'I'm not sitting down,' Former NC Gov. Cooper hints at run for US in 2026
It's widely expected he will run for the seat currently held by retiring Senator Thom Tillis.
PREVIOUS: Former Gov. Roy Cooper may announce plans to run for Senate
During his remarks at the NC Democrats' Unity Dinner, Cooper talked about policy accomplishments, including Medicaid expansion and teacher pay raises. He also argued that more needs to be done to address wealth disparities. While he didn't announce his run, he made clear he's not done with public service. In the middle of his speech, he called on fellow democrats who were running for office to stand up.
'Everybody who's planning to run for office next year…Stand up, guys…let's give them a big hand…hey, I'm not sitting down, am I?'
That line received the biggest round of applause of the evening.
And while Cooper wouldn't get into specifics, many in the room treated the campaign as already underway, including the keynote speaker, Illinois Governor JB Pritzker, a potential presidential candidate in 2028.
'Roy, I know I speak for Democratic Governors across the country when I say we can't wait to support you in the next stage of your career, delivering for the people of North Carolina,' said Pritzker.
Cooper's advisors tell Queen City News he will announce his plans in the coming days.
Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Solve the daily Crossword
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Hill
2 minutes ago
- The Hill
Senate Democrats launch investigation into RFK Jr. firing of CDC vaccine panel
Democrats on the Senate Health Committee launched an investigation on Tuesday into Health and Human Services Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr.'s firing of all members of a Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) vaccine advisory panel. Led by ranking member Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.), who caucuses with Democrats, the lawmakers asked for detailed information about why Kennedy dismissed members of the CDC's Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP), who else was involved in the process, and how the new members were identified and vetted. 'By removing all 17 of ACIP's members and replacing them with eight individuals handpicked to advance your anti-vaccine agenda, you have put decades of non-partisan, science-backed work— and, as a result, Americans' lives—at risk,' the lawmakers wrote. In June, Kennedy fired all members of the panel in an unprecedented escalation of his quest to reshape federal health agencies and vaccine policy. He then handpicked eight replacements, many of whom are vaccine critics. He accused the panelists of being beholden to corporate interests and said the panel was rife with conflicts, but did not provide any evidence. The panelists are not political appointees. ACIP members meet and discuss data to determine which vaccines are recommended and for whom. If the CDC director signs off on the panel's recommendations, ACIP-recommended vaccines must be covered by health insurance. Under many state laws, ACIP-recommended vaccines are mandated for schoolchildren. The lawmakers on Tuesday called on Kennedy to provide information on the firings by Aug. 12, including details of the alleged conflict of interest for each fired member and how their conflicts differ from ones they previously disclosed. Kennedy has promised transparency and department officials pledged to release ethics forms on the new panelists prior to their meeting last month, but that never happened. A searchable database of ACIP members lists conflicts of interest for just two of Kennedy's picks, though it's much more detailed for the dismissed members. The senators also asked if Kennedy plans to appoint any additional members to the panel. Only seven members participated in last month's meeting. Kennedy claimed in a Fox News interview in June that he would allow Health Committee chairman Sen. Bill Cassidy (R-La.) to place one of his own candidates on the panel. In addition to Sanders, the letter was signed by Democratic Sens. Tim Kaine (Va.), Maggie Hassan (N.H.), John Hickenlooper (Colo.), Ed Markey (Mass.), Andy Kim (N.J.), Lisa Blunt Rochester (Del.) and Angela Alsobrooks (Md.). The lawmakers said they launched a partisan investigation because a Sanders request for a bipartisan inquiry in June went unheeded. Cassidy on Tuesday said he doesn't see the point in an investigation, because Democrats will be able to question Kennedy directly the next time he testifies. 'The Secretary will be back before us. He's been before us once. He's going to be back before us again,' Cassidy told reporters. 'I'm not sure what an investigation is going to accomplish, more than the guy who apparently made the decision, sitting there before us, taking questions from everybody on the panel,' he continued.
Fox News
3 minutes ago
- Fox News
Democrats building two-tiered justice system to make Latinos ‘permanent underclass,' says LA GOP leader
Democrats are building a 'two-tiered' justice system to make Latinos and immigrants a 'permanent underclass,' says the head of the LA County GOP, who herself was a legal immigrant.
Politico
3 minutes ago
- Politico
MTG not running for Georgia governor
Senate Republicans are privately discussing whether to change the chamber's rules amid growing frustration with Democrats' slow-walking of President Donald Trump's nominees. The discussion, which came to a head during a closed-door lunch Tuesday, comes as Republicans seek to confirm dozens of Trump nominees before leaving for their traditional summer break. Doing so without weeks of delay would require Democrats to cut a deal to speed up the process. 'This can't continue — Democrats either have to change their behavior or we're going to have to change other things,' Sen. John Barrasso (R-Wyo.), the No. 2 Senate Republican, said Tuesday, adding that changing rules surrounding nominations would be 'part of the discussion.' Possible rules changes that Republicans are entertaining include reducing the amount of debate time each nominee is required to undergo before a final vote or allowing 'en bloc' voting on groups of nominees. Republicans are also discussing whether to reduce the number of nominees who have to undergo Senate confirmation. 'We are absolutely trying to avoid a nuclear option issue, but at some point you've got to have an operational government,' said Sen. Mike Rounds (R-S.D.). Republicans also spoke at length during their party lunch about allowing recess appointments — a once-unthinkable idea that appears to be gaining new traction within the conference. Sen. John Kennedy (R-La.) said afterward there was a 'consensus' within the Senate GOP about formally adjourning the Senate and allowing Trump to make recess appointments. The Senate typically holds brief 'pro forma' sessions during long breaks that prevent presidents from circumventing Congress. Republicans 'just don't have a choice,' Kennedy said, while also stressing that he wasn't certain every Republican senator is on board. Another GOP senator in the lunch, granted anonymity to speak candidly, said there was 'a lot of support in the room' for either changing the rules or allowing recess appointments. Even as some Republicans float recess appointments, they are still viewed as unlikely to happen. For one, GOP senators have a hangup out of their control: Both chambers need to formally adjourn, and the House left town without doing so. They're holding pro forma sessions instead. The GOP's internal frustration has been quietly building over the past months, with many Republicans particularly annoyed about the lack of voice votes for Trump's nominees. Senate Majority Leader John Thune noted in a floor address Monday that at the same point in his tenure President Joe Biden had gotten dozens of nominees approved without having to call individual roll call votes. Thune added in an interview Tuesday that 'pressure is going to grow to take steps to expedite this process if the Dems don't start playing ball soon. It's going to start coming from every direction.' There are roughly 150 nominees currently awaiting action on the Senate floor. Democrats are forcing Republicans to eat up floor time to overcome procedural hurdle nominees on even mid-level picks, sparking GOP frustration over not being able to clear those nominees via unanimous consent or voice votes. 'Republicans would like to return to those golden years when there were groups of nominees considered, but we weren't given that courtesy by them,' said Sen. Dick Durbin (D-Ill.), referring to the trickle of nominees confirmed under President Joe Biden. 'We're kind of stuck where we are,' he added. Even as senators air their frustrations, Thune said he is talking to Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer about a potential package of nominees that could get confirmed before the extended summer break. Durbin confirmed the negotiations. Durbin said the question for Democrats is 'what's the quid pro quo' that they would get in exchange for expediting nominees.
