Lawmakers Just Proposed Making It Illegal For Men To Have Unprotected Sex Unless They Intend To Make A Baby, And YES, This Is REAL
If the 'Conception Begins at Erection Act' passes, men in Ohio could be charged with a felony if they 'discharge genetic material' without intending to get a woman pregnant.
A Capitol Police car parked in front of the United States Capitol
However, the bill does provide exceptions if the male partner uses protection or contraception, masturbates on their own, donates sperm, or is a member of the LGBTQ+ community.
Think it sounds nutty? You'll get no arguments from Rep. Anita Somani, who co-sponsored the bill with fellow Democrat Tristan Rader.
In an editorial for the Columbus Dispatch, Somani, a gynecologist, admitted she knows 'how ludicrous my sounds' but said that was the point.
'Is my bill offensive because it dares to attack men? Maybe, but again, as an OB/GYN, I'm against regulating anyone's reproductive rights,' she said. Those decisions, she argued, 'should be between the patient and the physician without criminal penalties being built into bills conservative organizations are promoting across the country.'
HuffPost has reached out to Somani for details on the bill.
In an interview with CBS Cleveland affiliate WOIO, Somani said there's no doubt about the damage restrictive abortion laws have had on women.
'What other right do you know of where women have different rights based on where they live versus men?' she asked. 'If I live in a state that protects reproductive rights, I have more rights than somebody who lives in a state where reproductive rights have been restricted.'
'Men can go to any state in the United States and have the same rights no matter where they are,' Somani added.
Somani and Rader's bill is similar to another bill with the same name recently introduced in the Mississippi legislature.
Under the provisions of that proposed bill, violators wouldn't face jail time but would pay $1,000 for the first offense, $5,000 for the second, and $10,000 for three or more offenses. Somani told WOIO that her bill would make ejaculation a felony, which underscores the point she's trying to make by introducing it.
'We shouldn't be penalizing reproductive care for anybody, and that, again, is why we have the felony piece of this bill,' Somani said.
This article originally appeared on HuffPost
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
USA Today
26 minutes ago
- USA Today
Kamala Harris' decision kickstarts the 2028 Democratic presidential primary: 5 takeaways
The former vice president's decision to skip out on running for California governor changes the political math for her party - and back in her home state. She's out, but is she really still in? Kamala Harris ended months of speculation about running for California governor on July 30 when she announced she wasn't vying for the top spot in her home state. "For now," she said, her leadership and public service won't be in elected halls of power. Only Harris knows how long that will be, but her decision leaves the door open for mounting a third White House bid in 2028 amid what's expected to be a jam-packed Democratic field but where the former 60-year-old vice president's diehard supporters appear ready to leap at as President Donald Trump's approval numbers dip. "I remain proud AF to have voted for Kamala Harris," Ricky Davila, a Los Angeles-based musician, said in a July 30 post on X, responding to her decision. "It'll always break my heart that we were robbed (of) the opportunity to have a fantastic once in a lifetime president." But the choice comes at a time when Democrats are trying to turn the page, particularly in terms of festering questions surrounding former President Joe Biden's unprecedented exit from last year's race. Here are five takeaways on Harris' blockbuster decision, and what it could mean for Democrats going forward. Harris declining California governor marks '28 kickoff Several 2028 hopefuls on the Democratic side have already begun to put their stakes in the ground, whether by visiting early states, launching podcasts or drawing thousands at rallies across the country. But Harris forgoing a California governor bid now means that a new round of speculation will begin as to whether she wants a third bite at the apple. That will change the calculus for some would-be contenders, but also left-leaning advocacy groups and importantly voters. Longtime Harris allies were bullish, saying the 60-year-old Democrat's brand remains strong. They were blunt when asked about her future. "She can do anything she wants to do, but she owes us nothing," CNN commentator Bakari Sellers told USA TODAY. "She's a talent and 2028 could be it. Or 2032. Whatever she decides. She's young." A month before Harris' decision, however, an Emerson College survey was showing her support in a hypothetical 2028 contest beginning to slip as other names emerge. The mock Democratic primary found 16% supporting former Secretary of Transportation Pete Buttigieg, with Harris at 13% followed by current California Gov. Gavin Newsom at 12% and Pennsylvania Gov. Josh Shapiro and New York Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez both at 7% respectively. More voters were undecided at 23%, the June poll showed. Returning to the national stage, but with Biden's baggage There's no doubt Harris would be the most formidable contender and popular figure among the base if she returns to the national stage. She has the highest name ID and widest fundraising network by far of the potential candidates currently rumored. But she also carries a decent portion of the baggage from the 2024 