Edinburgh set to get £140,00 refund over Hogmanay wash-out
Read more:
However the city council has still not managed to recover any of the £812,456 it put into last year's four-day Hogmanay festival.
An official report for the city council has also revealed that is still to be paid more than £250,000 in fees from last year's Christmas and new year festivals.
However councillors have been told that "in excess of £140,000" is expected to be recouped once the insurance claim over the cancellations is settled, while the council said there is a "clear expectation" that it will all the money it is due from various charges, including traffic orders and the rental of key sites including Princes Street Gardens.
Edinburgh's Hogmanay fireworks were called off last year. (Image: Jane Barlow/PA Wire)
The new figures have emerged after it was announced that an overall audience of 2.8 million had been attracted to the city centre over the festive season, which has been valued at £198 million to the economy.
Unique Events and Assembly were last May awarded a joint contract to produce the Christmas and new year events for up to five years.
While the Christmas festival is expected to be run on a commercial basis, the £812,456 council grant is expected to help pay for the Hogmanay festival, which costs around £3.56 million to stage.
Key costs in the budget include £314,000 for a torchlight procession on December 29, £137,000 for a Night Afore Disco Party in Princes Street Gardens on December 30, £890,000 for the Concert in Gardens on Hogmanay and £1.49m for the main street party on Princes Street on Hogmanay.
However the fire parade was called off around 5pm, shortly before it was due to set off, due to the wind speeds being recorded in the city centre.
The plug was pulled on the other outdoor events and the planned midnight fireworks display just after 3pm on December 30 due to the weather conditions hampering the set up of the main arena and stages across the city centre.
All planned indoor events were able to go ahead as planned at venues including the Assembly Rooms, the Assembly Hall, St Giles' Cathedral and the National Museum of Scotland.
Councillors have been told that the event organisers had been in 'constant communication with their insurers between December 29 and 31.
The report for the council's culture committee said: 'It is anticipated that the council will be able to recover some of the grant funding released to support Edinburgh's Hogmanay.
'Due to the events that did take place and the ongoing insurance claim for the cancelled outdoor 2024/25 events, this figure is not currently available but is expected to be in excess of £140,000.
'The council receives fixed fee rental income from Unique-Assembly for the delivery of Edinburgh's Christmas dependent upon land made available to the successful contract holder. In addition, the council receives significant income from charges.
Council charges, including fixed fee income, rentals, hires, licensing, planning permission, building warrants and traffic management orders for the 2024-25 winter festivals 2024/25 represented an income to the council of £668,595 of which £418,700 has currently been paid.
'The council is in ongoing discussions with the contractor in relation to any outstanding payments due with a clear expectation that all relevant contractual sums will be settled.
'The council is aware of the terms of the contract and the potential remedies available to it and will continue to take appropriate steps to recover sums in line with the contract.'
A spokesperson for Unique Events and Assembly said: 'There will be a financial return to CEC following completion of the insurance process.
'In light of last year's extreme weather conditions, we will continue to adapt and evolve the four-day Hogmanay events programme to maintain the city's reputation as a premier new year celebration.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The National
20 hours ago
- The National
55 arrested in Westminster over Palestine Action protests
Metropolitan Police started the arrests on Saturday afternoon, with officers confiscating signs held by protesters which said, 'I oppose genocide, I support Palestine Action' and searching the bags of those arrested. Dozens of protesters wrote the same message on white placards and held the signs aloft before being surrounded by police officers at the Mahatma Gandhi statue in Parliament Square. READ MORE: LIVE: Activists gather at Edinburgh demo in support of Palestine Action Some protesters were carried away by officers, while others were led away in handcuffs. As he was carried away by police, one man said: 'Freedom of speech is dead in this country, shame on the Metropolitan Police.' Police carrying a protester away from Parliament Square (Image: Yui Mok/PA Wire) A further eight arrests were made at a similar demonstration in Truro. Devon and Cornwall Police said in a statement that around 30 protesters were involved in the 'peaceful' Defend Our Juries demonstration. The force went on: 'A number of placards which were contrary to the law remained on display despite police advice. 'Eight people, two men and six women, were arrested on suspicion of offences under Section 13 of the Terrorism Act 2000. 'They remain in police custody.' Around 86 arrests were made across the UK last weekend, including one in Glasgow on Friday, for holding similar signs. It comes ahead of a High Court hearing on Monday in which the co-founder of Palestine Action, Huda Ammori, will ask for the green light to challenge the Home Secretary's decision to ban the group under anti-terror laws. The ban means that membership of, or support for, the direct action group is now a criminal offence punishable by up to 14 years in prison, under the Terrorism Act 2000. Several other protests have taken place in the UK on Saturday, including Edinburgh, Bristol and Manchester. Deputy assistant commissioner Ade Adelekan, who led the policing operation in Westminster, warned on Friday that his officers will be on alert over the use of chants similar to that of 'death to the IDF' led by Bob Vylan at Glastonbury Festival. He said: 'This is also the first large-scale protest on this issue since Glastonbury Festival where offensive chanting led by an artist on one of the stages prompted a police investigation. 'Investigations are also underway, led by Met officers, following similar uses of the same chant in London.' He went on: 'At previous protests, the area between the main march and any counter protest has seen the most heated exchanges. Officers will be particularly alert to conduct, including chanting, in this area and will be working with stewards to ensure crowds keep moving past this point,' he said. 'Where they become aware of behaviour that crosses the line from protest into criminality, they will intervene and take appropriate action.' READ MORE: Man charged with attempted murder of police officer in Clydebank Adelekan said those expressing support for Palestine Action 'will likely be committing an offence and will very likely be arrested'. He added: 'I would urge those people to consider the seriousness of being arrested under the Terrorism Act and the very real long-term implications – from travel, to employment, to finances – that such an arrest is likely to have for their future.' He said the best way for protesters to stay within the law is to avoid 'threatening, abusive and insulting language' or any support for banned groups.
