Iran's Khamenei makes first public appearance since war with Israel
The 85-year-old leader appeared in a video aired by state media on Saturday, which showed dozens of people attending an event at a mosque to mark Ashura, the holiest day of the Shia Muslim calendar.
In the footage, Khamenei is seen waving and nodding to the chanting crowd, which rose to its feet as he entered the mosque.
State TV said the clip was filmed at the Imam Khomeini Mosque in central Tehran.
Khamenei has avoided public appearances since the start of the fighting on June 13, and his speeches have all been prerecorded.
The United States, which joined in the Israeli attacks by bombing three key nuclear sites in Iran on June 22, had sent warnings to Khamenei, with US President Donald Trump saying on social media that Washington knew where the Iranian leader was, but had no plans to kill him, 'at least for now'.
On June 26, in prerecorded remarks aired on state television, Khamenei rejected Trump's calls for Iran's surrender, and said Tehran had delivered a 'slap to America's face' by striking a US airbase in Qatar
Trump replied, in remarks to reporters and on social media: 'Look, you're a man of great faith. A man who's highly respected in his country. You have to tell the truth. You got beat to hell.'
Iran has acknowledged that more than 900 people were killed in the war, as well as thousands injured. Iran's retaliatory missile attacks on Israel killed at least 28 people there.
The ceasefire between the two countries took hold on June 24.
Since then, Iran has confirmed serious damage to its nuclear facilities, and denied access to them for inspectors from the United Nations's nuclear watchdog, the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA).
The IAEA's inspectors had stayed in the Iranian capital throughout the fighting, even as Israel attacked Iranian military sites and killed several of the country's most senior commanders and top scientists, as well as hundreds of civilians.
However, they left after Iranian President Masoud Pezeshkian signed a law suspending cooperation with the IAEA on Wednesday.
IAEA Director-General Rafael Grossi on Friday stressed 'the crucial importance' of dialogue with Iran to resume monitoring and verification work of its nuclear programme as soon as possible.
Iran was holding talks with the US on its nuclear programme when Israel launched its attacks. The US has been seeking a new agreement after Trump pulled the US out of the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action (JCPOA), which Tehran signed with world powers in 2015.
Iranian Minister of Foreign Affairs Abbas Araghchi separately said on Thursday that the country remains committed to the Treaty on the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons (NPT), dismissing speculation that Iran would leave the international accord.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Al Jazeera
2 hours ago
- Al Jazeera
Donald Trump threatens ‘un-American' BRICS countries with 10-percent tariff
United States President Donald Trump has threatened to hike tariffs against the BRICS economic bloc, after the group offered indirect criticism of trade wars and the recent military attacks in Iran. On Monday, Trump took aim at the 10-member bloc, which seeks to strengthen emerging economies, framing its interests as adversarial to the US's. 'Any Country aligning themselves with the Anti-American policies of BRICS, will be charged an ADDITIONAL 10% Tariff,' Trump wrote in a post. 'There will be no exceptions to this policy. Thank you for your attention to this matter!' BRICS is named for its founding members, Brazil, Russia, India, China and South Africa. But it has grown to include other countries including Indonesia, Egypt, Iran and the United Arab Emirates. Over the weekend, the group held its 17th summit in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil. The meeting culminated in a declaration angled at promoting peace and global cooperation. But several items in the joint declaration appeared aimed at the US and its ally Israel, even though neither was identified by name. Under a section entitled 'Strengthening Multilateralism and Reforming Global Governance', for instance, the BRICS leaders called out the increasing use of tariffs in global trade. This seemed directed at Trump, who has threatened US trading partners with a suite of tariffs in order to negotiate more favourable trade deals and exact policy concessions. The US president has also called tariffs 'the most beautiful word to me in the dictionary', though many economists warn the cost of such import taxes is often offset onto consumers. Trump has also championed the use of other protectionist economic policies, under the banner of his 'America First' agenda. But the BRICS leaders warned that these kinds of policies could backfire. 