Study: Property value may drop 5% if home is near solar farms
The same study found that agricultural and vacant land within two miles of a solar plant saw prices soar by nearly 19 percent—as developers scramble to lease land for future expansion. Researchers analyzed 8.8 million real estate deals near 3,699 industrial-scale solar facilities across the United States. These aren't rooftop panels—they're sprawling fields of ground-mounted panels stretching across hundreds of acres.
The Virginia Tech-led team built a detailed model to determine the impact of proximity, visibility, and terrain—even factoring in elevation to see whether solar sites were visible from nearby homes. Surprisingly, it wasn't the view that affected home values. Whether or not residents could see the solar farm, the price dip remained roughly the same. And the hit didn't last forever. Prices typically rebounded within 10 years—but the short-term impact could be devastating for those trying to sell soon after construction. Meanwhile, homes sitting on larger lots—more than five acres—were largely immune to the drop.
Experts believe the agricultural value surge is due to land near existing solar sites being seen as prime real estate for expansion. Developers prefer building next to existing infrastructure, making adjacent farmland highly attractive. But the study authors warned this may drive up rents for tenant farmers, even as landowners reap the benefits.
The researchers stopped short of drawing sweeping conclusions, noting that the results vary by region and circumstance. Still, the data points to a clear trend: solar farms do impact nearby property values. The study was led by Zhenshan Chen, an assistant professor of agricultural and applied economics at Virginia Tech, along with lead author Chenyang (Nate) Hu, who recently earned his Ph.D. The team also included faculty members Wei Zhang, Xi He, Darrell Bosch, and Pengfei Liu of the University of Rhode Island. The full research was published in June in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.
Chen urged policymakers to get ahead of the issue and consider steering future development toward brownfields—previously developed, abandoned industrial land—instead of prime farmland. But building solar farms on brownfields comes at a price. While the EPA offers financial help for cleanup, many sites are still too expensive for developers to touch. The Virginia Tech findings echo a growing—and conflicting—body of research on the solar–real estate question.
A Loyola University study last year found that homes near solar plants in the Midwest actually saw a bump in value—between 0.5 and 2 percent. But a 2023 analysis by Lawrence Berkeley National Lab and the University of Connecticut found that homes in six states lost 1.5 percent of their value when located near large solar sites. Meanwhile, a separate March study from Virginia Commonwealth University found that more than 30,000 acres of land in the state are now occupied by utility-scale solar projects. And cropland has taken the brunt of it. While cropland makes up just 5 percent of Virginia's total land, it accounts for 28 percent of land used for solar—sparking fears that farmers could be squeezed out as demand rises. Forests, by comparison, have been affected more proportionally—around 50 percent of solar sites were built on land that was previously wooded, mirroring Virginia's broader forest coverage. As the solar boom continues across America, the message is clear: these projects might help fight climate change—but they're reshaping the housing market in their shadow.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Independent
41 minutes ago
- The Independent
Ukraine-Russia war latest: Zelensky names new PM after Trump threatens Putin with ‘severe' tariffs
Ukrainian president Volodymyr Zelensky has asked first deputy prime minister Yulia Svyrydenko to lead a new government, setting the stage for a political reshuffle as Ukraine's war with Russia raged on. Ms Svyrydenko, 39, is an economist and has served as first deputy prime minister since 2021. She played a key role in recent negotiations for a minerals deal with the United States. This comes as Donald Trump once again expressed his disappointment with Russian president Vladimir Putin and announced 100 per cent sanctions on Russia as he pledged more weapons for Ukraine, including 17 Patriot missiles which Kyiv has urgently sought. "We're going to be doing secondary tariffs," the US president said, announcing sanctions on countries who trade with Moscow. "If we don't have a deal in 50 days, it's very simple, and they'll be at 100 per cent,' the US president said, adding that he was disappointed in Mr Putin. Mr Trump announced that billions of dollars of US weapons would go to Ukraine, and said: "We're going to make top-of-the-line weapons, and they'll be sent to Nato.' Zelensky thanks Trump for support as new sanctions on Putin likely Ukrainian president Volodymyr Zelensky said on Monday he had spoken to US president Donald Trump after his announcement of new weapons for Ukraine and thanked him for his support. "It was a very good conversation. I thanked him for his readiness to support Ukraine and to continue working together to stop the killings and establish a lasting and just peace," Mr