Taiwan Semiconductor Just Threw Cold Water on Tariff Concerns
Taiwan Semiconductor's products remain in high demand among end users.
TSMC is building plants in the U.S. to avoid tariffs.
10 stocks we like better than Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing ›
Tariff effects are still front and center in many investors' minds. As we approach Aug. 1, the date when many reciprocal tariffs take effect, the entire economic landscape could shift. Although deals are being announced, many questions remain regarding their impact.
However, there is one company that stands out by saying it hasn't seen any effect: Taiwan Semiconductor (NYSE: TSM). Taiwan Semiconductor's CEO C.C. Wei stated on its Q2 conference call that they "have not seen any change in our customers' behavior so far" regarding tariffs.
Where to invest $1,000 right now? Our analyst team just revealed what they believe are the 10 best stocks to buy right now. Learn More »
This is a significant development for TSMC, but does it suggest that the rest of the market is overreacting to tariffs?
Semiconductors aren't subject to reciprocal tariffs
There are a few key points to understand regarding tariffs and semiconductors. First, semiconductors are currently exempt from all reciprocal tariffs. Additionally, they're excluded from the base 10% blanket tariff.
However, that could shift as the Aug. 1 reciprocal tariff date arrives. If those tariffs are implemented, other goods could be subject to higher tariff rates than semiconductors. This means investors need to be cautious about drawing conclusions about how tariffs are being applied to one industry versus another. Still, it shows that the end users of products with their chips in them aren't slowing down purchases.
A second critical factor is Taiwan Semiconductor's unique position within the chip industry. There aren't many choices when it comes to chip foundries with high-end technology. Intel (NASDAQ: INTC) has failed to launch many of the cutting-edge chip nodes, and low chip yields have plagued Samsung. This leaves TSMC at the top of the high-end semiconductor fabrication pyramid, making it a critical partner for tech giants like Nvidia (NASDAQ: NVDA) and Apple (NASDAQ: AAPL).
As a result, these companies are somewhat compelled to deal with the tariffs rather than seeking an alternative. But this is only temporary. TSMC is working to avoid tariffs by accelerating the build-out of its U.S. chip production facilities in Arizona. This will allow U.S. clients to avoid any tariffs on foreign goods.
While Taiwan Semiconductor may not be experiencing any effects from tariffs, investors need to be cautious about drawing conclusions from its experience to the broader market. It's in a unique position that essentially requires its clients to deal with any tariff levies that come up, but it's actively working on increasing U.S. chip production capabilities to sidestep any tariffs.
With TSMC's strong position, the company also becomes an intriguing stock to consider, as few companies hold a more powerful position than TSMC.
Taiwan Semiconductor looks like an excellent buy at these prices
Taiwan Semiconductor's bull case is fairly straightforward: Its clients will use more chips and increasingly advanced chips over the next few years. This seems like a no-brainer investment thesis, and management's bold five-year growth projections back it up.
Starting with 2025, management projects that AI-related revenue will grow at a 45% compound annual growth rate (CAGR) over the next five years, with total revenue increasing at nearly a 20% CAGR. That's easily market-beating growth, yet Taiwan Semiconductor's stock trades at nearly a market-average forward price-to-earnings (P/E) ratio.
TSM PE Ratio (Forward) data by YCharts
Taiwan Semiconductor's 24 times forward earnings is nearly identical to the S&P 500 's (SNPINDEX: ^GSPC) 23.8 times forward earnings. However, with market-beating growth expected, this makes the price well worth paying, and I think Taiwan Semiconductor's stock looks like a great buy right now due to its projected growth, reasonable price, and strong position in the chip fabrication industry.
Should you invest $1,000 in Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing right now?
Before you buy stock in Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing, consider this:
The Motley Fool Stock Advisor analyst team just identified what they believe are the 10 best stocks for investors to buy now… and Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing wasn't one of them. The 10 stocks that made the cut could produce monster returns in the coming years.
Consider when Netflix made this list on December 17, 2004... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $636,628!* Or when Nvidia made this list on April 15, 2005... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $1,063,471!*
Now, it's worth noting Stock Advisor's total average return is 1,041% — a market-crushing outperformance compared to 183% for the S&P 500. Don't miss out on the latest top 10 list, available when you join Stock Advisor.
