Durban High Court gears up for the 2026 murder trial of rapper AKA
Image: Nomonde Zondi
The murder pre-trial conference of slain South African rapper Kiernan 'AKA' Forbes and his friend Tebello 'Tibz' Mostoane is approaching its end.
This as the State and defence have agreed on certain aspects. The Durban High Court on Thursday learnt that only minor issues need to be sorted out before the KwaZulu-Natal Judge President approves trial dates for 2026.
Lindokuhle Mkhwanazi, Lindani Ndimande, Siyanda Myeza, Mziwethemba Gwabeni, and Lindokuhle Lindo Ndimande are charged with the murders of Forbes and Motsoane, who were gunned down in Durban on Florida Road in February 2023. The two friends were killed outside Wish restaurant, where they had their last supper. The Wish restaurant has since closed down.
The state senior prosecutor, Elvis Gcweka, told the court that the Section 220 admissions have been made by the accused. Section 220 of the Criminal Procedure Act 51 of 1977 allows for formal admissions by the accused, which constitute sufficient proof of such facts and mean that the State does not have to prove these facts in the trial.
However, the big-shot Durban senior counsel advocate, Jimmy Howse, said in respect of his client Lindani, there were admissions that they had a problem with. Howse has just been recently instructed in this matter.
Video Player is loading.
Play Video
Play
Unmute
Current Time
0:00
/
Duration
-:-
Loaded :
0%
Stream Type LIVE
Seek to live, currently behind live
LIVE
Remaining Time
-
0:00
This is a modal window.
Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window.
Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan
Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan
Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Window Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan
Transparency Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque
Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Dropshadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps
Reset
restore all settings to the default values Done
Close Modal Dialog
End of dialog window.
Advertisement
Next
Stay
Close ✕
Ad loading
In the past, he has represented controversial Durban businesswoman Shauwn Mkhize. He is also representing the former eThekwini deputy head of Supply Chain Management, Sandile Ngcobo, in a Durban Solid Waste corruption case involving Zandile Gumede, a former mayor of eThekwini.
Attorney Sibusiso Dlamini, who is instructing all the counsels in this matter, also told the court that in respect of Mkhwanazi and Lindokuhle Ndimande, there was an admission that they had a problem with.
Dlamini further stated that advocate Simphiwe Mlotshwa, who is the counsel for Mkhwanazi and Lindokuhle Ndimande, was in another matter as he was not present.
At some stage, the matter had to stand down as Judge Jacqueline Henriques said the State and defence must get their house in order regarding this. When the matter was called again, Gcweka said the evidence that the state would lead in the trial is bank statements, motor vehicle car trackers, ballistics, CCTV, and witness statements. He added that the State would lead with 45 witnesses, with additional witnesses.
However, Howse said he wanted the State to provide the defence with the witness statements of the additional witnesses that were not named by the State. 'It's always an ambush at trial,' he added.
'The trial would be heard over two sessions, one in July and the other in October,' Gcweka told the court.
However, he stated that the dates had not been approved by Judge President Thoba Poyo-Dlwati.
Judge Henriques said she was not going to certify the matter trial-ready as the defence and State need to get their house in order and get the court dates certified by Judge President Poyo-Dlwati.
The matter was postponed to August 13.
