of charity, goodwill and caring see the sense in that equation and would be willing to contribute $4.55 once a year to support our low-income seniors. Is it really worth just over a penny a day to force our grandparents from their homes due to increased costs and inflation?
A better solution is Senator Wayne Harper's SB224, keeping the program intact with slight improvements to keep up with inflation and rising costs. What's amazing is that it will cost taxpayers only 68 cents per year, according to the fiscal note analysis! This is the bill the 10,000 Utah households who received this help and those Utahns who support humane tax policy need to support. A prompt call to your legislators and the governor to support SB224 is absolutely critical.
This program is also essential for widows and widowers. Let's remember what happens when a spouse passes when a couple is living on Social Security: you lose the income your spouse was getting, resulting in a severe ongoing cash crunch. Many times medical issues precede the spouse's passing, often impacting the bank account these seniors rely on for co-pays, medications and higher premiums.
Why is this even being proposed? Past reports showed the state's share on the Circuit Breaker program was less than 10% of the cost, with the rest being borne by Utah's counties. Sen. McCay apparently laments chipping in anything, and the fiscal note on Sen. Harper's SB224 estimates that amount will be $4.5 million, a bargain compared to what else our tax dollars go to. How is it that 15-20,000 low-income seniors don't deserve critical relief when last year, just 10,000 students were awarded 18 times that amount, $82 million, through the Utah Fits All Scholarship program? Oddly, in 2023, McCay's committee mandated an increase in costs to the counties of over three times that estimate, resulting in a $14 million cost increase in just one year.
SB197 is also more costly. Many tax administrators around the state are not happy with the deferral program that allows people to not pay their taxes until ownership is transferred. They fear the unpredictability when the numbers of households deferring their taxes vary and their annual budgets fluctuate, while deferral will simultaneously create the need to hire more administrative staff to implement the program when 10,000 households are forced on to it. The deferral program was implemented in Salt Lake and Weber counties in 2023. Dozens applied, but only one household between those two counties benefited. Last year it went statewide and only seven households benefited, while about 10,000 households got homeowner's credit. This failed program is being revamped and the newest experiment is being forced onto the seniors of our state while denying them any opportunity for actual financial relief.
So now you get to make the choice: show love to 10,000 senior low-income households for 68 cents per year, or reap $4.55 in yearly savings.
Please call.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Texas Dems leave state in bid to block Trump-backed redistricting vote
Texas Dems leave state in bid to block Trump-backed redistricting vote

Axios

timean hour ago

  • Axios

Texas Dems leave state in bid to block Trump-backed redistricting vote

Over 50 Texas Democrats fled the state Sunday in an attempt to prevent Republicans from holding a vote in the state House on a new congressional district map. Why it matters: They're responding to a President Trump -led proposal to redraw the districts ahead of the 2026 midterm elections that could net Republicans up to five seats. The Democrats face a $500 fine for every day they break quorum. Fleeing the state now could be politically risky as the vote was due to take place during the state Legislature's special session that was also called in response to last month's deadly flooding in Central Texas. What they're saying: "Governor Abbott has turned the victims of a historic tragedy into political hostages in his submission to Donald Trump," Texas House Democratic Caucus Chair Gene Wu said in a Sunday statement. "He is using an intentionally racist map to steal the voices of millions of Black and Latino Texans, all to execute a corrupt political deal," he said. "We're leaving Texas to fight for Texans. We will not allow disaster relief to be held hostage to a Trump gerrymander," Wu added. "We're not walking out on our responsibilities; we're walking out on a rigged system that refuses to listen to the people we represent. As of today, this corrupt special session is over." Flashback: Texas House Democrats have broken quorum twice in recent history — in 2021 to Washington, D.C., in response to proposed voting restrictions and to Ardmore, Oklahoma, in 2003 over redistricting. Both times only delayed the inevitable passage of the bills they had opposed. What we're watching: A large number of the Democrats were expected to arrive in Chicago Sunday and meet with Illinois Gov. JB Pritzker, who last month hosted Texas state legislators in a strong show of support in the redistricting fight.

