What is a proscribed organisation?
But what is proscription and what does it mean for an organisation to be proscribed?
– What is a proscribed organisation?
According to the Government website, under the Terrorism Act 2000, the Home Secretary may proscribe an organisation if they believe it is concerned in terrorism, and it is proportionate to do so.
Under the law this means the organisation commits or takes part in acts of terrorism, prepares for terrorism, promotes or encourages terrorism (including the unlawful glorification of terrorism), or is otherwise concerned in terrorism.
Once an organisation is proscribed it is illegal to join or show support for it.
– What does terrorism mean when talking about proscription?
As defined in the Act, terrorism means the use or threat of action which involves serious violence against a person, involves serious damage to property, endangers a person's life (other than that of the person committing the act), creates a serious risk to the health or safety of the public or section of the public or is designed seriously to interfere with or seriously to disrupt an electronic system.
The definition also sets out that the use or threat of such action must be designed to influence the government or an international governmental organisation or to intimidate the public or a section of the public.
Additionally, it must be undertaken for the purpose of advancing a political, religious, racial or ideological cause.
– What factors are taken into consideration when determining whether proscription is proportionate?
According to the Government website, the Home Secretary will take into account the nature and scale of an organisation's activities, the specific threat that it poses to the country, and the specific threat that it poses to British nationals overseas.
The Home Secretary will also consider the extent of the organisation's presence in the UK, and the need to support other members of the international community in the global fight against terrorism.
– Which other groups have been designated as proscribed organisations?
There are currently 81 international terrorist groups proscribed under the Terrorism Act 2000 and 14 organisations in Northern Ireland proscribed under previous legislation.
The most recent proscription orders concerned Hamas, the Wagner Group, Hizb ut Tahrir and Terrorgram.
Other organisations on the list include Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant (Isil), and various aliases, and al Qaida.
– Once an organisation is proscribed, what becomes illegal?
It becomes a criminal offence to belong, or profess to belong, to a proscribed organisation in the UK or overseas, or invite support for a proscribed organisation.
It is also illegal to express an opinion or belief that is supportive of a proscribed organisation, reckless as to whether a person to whom the expression is directed will be encouraged to support a proscribed organisation, express an opinion or belief that is supportive of a proscribed organisation, reckless as to whether a person to whom the expression is directed will be encouraged to support a proscribed organisation.
Other offences include arranging, managing or assisting in arranging or managing a meeting in the knowledge that the meeting is to support or further the activities of a proscribed organisation.
It is also an offence to wear clothing or carry or display articles in public in such circumstances as to arouse reasonable suspicion that the individual is a member or supporter of a proscribed organisation, or publish an image of an item of clothing or other article, such as a flag or logo, in the same circumstances.
– Once proscribed, will an organisation remain banned forever?
No. The Home Secretary will consider deproscription on application only.
The law allows any organisation or any person affected by a proscription to submit a signed, written application to the Home Secretary requesting that they consider whether a specified organisation should be removed from the list of proscribed organisations.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Powys County Times
30 minutes ago
- Powys County Times
EDF investment hailed as ‘vote of confidence in UK', despite reduced stake
The Prime Minister has hailed investment by French energy giant EDF in the Sizewell C nuclear plant as 'a vote of confidence in the UK as an investment destination', though the company appears to be taking a reduced stake in the major project. The French state-owned electricity company said it had agreed in principle to invest £1.1 billion in the power plant on the Suffolk coastline. Sir Keir Starmer said the 12.5% stake by the French government-owned company takes the project 'a step closer to the benefits it will bring to the British people', though it is down from EDF's previously stated ownership stake of 16.2%. The Government pointed to EDF's annual results for 2024, which stated that upon a final investment decision the company expected to take a share of ownership between 10% and 20% of Sizewell C. EDF is the first shareholder to announce its final stake in the project, which comes alongside a £14.2 billion investment from the UK Government announced at the Spending Review in June. It comes as French President Emmanuel Macron begins his state visit to the UK on Tuesday, where he is being given a ceremonial welcome by the King and will discuss shared political matters with the Prime Minister. Other private investors could include British Gas's owner Centrica, and Canadian investment firm the Brookfield Corporation, the Financial Times (FT) newspaper reported. The FT also reported EDF has reduced its stake as the French state has tasked it with focusing on building new nuclear projects in France and maintaining the country's existing nuclear plants. Further investors will be officially announced at the point the final decision, expected later in the summer. Welcoming EDF's announcement, Sir Keir said: 'I've been clear there will be no more dithering and delay on Sizewell C – and this investment takes us a step closer to the benefits it will bring to the British people. 'Lower energy bills, thousands more jobs and apprenticeships, and better energy security – this is not only a vote of confidence in the UK as an investment destination, it is our Plan for Change in action.' The power station is expected to support some 10,000 jobs at peak construction, as well as thousands more in the supply chain and will create 1,500 apprenticeships, the Government said. Energy Secretary Ed Miliband said: 'Thousands of jobs and clean power for millions of homes are one step closer today as we welcome this investment into Sizewell C, delivering a golden age of new nuclear to protect family finances and boost energy security. 'This agreement is a landmark moment in the UK and France's long-standing partnership in civil nuclear, and a testament to our countries' strong relationship.'