NBC News
a day ago
- NBC News
The biggest political fights over Trump's megabill are converging in Nevada
When it comes to President Donald Trump's 'big, beautiful bill, ' few places could be impacted more significantly than Nevada — one of the country's most closely divided swing states. For starters, Nevada is expecting the law's changes to Medicaid and food assistance to boot hundreds of thousands of residents from crucial social safety net programs. Like other states in similar predicaments, lawmakers will have to scramble to figure out how to find money in the state budget to keep many of those people covered. But the impacts of the law on that budget and the state's broader finances could be even more significant than in many others because Nevada has no state income tax, and therefore is extremely limited in how it can find new revenues. Then there are the new law's tax provisions related to tipped employees and gamblers that will have an outsize effect on a state whose economy relies almost exclusively on casinos and hospitality. The implementation of the new law in the coming months and years will occur as Nevada is set to play a key role in the next midterm and presidential elections. In 2026, Gov. Joe Lombardo — who has walked a fine line between offering praise for certain aspects of the megabill while pushing back against others — is seen as the most vulnerable Republican governor up for re-election. And Nevada's battleground 3rd District, represented by Democratic Rep. Susie Lee, will be a key race in the fight for the House majority. And in 2028, Nevada will likely again host critical contests for the White House and Senate. Democrats are already eager to go on offense against the law. State Rep. Steve Yeager, the Democratic speaker of the state Assembly, said he's already been contacted by many constituents who have expressed 'concern about what this bill might mean for them' and how they could be impacted by its changes to Medicaid, food assistance, energy credits, taxes on tips and gambling. Yeager added he was going 'to make sure that every single voter who goes to the ballot box here next year in 2026 knows about this bill and knows about the impact.' 'A low-revenue state' Approximately 1 in 3 Nevadans are on Medicaid, according to data from the state and KFF, a nonpartisan health policy research group, due in part to a massive expansion of the program back in 2013 by then-Gov. Brian Sandoval, one of the first Republican governors to embark on Medicaid expansion under the Affordable Care Act. Trump's law will institute steep cuts to Medicaid and food aid benefits mostly by establishing new work requirements, restrict state-levied fees on health care providers that are mostly used to fund Medicaid, and preclude the federal government from being responsible for reimbursing states any longer. In Nevada, as many as 100,000 people could fall off Medicaid as a result, according to the nonpartisan Center on Budget and Policy Priorities. But unlike some other states, which may be able to shift funds around in their budgets to build financial support for affected residents, Nevada's hands are largely tied. It has no state income tax and has a state constitutional provision requiring a two-thirds majority to raise revenue. 'We don't have the funds to be able to fill these critical gaps,' Yeager said. 'We're a low-revenue state. … We're in a really tough place.' Nevada is also likely to be uniquely impacted by a pair of tax provisions. Starting in 2026, gamblers will have to pay more taxes under the GOP's new law. That's because the law will limit what gamblers can deduct from their yearly taxes to 90% of their losses. Bettors can currently deduct the entirety of their losses — up until their winnings. Bettors have expressed concerns that the provision could cause professional gambling in the U.S. to fold. And Nevada Democrats say it's all but certain to impact the bustling and crucial industry in the casino-laden state. 'This means if someone wins a big jackpot in Las Vegas and then loses that one jackpot later on, they would still be liable for 10% in taxes on gaming 'income,' even though they had not brought home anything,' Sen. Jacky Rosen, D-Nev., said last week on the chamber floor. 'That's not just bad math, it's bad policy.' Meanwhile, Trump and Republicans have boasted of the law's provision that they call 'no tax on tips.' Trump unveiled the concept during a 2024 campaign event in Nevada, which is among the states with the highest concentration of service workers who rely on tips. 