logo
U.S. admiral at NATO fired in expanding national security purge

U.S. admiral at NATO fired in expanding national security purge

Japan Times08-04-2025
U.S. Navy Vice Adm. Shoshana Chatfield, who holds a senior position in NATO, has been fired as part of what appears to be an expanding national security purge of top officials by the administration of U.S. President Donald Trump, three sources said on Monday.
The information was not immediately confirmed by the Pentagon. However, the sources said that allies have been notified that Chatfield had been removed from her job.
Chatfield, the U.S. military representative to the NATO Military Committee, is one of only a handful of female three-star Navy officers and was the first woman to lead the Naval War College, a job she held until 2023.
The firing is the latest to rock the Pentagon after Thursday's removal of Gen. Timothy Haugh, the head of the National Security Agency and U.S. Cyber Command. For the Navy, it follows the firing of its top officer, Adm. Lisa Franchetti, the first woman to become Chief of Naval Operations.
Trump's administration has taken a cool view of NATO, as well as European allies, since taking office in January. Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth used his first trip to NATO headquarters in February to warn Europe against treating the United States like a "sucker" by making it responsible for its defense.
It was unclear if any official reason was given for Chatfield's dismissal, or if it was related to any U.S. policy direction on the North Atlantic Treaty Organization. One source said the motive may have been related to the Pentagon's crackdown on diversity, equity and inclusion (DEI) initiatives.
The Pentagon did not immediately respond to a request for comment.
In a recent Harvard Magazine interview, Chatfield sounded eager for a time when the qualifications of women in the military would not be held in suspicion.
The article cited one example when Chatfield, herself a helicopter pilot, led an MH-60S Sea Hawk expeditionary helicopter squadron in 2005-06.
"A mid-grade sailor ... asked, 'Ma'am, can you fly one of those helicopters?' And I chuckled and said, 'Yes, actually it's a prerequisite for this job!'" she was quoted as saying, adding that at the time she had been wearing her wings that showed she was a naval aviator.
Hegseth has made the elimination of DEI initiatives a priority, arguing they are divisive.
He has also ended observances of events such as Black History Month and Women's History Month, issuing guidance to the U.S. military that "efforts to divide the force — to put one group ahead of another — erode camaraderie and threaten mission execution." In recent weeks, the chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, General C.Q. Brown, as well as other admirals, generals and security staff have also been dismissed.
Many current and former government officials have said they worry that any national security official could be suspected of disloyalty by Trump's inner circle because of perceived links to those who have fallen out of favor or for having served key roles in the administration of his predecessor, Joe Biden.
Uniformed military officials are supposed to be loyal to the U.S. Constitution and independent of any party or political movement.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Trump Announces 30% Tariffs against EU, Mexico to Begin Aug. 1, Rattling Major US Trading Partners
Trump Announces 30% Tariffs against EU, Mexico to Begin Aug. 1, Rattling Major US Trading Partners

Yomiuri Shimbun

timean hour ago

  • Yomiuri Shimbun

Trump Announces 30% Tariffs against EU, Mexico to Begin Aug. 1, Rattling Major US Trading Partners

