
Desperate times: is Boris about to make a comeback and could he save the Conservatives?
First things first: the Tories have got through five leaders in roughly 10 years – of whom Johnson himself was one – and there's no reason to believe that the removal of Kemi Badenoch would solve the Conservatives' problems. The Tory ship is losing planks and leaking water. Another mutiny on deck would risk it going down altogether.
But it's hard to keep your head while those about you are losing theirs – and blaming it on the leader. This year saw 23 council areas in England go to the polls. Next year, 150 or more may vote. Scottish parliamentary and Welsh assembly elections will also take place. Badenoch thus faces a mini general-election. Her leadership may not survive it. Or even last until then.
And according to Luke Tryl, one of the most sober pollsters in the business, 'to a surprising degree across our focus groups in recent weeks the one Tory – particularly those leaning Reform – spoken of with any affection was Johnson… the difference between Boris and other Tories is, for whatever reason, he passes that connection/relatability/not a typical Tory test.'
This presumably explains the recent survey by More in Common, of which Tryl is executive director, which found that the Conservatives would overturn an eight-point Reform poll lead and take a three-point lead themselves were Johnson to lead them again. The replacement of Badenoch by Robert Jenrick would, according to this survey, make no difference to the Tory position.
Now polls tell many different tales, but Johnson's appeal may indeed not be exhausted – at least among the striving, provincial, just-about-managing voters who backed Brexit, voted Conservative in 2019, switched to Labour last year, and last week voted in substantial numbers for Reform. The Tories need to get voters to consider them again. If Johnson can't do it, can it be done at all?
His return would also mean unfinished business. Admittedly, he wasn't compelled to leave Parliament. He chose to quit himself, before a by-election was forced on him. A Commons committee was poised to recommend a 90-day suspension from the House, which would have exceeded the 10-day threshold for triggering a recall petition and potential by-election.
You may feel that this was no more than Johnson deserved – that the committee was right to find that he deliberately misled the Commons over Covid parties in Downing Street. But was it fair that the voters never had the chance to give their view at a general election? After all, they put Johnson in, and there's a case for saying that only they were entitled to turn him out.
Whatever your view, his successors in government, Liz Truss and Rishi Sunak, were haunted from the start by the claim that neither had democratic legitimacy, since neither had won – or even fought – a general election before becoming Prime Minister. There would be a kind of justice in Britain's voters once again giving their view of Johnson as Tory leader at the ballot box.
So much for the past. What of the future? The practical obstacles to a Johnson return are formidable. First, he would have to be re-admitted to the Conservative candidates' list. Second, he would need to find a local association to adopt him where a by-election was pending. Third, he would have to be returned to Parliament. And then, finally, win a leadership election.
It sounds fantastical – as indeed it is. Self-preservation would suggest that Badenoch, who effectively controls the Tory candidates' list, has every reason to keep Johnson off it. By-elections are hazardous at the best of times, and this is a sticky time for the Conservatives. Above all, most of Johnson's most fervent parliamentary supporters lost their seats last year.
Furthermore, a comeback wouldn't come pain-free. A slice of Toryworld sees Johnson as a joke in the worst possible taste. There would be resignations both outside Parliament and within it – and, perhaps, defections. But if the Conservatives are desperate enough, who knows what might happen? Johnson's zany story may have further twists in it yet.
When the Tories are three-nil down and the clock is ticking, they tend to turn to their star striker on the substitutes' bench. And one can imagine, just about, Johnson turning the game round for the Conservatives. But there is much more to the matter than the Tories' own interests. Johnson might be a tonic for his party. But would he really be one for the country?
Britain isn't paying its way in the world and must face up to some home truths. Voters know in their gut that the country faces unpalatable choices. They despise politicians for not offering a lead, but are fearful of what it might mean. It is very difficult to see Johnson, with his unquenchable boosterism, knuckling soberly down to the task.
The best of governments would have been knocked off course by Covid and the Ukraine war. But Johnson's enemies have a lengthy charge sheet: net zero excess, ending no fault evictions, the Football Regulator, Covid lockdowns, a record tax burden, mass ministerial resignations. Some of this is unfair. But the critics have a point, and then some, about what happened to immigration.