*Stock Advisor returns as of July 21, 2025
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
CTV News
a minute ago
- CTV News
Google loses U.S. appeal over app store reforms in Epic Games case
Alphabet's Google on Thursday failed to persuade a U.S. appeals panel to overturn a jury verdict and federal court order requiring the technology company to revamp its app store Play. The San Francisco-based 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals, in a unanimous ruling, rejected claims from Google that the trial judge made legal errors in the antitrust case that unfairly benefited 'Fortnite' maker Epic Games, which filed the lawsuit in 2020. Epic accused Google of monopolizing how consumers access apps on Android devices and pay for transactions within apps. The Cary, North Carolina-based company convinced a San Francisco jury in 2023 that Google illegally stifled competition. U.S. District Judge James Donato in San Francisco ordered Google in October to restore competition by allowing users to download rival app stores within its Play store and by making Play's app catalog available to those competitors, among other reforms. Donato's order was on hold pending the outcome of the 9th Circuit appeal. The court's decision can be appealed to the full 9th Circuit and ultimately to the U.S. Supreme Court. In a statement, Lee-Anne Mulholland, Google's vice president of regulatory affairs, said the appeals court's ruling 'will significantly harm user safety, limit choice, and undermine the innovation that has always been central to the Android ecosystem.' The company said it would continue to focus on 'ensuring a secure platform as we continue our appeal.' Epic CEO Tim Sweeney said in a social media post: 'Thanks to the verdict, the Epic Games Store for Android will be coming to the Google Play Store!' Google told the appeals court that the tech company's Play store competes with Apple's App Store, and that Donato unfairly barred Google from making that point to contest Epic's antitrust claims. The tech company also argued that a jury should never have heard Epic's lawsuit because it sought to enjoin Google's conduct — a request normally decided by a judge — and not collect damages. Epic has defended the verdict and court injunction, telling the 9th Circuit judges that the Android app market has been 'suffering under anti-competitive behavior for the better part of a decade.' In the trial court and in the appeal, Epic disputed arguments by Google that changes to its app business ordered by the court would harm user privacy and security. Microsoft MSFT.O filed a brief backing Epic, as did the U.S. Justice Department and Federal Trade Commission. Epic separately is battling Apple over a U.S. judge's order requiring the iPhone maker to give developers greater freedom to steer consumers to make purchases outside its App Store. Apple has appealed a ruling that said it violated a prior injunction in a lawsuit that Epic filed in 2020. (Reporting by Mike Scarcella; Editing by David Bario, Jan Harvey, Rod Nickel)
CTV News
a minute ago
- CTV News
Exxon, Chevron profits to drop to lowest point since pandemic, analysts say
HOUSTON — Top U.S. oil producers Exxon Mobil and Chevron are expected to report their lowest earnings in four years when they release second-quarter results on Friday, as weaker oil and gas prices slashed revenue. The April-June quarter covered a volatile period in which the OPEC+ group of producers continued raising their production volumes, putting pressure on crude prices and in turn cutting the profits of oil firms. Oscillating tariff policy from U.S. President Donald Trump's administration also added to fears about weakening economies and oil demand. Global benchmark Brent crude prices declined 11 per cent during the quarter from the previous three months, while U.S. natural gas futures declined nine per cent. While investors had previously been watching whether producers would cut spending in response to lower prices, the market is now likely to focus more on company-specific results and commentary about the macroeconomic environment, said Jeoffrey Lambujon, an analyst with TPH Energy Research, in a note last week. Exxon, the top U.S. oil producer, is expected to post US$6.67 billion in adjusted earnings for the second quarter, or $1.56 per share, according to the consensus analyst estimates compiled by LSEG. That would be a 27 per cent drop from the year-ago quarter and the lowest earnings since 2021, after the COVID-19 pandemic sank global demand. The company had signaled earlier this month that lower oil and gas prices could cut about $1.5 billion from its earnings compared with the first quarter. One bright spot is improved refining margins, which Exxon said could help boost second-quarter earnings by about $300 million, but refining is a smaller portion of its business compared with oil and gas production. The company has several projects slated for start-up in the second half of the year that should drive stronger earnings, said Jason Gabelman, an analyst with TD Cowen in a July 10 research note. These include Yellowtail, a fourth floating production, storage and offloading vessel in the prolific Stabroek Block in Guyana, the lucrative oil hotspot where profits soared 64 per cent last year. Wall Street expects Chevron, the