Zelensky wrote. His remarks come as Mr Trump announced new weapons for Ukraine yesterday, and threatened sanctions on buyers of Russian exports unless Russia agrees a peace deal in the next 50 days. Mr Trump's threat to impose so-called secondary sanctions on Russia, if carried out, would be a major shift in Western sanctions policy. Lawmakers from both US political parties are pushing for a bill that would authorise such measures, targeting other countries that buy Russian oil. Arpan Rai15 July 2025 06:36 Zelensky and Kellogg discuss joint arms production and defences Ukrainian president Volodymyr Zelensky says he had "a productive conversation" with US president Donald Trump's special envoy to Ukraine and Russia about strengthening Ukrainian air defences, joint arms production and purchasing US weapons in conjunction with European countries. The two also talked about the possibility of tighter international sanctions on the Kremlin. Mr Zelensky, who met retired Lt Gen Keith Kellogg in Kyiv, wrote on social media: "We hope for the leadership of the United States, because it is clear that Moscow will not stop unless its ... ambitions are stopped by force." Arpan Rai15 July 2025 06:25 Several people injured in Russia as 55 Ukrainian drones downed overnight Several people were injured and houses and non-residential buildings were damaged as a result of Ukraine's overnight drone attack on Russia, regional officials said. The drones were downed in Russia's southwestern regions of Lipetsk and Voronezh, regional governors said this morning. The Russian defence ministry said on Telegram that its units destroyed 55 Ukrainian drones overnight over five Russian regions and the Black Sea, including three over the Lipetsk region. The full extent of damage from the attacks was not immediately known. There was no immediate comment from Ukraine about the attack. Russia's air defence units destroyed 12 drones over the Voronezh region that borders Ukraine, governor Alexander Gusev said on Telegram. "Unfortunately, there were injuries," Mr Gusev said. "In central Voronezh, several people sustained minor injuries due to debris from a downed UAV (unmanned aerial vehicles)." Several apartments in multi-storey buildings in the city of Voronezh that is the administrative centre of the broader Voronezh region were damaged, as well as houses in the suburbs, Mr Gusev said. Additionally, several commercial facilities throughout the region were damaged by falling drone debris, he said, without providing further details. In the city of Yelets in the Lipetsk region a drone crashed in an industrial zone, regional governor Igor Artamonov said on Telegram. "One person was injured and is receiving all necessary medical assistance," Mr Artamonov said. Arpan Rai15 July 2025 06:20 Trump says his sanctions threat is led by frustration with Putin Donald Trump said his shift in imposing punitive actions on Russia was motivated by frustration with Vladimir Putin. "We actually had probably four times a deal. And then the deal wouldn't happen because bombs would be thrown out that night and you'd say we're not making any deals," Mr Trump said. Last week he said, "We get a lot of bulls*** thrown at us by Putin." Since returning to the White House promising a quick end to the war, Mr Trump has sought rapprochement with Moscow, speaking several times with Mr Putin. His administration has pulled back from pro-Ukrainian policies such as backing Kyiv's membership in Nato and demanding Russia withdraw from all Ukrainian territory. But the Russian leader has yet to accept a proposal from Mr Trump for an unconditional ceasefire, which was quickly endorsed by Kyiv. Recent days have seen Russia use hundreds of drones to attack Ukrainian cities. Arpan Rai15 July 2025 05:16 Trump is looking at making money out of Nato – not saving Ukraine Donald Trump has not turned against Vladimir Putin. Rather, he has just announced a big day of future sales for the US arms industry with a buying bonanza for Ukraine by Nato. With the secretary general of Nato sitting next to him in the Oval Office, the US president warned that Russia would face '100 per cent' tariffs if it did not agree to a ceasefire with Kyiv inside 50 days. He went on to criticise Putin several times for his warm approach and manner on the telephone which he then followed up by renewed missile attacks on Ukraine. 'I wouldn't call him an assassin, but I would call him a very tough guy,' he said of the Russian president. Trump is looking at making money out of Nato – not saving Ukraine Don't be misled; Trump is peeved by Putin and will make money from his irritation out of Ukraine's war but he has not shifted away from Russia completely, writes world affairs editor Sam Kiley Arpan Rai15 July 2025 05:05 Trump pledges more Patriots for Ukraine in coming days US president Donald Trump has said billions of dollars of US weapons would go to Ukraine, including more than a dozen Patriot air defence missiles. "We're going to make top-of-the-line weapons, and they'll be sent to Nato," Mr Trump said, adding that Washington's Nato allies would pay for them. The weapons would include Patriot air defence missiles Ukraine has urgently sought, he said. "It's a full complement with the batteries," Mr Trump said. "We're going to have some come very soon, within days." "We have one country that has 17 Patriots getting ready to be shipped... we're going to work a deal where the 17 will go or a big portion of the 17 will go to the war site,' he said. Nato secretary general Mark Rutte, who was sitting alongside Mr Trump in the Oval Office, said Germany, Finland, Denmark, Sweden, Norway, the United Kingdom, the Netherlands and Canada all wanted to be a part of rearming Ukraine. 