US Spent $800 Million In THAAD Missiles In 12 Days To Shield Israel From Iran
The United States used up a total of 15 to 20 per cent of the country's advanced anti-missile system or Terminal High Altitude Area Defense (THAAD) to bolster the defence against Iran's aerial strikes during the 12-day conflict in which Israel and the US struck nuclear facilities.
According to Military Watch Magazine, an estimate of 60-80 interceptors were utilised during the conflict. A single launch of a THAAD interceptor costs between $12-15 million, so the entire cost of these interceptors sits between $810 million to $1.215 billion. This figure dwarfs the cost of Iran's missile barrages. This asymmetric cost of defence versus offence is not sustainable in the long term or multi-front conflicts.
Per the Wall Street Journal, the US had restocked the THAAD system set up in Israel in 2024.
Iran had launched a barrage of missiles on cities across Israel in response to attacks on its nuclear and military facilities. They included models such as Ghadr, Emad, Kheibar Shekan, and the Fattah-1 hypersonic missile, which is hard to intercept as it travels at up to Mach 15.
The THAAD deployment to Israel came with challenges as supporting allies in conflict zones would mean using resources that could affect military readiness and future deployment.
The THAAD system was designed to counter the expanding missile capabilities of nations like North Korea and Iran as they were pursuing medium and intermediate range ballistic missiles capable of delivering conventional or nuclear warheads.
Moreover, the United States produces only about 50-60 THAAD interceptors annually, which means it could take years to replenish what it just expended in 11 days.
The war between Israel and Iran came to an end after US President Donald Trump announced on Monday that a "complete and total ceasefire" had been reached by both the parties. In the end, the US-Israel campaign has managed to contain, not defeat, Iran. Nuclear sites were hit. Military leadership was shaken. But Iran's regime, and its nuclear ambition, remain intact.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
News18
an hour ago
- News18
Israel-Iran War: How Many Homes Can Be Lit Up With 1 Kg Of Enriched Uranium?
Last Updated: A single kilogramme of uranium-235 can theoretically generate about 24 million kilowatt-hours (kWh) of electricity, enough to power 6,666 households for an entire year The guns may have fallen silent, but the world is still holding its breath. Just hours after US President Donald Trump declared a 'total and complete ceasefire" between Iran and Israel, effectively ending what's being termed the '12-Day War", a chilling question is being whispered across diplomatic and intelligence circles alike – Where is Iran's highly enriched uranium? This unsettling uncertainty emerged after the US carried out a series of targeted strikes on three of Iran's nuclear facilities. These sites, according to the US, were 'completely destroyed" using advanced bunker-busting munitions. However, while the missile strikes may have demolished infrastructure, they also raised an alarming suspicion – what if Iran moved its uranium stockpile beforehand? In May, the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) released a report confirming that Iran possessed 408.6 kgs of uranium enriched up to 60 percent purity. That's a significant jump from the 133.8 kgs recorded just three months earlier in February. For context, nuclear weapons require uranium enriched to 90 percent. US intelligence officials have long warned that a stockpile of 400 kg at 60% enrichment could be a short sprint away from weapons-grade material – enough, they say, to potentially produce up to 10 nuclear bombs. With the targeted sites now reportedly in ruins, one crucial question remains unanswered: Was the uranium there at all when the bombs hit? So far, there's been no confirmation from the IAEA, Iran, or even satellite intelligence on whether the stockpile was destroyed or hidden. What Makes Enriched Uranium So Dangerous? To understand why the world is so nervous, it's important to know what enriched uranium is and how it works. Naturally occurring uranium contains just 0.7% of the fissile isotope uranium-235. Power reactors typically use fuel enriched to 3–5% U-235. Weapons, however, require enrichment to around 90%. The enrichment process involves increasing the concentration of U-235 by removing the non-fissile U-238. This makes the uranium 'fissile," meaning its atoms can be split by neutrons, unleashing vast amounts of energy; whether for peaceful electricity or devastating explosions. If channeled into civilian use, enriched uranium has almost mythical energy potential. A single kilogramme of uranium-235 can theoretically generate about 24 million kilowatt-hours (kWh) of