Trump hasn't ruled out funneling longer-range missiles to Ukraine
In conversations with European allies over the past several weeks, Trump has not ruled out allowing certain offensive weapons into Ukraine, including products Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky has previously requested from the United States but not yet received, the officials said.
Trump has also asked about Ukraine's ability to carry out strikes deep inside Russia in recent weeks in an effort to increase pressure on the Kremlin to drive an end to the war, according to a source briefed on the conversation.
In a recent phone call with Zelensky, Trump asked about Ukraine's ability to hit both Moscow and St. Petersburg, the source said, a question first reported by the Financial Times.
A US official and a White House official said the question was one of many the president asked about the conflict on the call, and seemed to be raised in passing.
But the Ukrainians were stunned and took Trump's ideas seriously. Zelensky said that the strikes could be carried out if the Ukrainians had the weapons needed, the first source said. After the conversation, there has been follow-up discussion between Ukraine, other European countries and the US about long-range systems that could be given to Ukraine, the source said.
Ukraine has already been reaching Moscow and the St. Petersburg area with drone strikes.
After the Financial Times reported on Trump's question, the White House said Trump's words had been taken out of context.
'President Trump was merely asking a question, not encouraging further killing. He's working tirelessly to stop the killing and end this war,' press secretary Karoline Leavitt told CNN.
The episode underscores the current dynamic between the two countries, as Zelensky works tirelessly to get Trump's ear and does not want to squander what might be limited support and engagement from the United States.
On Monday, Trump's NATO envoy Matt Whitaker said the immediate focus on shipping weapons to Ukraine was on defensive systems, like the Patriot missile batteries. But he didn't rule out providing offensive weapons.
'All weapons are both offensive and defensive,' he said. 'Obviously an air defense system is important and critical for the situation, but at the same time we're not taking anything off the table.'
At the end of his term, President Joe Biden allowed shipments of powerful long-range Army Tactical Missile System (ATACMS) missiles to Ukraine for use inside Russia, though those weapons would not be able to reach the two cities Trump reportedly questioned Zelensky about in his phone call.
Trump called the move 'stupid' and a 'big mistake,' and questioned why he wasn't consulted as he was preparing to take office.
Ukraine has also previously requested — but not yet received – Joint Air-to-Surface Standoff Missiles, or JASSMs, which are fired from F-16 fighter jets. European nations have previously provided those jets to Ukraine.
For now, however, the priority appears to be getting Ukraine air defense systems — namely, the Patriot batteries that can intercept Russian ballistic missiles. Those products will be the first to enter the new weapons pipeline that Trump announced Monday involving European nations purchasing the products and then transferring them to Ukraine.
The weapons will be available to ship quickly from existing stockpiles in Europe, and will likely be backfilled by new purchases from the US by European nations.
'When it comes to ammunition and missiles, we will work on this from now on, every hour, making sure that the stuff gets into Ukraine. But of course, we know it's not only Patriots,' NATO Secretary General Mark Rutte told CNN's Jake Tapper on Monday, citing other systems used to intercept cruise missiles as essential to Ukraine's defenses.