nomonde.zondi@inl.co.za
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
IOL News
3 hours ago
- IOL News
LISTEN: EFF leader recounts choking in Cape Town Council
EFF caucus leader in the City of Cape Town, Mzubani Dambuza has given a blow by blow account of how he lost consciousness while being choked by security officer at City chambers. screenshot EFF caucus leader in the City of Cape Town, Mzubani Dambuza, choked by secuity personnel. Image: screenshot EFF caucus leader in the City of Cape Town, Mzubani Dambuza, has given a blow-by-blow account of how he lost consciousness while being choked by a security officer during a Council sitting on Wednesday, saying he begged them to allow him to get up and walk out of the Chambers. The peace officer identified in a video as Renato Reid, which went viral on social media, shows him allegedly choking Dambuza while apparently pinning him to the ground. According to Reid's LinkedIn profile, he is a SWAT Operational Commander with 18 years experience in the South African police. His profile was shared widely on social media following the incident. Cape Town Speaker, Felicity Purchase, said the confrontation started after Dambuza refused to leave the Council Chambers when she asked him to. Giving his account of what happened, Dambuza, better known as 'Banzi', said he refused to leave the Chambers after another councillor was allowed to bring a Point of Order. 'A councillor of GOOD Party was asking a question, and then a Point of Order came from a councillor of the DA,' he said. 'She (Speaker) allowed it, meanwhile, she would always say there is no Point of Order during the time we are dealing with the speech of the mayor. 'I again raised the protective cultures of the DA, she (Purchase) named me for the first time, second time and third time and said I must be removed from Council. 'Upon that I said, I am not going to move out of Council. 'The Speaker called on what we deem as 'peace officers'. 'The rest of the caucus of the EFF started laying a protective layer around me.' Dambuza said the incident quickly escalated. 'There is a photograph showing one of the EFF councillors, she was placing her whole body on top of me, so that I am not taken away,' he said. 'These so-called peace officers were pulling her, whether they were male or female, they were harassing a woman. 'As I grabbed the poles, they wanted to get me out and they tore my pants as they grabbed it. 'This officer, Renato Reid, came in and held me from the back on my neck and then he started strangling me. 'After he pulled me out, he placed his knee onto my neck and then he strangled me. 'I said to him, 'but you are strangling me', 'you are trying to kill me'. He did not stop, he turned me around and sat on top of me and then he continued to strangle me, this was when I was losing life (unconscious), when I became unconscious, he started hitting me from the back, and I came back (from consciousness), then he tried to strangle me again. "This is the time when executive director Vincent Botto stopped them. 'There was another guy holding my right arm under the table, so that I was not able to remove his hands. 'After that, I asked Vincent Botto, who is the officer, they refused to give his details. 'We went to the police station to open a case. Councilors from ANC, NCC, EFF and GOOD who were witnesses, gave statements. "Let's say hypothetically speaking, I was wrong in terms of the rules, they carry their own opinion but there is no councillor that must be choked, the way that they dealt with it could have been better. "I was telling them, let me go, I can get up and walk out.' Get your news on the go, click here to join the Cape Argus News WhatsApp channel. Cape Argus
Daily Maverick
3 hours ago
- Daily Maverick
Policing crisis is symptom of SA's transition into a violent democracy
South Africa has undergone a second transition, away from the ideals of a constitutional democracy, first into a gatekeeper state, and then increasingly into what academics call a 'violent democracy'. President Cyril Ramaphosa recently established a judicial commission of inquiry, chaired by Acting Deputy Chief Justice Mbuyiseli Madlanga, to investigate Lieutenant General Nhlanhla Mkhwanazi's allegations that 'sophisticated criminal syndicates have infiltrated law enforcement and intelligence structures in South Africa'. Naturally, much of the attention has been on the toxic relationship between ANC politicians, corrupt businesspeople and the country's top police structures. However, while it is tempting to believe that this is just another example of the rot infecting the South African state, this would be a mistake, because these activities are not an aberration of South Africa's weak state but rather an outcome of the dysfunctional democratisation process that has unfolded in the country over the last few decades. Gatekeeper state In common with many other post-independent African states, South Africa transitioned from the horrors of colonialism and racism into being a gatekeeper state. In these fragile states, the control of access to wealth and power, rather than governance, is the ultimate political prize. Over time, state wealth and power are increasingly centralised and contested among the elites, while service delivery and governance for most of the population languish at the periphery. Political authority is therefore less about guiding national development and more about managing the intersection between internal resources and external recognition. At its core, a gatekeeper state revolves around who controls the 'gate'. In South Africa, this gate was historically guarded by the ANC so long as there was uncontested electoral recognition. Governance, in this framework, becomes a zero-sum