logo
As interest rates normalise, private credit can help portfolios

As interest rates normalise, private credit can help portfolios

Business Times3 days ago
'HOW did you go bankrupt?' 'Two ways. Gradually, then suddenly.' – Ernest Hemingway, The Sun Also Rises
Often quoted and widely recycled, that response from Mike Campbell – the fictional once-wealthy friend of Jake Barnes, narrator in Hemingway's novel – captures more than just personal financial woes. It's an apt description of how long-running trends unravel – first with subtle shifts, then with violent clarity.
Economist Rudiger Dornbusch put it more clinically: 'In economics, things take longer to happen than you think they will, and then they happen faster than you thought they could.'
Both sentiments apply to today's bond market.
For nearly four decades, falling interest rates created a generational tailwind for fixed income. Bonds didn't just pay income, they delivered capital appreciation, diversification, and ballast. Now, that dynamic is breaking down. Prices have fallen, and correlations have flipped. The 40 per cent in a 60/40 portfolio – which comprises fixed income, the supposedly steady part – has become a problem.
But there's one corner of the market that has held steady amid all this instability: private credit.
BT in your inbox
Start and end each day with the latest news stories and analyses delivered straight to your inbox.
Sign Up
Sign Up
From tailwind to headwind
The bond bull market began in 1981, when then-Federal Reserve chair Paul Volcker engineered a brutal double-dip recession to break inflation's back. At the time, the 10-year Treasury yield peaked near 16 per cent.
What followed was a 39-year stretch of disinflation, financial globalisation, and central bank credibility, which drove yields lower and bond prices higher.
For fixed income investors, it was a golden era where being long duration paid off. A simple strategy of buying 10-year Treasuries and rolling them annually would have delivered over 8 per cent in annualised returns from 1981 to 2020.
The Bloomberg Barclays Aggregate Bond Index returned a similarly impressive 8 per cent over that same period. Bonds weren't just a buffer against equity risk; they were a consistent source of performance.
But that golden era followed a very different one. In the 35 years before 1981, yields climbed steadily and were far more volatile. Bondholders clipped coupons while watching principal values erode. Price appreciation simply wasn't part of the fixed income playbook. There were no 'total return' bond funds because, frankly, there was no total return to chase.
The middle ground
We're not heading back to the 1970s. The US economy is structurally stronger; the Fed is more disciplined; and the lessons of the Volcker era still hold.
But we're also not in a new bond bull market. Instead, we're in a period of normalisation where rates are higher than the recent past but still lower than long-term historical norms.
Following the global financial crisis (GFC), the Fed supported the bull market in bonds with quantitative easing. But in 2022, the central bank began reducing its balance sheet, and by continuing to let its Treasury holdings mature without reinvesting the proceeds, it has kept upward pressure on rates with the increased supply.
Increased fiscal spending and higher deficits bring uncertainty and expectations of higher future Treasury issuance, increasing the term premium demanded by investors.
This middle ground comes with consequences: greater volatility and interest rate risk, less price support, and less reliable diversification.
We've written extensively about how rising rates scramble traditional asset class relationships. In 2022, when the Fed launched its most aggressive hiking cycle in decades, the longstanding negative correlation between stocks and bonds broke down. Since then, the two have moved in the same direction in 31 of the past 40 months, nearly 80 per cent of the time – a dynamic that undermines the very foundation of balanced portfolios.
If you believe that we're beginning a normalised inflationary regime, different from the sub-2 per cent post-GFC era, the unreliable stock-bond correlation is likely to continue. Based on historical data, the stock-bond correlation becomes positive beginning at 2 per cent inflation, strengthening as inflation increases.
It's not just the lack of diversification that's troubling. Bond market volatility, once rare, is becoming routine as a result of policy uncertainty. Modest data surprises or policy comments now trigger exaggerated moves across the yield curve, and central banks retreating as a steady source of demand has reduced market liquidity that helped keep bond prices stable and predictable.
Once major buyers of Treasuries, central banks are pulling back as rising yields in markets such as Germany and Japan make US Treasuries less appealing, especially after factoring in currency hedging costs. At the same time, heightened uncertainty has caused the term premium to resurface, hitting an 11-year high in May.
Investors are demanding more compensation for interest rate risk, reflecting a structurally different regime. In April, high-yield bond prices suffered their steepest drop since the early days of the pandemic – second only to March 2020.
Private credit's quiet consistency
While public credit markets have endured drawdowns and dislocations, private credit has functioned as intended, providing financing to borrowers and liquidity to private equity sponsors without disruption.
That resilience is showing up in the data. April's tariff-driven volatility caused liquid credit spreads to swing sharply – widening in one of the most significant moves in history, before recovering around 71 per cent by early May.
In contrast, the private credit market operated as usual, providing a stable source of funding for companies throughout the turmoil.
Private credit's advantages are structural. In a world of higher rates and unpredictable correlations, it can offer insulation from policy shifts, with floating rates and lower correlation to public markets.
The private credit model brings lenders (investors) directly to borrowers in a 'farm to table' model, reducing the role of bank intermediaries and giving back this spread to investors.
The strategy's floating rate nature reduces exposure to interest rate risk, leaving credit risk as the primary concern – one that experienced managers seek to address through careful underwriting, active portfolio management, and within private investment-grade credit, a focus on first-lien senior secured debt.
Historically, private credit has delivered steady cash flows, limited volatility, and a reliable alternative source of return.
Importantly, the private credit space extends far beyond traditional direct lending. Today, the total addressable market for private credit exceeds US$30 trillion, a significant expansion from less than US$100 billion prior to the GFC.
Private asset-backed financing has become a vital source of capital for companies in high-growth areas such as energy, digital infrastructure, and transportation, while providing investors with hard asset collateral, amortising cash flows and over-collateralisation.
The continued growth of these sectors may expand the asset-backed financing opportunity and potentially give investors an increasingly diverse mix of private credit strategies, providing more resilient portfolios.
That's good news for investors, because as they confront the 40 per cent problem – the end of easy returns and automatic diversification from public traditional fixed income – they'll need to adapt. In a portfolio that's no longer self-balancing, we believe that tools like private credit are essential.
The writer is chief investment strategist, Blackstone Private Wealth Solutions
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Neuralink sees US$1 billion of revenue by 2031 in vast expansion
Neuralink sees US$1 billion of revenue by 2031 in vast expansion