BRIDGEWATER, N.J. (AP) — President Donald Trump on Saturday announced he's levying tariffs of 30% against the European Union and Mexico starting Aug. 1, a move that could cause massive upheaval between the United States and two of its biggest trade partners. Trump detailed the planned tariffs in letters posted to his social media account. They are part of an announcement blitz by Trump of new tariffs aimed at allies and foes alike, a bedrock of his 2024 campaign that he said would set the foundation for reviving a U.S. economy that he claims has been ripped off by other nations for decades. In his letter to Mexico's leader, President Claudia Sheinbaum, Trump acknowledged that the country has been helpful in stemming the flow of undocumented migrants and fentanyl into the United States. But he said the country has not done enough to stop North America from turning into a 'Narco-Trafficking Playground.' 'Mexico has been helping me secure the border, BUT, what Mexico has done, is not enough,' Trump added. Trump in his letter to the European Union said the U.S. trade deficit was a national security threat. 'We have had years to discuss our Trading Relationship with The European Union, and we have concluded we must move away from these long-term, large, and persistent, Trade Deficits, engendered by your Tariff, and Non-Tariff, Policies, and Trade Barriers,' Trump wrote in the letter to the EU. 'Our relationship has been, unfortunately, far from Reciprocal.' The letters come in the midst of an on-and-off Trump threat to impose tariffs on countries and right an imbalance in trade. Trump in April imposed tariffs on dozens of countries, before pausing them for 90 days to negotiate individual deals. As the three-month grace period ended this week, Trump began sending his tariff letters to leaders but again has pushed back the implementation day for what he says will be just a few more weeks. If he moves forward with the tariffs, it could have ramifications for nearly every aspect of the global economy. EU members and Mexico respond European Union Commission President Ursula von der Leyen responded by noting the bloc's 'commitment to dialogue, stability, and a constructive transatlantic partnership.' 'At the same time, we will take all necessary steps to safeguard EU interests, including the adoption of proportionate countermeasures if required,' von der Leyen said in a statement. Von der Leyen added that the EU remains committed to continuing negotiations with the U.S. and coming to an agreement before Aug. 1. Trade ministers from EU countries are scheduled to meet Monday to discuss trade relations with the U.S., as well as with China. European leaders joined von der Leyen in urging Trump to give negotiations more time and warnings of possible new tariffs on Washington. 'With European unity, it is more than ever up to the Commission to assert the Union's determination to resolutely defend European interests,' French President Emmanuel Macron said in a statement posted on X. Italian Premier Giorgia Meloni's office said 'it would make no sense to trigger a trade war between the two sides of the Atlantic.' Danish Foreign Minister Lars Løkke Rasmussen told broadcaster DR that Trump was taking a 'pointless and a very shortsighted approach.' Swedish Prime Minister Ulf Kristersson warned in an interview with SVT that 'everyone loses out from an escalated trade conflict, and it will be U.S. consumers who pay the highest price.' Trump, as he has in previous letters, warned that his administration would further raise tariffs if the EU attempts to hike its own tariffs on the United States. The Mexican government said it was informed during high-level talks with U.S. State Department officials Friday that the Trump letter was coming. The delegation told Trump officials at the meeting it disagreed with the decision and considered it 'unfair treatment,' according to a Mexican government statement. Sheinbaum, who has sought to avoid directly criticizing Trump in the early going of her presidency, expressed a measure of confidence during a public appearance on Saturday that the U.S. and Mexico will reach 'better terms.' 'I've always said that in these cases, you need a cool head to face any problem,' Sheinbaum said. With the reciprocal tariffs, Trump is effectively blowing up the rules governing world trade. For decades, the United States and most other countries abided by tariff rates set through a series of complex negotiations known as the Uruguay round. Countries could set their own tariffs, but under the 'most favored nation' approach, they couldn't charge one country more than they charged another. The Mexico tariff, if it goes into effect, could replace the 25% tariffs on Mexican goods that do not comply with the existing U.S.-Mexico-Canada free trade agreement. Trump's letter did not address if USMCA-compliant goods would still be exempt from the Mexico tariffs after Aug. 1, as the White House said would be the case with Canada. Trump sent a letter to Canada earlier this week threatening a 35% tariff hike. Higher tariffs had been suspended With Saturday's letters, Trump has now issued tariff conditions on 24 countries and the 27-member European Union. So far, the tally of trade deals struck by Trump stands at two — one with the United Kingdom and one with Vietnam. Trump has also announced the framework for a deal with China, the details of which remain fuzzy. Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent on Saturday said the U.K. 'smartly' acted early. 'Let this be a lesson to other countries – earnest, good faith negotiations can produce powerful results that benefit both sides of the table, while correcting the imbalances that plague global trade,' Bessent said in a posting on X. Douglas Holtz-Eakin, a former Congressional Budget Office director and president of the center-right American Action Forum, said the letters were evidence that serious trade talks were not taking place over the past three months. He stressed that nations were instead talking amongst themselves about how to minimize their own exposure to the U.S. economy and Trump. 'They're spending time talking to each other about what the future is going to look like, and we're left out,' Holtz-Eakin said. Potential impact is vast If the tariffs do indeed take effect, the potential impact on Europe could be vast. The value of EU-U.S. trade in goods and services amounted to 1.7 trillion euros ($2 trillion) in 2024, or an average of 4.6 billion euros a day, according to EU statistics agency Eurostat. Europe's biggest exports to the U.S. were pharmaceuticals, cars, aircraft, chemicals, medical instruments and wine and spirits. Lamberto Frescobaldi, president of the Union of Italian Wines trade association, said Trump's move could lead to 'a virtual embargo' of his country's wine. 'A single letter was enough to write the darkest chapter in relations between two historic Western allies,' Frescobaldi said. Trump has complained about the EU's 198 billion-euro trade surplus in goods, which shows Americans buy more goods from European businesses than the other way around. However, American companies fill some of the gap by outselling the EU when it comes to services such as cloud computing, travel bookings, and legal and financial services. The U.S. services surplus took the nation's trade deficit with the EU down to 50 billion euros ($59 billion), which represents less than 3% of overall U.S.-EU trade.