The 'Boriswave' saw net migration peak at 906,000 in 2023. It is thought his government simply threw open the doors. Does he think it was a mistake? Or would some future Johnson government do the same all over again? Whatever the answer, the strongest case against a Johnson return is the simplest one: been there, done that – time to move on.
He may even draw that conclusion himself, especially if Reform continues to advance. Get ready for more Johnson interviews – more coat-trailing, more exploratory probing – if he thinks he has a crack at returning to Downing Street. But if that looks unlikely, the hard yards of leading a party to election defeat is surely not for him. For the moment, he will watch and wait.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


The Independent
4 minutes ago
- The Independent
UK-wide strategy needed to tackle pensioner poverty, says committee
A national strategy to tackle pensioner poverty is needed, according to MPs. The Government should also decide on – and ensure – a minimum level of retirement income, the Work and Pensions Committee urged. Once set, a plan should be created for everyone to reach that level, it added. Given that the state pension is the core of the Government's offer to pensioners, a guiding principle should be that it provides the amount needed for a 'minimum, dignified, socially acceptable standard of living', the committee said. It urged the Government to commit to a UK-wide, cross-government strategy for an ageing society, that it said would help target support to tackle pensioner poverty. If it does not effectively tackle poverty as one of the causes of ill-health, 'the Government will not be able to achieve its goal of building a health and social care service that is sustainable', the Pensioner Poverty report warned. The report also highlighted longer-term trends that 'threaten to undermine pension adequacy', such as people renting into later life. The committee also called for a pension credit take-up strategy for England by the end of 2025. Despite being worth up to £4,000 a year, the take-up of pension credit has hovered between 61% and 66% for a decade, with an estimated 700,000 households being eligible but not claiming, the committee said. A taper to pension credit should also be considered to 'mitigate the cliff-edge effect' for those who currently miss out, the report said. Under current rules, some pensioners just above income thresholds could end up worse off than those with slightly lower incomes, it added. Pension credit can 'passport' recipients to other benefits such as housing benefit, council tax support, the warm homes discount, a free TV licence, help with dental treatment and, in winter 2024/25, the winter fuel payment. The committee argued that reliance on top-ups such as pension credit and housing benefit is not sufficient to ensure people do not fall below the poverty line. The report said: 'After a decline in pensioner poverty in the 2000s, the number of pensioners in relative low income started to rise again from 2010. This has been exacerbated by increases in the cost of living since 2021.' It continued: 'The number of people of pension age living in relative poverty (below 60% of median income) is 1.9 million or 16% of pensioners. 'Measures which factor in the cost of living show that between 2008/09 and 2022/23, the number of pensioners in households below the Minimum Income Standard (MIS)—the amount needed for a minimum dignified socially acceptable standard of living—rose from 1.5 to 2.8 million. 'The proportion of pensioners below 75% of MIS (where the risk of material deprivation increases substantially) rose from 5.9% in 2021/22 to 9.5% in 2022/23. 'In practice, this means cutting back on essentials, like food, energy use and seeing friends, in an attempt to manage costs. Health experts explained the implications for health. Financial hardship can accelerate the ageing process, making it more likely that an older person will enter hospital or need care.' The committee said that in some places, organisations are working together towards shared objectives. The report continued: 'However, not all areas do this. We heard that it would help to have a national cross-government strategy for our ageing society and older people. 'This could provide a framework to hold the different partners to account for their role in delivering the agreed outcomes. It could also ensure that central government departments developed policy with shared objectives in mind.' Committee chairwoman Debbie Abrahams said: 'To boost incomes, the Government needs to come up with a strategy to increase pension credit take-up. It's a scandal that so many have missed out for so many years, often through an aversion to claiming benefits altogether, or lack of support. 'The fairness of the pensions credit eligibility criteria where if you are a penny above the threshold, you miss out on thousands of pounds, also needs to be looked at. 'Ultimately, the Government should decide what it thinks is enough for a dignified retirement, and then work to ensure that all pensioners are on at least that level. 