'We voice serious concerns about the rise of unilateral tariff and non-tariff measures which distort trade and are inconsistent with WTO [World Trade Organization] rules,' the BRICS leaders said in their statement. Such measures, they continued could 'reduce global trade, disrupt global supply chains, and introduce uncertainty into international economic and trade activities, potentially exacerbating existing economic disparities'. The BRICS leaders also used their declaration to denounce the recent military strikes on one of the bloc's member nations, Iran. 'We condemn the military strikes against the Islamic Republic of Iran since 13 June 2025, which constitute a violation of international law,' they wrote, adding that 'peaceful nuclear facilities' had been targeted. Israel carried out the first attacks against Iran in the 12-day war on June 13, and on June 22, the US sent seven B-2 Spirit stealth bombers to Iran to strike three nuclear facilities. Both Israel and the US have maintained these actions were necessary to prevent Iran from acquiring a nuclear weapon, though Iran has denied seeking one. In the wake of Trump's tariff threat, BRICS leaders rushed to assure their US counterparts that they are not seeking confrontation. Others, however, chafed at Trump's remarks. 'I became aware of what President Trump tweeted, and I think there needs to be greater appreciation of the emergence of various centres of power in the world,' said South African President Cyril Ramaphosa. 'And this should be seen in a positive light, rather than in a negative light.' Brazilian President Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva took an even blunter approach to Trump's threats. 'I don't think it's very responsible or serious for the president of a country as big as the United States to go around threatening the world through the internet,' Lula said in a question-and-answer session with reporters. 'It's not right. The world has changed. We don't want an emperor.'
Qatar Tribune
3 hours ago
- Qatar Tribune
Deals made by Trump since pausing his ‘Liberation Day' tariffs remain sparse
Agencies Just over three months ago, President Donald Trump unveiled his most sweeping volley of tariffs yet — holding up large charts from the White House Rose Garden to outline new import taxes that the U.S. would soon slap on goods from nearly every country in the world. But in line with much of Trump's on-again, off-again trade policy playbook, the bulk of those 'Liberation Day' levies in April were postponed just hours after they took effectin a 90-day suspension that arrived in an apparent effort to quell global market panic and facilitate country-by-country negotiations. At that time, the administration set a lofty goal of reaching 90 trade deals in 90 days. Now, with the July 9 deadline looming, the U.S. has only announced pacts with the United Kingdom and Vietnam — as well as a 'framework″ agreement with China in a separate trade dispute. News of these deals often trickled through social media posts from the president and, even when countries on both sides of a negotiation table made more official announcements, many key details — including timing — were sparse. The Trump administration has since hinted that some trading partners might get more time for talks. Over the July 4th holiday weekend, Trump said that the U.S. would start sending letters to certain countries warning that higher tariffs could kick in Aug. 1. Trump took to Truth Social on Monday to share letters he sent to the leaders of Japan and South Korea, declaring that both countries would see 25% tariffs on goods entering the U.S. starting Aug. 1. Even with negotiations ongoing, most countries have still faced a minimum 10% levy on goods entering the U.S. over the past three months, on top of punishing new taxes targeting foreign steel and aluminum as well as auto imports. The 90-day pause pushed back additional steeper rates, which Trump calls 'reciprocal' tariffs, for dozens of nations. Here's what we know about the trade deals announced since April. On July 2, Trump announced a trade deal with Vietnam that he said would allow U.S. goods to enter the country duty-free. Vietnamese exports to the United States, by contrast, would face a 20% levy. That's less than half the 46% 'reciprocal' rate Trump proposed for Vietnamese goods back in April. But in addition to the new 20% tariff rate, Trump said the U.S. would impose a 40% tax on 'transshipping'' — targeting goods from another country that stop in Vietnam on their way to the United States. Washington complains that Chinese goods have been dodging higher U.S. tariffs by transiting through Vietnam. It wasn't immediately clear when these new rates would go into effect or whether they would come on top of any other previously-imposed levies. Like most other countries, Vietnam has faced Trump's 10% baseline tariff for the last three months. On May 8, Trump agreed to cut tariffs on British autos, steel and aluminum, among other trade pledges — while the U.K. promised to reduce levies on U.S. products