campaign, which collapsed after Biden's poor debate performance that reminded the nation about his age and acuity. Harris' return risks reopening wounds and questions about her role and decision-making during the Biden administration just as the party looks to heal itself after bypassing on a public autopsy about last year's loss. The former VP said in her July 30 statement that her immediate leadership will be dedicated to "helping elect Democrats across the nation." The first test of that appetite for Harris will come this fall as critical races for governor in New Jersey and Virginia -- two states she won in 2024 -- are gearing up for November. Both Reps. Mikie Sherrill, D-N.J., and Abigail Spanberger, D-Va., the Democratic gubernatorial nominees in their respective states, endorsed Harris for president. It will be telling how eager and in what ways they and other Democrats, particularly in battleground states and swing districts, will be for Harris' return to the trail whether it is this year or the upcoming 2026 midterms. "Excited about (Harris) hitting the road and traveling the country to help us flip the House and win back Congress," Rep. Robert Garcia, D-Calif., said in a July 30 post on X. "Let's go!" '107 Days': Harris debuts new book Harris delivered another revealing piece of news after passing on the California governor's race. She is coming out with a book about her experience entitled "107 Days" - which was the length of her abbreviated campaign. "Since leaving office, I've spent a lot of time reflecting on those days and with candor and reflection, I've written a behind-the-scenes account of that journey," Harris said in a July 31 post on X. "I believe there's value in sharing what I saw, what I learned, and what it will take to move forward." What the world saw on the campaign trail was only part of the new book is a behind-the-scenes look at my experience leading the shortest presidential campaign in modern history.107 Days is out on September 23. I can't wait for you to read it: How much it will reveal remains to be seen about last year's campaign, chiefly her knowledge about Biden's health and how it all went down when she received the party's nomination. Simon & Schuster, the New York-based publisher behind the book, is advertising it as a "page-turning account" with "surprising and revealing insights" so expect political observers to pour over if it lives up to the hype, but the book gives Harris a chance to go back on the road and keep her profile high. Don't expect 2028 hopefuls to back down amid rising progressive populism If Harris ends up running for a third time, don't expect other rumored candidates to simply walk away and allow for another coronation. Democrats have been engaged in a big debate about their party's future for much of this year, including sharp criticisms of their leadership in Congress around how to effectively challenge Trump. There also is a rising populism on the left, emboldened by Zohran Mamdani's win in the New York City Democratic primary in June. Those within the activist left especially are pointing to a shift, especially around issues that Harris ducked during the 2024 campaign such as the ongoing conflict in Gaza. A poll released July 29 by Data for Progress, for instance, found 78% of NYC Democratic voters said Israel is committing genocide in the region, and that more are likely to side with the Palestinians. "The dam has broken," Margaret DeReus, executive director of the Institute for Middle East Understanding, which commissioned the survey, said in a statement. "As the Democratic Party considers its future after November's loss, and as poll after poll shows the party's approval to be at historic lows, Zohran Mamdani's ability to energize new voters with his bold platform for Palestinian rights should be a wake-up call." If Harris does run again, it also would create a bit of an awkward scenario where she would be jockeying against some of the same people her failed campaign vetted to be her running mate, including Minnesota Gov. Tim Walz, who was on the 2024 ticket but has spoken out about last year's campaign. "We shouldn't have been playing this thing so safe," Walz told Politico in March. California governor's race is now wide open Now that Harris is out, the California governor's race becomes a massive derby among roughly a dozen notable contenders who have already expressed an intention to join the 2026 primary battle. Among the names are Xavier Becerra, a former health secretary under Biden; Antonio Villaraigosa, a former L.A. mayor; current Lt. Gov. Eleni Kounalakis, who has been endorsed by former Speaker Nancy Pelosi; Riverside County Sheriff Chad Bianco, an outspoken Trump supporter; and former Rep. Katie Porter, a staunch progressive who previously ran for Senate and who many believe to be in the best position to benefit from Harris' exit. A University of California, Irvine poll released July 2 showed Harris at 24% with no other would-be contenders receiving double-digit support. Remember in California, candidates sprint in a primary where the top two finishers, regardless of party affiliation, advance to the general election in a runoff. California, which holds the world's fourth largest economy, is thought of as a safe blue state by most forecasters but it has been at the forefront of Trump's immigration crackdown, which has been marked by violent clashes between law enforcement and left-leaning demonstrators. It also has been in the news around other issues, such as homelessness and wildfires, and the UCI survey found that by a 2-to-1 margin, most Californians think their state is on the wrong track.