'Faced with a combination of high energy costs, ill-health and ever higher rates of pensioners in more costly privately rented accommodation, tackling pensioner poverty is not simply a DWP (Department for Work and Pensions) issue. So, we're calling for a nationwide, cross-government strategy for an ageing society that should be rooted in equity and wellbeing.' On Tuesday, Chancellor Rachel Reeves said that a review into raising the state pension age is needed to ensure the system is 'sustainable and affordable'. The Government review is due to report in March 2029 and Ms Reeves said it was 'right' to look at the age at which people can receive the state pension as life expectancy increases. The state pension age is currently 66, rising to 67 by 2028 and the Government is legally required to periodically review the age. A Government spokesperson said: 'Supporting pensioners is a top priority, and thanks to our commitment to the triple lock, millions will see their yearly state pension rise by up to £1,900 by the end of this parliament. 'We have also run the biggest-ever campaign to boost pension credit take-up, with nearly 60,000 extra pensioner households being awarded the benefit, worth on average around £4,300 a year. 'But we know there is a real risk that tomorrow's pensioners will be poorer than today's, which is why we are reviving the Pension Commission, to tackle the barriers that stop too many people from saving.' Emma Douglas, wealth policy director at Aviva, said: 'The pensions industry – alongside a revitalised Pensions Commission – has a critical role to play in helping people save for retirement and then turn their hard-earned pension pots into lasting financial security. 'With many people likely to manage their money well into their 90s, we must ensure those savings work harder and stretch further – especially as later life can bring complex challenges like cognitive decline.' She said that Aviva and Age UK were exploring a 'mid-retirement MOT' to help give people tools, guidance, and confidence to stay financially resilient throughout retirement. Caroline Abrahams, charity director at Age UK, said: 'We warmly welcome this thoughtful and wide-ranging select committee report, which comes closer to providing a thorough and progressive strategic overview of the issues facing older people on low incomes and proposing workable solutions than anything successive governments have produced in recent years. 'When the Government announced the launch of the Pensions Commission earlier this week, ministers made it clear that its task is to think about the creation of a better system for future pensioners. 'This is necessary and important, but this committee report reinforces the point that there's work to do to improve the situation of today's pensioners on low incomes as well.'


Telegraph
5 minutes ago
- Telegraph
Kemi Badenoch's reshuffle has done nothing to energise the Tory brand
SIR – Reform UK's recent fiscal swerve to the Left opened up a space on the Right for Kemi Badenoch to grab. She could have achieved this through her changes to the shadow cabinet (report, July 23). Instead, she chose to invite the arch-liberal centrist and aspiring Conservative leader Sir James Cleverly back into the tent. Bob Lyddon Wells-next-the-Sea, Norfolk SIR – Sir James Cleverly is a well-known Tory wet and supports Britain's membership of the European Convention on Human Rights. His promotion by Kemi Badenoch confirms that the Conservative Party has learnt nothing from its crushing general election defeat. David Saunders Sidmouth, Devon SIR – Sir James Cleverly's return to the shadow cabinet not only highlights Kemi Badenoch's lack of political flair and vision, but also confirms beyond any doubt that the Tories are a spent force. Let us not forget that it was Sir James who, as foreign secretary, naively reopened the Chagos dossier – among other blunders. Jean Maigrot London SW6 SIR – I have had many conversations with fellow Conservative Party members since last year's bruising defeat. Even now, more than 12 months on, there remains widespread dismay at some of the decisions made during our time in government – and, in many quarters, outright anger at the lack of decisive action taken on a host of issues that matter deeply to voters. To stand any chance of regaining power, the party will need to put forward an unapologetically bold and wide-ranging set of policies that address public concerns. The problem is that I simply can't see it happening. And if I – a paid-up member of the party – feel this way, I struggle to see how we can expect to win back the confidence of the wider electorate. James Luke Steeple Ashton, Wiltshire SIR – The existence of a Right and a Left in the Conservative Party, split over matters such as the ECHR, is a fundamental barrier to its recovery. It's all very well being a broad church, but the party consists of too many agnostics and atheists. No leader can square this circle. The answer is not to keep changing the leader, but to change the party and reset it according to conservative values. This would mean a significant slice of the parliamentary party moving elsewhere. Currently, the Conservatives are offering no alternative to Reform UK, never mind