'This is really discussing everything the US can still deliver without hurting the defense of the US itself,' he said.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
19 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Hassett grabs pole position in race to be Trump's new Fed Chair
(Bloomberg) — Kevin Hassett, one of President Donald Trump's longest-serving economic aides, is the early frontrunner to replace Jerome Powell as Federal Reserve chief next year, according to people familiar with the process. Hassett, director of the National Economic Council, and Kevin Warsh are the top two contenders in an Apprentice-like contest run by Trump out of the White House. Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent is advising on selection — but could get the job himself if others fail to impress — while Fed governor Christopher Waller remains the dark horse, said people familiar with the deliberations. Trump has raised the succession stakes by routinely blasting Powell for keeping interest rates too high, and saying he'll pick a Fed chair who wants to cut them. It's left investors worried that the central bank's autonomy from political pressure — key to its ability to fight inflation and support the dollar — is in growing danger. Hassett has echoed Trump's Fed critique. In a Fox Business interview this month he noted that the central bank is an independent agency. But he said that by cutting rates before last year's presidential election — and then keeping them on hold more recently, citing inflation risk from tariffs – it deserved the president's barbs. 'I think that that raises the specter that they're not being non-partisan, they're not being independent,' Hassett said. 'There to Serve' Once seen as a measured right-leaning economist, aligned with politicians like Mitt Romney, Hassett has been in the Trump orbit for close to a decade now. He's approached the National Economic Council job very differently from predecessors like Gary Cohn, who sought to damp down the president's impulses on tariffs – and didn't last long. Hassett has gone full MAGA instead – amplifying Trump's instincts on trade, taxes, inflation or the Fed, in myriad TV appearances. That's what it takes in Trumpworld, according to Stephen Myrow, who runs Beacon Policy Advisers, a Washington research firm. 'Anyone who has survived this long under Trump, they're not coming in with an ideology that they want to advance,' Myrow said. 'They're not there to serve a school of monetary thought. They're there to serve Trump.' What remains to be seen is how that service ethos applies to the next Fed chair – a job that's supposed to be walled off from administration priorities. It's a multi-trillion-dollar question. Economists say autonomous central banks are better at taming inflation, so a Fed chief seen as acquiescent to the White House could trigger a slump in Treasury markets. Trump's threats to fire Powell have added to financial jitters set off by his trade war. The president has taken the opposite tack, arguing that excessive Fed rates add hundreds of billions a year to America's debt service costs. 'Most Qualified Individuals' The process of choosing Powell is officially under way, Bessent told Bloomberg TV on Tuesday. Along with the Treasury chief, the narrow circle of aides involved include White House chief-of-staff Susie Wiles – who's advised on Trump's key hiring decisions, and is steeped in the politics of trying to ensure the US economy is thriving by next year's midterm election. Trump allies say the president is deeply engaged in the choice. One adviser predicted the interview process would move quickly, since the president tends to act once he gets an idea in his head. Hassett has been telling people both inside and outside the administration that he very much wants the job — though he plays it coy when asked on TV. Hassett did not respond to requests for comment. Trump, asked by reporters on Tuesday if Bessent is the No. 1 contender to lead the Fed said that he is 'an option' and complimented the Treasury secretary for 'the job he's doing.' 'With Joe Biden's inflation crisis firmly past us, President Trump has been clear about the need for the Federal Reserve's monetary policy to complement the administration's pro-growth agenda,' said White House spokesman Kush Desai. 'He will continue to nominate the most qualified individuals who can best serve the American people.' As NEC chief, Hassett benefits from daily proximity to the president, with an office in the West Wing. Warsh by contrast, spends much of his time shuttling between the Hoover Institution in California and New York City. Trump interviewed Warsh — a former Fed governor — for the chair role in 2017, but opted for Powell instead because he thought Warsh's views were too hawkish and he looked too young for the job. Hassett served as the head of the Council of Economic Advisers during Trump's first term. His earlier career includes stints as a Fed economist and at the American Enterprise Institute, where he was director of research. Hassett is known as an expert on tax, and has written widely on the topic. But perhaps his most notorious book was 'Dow 36,000,' predicting a surge in the US stock market, which was published shortly before the dotcom bubble burst. The Dow eventually hit the level predicted in his title more than two decades later. 