Business Times

time36 minutes ago

  • Business Times

Neuralink sees US$1 billion of revenue by 2031 in vast expansion

[BOSTON] Elon Musk's brain implant company Neuralink expects to put its chips in 20,000 people a year by 2031, generating at least US$1 billion in annual revenue, in a major ramp-up of its work to treat disease and gain unprecedented access to the human mind, according to documents reviewed by Bloomberg. Within six years, the company also plans to have about five large clinics in operation, with at least three versions of its device available, according to a recent presentation shown to investors. One version, Telepathy, is for enabling communication between the brain and machines; another, Blindsight, is aimed at giving vision to blind people; and a third, Deep, would treat tremors and Parkinson's disease. The financial projections, as well as the company's work in patients with tremors and Parkinson's, have not been previously publicly reported. Representatives for Musk and Neuralink did not immediately respond to a request for comment. The company's stated goals show the enormous scale of Musk's vision for Neuralink and the ambitious timeline on which he seeks to operate. Fewer than 10 people are publicly known to have Neuralink brain devices so far as part of clinical trials, and no patients have them to restore vision or treat Parkinson's. By 2029, the company expects to gain regulatory approval in the US for its Telepathy device, and it hopes to perform 2,000 surgeries a year and generate at least US$100 million in annual revenue, according to the documents. Then by 2030, Neuralink sees the launch of its sight-restoring chip Blindsight, expanding to 10,000 surgeries a year and bringing in over US$500 million. The figures assume 'a conservative reimbursement of US$50k per surgery', the documents show. BT in your inbox Start and end each day with the latest news stories and analyses delivered straight to your inbox. Sign Up Sign Up Neuralink has raised US$1.3 billion from investors and is now valued at US$9 billion, according to PitchBook. Brain-computer interface companies such as Neuralink have attracted significant attention and investment in recent years for potential medical applications. No devices are approved by US regulators for permanent use in humans, as companies are still working on gathering data on safety and effectiveness. Musk has hit a number of milestones with Neuralink, though he is also known for overstating how quickly he will be able to reach technological achievements. For example, in 2015, Musk said that Tesla cars would be able to drive themselves within three years. He moved the timeline back several times and finally launched Robotaxis for testing last month. As part of clinical trials, paralysed patients have used Neuralink devices to control computers, allowing them to browse the internet, play games, and edit videos. The company has also been testing its vision implant in monkeys. Several other brain implant companies are building and testing devices to stimulate or read data from the brain. No brain-computer interfaces are approved commercially for permanent implantation by the US Food and Drug Administration. BLOOMBERG

Tesla's sales fall most in a decade in another rough quarter
Tesla's sales fall most in a decade in another rough quarter