15 July 2025 04:44 'Trump did not go as far as Russian markets had feared' Artyom Nikolayev, an analyst from financial information firm Invest Era, said the US president Donald Trump did not go as far as Russian markets had feared. "Trump performed below market expectations. He gave 50 days during which the Russian leadership can come up with something and extend the negotiation track. Moreover, Trump likes to postpone and extend such deadlines," he said. Arpan Rai15 July 2025 04:36 Zelensky nominates new prime minister to lead Ukraine government Ukrainian president Volodymyr Zelensky has asked first deputy prime minister Yulia Svyrydenko on Monday to lead a new government, setting the stage for a political reshuffle as Ukraine's war with Russia raged on. Mr Zelensky also proposed that Ukraine's current prime minister, Denys Shmyhal, take over as defence minister, describing him as holding the right qualifications for a very important job. "We... discussed concrete measures to boost Ukraine's economic potential, expand support programs for Ukrainians, and scale up our domestic weapons production," Mr Zelensky wrote on X. "In pursuit of this goal, we are initiating a transformation of the executive branch in Ukraine," he said, adding that he had proposed that Ms Svyrydenko lead the government and "significantly renew its work". Ms Svyrydenko, 39, is an economist and has served as first deputy prime minister since 2021. She played a key role in recent negotiations for a minerals deal with the United States. Arpan Rai15 July 2025 04:27 Trump threatens Russia with new sanctions if no peace deal is reached in 50 days The US could impose crippling secondary sanctions on Russia if the three-year-old war it has been waging against Ukraine is not brought to an end by 2 September, president Donald Trump has said. Speaking in the Oval Office on Monday alongside Nato secretary-general Mark Rutte, Mr Trump said he's 'very unhappy' with Russia and its president Vladimir Putin, and pledged to impose what he described as 'very severe tariffs' on Moscow 'if we don't have a deal in 50 days.' 'I'm disappointed in President Putin, because I thought we would have had a deal two months ago, but it doesn't seem to get there. So based on that, we're going to be doing secondary tariffs. If we don't have a deal in 50 days, it's very simple, and they'll be at 100 percent, and that's the way it is. That can be more simple. It's just the way it is. I hope we don't have to do it,' he said. Read Andrew Feinberg 's full report here: U.S. will also send weapons to Ukraine as Trump turns against Putin Arpan Rai15 July 2025 04:19
Telegraph
44 minutes ago
- Telegraph
European energy rationing is a dire warning for net zero Britain
It was the first country to develop a stock market. And it was among the first to create joint stock companies, global banking, and trading houses that could span continents. The Netherlands has always been one of the pioneers of business and capitalism, a place where new ideas are perfected. The trouble is, it is now pioneering something entirely different in electricity rationing, a policy that will make it very hard for companies to operate in and impossible to expand. And let's not kid ourselves. Now that rationing has been imposed by the Dutch, it will almost inevitably be imposed in Britain as well, with catastrophic consequences for the economy. If you are running a restaurant in Amsterdam, a factory in Rotterdam or a shop in Eindhoven, it is probably the worst news you could have feared. The power you need to keep your business running is no longer just expensive – it might not be available at all. Why? The Netherlands, like so many European countries, is rushing ahead with ambitious green energy targets, while failing to make sure that adequate supplies of electricity are available as older systems are shut down. The massive Groningen gas field was closed down last year, and while that might make sense once the wind and solar needed to replace it are on stream, it means in the meantime, there is not enough juice to keep all the lights switched on. The result? More than 11,000 businesses are stuck in a queue for access to the network, and it is growing longer all the time. If you need power, forget it. It is even worse for private individuals, with thousands of new homes waiting to be connected to the grid. It is, of course, not just the Dutch. Spain and Portugal suffered a massive blackout earlier this year, with the entire power system shutting down for the day. While the reasons for the failure are still not entirely clear, it looks as if relying on solar power without enough back-up capacity may have been a big part of the problem. Likewise, shortages are emerging in Belgium and France, and Germany may not be far behind. We should not kid ourselves that this is an issue restricted to the Netherlands or