'Very Confusing' During Trump's years in exile in Florida between his first and second terms, Hassett – who was doing some work for Jared Kushner's investment fund Affinity Partners at the time — also frequently got together with Trump to talk through economic ideas. Both men share a similar approach to the world and a tendency to store up grievances based on perceived slights, said one longtime friend of Hassett. Trump has been voicing grievances with Powell almost ever since naming him to the top Fed job. Complaints have escalated into open anger during Trump's second term, when he nicknamed Powell 'Too Late' and often resorted to harsher insults. Powell's Fed has kept interest rates unchanged this year, after lowering them by a percentage point over the last few months of 2024. US central bankers say there's no rush to cut further, pointing to solid growth and a healthy job market, and arguing that they need time to see whether tariffs will boost inflation, like most economists expect. So far, consumer prices haven't seen much of a tariff jump – though there were signs in the June numbers, published on Tuesday, that companies are beginning to pass on trade-related costs. That's reinforced expectations that the Fed will stand pat again at its next rates meeting on July 29-30. Markets still expect a couple of cuts by year-end. Echoing Trump's 'too late' jibe, Hassett accused the Fed in his Fox interview of 'falling behind the curve' compared to what other central banks are doing. In another interview with Fox Business on Wednesday, Hassett suggested the Fed had strayed from the 'normal correlation' between policy rates in the US and in Europe, arguing that provided more evidence the US central bank was too slow in cutting. He's also joined other Trump aides and Republican lawmakers in voicing alarm about the rising costs of the Fed's headquarter renovations – which has become the president's latest stick to beat Powell with. One goal may be to pressure Powell to leave the Fed board when his tenure as chair ends in May next year — rather than staying on in the role of governor, where his term extends into 2028. The administration's argument is essentially that Trump's Fed pick — whether it's Hassett or someone else — needs a clear run at the job. 'Traditionally, the Fed chair also steps down as a governor,' Bessent told Bloomberg TV on Tuesday. 'There's been a lot of talk of a shadow Fed chair causing confusion in advance of his or her nomination. And I can tell you, I think it'd be very confusing for the market for a former Fed chair to stay on also.' —With assistance from Charlie Zuza. (Updates with additional Hasset comments in 27th paragraph.) ©2025 Bloomberg L.P.
Yahoo
19 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Traders boost bets on Fed rate cuts
(Reuters) -Short-term U.S. interest-rate futures rose on Wednesday after a report that President Donald Trump is likely to fire Federal Reserve Jerome Powell soon, with traders now betting on rate cuts starting in September and at least one more by December. Trump has railed against Powell for not cutting rates. A recent Supreme Court ruling suggests no change to the long-held understanding that the law prohibits a president from firing a Fed chair over a policy difference. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
Miami Herald
20 minutes ago
- Miami Herald
Share of Americans who ‘strongly approve' of Trump hits all-time low in CNN poll
The share of Americans who strongly approve of President Donald Trump's job performance has hit an all-time low, according to new polling. In the latest CNN/SSRS survey, 21% of respondents said they approve strongly of the way 'Trump is handling his job as president.' This is the lowest such figure recorded in any CNN/SSRS survey spanning both of Trump's terms in office. It also continues a slight decline in the share of Americans who wholeheartedly back the president. In a March poll, 26% said they strongly approved of Trump, while in April, 22% said the same. That said, Trump's net approval — the share of Americans who strongly or moderately approve — remains about average compared to past ratings. In the latest survey, the president garnered a 42% net approval rating, up from 41% in April and down from 45% in March. His net disapproval — a combination of the shares who strongly and moderately disapprove — by contrast, stood at 58%, which is down from 59% in March and up from 54% in April. The survey sampled 1,057 U.S. adults July 10-13 and has a margin of error of 3.5 percentage points. It comes on the heels of a whirlwind news cycle in recent weeks. In late June, Trump authorized strikes on several of Iran's nuclear facilities, escalating U.S. involvement in the region. And, on July 4, following extensive debate and narrow passage in Congress, he signed the sweeping Republican-backed spending package known as the 'One Big Beautiful Bill' into law. Around the same time, the Trump administration concluded its high-profile investigation into Jeffrey Epstein, determining that no 'client list' exists and finding no evidence that could lead to charges against any third parties, resulting in widespread skepticism from the public, a YouGov poll found.