'If you're a restaurant worker, a server, a valet, a bellhop, a bartender, one of my caddies … your tips will be 100% yours,' Trump said of the policy idea during a January visit to Las Vegas shortly after he was sworn in for his second term. The law allows for a deduction on federal taxes of up to $25,000 in tipped income. At first glance, it appears it could be a boon for workers who rely heavily on tips. But economists at the Yale Budget Lab have written that 37% of all tipped workers don't earn enough money to even pay federal income tax, meaning that these people wouldn't gain from the new deduction. In addition, critics note the cap is relatively small and that it phases out once workers enter a higher income bracket ($150,000 per year). Plus, the provision only runs through 2028. Democrats also note that the law froze nearly all of the clean energy funds the state had received under President Joe Biden's Inflation Reduction Act. Nevada, where scorching temperatures have led to soaring energy costs for voters and businesses, was among the states that claimed the most IRA funds used to incentivize clean energy investments and jobs, as well as home energy rebates. As those funds dry up, so too could financial relief for residents and businesses. 'With the undoing of some of the Inflation Reduction Act, losing monies that were in the bill, we're going to lose solar jobs — and I am confident that our power bills are going to increase,' Yeager said. A key gubernatorial race Those impacts will loom particularly large in next year's governor's race in Nevada. Even before Trump enacted the law, Lombardo, who won his 2022 election over Democrat Steve Sisolak by just 1.5 percentage points, was the only Republican governor up for re-election next year whose race was rated by the nonpartisan Cook Political Report as a 'toss-up.' Nevada Democrats have already aggressively sought to link Lombardo to the 'big, beautiful bill.' 'Lombardo will have to reckon with the damage done to Nevadans' lives and livelihoods because he was too cowardly to stand up to Trump,' said Nevada Democratic Party Chair Daniele Monroe-Moreno. Lombardo, for his part, has praised some of the tax provisions in the law, but he also warned Congress not to make changes to Medicaid funding ahead of its passage. 'While my administration continues to assess this bill as it moves to get signed into law, Nevadans should be excited about the potential impacts of tax cuts, investments in small businesses and American manufacturing, and efforts to help secure our border,' Lombardo wrote on X the day before Trump signed it into law. A spokesperson for Lombardo declined to comment for this story but referred to that post on X, in which Lombardo also lauded the law's 'no tax on tips' provision. The spokesperson also referred to the letters Lombardo wrote to Congress and state legislators expressing his concerns about the bill's impact on Medicaid, plus a letter he wrote to Trump urging him to reconsider the gambling losses provision. Lombardo was also among just seven Republican governors who did not sign a May letter in support of Trump's proposed 'big, beautiful bill.' That tension underscores the bind many Republican incumbents are likely to find themselves in during next year's midterms as they seek to take credit for some of the tax-saving mechanisms of the bill while distancing themselves from the cuts that Democrats are already hammering them on — all while trying to avoid running afoul of Trump. Responding to questions about the political impacts of the law, John Burke, a spokesperson for the Lombardo-supporting Better Nevada state PAC, said in an email, 'Under Governor Lombardo's leadership, Nevada is finally getting back on track, and the people of our state are seeing results.' He pointed specifically to accomplishments on affordable housing and education. 'The Governor has been vocal about his support for eliminating taxes on tips and supports a return to previous law on gambling losses,' Burke added. State Attorney General Aaron Ford, who is so far the only Democrat who's entered the race against Lombardo, slammed the law for its impacts on health care and food assistance. He said 'servers and bartenders and hospitality workers are going to be getting played' by Republicans' 'no tax on tips' claims.