opposition to the Labour Government. Another harmful tax SIR – You report (July 22) Angela Rayner's suggestion that councils should be able to tax visitors' hotel stays in order to cash in on Britain's tourism industry. This is both dispiriting and completely unsurprising. The Labour administration seems to have no other idea than to levy extra taxes, oblivious to, or unconcerned about, the economic damage such short-term expedients are likely to cause. Mart Ralph Salisbury, Wiltshire SIR – The focus on a 'tourist tax' is a red herring when the 20 per cent VAT rate on hospitality and tourism services already creates a significant tax burden. All the major European destinations have much lower VAT rates than the UK. Adding a new tourist tax, on top of our high VAT, would be a devastating blow to our competitiveness. It would deter visitors, hurt local businesses, and ultimately reduce the total tax revenue generated by tourism. Instead of considering new taxes, we should focus on creating a more competitive tax environment that supports our hospitality and tourism sectors. Kate Nicholls Chairman, UKHospitality London WC1 Orgreave inquiry SIR – I am a blue-collar trade unionist and I agree that the country doesn't need an inquiry into the Battle of Orgreave (Letters, July 23). If the Left were real friends of trade unionists they would be pressing for a revival of at least a niche coal-mining sector in the UK, to include coking coal mines in Cumbria and South Wales. This industry could support our defence industry and green technology, given that railways, nuclear plants and wind turbines need high-grade steel – and high-grade steel needs coking coal. John Barstow Pulborough, West Sussex SIR – I was a young district nurse in 1984, and as such had to travel past Longannet power station in Kincardine, Fife, to visit an elderly lady to administer her insulin injection. However, 'Arthur's Army' of Yorkshire miners parked their bus across the lane I needed to access. Though my Mini clearly stated 'Fife Health Board', a baying crowd of men started to rock my car backward and forward, and stand in my way across the road. Terrified and alone, I put my foot down and accelerated away, running over several toes. So don't tell me police used undue force in their attempt to clear the strikers. Taught a lesson SIR – John Frankel (Letters, July 22) asks when schools became political. I was at boarding school in the early 1960s, and by far the best teacher taught history. Unfortunately, one of our history trips included a visit to a friend's house, where we were shown a promotional film for the 'ban the bomb' movement. We were left in no doubt that our teachers agreed with the views shown. Once a few parents became aware of this, the history teacher was sacked. Rachel Jameson-Till Etchingham, East Sussex SIR – During a lesson at the local grammar school I attended in the 1970s, the English mistress stated that The Daily Telegraph should be closed down. Adrian Bone Cranbrook, Kent Unrest in Essex SIR – It is worrying that Essex police have admitted escorting members of the pro-migrant activist group Stand Up to Racism to an asylum hotel at the centre of days of unrest (report, July 23). This group has shown that there are people in this country who think the influx of illegal immigrants should be condoned and supported. The unrest has nothing to do with racism, but much to do with criminality on a massive scale – worthy of widespread condemnation. Meanwhile, ministers appear to think they can stop the boats with words alone. I fear for my country. Carole Doggett Milford, Hampshire Today gets tough SIR – The newest Today programme presenter, Anna Foster, is a welcome addition, combining excellent knowledge and forthright interviewing. Prior to her arrival there had been an increase in petty pleasantries and personal chatter between presenters. Her recent lambasting of David Lammy, the Foreign Secretary, was a brilliant example. Long may she continue to outwit political interviewees, who are too often let off the hook when they fail to respond to direct questions with straight answers. Dr Paul Veale Bath, Somerset Seaside Shakespeare SIR – There was a magical moment at a performance of Macbeth at the Minack open-air theatre in Cornwall one lovely summer's evening (Letters, July 22). The trees of Birnam Wood arrived by boat across the sea, with the actors brandishing large branches before coming ashore for battle. Wonderful. Pam Booth Hathersage, Derbyshire SIR – When a local cinema announced it would be showing a film of Romeo and Juliet, the school at which I then taught welcomed the opportunity to clarify the meaning of any parts that some pupils might have found difficult to understand. I remember thinking it was a rather disjointed version of the play. The reason for this became clear when the boy next to me exclaimed: 'Ey, sir – I thought he was dead.' He should have been. It was Tybalt. The reels were being shown in the wrong order. Hartlepool, Co Durham Girlguiding traditions worth keeping alive SIR – I have mixed feelings about the introduction of 72 new badges to be awarded to members of the Girlguiding movement (report, July 