Daily Mirror
36 minutes ago
- Daily Mirror
UK airport cleaner plotted Russian-backed arson attack in London
The £1 million blaze in east London was started at a warehouse used to supply aid and StarLink satellite equipment to Ukraine as part of a plot by Russian-backer terrorist Wagner Group Three British men have been found guilty of an arson attack on a warehouse linked to Ukraine on behalf of the Russian-backed terrorist Wagner Group. About £1 million of damage was caused by the blaze at an industrial unit in Leyton, east London, last March 20, the Old Bailey was told. Nii Mensah, 23, livestreamed on his phone as he and Jakeem Rose, 23, set fire to the building while fixer Ugnius Asmena, 20, waited in a car, jurors heard. The attack was orchestrated by Dylan Earl, 20, with Gatwick airport cleaner Jake Reeves, 23, who had targeted the warehouse because it was being used to supply humanitarian aid and StarLink satellite equipment to Ukraine. They went on to plot more arson attacks in a restaurant and wine shop in Mayfair and the kidnap of the owner, the wealthy Russian dissident Evgeny Chichvarkin. Earl and Reeves had admitted aggravated arson on behalf of the Wagner Group and were the first to be convicted of offences under the National Security Act 2023, jurors heard. Earl had also admitted possessing cocaine and thousands of pounds in criminal cash. Following an Old Bailey trial, Mensah, Rose, and Asmena were found guilty of aggravated arson with intent to endanger life. Driver Paul English, 61, was cleared of wrongdoing. Commander Dominic Murphy, head of the Met's Counter Terrorism Command, said; "This case is clear example of an organisation linked to the Russian state using 'proxies', in this case British men, to carry out very serious criminal activity in this country on their behalf. The ringleaders, Earl and Reeves, willingly acted as hostile agents on behalf of the Russian state. "I am pleased that, working closely with the Crown Prosecution Service, we were able to use the new National Security Act legislation, which meant the severity of Earl and Reeves's offending was reflected in the charges they faced. The warehouse arson put members of the public at great risk, and it was only by good fortune nobody was seriously injured or worse. "Those involved showed little or no regard for the potential impact of their actions on the UK's wider security. Seemingly motivated by the promise of money, they were prepared to commit criminal acts on behalf of Russia. "I hope these convictions send a strong warning of the very serious consequences of committing offences on behalf of a foreign country." Ashton Evans, 20, was found guilty of failing to disclose information about terrorist acts relating to the Mayfair plot but cleared of failing to tell authorities about the warehouse arson. Dmirjus Paulauskas, 23, was cleared of two similar offences relating to both terrorist plots after the jury deliberated for nearly 22 hours. The case is the first to result in convictions of British criminals acting as proxies for the proscribed Wagner Group. Jurors had heard "overwhelming" evidence linking the arsonists to the warehouse attack. They were tracked by phone data and traffic cameras as Mr English drove them in his Kia Picanto through south London and the scene of the fire, which was covered by CCTV. More footage captured Rose and Mensah getting out of the vehicle, climbing over a wall and approaching the warehouses, jurors heard. As they fled the scene, Rose dropped a very large knife with his DNA on it, with Mensah later messaging Reeves to say "L9 (Rose's nickname) left his Rambo at the scene". It took eight fire crews, composed of 60 firefighters, to get the blaze under control. Afterwards, Mensah messaged Earl: "Bro there was bare smoke ... You saw it on Face Time." Later, he added: "Bro lol it's on the news ... we dun damagees (sic)." Prosecutor Duncan Penny KC said that while the arsonists were motivated by the promise of money, Earl and Reeves had orchestrated it for Russia. Earl had told a Wagner Group operative he met on Telegram he was keen to carry out a series of "missions", of which the Leyton fire was to be just the first. Reeves was also prepared to accept money from a foreign intelligence service to target the Russian dissident and his London-based businesses next, the jury was told. Earl admitted preparing to set fire to the Hide Restaurant and Hedonism Wines in Mayfair, west London, and kidnapping owner Mr Chichvarkin on behalf of the Wagner Group. The court was told the two Mayfair businesses targeted by the Wagner Group collectively employed 200 people and were valued at more than £30 million. Mr Chichvarkin was described as a "high-profile Russian dissident and refugee" who has been vocal in his criticism of President Vladimir Putin and the war in Ukraine. On April 5 2024, Reeves, from Croydon, south London, sent an unknown contact Mr Chichvarkin's name and said he would make an "amazing target". In chat, Earl's