U.S. urges clarity on Japan's role in potential war over Taiwan, report says
U.S. urges clarity on Japan's role in potential war over Taiwan, report says

Japan Times

time2 hours ago

  • Japan Times

U.S. urges clarity on Japan's role in potential war over Taiwan, report says

The Pentagon is urging Japan to make clear the role it would play in the event of a U.S.-China conflict over Taiwan, a media report said Saturday, with the U.S. Defense Department's No. 3 official later appearing to confirm the push. U.S. Undersecretary of Defense for Policy Elbridge Colby has been broaching the sensitive issue in meetings with Japanese and Australian officials in recent months, the Financial Times (FT) quoted unidentified sources as saying. Following the report's publication, Colby said in a post to X that linked to the report that the Defense Department is focused on implementing U.S. President Donald Trump's 'America First' agenda of 'restoring deterrence and achieving peace through strength.' He said that included 'urging allies to step up their defense spending and other efforts related to our collective defense.' Quoting an unidentified U.S. defense official, the FT said the 'animating theme' of the discussions with allies was 'to intensify and accelerate efforts to strengthen deterrence in a balanced, equitable way.' But the move reportedly caught Japanese officials off-guard since the U.S. itself maintains a policy of 'strategic ambiguity' on whether or not it would defend democratic Taiwan. China claims the self-ruled island as its own and has vowed to unify it with the mainland, by force if necessary. Colby hinted in his post on X that moves by the Pentagon under Trump had caused unease among some U.S. partners, but emphasized that the U.S. side 'will not be deterred from advancing his agenda.' 'Of course, some among our allies might not welcome frank conversations,' he wrote. 'But many ... are seeing the urgent need to step up and are doing so.' Elbridge Colby, then-nominee to be U.S. undersecretary of defense for policy under President Donald Trump, arrives for a Senate Armed Services Committee confirmation hearing in Washington in March. | BLOOMBERG Asked to confirm the report, the Pentagon referred The Japan Times to Colby's X post and one by chief Pentagon spokesman Sean Parnell quoting a media commentator praising the FT story. 'The Department of Defense is focused on preventing war, with a strong shield of deterrence,' Parnell said in quoting the commentator. 'That requires strength — but it is a simple fact that our allies must also do their part.' Washington is Taiwan's most important global backer and arms supplier — despite not having formal diplomatic ties with Taipei. Trump has refused to say what he would do in the event of a Taiwan emergency, differing from his predecessor, Joe Biden, who deviated from U.S. policy several times by hinting that the United States would defend the island. Tokyo, which also does not have diplomatic ties with Taipei, has also become more vocal about its concerns over Taiwan in recent years. The Chinese military has ramped-up training and drills near the island, unnerving Japan and prompting senior government and ruling party officials to say that an emergency over Taiwan would also represent an emergency for Japan. Those fears are widely seen as a driving factor behind Japan's push to beef up its defense capabilities, with Tokyo saying in a defense white paper last year that China's string of large-scale military exercises around Taiwan likely 'demonstrated at least part of Beijing's invasion strategy.' Japan in March unveiled an evacuation plan for the roughly 120,000 people on remote southwestern islands near Taiwan, drawn up with a possible conflict in mind. A High Mobility Artillery Rocket System (HIMARS) is displayed at a park during Taiwan's annual Han Kuang military exercise in Taichung, Taiwan, on Saturday. | REUTERS The U.S. and Japan are also widely believed to be working on concrete operation plans in the event of an emergency over Taiwan. Recent bilateral and trilateral military drills involving the U.S., Japan and Australia — including this month's Southern Jackaroo and Talisman Sabre exercises — are largely focused on interoperability with a Taiwan contingency in mind. But any military response by Japan would face constitutional and legal restraints, though these have been loosened over the last decade. Much would also depend heavily on whether China struck U.S. or Self-Defense Force bases in Japan. Japanese leaders would have to formally declare such a contingency as being at a certain level to allow the SDF to respond. That process would likely take some time to unfold — a likely concern of Washington — although the severity of the situation could quicken decision-making. Experts say that in the event of a Taiwan contingency, time would be of the essence when making critical policy decisions. 'The allies should avoid, at all costs, a situation in which the U.S. is engaged in the defense of Taiwan while Tokyo debates its response,' James J. Przystup, a senior fellow with the Hudson Institute think tank, wrote in an analysis released Thursday. 'Failure to respond in a timely fashion would put the alliance at risk,' he added.