like olive oil, wine and sports equipment. The deal was announced in grandiose terms by both countries, but some key details remained unknown for weeks. When the deal was announced, for example, the British government notably said that the U.S. agreed to exempt the U.K. from its then-universal 25% duties on foreign steel and aluminum — which would have effectively allowed both metals from the country to come into the U.S. duty-free. But the timing for when those cuts would actually take effect stayed up in the air for almost a month. It wasn't until early June, when Trump hiked his steel and aluminum tariffs to a punishing 50% worldwide, that the U.S. acknowledged it was time to implement the agreement. And even then, U.S. tariffs on British steel and aluminum did not go to zero. The U.K. was the only country spared from Trump's new 50% levies, but still faces 25% import taxes on the metals — and Trump said that rate could also go up on or after Wednesday. The U.K. did not receive a higher 'reciprocal' rate on April 2, but continues to face the 10% baseline its peak, Trump's new tariffs on Chinese goods totaled 145% — and China's countertariffs on American products reached 125%. But on May 12, the countries agreed to their own 90-day truce to roll back those levies to 30% and 10%, respectively. And last month, details began trickling in about a tentative trade agreement. On June 11, following talks in London, Trump announced a 'framework' for a deal. And late last month, the U.S. and China both acknowledged that some sort of agreement had been reached. U.S. Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent said that China had agreed to make it easier for American firms to acquire Chinese magnets and rare earth minerals critical for manufacturing and microchip production. Meanwhile, without explicitly mentioning U.S. access to rare earths, the Chinese Commerce Ministry said that it would 'review and approve eligible export applications for controlled items' and that the U.S. would 'lift a series of restrictive measures it had imposed on China.' More specifics about those measures — and when they would actually go into effect — were not immediately clear. But on Friday, the Ministry of Commerce acknowledged that the U.S. was resuming exports of airplane parts, ethane and other items to China. And when Trump first announced the framework on June 11, the U.S. had said it agreed to stop seeking to revoke the visas of Chinese students on U.S. college campuses.
Qatar Tribune
3 hours ago
- Qatar Tribune
Pakistan's potential path to becoming an energy transit state
Tribune News Network Doha At the crossroads of strategic ambition and regional complexity lies Pakistan's untapped potential to emerge as a critical energy transit state—linking the hydrocarbon-rich Gulf and Central Asian states with the energy-hungry economies of South and East Asia. In its latest Energy Research Paper, the Al-Attiyah Foundation delves into Pakistan's efforts to harness its geographical advantage, analysing over US$ 35 billion in energy investments from China, Saudi Arabia, the UAE, and Qatar, as well as major transnational projects like the Turkmenistan–Afghanistan–Pakistan–India Pipeline (TAPI), Central Asia–South Asia Electricity Transmission and Trade Project (CASA-1000) and the China-Pakistan Economic Corridor (CPEC). The analysis reveals a complex web of opportunity and vulnerability. CPEC, a project that involves upgrading roads, railways, and energy infrastructure to facilitate trade and transportation between the Pakistan and China, has delivered over 13 GW of power capacity through coal, hydro, solar, and wind projects. However, it has also contributed to Pakistan's US$ 1.4 billion in unpaid energy debts and drawn security risks—including militant attacks on Chinese workers between 2021 and 2024. Qatar's US$ 15 billion LNG agreement addressed Pakistan's gas deficit but has become a financial strain amid declining domestic energy demand and currency depreciation. Meanwhile, instability in Afghanistan threatens to derail the US$ 7.7 billion TAPI pipeline and the US$ 1.16 billion CASA-1000 transmission line, both of which are critical to Pakistan's regional integration and energy diversification. Despite these challenges, serious momentum is building. Pakistan's domestic energy system remains under strain, with over 60% of demand met by imported fossil fuels and widespread transmission losses weakening grid reliability. Yet a shift is underway. Solar and wind energy now account for 10% of installed capacity, and the government has pledged to reach 60% clean energy by 2030, including targets to electrify 30% of road transport. Meeting this goal will require 22 GW of new renewable capacity, competitive procurement, and grid modernisation. However, persistent fiscal stress, climate vulnerability, and geopolitical friction continue to test Pakistan's credibility as a stable energy partner in the region.