Business Times

time2 hours ago

  • Business Times

Tesla's sales fall most in a decade in another rough quarter

[AUSTIN] Tesla fell short of Wall Street's expectations in one of the automaker's worst quarters in years, a sign of the toll that rising competition and a backlash against chief executive officer Elon Musk have taken on the company. Adjusted earnings were 40 cents per share, Tesla said on Wednesday (Jul 23), just below the average analyst estimate. Revenue fell 12 per cent to US$22.5 billion, the sharpest decline in at least a decade. Still, the report was free of new bombshells and the company said it continues to move forward with robotaxi and affordable-vehicle plans, providing a measure of relief for investors. That comes 'despite a sustained uncertain macroeconomic environment resulting from shifting tariffs, unclear impacts from changes to fiscal policy and political sentiment', Tesla said. The revenue drop was due to a decline in vehicle deliveries, lower regulatory credit revenue and a lower average selling price for its cars. Tesla also reported a decline in energy generation and storage revenue. The company did see a boost from the business segment that includes its supercharging network. The shares were little changed at 4.48 pm in extended trading in New York. The stock's value has fallen 18 per cent since the start of the year to Wednesday's close but has largely rebounded from lows in March and April. Some investors are looking past Tesla's uneven financial results and towards Musk's promises of a future built around artificial intelligence, humanoid robots and self-driving technology. BT in your inbox Start and end each day with the latest news stories and analyses delivered straight to your inbox. Sign Up Sign Up 'If one thinks Tesla is at its core just an auto business, then the results were poor,' Adam Crisafulli, founder of the market intelligence firm Vital Knowledge, said in a research note. 'If one thinks Tesla is an AI/robotics juggernaut, then you will probably feel the same about its prospects after the Q2 release as you did before.' Polarisation Tesla's brand has become increasingly polarising following Musk's support of President Donald Trump. During his brief role helping the administration, Musk's attempts to slash government spending generated criticism from many of Tesla's traditionally left-leaning consumers, while some investors worried the project was a distraction. A number of analysts have adjusted their expectations downward in recent weeks. Revenue from regulatory credits, an area that has become a significant revenue stream for the company, fell more than 26 per cent to US$439 million in the second quarter. That's down from US$595 million in the first quarter and US$890 million in the same period a year earlier. That income is expected to drop sharply as the Trump administration eliminates penalties for automakers that fail to meet federal fuel economy standards. Tesla reported gross margin, a gauge of profitability, that exceeded the average estimate. Investors are still eager for more details on robotaxis' path forward, including how quickly the service can grow in Austin and go to other cities. The company said it aims to further improve and expand the service, but did not give timelines or specific locations. Tesla also reported the 'first builds of a more affordable model in June'. The company had previously said production of its more-affordable model would begin in the first half of this year. The model is seen as a key factor to helping reverse the company's recent sales declines. 'The guidance was very sparse,' Ben Kallo, senior analyst at Baird, said. He added that the company offered fewer forward-looking details than in the previous quarter. 'All in all, not a lot of fireworks,' he said. BLOOMBERG

US tariffs, trade tensions to slow growth in developing Asia and Pacific: ADB
US tariffs, trade tensions to slow growth in developing Asia and Pacific: ADB

Business Times

time15 hours ago

  • Business Times

US tariffs, trade tensions to slow growth in developing Asia and Pacific: ADB

[MANILA] Higher US tariffs and trade uncertainty have worsened the economic outlook for developing Asia and the Pacific, the Asian Development Bank (ADB) said in a report on Wednesday (Jul 23) as it lowered its growth forecasts for the region for this year and next. Domestic demand is expected to weaken as factors including geopolitics, supply chain disruptions, rising energy prices and uncertainty in China's property market buffer the region, the Asian Development Outlook report said. The ADB cut its 2025 growth forecast for the region to 4.7 per cent from an earlier projection of 4.9 per cent made in April. The forecast for 2026 was trimmed to 4.6 per cent, from 4.7 per cent. 'Asia and the Pacific has weathered an increasingly challenging external environment this year. But the economic outlook has weakened amid intensifying risks and global uncertainty,' said ADB chief economist Albert Park. Among the sub regions, South-east Asia was expected to slow the most, with growth now projected at 4.2 per cent in 2025 and 4.3 per cent in 2026, down from earlier forecasts of 4.7 per cent for both years. 'Economies in the region should continue strengthening their fundamentals and promoting open trade and regional integration to support investment, employment, and growth,' Park said. BT in your inbox Start and end each day with the latest news stories and analyses delivered straight to your inbox. Sign Up Sign Up The ADB defines developing Asia and the Pacific as 46 economies ranging from China to Georgia to Samoa, and excluding countries such as Japan, Australia and New Zealand. The forecasts were released shortly after US President Donald Trump said that the US and Japan had struck a deal that includes a 15 per cent tariff on Japanese exports, lower than a threatened 25 per cent rate. Trump also announced a new 19 per cent tariff rate for goods from the Philippines, below the threatened 20 per cent levy flagged earlier this month but still above a 17 per cent rate announced in April. He has upended global trade flows with tariffs on nearly every trading partner, with almost all countries facing a 10 per cent tariff that took effect in April and many facing steep additional tariffs from Aug 1. AFP

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store