Wagner Group contact, Privet Bot, instructed him to watch the period drama The Americans and use it as a "manual" for his covert mission. The television series is set during the Cold War and is about two KGB agents posing as Americans in Washington DC to spy on the American government. In further chat with Privet Bot, wholesale drug dealer Earl appeared to brag that he had criminal connections, saying he could "sort" an introduction to the IRA and Kinahan Irish organised crime group. He was arrested in a B&Q car park in Hinckley, Leicestershire, and videos of the warehouse fire being started were found on his iPhone. In a search of his home in Elmesthorpe, Leicestershire, police recovered a Russian flag, more than £20,000 in cash and cocaine hydrochloride with a street value of some £34,000. Evidence on his phone revealed details of a cryptocurrency account holding more than £58,000 and images of bundles of cash estimated to total £175,000. Following Reeves's arrest at Croydon East railway station, police uncovered videos on his phone which were taken by Mensah on the night of the arson attack. Giving evidence, Asmena, of no fixed address, denied being aware of the arson attack or hiring Mr English as the driver, telling jurors he was "just there". Mensah, of Thornton Heath, and Rose, from Croydon, had admitted arson and Rose also pleading guilty to possessing of a blade. However, both claimed the prosecution had failed to prove the fire had endangered life. Mr English, of Roehampton, told police on his arrest that he had been paid £500 by Asmena to drive but knew nothing about the fire. Evans, from Newport, Gwent, told jurors that he had got in touch with Earl to buy cocaine, which he admitted having. He claimed not to take what Earl told him seriously and went along with it to get his money back after buying drugs that were not the genuine article. Aviation engineering student Mr Paulauskus, from Croydon, told jurors he had been doing work experience at an aircraft maintenance hangar, was interested in gaming and was a "gun nerd". Born in Lithuania, he holds a joint British and Russian passport, and believed that the war with Russia was Ukraine's fault. He told jurors that he had been friends with Reeves since secondary school but did not believe anything he told him about the plots was real. Mrs Justice Cheema-Grubb said the convicted defendants would be sentenced on a date to be fixed in the autumn.
South Wales Guardian
36 minutes ago
- South Wales Guardian
Almost 40% of female Scottish survey respondents report inappropriate touching
The survey, run by trade union Unite, polled more than 6,000 women across the UK – 1,143 of whom were in Scotland. Of those north of the border, 37.5% reported unwanted touching at work, while just under 10% said they had been sexually assaulted and 4.6% said they had been a victim of sexual coercion. Unite's general secretary Sharon Graham said the findings – part of the union's Zero Tolerance to Sexual Harassment campaign – were 'damning'. 'Nobody should suffer sexual harassment in the workplace,' she said. 'Unite is committed to taking a zero-tolerance approach and we will put every Scottish based employer turning a blind eye on notice. 'We will fight every step of the way to stamp out workplace harassment once and for all. 'Every worker deserves a safe working environment and should feel able to report harassment.' Elsewhere in the survey, more than half said they had been told sexually offensive jokes, while 45.6% experienced unwanted flirting or sexual remarks – and 13.6% said they had been shown pornography by a colleague. Despite 45% of women who were harassed saying it had happened more than twice and 38.8% saying it had happened more than once, almost three quarters said they had not reported the incidents. The figures come despite the Worker Protection Act coming into force last year, imposing a duty on employers to prevent sexual harassment. The union's equalities officer in Scotland Lorna Glen said the legislation 'has not gone far enough' to protect women. 'Employers are not taking their obligations seriously despite the fact it is the law,' she said. 'This is creating a culture where sexual harassment is going unreported, while those who do take the issues forward are left feeling disbelieved, forced to work with abusers and even losing their roles.' A spokeswoman for the UK Government said: 'Sexual harassment is completely unacceptable, it has no place in our society, and we expect any employer to take a zero-tolerance approach wherever it is found. 'Our Employment Rights Bill will strengthen protections for workers, requiring employers to take all reasonable steps to prevent sexual harassment of their employees, including by third parties.' Deputy Prime Minister Angela Rayner announced this week the Government would also change the law to ban employers from using non-disclosure agreements (NDAs) to silence victims of workplace harassment, saying it had 'heard the calls from victims'.