Are Social Security Cuts a Myth? Here's What's Really Happening.
Are Social Security Cuts a Myth? Here's What's Really Happening.

Yahoo

time2 hours ago

  • Yahoo

Are Social Security Cuts a Myth? Here's What's Really Happening.

Key Points Social Security is facing a serious financial shortfall. At this point, many retirees and workers alike are resigned to benefit cuts. Though cuts are possible, there may be a work-around. The $23,760 Social Security bonus most retirees completely overlook › Whether you rely on Social Security for some of your retirement income, most of it, or all of it, you probably do not want to see that monthly paycheck shrink. So if you've been hearing about benefit cuts in the news, you may have an unpleasant feeling in the pit of your stomach. At this point, a lot of retirees and workers alike are worried about Social Security cuts. And some are even resigned to those benefits shrinking. But is Social Security actually looking to cut benefits, or is that just hype? Let's dig in. What's happening with Social Security's finances? Social Security relies mostly on payroll tax revenue to cover its expenses. In the coming years, though, that income stream is expected to decline due to a shrinking workforce. The program also has trust funds it invests for added revenue. Those trust funds can help the program keep up with its scheduled benefits for a good number of years until they run dry. The most recent Trustees report has Social Security's Old-Age and Survivors Insurance (OASI) trust fund running out of money by 2033. At that point, the program expects only 77% of benefits to be payable. If the program were to combine its OASI fund with its Disability Insurance fund, then benefit cuts would not be on the table until 2034. At that point, Social Security would be in a position to pay 81% of benefits. Based on these numbers, benefit cuts might seem like a foregone conclusion. But that's not necessarily what's in store. Lawmakers can work to prevent Social Security cuts Social Security has faced the possibility of benefit cuts before. Want to guess how many times the program has actually reduced benefits? Zero. That's because lawmakers have always managed to find ways to prevent Social Security cuts. And there's no reason to think they won't try to do the same now. However, they're cutting things awfully close. At this point, we're less than a decade away from potential cuts, and lawmakers don't seem to be prioritizing solutions. And some solutions could take time to phase in. For example, one option for preventing cuts is to push back full retirement age, which is when recipients can collect their monthly benefits without a reduction. Full retirement age is currently 67 for anyone born in 1960 or later, but lawmakers have talked about moving it back to 68 or 69. If that's a change they want to make, they're going to have to make it soon. That's because there are many older workers today on the cusp of full retirement age. Granted, if this change were to happen, there would probably be a lengthy phase-in so as to not upend the retirement plans of people already in their 60s (or at least, ideally that's what would happen). But because of this, lawmakers can't afford to just take their time. What to expect from Social Security So let's circle back to our key question. Are Social Security cuts a myth? No -- they're more than possible. Are they a given? No, they're not. Whether you're working or retired, your best option may be to hope for the best while planning for the worst. That could mean boosting savings if you're still employed or considering some type of work if you're retired and don't have many expenses you can cut. The $23,760 Social Security bonus most retirees completely overlook If you're like most Americans, you're a few years (or more) behind on your retirement savings. But a handful of little-known could help ensure a boost in your retirement income. One easy trick could pay you as much as $23,760 more... each year! Once you learn how to maximize your Social Security benefits, we think you could retire confidently with the peace of mind we're all after. Join Stock Advisor to learn more about these Motley Fool has a disclosure policy. Are Social Security Cuts a Myth? Here's What's Really Happening. was originally published by The Motley Fool Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data

Social Security Rolling Out New Change in August, Says Policy Now Optional
Social Security Rolling Out New Change in August, Says Policy Now Optional

Epoch Times

time3 hours ago

  • Epoch Times

Social Security Rolling Out New Change in August, Says Policy Now Optional

The Social Security Administration (SSA) clarified on Aug. 1 that a new policy that would have mandated some seniors and others to visit local field offices for routine updates is now optional. In a post on the SSA website, the agency said that it will be debuting a Security Authentication PIN for account-holders starting in the middle of August, noting that it is 'designed to make the identity verification process faster and more secure when calling the National 800 Number to handle your Social Security business.'

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store