to continental Europe. The UK will almost certainly be next in line, and we are already seeing the early warning signs of that. Industrial electricity prices have soared to the highest level in Europe, and that has forced many heavy industries to close. It is a form of rationing, except by price. The electricity companies have already imposed smart meters on households in the hope that a nagging little dial in the corner of the kitchen warning how much power the dishwasher is using might persuade you to use less, as well as experimenting with off-peak rates to encourage us to use less power in the main part of the day. Indeed, given that the Dutch are generally a lot more organised than we are, they might simply be getting on the front foot by putting formal rationing in place early in the process. In the UK, it is more likely that there will be sudden blackouts, with towns and cities potentially plunged into darkness. This could then be followed by rolling blackouts for 'non-essential' industries on a sporadic basis. Whichever form it takes, the main point is the same. But hold on. This is crazy. It is inconvenient for a household, but most of us can have a sandwich for supper and read by candlelight if we have to. We can live without power for a day or two. However, a restaurant, shop, warehouse or factory simply can't operate without electricity. If rationing does become the new normal, there are two big problems. First, it will push many businesses over the edge. We already know that pubs and restaurants are closing at record rates, hammered by the rise in employers' National Insurance. If they have to close down a couple of nights a week because their zone is offline, it may well finish them off. After all, their costs will remain the same, but a couple of days' takings will be lost. Likewise, many retailers are struggling to survive as they struggle with rising business rates, new packaging levies, as well as fines if customers don't buy enough healthy food. A day or two of trading lost every week will be the final straw. As for industry, it is already in full-scale collapse. With rationing to contend with, it is hard to imagine that anything will survive. Next, it will deter investment. What is the point of spending tens of millions on a new factory or warehouse if you can't guarantee power supplies? Or building new homes if they won't be connected to the grid. In reality, this needs to be stopped in its tracks. Most of us agree that climate change is a serious issue and one that needs to be addressed. But we need to plan the transition to green energy in a way that makes sure it is affordable and reliable, as it has been for the last 100 years.
Daily Mail
an hour ago
- Daily Mail
Crappy two-bedroom home sells for $8million in Sydney
A crappy two-bedroom home has been sold for more than $8million in Sydney. But it's not the home buyers were interested - with the 676 sqm block could house 14 apartments, a pub, a fitness centre or a daycare. The 16 Walker Street home in Rhodes, 12km west of the Sydney CBD, attracted a crowd of 150 to Saturday's auction which got competitive. 'We thought it would go for between $7milllion and $7.5million and the important thing was we got a really good price,' selling agent Vanessa Kim told Daily Mail Australia. 'There were so many buyers there, but it was a bit like hide-and-seek among them in the crowd. 'It was the only house like that in the street so it was a lonely project but we sold it for an unbelievable price.' The bids started at $6million and went up in increments of $25,000 and $20,000 to $7.2million. It went up in $10,000 bids to $8million, before eventually being sold for $8,150,000. The two-bedroom, one-bathroom property was the last freestanding home on a street filled with high-rise apartments. Ms Kim, who is an award-winning real estate agent at Strathfield Partners, gave the owners a key piece of advice to ensure the bidding became more competitive. 'It's a winter market which means there's not as many properties on the market but I mentioned to the owner that the best time was to sell was in the winter,' she said. 'There's not so many properties on the market but in spring it's flooded. When there's too many properties on the market, people have a lot of choices. 'I said to the old owner, "you must sell in winter and we'll get a top dollar".' The demanding owner was hoping to get $9million however as an $8million reserve was set. 'It's not a normal house, it has a lot of potential,' Ms Kim said. 'We had several inquiries for a lot of future development.' The home last sold in 2017 for $978,000 and before that, it was bought for $1.7million in 2012. The property is so old that it still has a small outhouse in the backyard, but it has had some work done to it. Developers have had their eyes on the property for some time now as it sat squashed in between high-rise buildings. In 2022, it was leased for $900 per week and at the time the elderly owner refused to sell her humble home to developers for less than $20million – even while neighbours labelled her home an eyesore. She had reportedly fought against property giant Billbergia, who started construction on Rhodes Central a few years prior, to stop building unit blocks around her property. It is understood she lost that bid.