22), including ones to recognise having a good night's sleep, laughter and dancing. It is right that Guides move with the times, that badges reflect important issues of today, and that there is something to interest all girls. However, as a movement we should not forget our history, values and skills acquired over 125 years. When I became a Guide they were called proficiency badges, and we learnt new skills and improved others. We had to earn them and were proud to receive one. The Guide movement should march forward without forgetting its heritage and raison d'être. Christine Doughty Nottingham The pensions time bomb has already gone off SIR – When I was an actuarial student in 1988, the firm I worked for produced a paper entitled 'The Pensions Time Bomb', examining the unsustainable funding model of the Basic State Pension (where today's workers pay, via taxation, for today's pensions) and the decline in final-salary pension schemes. The key message was that, if urgent action was not taken, the pensions system would be broken within 25 years. This did not anticipate Gordon Brown removing the dividend tax relief on pension schemes in 1997, which only accelerated the decline in final-salary schemes. Today, almost the only people to benefit from such generous pensions are public sector workers. The Basic State Pension was set up in 1946, when retirement typically lasted only about five years. Today it can last well in excess of 20. We were concerned about these issues 40 years ago, and I find it deeply depressing to hear that Liz Kendall, the Work and Pensions Secretary, is only thinking about tinkering with the current system (report, July 22) many years after our predicted 'pensions time bomb' has exploded. Ian MacGregor London N2 SIR – I allowed myself a rueful smile when I read that the Government wants people to pay more into their pension funds (report, July 21). I am now 79 years old, and paid into a pension from the age of 18. Unfortunately, chancellors of all political stripes seem to regard pension funds as their personal piggy banks, to be robbed as and when required – a trend started by Geoffrey Howe in the 1980s and continued by Gordon Brown in 1997. Letters to the Editor We accept letters by email and post. Please include name, address, work and home telephone numbers. ADDRESS: 111 Buckingham Palace Road, London, SW1W 0DT EMAIL: dtletters@ FOLLOW: Telegraph Letters @LettersDesk


Times
5 minutes ago
- Times
Badenoch says she would copy drastic cuts of Argentina's president
Kemi Badenoch has signalled that she wants to use Argentina's state-cutting president as the template to revive Britain's economy and her own party's fortunes. The Conservative leader said that her plans to reduce government spending would take inspiration from Javier Milei, adding that she was 'terrified' by the size of Britain's debt. Badenoch also batted away speculation that she may not survive in post until the next general election, saying that if she paid attention to briefings by some Tory MPs about her being deposed, she would 'lose her mind'. It came after a mini-reshuffle of the Conservative frontbench, in which Badenoch brought back her former rival in the leadership contest, Sir James Cleverly, to shadow the housing secretary, Angela Rayner. Badenoch was asked on Thursday if Britain needed a Milei, whom she has previously paid tribute to, and whether she was such a leader. 'Yes and yes,' she told the Financial Times in an interview. 'Milei is the template.' • Javier Milei's chainsaw economics in Argentina could lead the way Milei has overseen massive spending cuts since he came to power, just over a year and a half ago. His trademark prop is a chainsaw, to demonstrate his approach to public spending. Measures implemented in Argentina under his leadership include dismissing tens of thousands of state employees, slashing pensions and freezing dozens of infrastructure projects. The tribute to Milei this week will lead to speculation that Badenoch will push for significant spending cuts — however, where these would fall remains unclear. She said: 'It's not about cutting bits of the state.' Badenoch warned against 'top slicing' spending, and said instead: 'It's about looking at what the state does, why it does it.' Despite the Tories having trailed in the opinion polls for months, Badenoch warned her party not to emulate Nigel Farage's party. She said: 'We cannot be a repository for disenchantment,' instead saying the Tories should be about 'offering hope, fixing problems'. • What Kemi Badenoch's reshuffle says about the state of the Tories Badenoch praised Milei in her leadership pitch to Tory members at the party conference last autumn, saying that he gave a speech with 'very similar themes' to one she delivered two years ago, and hoped to have been his source of inspiration. In January, Badenoch also said that Argentina was 'serious about freeing business from red tape'. At prime minister's questions at the start of the year, she said 'Argentina is taking a chainsaw to regulations', in an attempt to persuade Sir Keir Starmer to drop his plans to strengthen workers' rights that she argued would stifle business growth.