game where controlling the gate is paramount because losing power means losing access to wealth. This has irredeemably reshaped the internal dynamics of the ANC, fuelling factionalism as different groups within the party compete for control of shrinking state resources. Consequently, the government is increasingly unable to meet its service delivery obligations because public office is not about public service but is instead a means of ensuring financial rewards, and because service delivery is not about optimal provision within the budgetary limits but is instead a means to garner political loyalty. Over time, as the ANC's factional battles worsened, the ANC's response has been to centralise control, consolidating authority in the Presidency, marginalising Parliament, and actively eroding independent institutions. However, as the ANC's electoral support has declined, gatekeeping, instead of weakening, has decentralised and now infects both formal and informal political-economic structures. The consequence of this system is neo-patrimonialism — ruling by patronage rather than by policy — that replaces governance as hollowed-out formal institutions are replaced with informal networks based on political allegiance and reciprocal favours. Loyalty is rewarded not through public service delivery or national development, but instead by access to tenders, jobs, and contracts. As the electorate loses faith in political leadership, political support is 'purchased' via patronage networks rather than earned through effective governance. Violent democracy The implications for South Africa's democratisation have been grim. In the years of the Zuma-Ramaphosa presidencies, South Africa has undergone a second transition, away from the ideals of a constitutional democracy, first into a gatekeeper state, and increasingly into what academics call a ' violent democracy '. This is not merely a democracy with violence. In this aberrant form of democracy, violence is an implicit part of the political system. Assassinations, intimidation and State Capture are features of how power is contested, contained, and controlled. In a violent democracy the state does not have the sole legitimate right to use violence — instead elite coalitions, criminal networks, and even taxi associations can use violence to capture and replace democratic governance. Naturally, as violent democracy deepens, constitutional democracy weakens. South Africa's democratic institutions, once the pride of our post-apartheid dispensation, are now infected with corruption, inefficiency and decay. The ANC cannot be reformed, but whether the Government of National Unity can resurrect the democratic institutions of accountability and reverse the country from its dark path remains to be seen. If not, then the dream of a free, fair, and equal South Africa will likely become just another casualty of rapacious greed. DM
IOL News
4 hours ago
- IOL News
Witness recounts events of the July 2021 unrest in Phoenix
Motor vehicles were set alight on Phoenix Highway during the unrest in Phoenix, north of Durban. Image: Motshwari Mofokeng/African News Agency (ANA) A State witness, who is a recovered drug addict, told the Durban High Court that during the 2021 July unrest violence in Phoenix, where black Africans were allegedly attacked by four Indian males, he witnessed the incident in his sober senses and he got a clear view of it. The State witness, whose name cannot be revealed for security reasons, had told the court earlier in his testimony that he had been on drugs for 40 years. He has pointed out Trevor Gopal, the owner of Tees Tavern in Phoenix, as the person who incited violence and ordered that the three victims, Njabulo Allen Dlamini, Nkosikhona Madlala, and Sandile Sambo, be burnt alive with their taxi. In this matter, Gopal, Ravine Naidoo, Tyreece Govender, and Timothy Govender are charged with Dlamini's murder, two counts of attempted murder, malicious damage to property, and public violence. The State is alleging that Gopal incited his security guards and members of the public to commit acts of violence against black Africans visiting Phoenix. The witness said that when the incident took place around midday on July 12, 2021, he had last taken drugs at 6am. 'When the incident took place, I was in my sober senses,' he said. During re-examination by state prosecutor advocate Thabani Buthelezi, the witness said his drug addiction had been arrested three or four years ago when he went into rehabilitation. As he was continuing to explain, Judge Mluleki Chithi interjected, stating that the addiction issue was not relevant to the court. 'Was he under the influence of drugs at the relevant time? That is the question,' he said. Judge Chithi interjected often, telling the witness to answer the questions that had been asked instead of talking about his life experiences or giving the court unnecessary answers. Additionally, the witness told the court that during the incident, he had a clear view. Buthelezi asked the witness if he knew where the person seen in a video of the incident got the cloth that was put in the petrol tank of the victim's taxi. The witness said this was done by two people and one was wearing a bulletproof vest. When the taxi did not burn as anticipated, Gopal and his brother then made attempts to burn it. 'You told us here in court that the people who burnt the taxi were accused, two (Gopal and his brother). Why did you not tell us about this?' Judge Chithi asked. The witness replied by saying he thought it was not relevant to mention this, 'because the taxi did not do what it was meant to do'. The witness said Gopal told people to stop filming at that stage, and he together with his brother approached the taxi to set it alight.