Trump says he's considering 'taking away' Rosie O'Donnell's US citizenship
Trump says he's considering 'taking away' Rosie O'Donnell's US citizenship

The Mainichi

time2 hours ago

  • The Mainichi

Trump says he's considering 'taking away' Rosie O'Donnell's US citizenship

WASHINGTON (AP) -- President Donald Trump says he is considering "taking away" the U.S. citizenship of a longtime rival, actress and comedian Rosie O'Donnell, despite a decades-old Supreme Court ruling that expressly prohibits such an action by the government. "Because of the fact that Rosie O'Donnell is not in the best interests of our Great Country, I am giving serious consideration to taking away her Citizenship," Trump wrote in a social media post on Saturday. He added that O'Donnell, who moved to Ireland in January, should stay in Ireland "if they want her." The two have criticized each other publicly for years, an often bitter back-and-forth that predates Trump's involvement in politics. In recent days, O'Donnell on social media denounced Trump and recent moves by his administration, including the signing of a massive GOP-backed tax breaks and spending cuts plan. It's just the latest threat by Trump to revoke the citizenship of people with whom he has publicly disagreed, most recently his former adviser and one-time ally, Elon Musk. But O'Donnell's situation is notably different from Musk, who was born in South Africa. O'Donnell was born in the United States and has a constitutional right to U.S. citizenship. The U.S. State Department notes on its website that U.S. citizens by birth or naturalization may relinquish U.S. nationality by taking certain steps -- but only if the act is performed voluntary and with the intention of relinquishing U.S. citizenship. Amanda Frost, a law professor at the University of Virginia School of Law, noted the Supreme Court ruled in a 1967 case that the Fourteen Amendment of the Constitution prevents the government from taking away citizenship. "The president has no authority to take away the citizenship of a native-born U.S. citizen," Frost said in an email Saturday. "In short, we are nation founded on the principle that the people choose the government; the government cannot choose the people." O'Donnell moved to Ireland after Trump defeated Vice President Kamala Harris to win his second term. She has said she's in the process of obtaining Irish citizenship based on family lineage. Responding to Trump Saturday, O'Donnell wrote on social media that she had upset the president and "add me to the list of people who oppose him at every turn."

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store