Scotsman
a day ago
- Scotsman
Why I'm proud to call 'Scotland's worst seaside resort' my home
Sign up to our daily newsletter – Regular news stories and round-ups from around Scotland direct to your inbox Sign up Thank you for signing up! Did you know with a Digital Subscription to The Scotsman, you can get unlimited access to the website including our premium content, as well as benefiting from fewer ads, loyalty rewards and much more. Learn More Sorry, there seem to be some issues. Please try again later. Submitting... 'Are you doing Edinburgh this year?' It's a question asked of many performers, meaning 'are you doing the Fringe this August?' When I lived in the city, involved in the performing arts for most of my adult life until 2020, it tickled me to be asked this annually. I 'did' Edinburgh every day. I planned to for the rest of my life. Sure, her drinks were extortionate, her rents became alarming, and the old architecture looked down on the shiny glass of yet another student accommodation block with understandable disdain. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad But I loved her. She was a privilege to know – yes, a little difficult to – but worth the effort. Our relationship felt permanent, despite others finding her a mere 'base' or a transient city, to be studied in, 'done', or visited, before leaving. I'd served her tourists, extremely incompetently, as a waitress in my late teens. I'd dropped out of one of her universities in a hail of failure in the year 2000. I'd pulled pints in her clubs, performed on her stages from the noughties onwards. It is a wonderful thing to live in Edinburgh, a city that so many people want to visit (Picture: Jane Barlow) | PA Privilege of life in Edinburgh I'd cleaned her apartments and ferried distraught, often angry, newly homeless individuals and families into temporary accommodation, all over the city, as a homelessness warden in 2008/09. I eventually taught in three of her secondary schools, from coastal, diverse-intake comprehensives, to a posher state school in the leafy suburb of Barnton. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad I knew her – as many writers have noted – to be a city of enormous contrasts. 'All roads lead to Princes Street,' the saying goes, but I was well aware that the city centre, with the arts hubs I was working towards making a full-time living in, didn't reflect her full story. Nevertheless, until my final year in Edinburgh, by which point I'd been a full-time, freelance poet/performer and literary events programmer for a few years, I felt an enormous privilege living somewhere that people loved to visit. Edinburgh was proud of herself, of her culture, her history. Breaking up with her was traumatic. But, frankly, by the time I left she really hadn't been behaving herself. Amongst other antics, her most eminent university caved to shouty activist pressure in 2020, renaming David Hume Tower the bland '40 George Square'. On the basis of complaints over one footnote in one essay, which, as poet Don Paterson pointed out in a recent polemic for the Irish Pages is entirely at odds with everything else Hume ever wrote, contemporary Edinburgh decided to put the boot in, declaring 'problematic' one of her most famous philosophers and influential sons. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad People stroll along Ayr beach (Picture: John Devlin) | National World No regrets about leaving Edinburgh had started to feel hostile. The increase in 'cancel culture' activism across the arts, and a subsequent change in finances, meant divorce was necessary. I packed up my scuffed memories, moving to the seaside town of Ayr, near where I grew up spending my teenage-hood dreaming of leaving for a life in Edinburgh. Ten days later, the Covid lockdown, 2020 was discombobulating... Five years in, however, I've no regrets. Apart from anything else, my writer's income wouldn't get me a mortgage on a letterbox in Edinburgh. I'm now in the nicest, most affordable apartment I've ever lived in. Yes, the seagulls are boisterous: one of them in particular should be on the stalking register for the way it eyes my cats through the window. But the salt cure of being next to the sea is priceless. My neighbours are friendly. The skies seem huge after the cramped, no-sunlight tenements of Tollcross. And, if I can thank those pesky Edinburgh arts activists for something, I experienced the otherwise bleak isolation of Covid in a place of serious beauty. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad The River Ayr, where I used to go when skiving school 25 years prior, was a particular source of solace in those early days. Coming to terms with successfully escaping Ayrshire, only to be chewed up and spat out by the city, returning as someone then pushing 40, wasn't exactly the life-plan. 'That's my girl' But, in confirmation that my wee town truly is home now, I enjoyed my reaction to a recent headline. ''Scotland's worst seaside resort' revealed as locals blast 'ghost town' full of empty shops that's 'only getting worse'' led the story in The Sun. According to a survey of 3,800 Which? magazine readers, Ayr failed to impress many tourists, with residents also eager to point out the obvious decline of the town over the last three decades. My response? A chuckle and a 'that's my girl!' Like the early philosophers urged, Ayr knows itself. As with Edinburgh, it has a rich history worth exploring. But nobody denies the grim state of this once-thriving holiday town; nobody tries to put a shine on the stark situation. While there are pockets of affluence, like many Ayrshire towns there is serious rural poverty, a lack of affordable housing, and schools that struggle to improve educational attainment. While some have responded to the Which? survey by extolling the virtues of good transport links to Glasgow, the plentiful family-oriented activities and beautiful countryside (all true), as a resident it's unavoidable: Ayr is tired, needing more than sticking-plaster solutions to solve its problems. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad Nevertheless, I'm certain residents wouldn't indulge activists trying to rename Burns Statue Square, denigrating the celebrated Ayrshire-born poet's entire work, despite his arguably 'problematic' utterances. While the town struggles, it's characterised by real potential; people trying to improve things – alongside those who rightly chuff about the seeming lack of vision from local authorities. Much as with Edinburgh, Ayr's taken some getting used to, particularly after so long away from her. Despite the divorce, Edina and I are also back on – albeit cautious – speaking terms. But Ayr is, proudly, home, for the foreseeable.