The Hill
26 minutes ago
- The Hill
Tillis declares he won't ‘go nuclear' to change rules to speed up Trump nominees
Sen. Thom Tillis (R-N.C.) said Thursday that he would not support a simple-majority vote to change the Senate's rules on order to speed up the confirmation of more than 160 pending Trump nominees, who have been held up by Democrats demanding time-consuming votes on even low-level, non-controversial picks. The backlog of nominees has prompted Senate Republicans to discuss a variety of rules reforms, such as getting rid of the two hours of debate time that must elapse between a cloture vote, a key procedural step, and a final vote. Republicans are also discussing packaging lower-level nominees in groups and voting on them en bloc to speed up consideration on the floor. A third option would be to eliminate the cloture vote, which limits debate time on the floor, before the final vote on lower-level nominees. All of these rules changes, however, would need at least 51 votes on the Senate floor if Republicans decide to make them without any Democratic input. Under regular order, it requires 67 votes to change the Senate's rules, but there's a short-cut to establishing new precedents through simple-majority votes known as the nuclear option. It's called the nuclear option because changing the Senate's rules with a simple majority-vote is viewed as a major escalation of partisan tactics. Tillis on Thursday said he would not support changing Senate precedent with a simple-majority vote to limit the minority party's ability to slow down nominees. 'I just generally don't go nuclear,' he said. He argued that 'if we do this, then that means the new bar for rules [changes] is a simple majority' instead of mustering 67 votes to change the rules under regular order. Sen. Susan Collins (R-Maine) also sounded leery about changing the rules for processing lower-level nominees through a partisan vote. 'We clearly have a huge problem with bipartisan nominees requiring roll call votes but I want to see what the exact proposals are,' she said. Senate Majority Leader John Thune (R-S.D.) told reporters Thursday morning that the conference is exploring various rules change to get Trump's nominees confirmed more swiftly. 'We're having the conversations. Obviously, you want to do it the right way and so it could very well be something we do when we come back,' he said, referring to when senators come back to Washington in September of the August recess. Thune said it would be 'preferrable' to change the rules with 67 votes from members of both parties, but he observed that's unlikely to happen in today's partisan environment. 'There is some interest on the Democrat side that has been expressed,' he said of a potential rules change. 'I suspect with the current Democrat party, though, it would be very hard to get 67.'
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Rounds wins Trump endorsement after playing deal-making role in rescinding public media funds
President Donald Trump issued a reelection endorsement Monday for South Dakota's U.S. Sen. Mike Rounds, days after Rounds helped pass Trump's cancellation of previously approved funds for public broadcasting and foreign aid. Rounds, a Republican former governor, is serving his second term in the U.S. Senate. He's up for reelection next year. In a message posted to social media, Trump described Rounds as an 'incredibly strong advocate for the wonderful people of South Dakota.' Trump wrote that Rounds has his 'Complete and Total Endorsement.' Rounds shared the endorsement on social media and thanked Trump, writing, 'I look forward to working with you to make America even better!' The endorsement came on the heels of Rounds helping to pass Trump's recission of Corporation for Public Broadcasting funds last week. Rounds had expressed concerns about canceling $1.1 billion of previously approved funding for the corporation. He announced his support after saying he'd negotiated with the Trump administration to move $9.4 million from an account within the Interior Department to at least two dozen Native American radio stations in multiple states that depend on the corporation for much of their funding. The legislation also cancels about $8 billion in foreign aid spending that Congress had appropriated for dozens of programs, including global health initiatives. After Rounds announced his support, the bill advanced 51-50 on a procedural vote in the Senate, on its way to eventual passage. The Trump endorsement completes a two-year political shift for Rounds, who endorsed U.S. Sen. Tim Scott, R-South Carolina, for president in May 2023 and did not attend Trump's September 2023 rally with then-Gov. Kristi Noem in a Rapid City arena. No Republican has come forward so far to challenge Rounds for the party's nomination. The other declared candidates for the Senate seat are Julian Beaudion, a Democratic business owner and former state trooper, and Brian Bengs, who is running as an independent after running unsuccessfully as a Democrat against Republican Sen. John Thune in 2022. South Dakota's primary election is June 2, 2026, and the general election is Nov. 3, 2026. This article originally appeared on Sioux Falls Argus Leader: Rounds wins Trump endorsement after playing deal-making role in rescinding public media funds