No.2 U.S. oil producer, to report $3 billion in adjusted earnings, or $1.70 per share, down 33% from the same period a year ago and also the lowest in four years. Chevron closed its acquisition of smaller oil producer Hess on July 18 after triumphing in a legal challenge from Exxon that delayed the deal close by over a year. Chevron said the deal will lead to $1 billion in cost synergies by the end of the year. It will provide updated financial guidance for the combined company during its investor day in November. The company could report about one per cent lower production volumes compared with the first quarter following a well blowout in Colorado, and a two-week production shutdown at the Leviathan gas field in Israel during the country's conflict with Iran, said Barclays analysts in a July 13 note. French oil major TotalEnergies last week reported its lowest profit in four years as higher production was not enough to make up for lower oil prices. On Thursday, British oil major Shell reported a profit that tumbled by almost a third. Rival BP will release results next week. (Reporting by Sheila Dang in HoustonEditing by Marguerita Choy)
Globe and Mail
a minute ago
- Globe and Mail
Appellate judges question Trump's authority to impose tariffs without Congress
WASHINGTON (AP) — Appellate court judges expressed broad skepticism Thursday over President Donald Trump's legal rationale for his most expansive round of tariffs. Members of the 11-judge panel of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit in Washington appeared unconvinced by the Trump administration's insistence that the president could impose tariffs without congressional approval, and it hammered its invocation of the International Emergency Economic Powers Act to do so. 'IEEPA doesn't even mention the word 'tariffs' anywhere,' Circuit Judge Jimmie Reyna said, in a sign of the panel's incredulity to a government attorney's arguments. Brett Schumate, the attorney representing the Trump administration, acknowledged in the 99-minute hearing 'no president has ever read IEEPA this way' but contended it was nonetheless lawful. The 1977 law, signed by President Jimmy Carter, allows the president to seize assets and block transactions during a national emergency. It was first used during the Iran hostage crisis and has since been invoked for a range of global unrest, from the 9/11 attacks to the Syrian civil war. Trump says the country's trade deficit is so serious that it likewise qualifies for the law's protection. In sharp exchanges with Schumate, appellate judges questioned that contention, asking whether the law extended to tariffs at all and, if so, whether the levies matched the threat the administration identified. 'If the president says there's a problem with our military readiness,' Chief Circuit Judge Kimberly Moore posited, 'and he puts a 20% tax on coffee, that doesn't seem to necessarily deal with (it).' Schumate said Congress' passage of IEEPA gave the president 'broad and flexible" power to respond to an emergency, but that 'the president is not asking for unbounded authority.' But an attorney for the plaintiffs, Neal Katyal, characterized Trump's maneuver as a 'breathtaking' power grab that amounted to saying 'the president can do whatever he wants, whenever he wants, for as long as he wants so long as he declares an emergency.' No ruling was issued from the bench. Regardless of what decision the judges' deliberations bring, the case is widely expected to reach the U.S. Supreme Court. Trump weighed in on the case on his Truth Social platform, posting: "To all of my great lawyers who have fought so hard to save our Country, good luck in America's big case today. If our Country was not able to protect itself by using TARIFFS AGAINST TARIFFS, WE WOULD BE 'DEAD,' WITH NO CHANCE OF SURVIVAL OR SUCCESS. Thank you for your attention to this matter!'' In filings in the case, the Trump administration insists that 'a national emergency exists' necessitating its trade policy. A three-judge panel of the U.S. Court of International Trade, a specialized federal court in New York, was unconvinced however, ruling in May that Trump exceeded his powers. The issue now rests with the appeals judges. The challenge strikes at just one batch of import taxes from an administration that has unleashed a bevy of them and could be poised to unveil more on Friday. The case centers on Trump's so-called 'Liberation Day' tariffs of April 2 that imposed new levies on nearly every country. But it doesn't cover other tariffs, including those on foreign steel, aluminum and autos, nor ones imposed on China during Trump's first term, and continued by President Joe Biden. The case is one of at least seven lawsuits charging that Trump overstepped his authority through the use of tariffs on other nations. The plaintiffs include 12 U.S. states and five businesses, including a wine importer, a company selling pipes and plumbing goods, and a maker of fishing gear. The U.S. Constitution gives the Congress the authority to impose taxes — including tariffs — but over decades lawmakers have ceded power over trade policy to the White House. Trump has made the most of the power vacuum, raising the average U.S. tariff to more than 18%, the highest rate since 1934, according to the Budget Lab at Yale University. ____