electricity. That's roughly 20 terajoules or 1,111 megawatt-hours – enough to power 6,666 households for an entire year, based on average annual consumption. To put this in perspective, coal, our most common source of thermal energy, doesn't even come close. It would take 160 tonnes of coal to produce the energy in just 1 kg of uranium. But the potential doesn't stop at homes. Theoretical models suggest that 1 kg of enriched uranium could: Run a 1.5-ton air conditioner continuously for 12 million hours (or about 1,370 years) Fully charge 1.2 billion mobile phones Power 3,00,000 electric cars for a single full charge (assuming 80 kWh per charge). Of course, these are idealised estimates. In the real world, energy is lost at every stage – from heat conversion to grid transmission to end-use. The silence from Iran's leadership on the uranium question has only deepened the anxiety. While officials have condemned the strikes and accused the US of 'nuclear terrorism", there's been no confirmation about whether any of the 408.6 kg of enriched uranium was destroyed, moved, or remains intact elsewhere. Meanwhile, satellite intelligence, usually swift to pick up signs of radioactive leakage or large-scale transport, has revealed little. In fact, sources within US defence circles privately admit that the intelligence on Iran's nuclear movements was 'inconclusive" in the lead-up to the strikes.
&w=3840&q=100)
Business Standard
an hour ago
- Business Standard
What's inside Trump's 940-page tax, spending bill now before Senate
Trump told Republicans, who hold majority power in the House and Senate, to skip their holiday vacations and deliver the bill by July 4 AP Washington At some 940-pages, the legislation is a sprawling collection of tax breaks, spending cuts and other Republican priorities, including new money for national defense and deportations. Now it's up to Congress to decide whether President Donald Trump's signature's domestic policy package will become law. Trump told Republicans, who hold majority power in the House and Senate, to skip their holiday vacations and deliver the bill by July 4. Senators were working through the weekend to pass the bill and send it back to the House for a final vote. Democrats are united against it. Here's the latest on what's in the bill. There could be changes as lawmakers negotiate. Tax cuts are priority Republicans say the bill is crucial because there would be a massive tax increase after December when tax breaks from Trump's first term expire. The legislation contains roughly $3.8 trillion in tax cuts. The existing tax rates and brackets would become permanent under the bill. It temporarily would add new tax breaks that Trump campaigned on: no taxes on tips, overtime pay or some automotive loans, along with a bigger $6,000 deduction in the Senate draft for older adults who earn no more than $75,000 a year. It would boost the $2,000 child tax credit to $2,200 under the Senate proposal. Families at lower income levels would not see the full amount. A cap on state and local deductions, called SALT, would quadruple to $40,000 for five years. It's a provision important to New York and other high tax states, though the House wanted it to last for 10 years. There are scores of business-related tax cuts. The wealthiest households would see a $12,000 increase from the legislation, which would cost the poorest people $1,600 a year, according to the nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office analysis of the House's version. Middle-income taxpayers would see a tax break of USD 500 to USD 1,500, the CBO said. Money for deportations, a border wall and the Golden Dome The bill would provide some $350 billion for Trump's border and national security agenda, including $46 billion for the US-Mexico border wall and $45 billion for 100,000 migrant detention facility beds, as he aims to fulfil his promise of the largest mass deportation operation in US history. Money would go for hiring 10,000 new Immigration and Customs Enforcement officers, with $10,000 signing bonuses and a surge of Border Patrol officers, as well. The goal is to deport some 1 million people per year. The homeland security secretary would have a new $10 billion fund for grants for states that help with federal immigration enforcement and deportation actions. The attorney general would have $3.5 billion for a similar fund, known as Bridging Immigration-related Deficits Experienced Nationwide, or BIDEN, referring to former Democratic president Joe Biden. To help pay for it all, immigrants would face various new fees, including when seeking asylum protections. For the Pentagon, the bill would provide billions for ship building, munitions systems, and quality of life measures for servicemen and women, as well as $25 billion for the development of the Golden Dome missile defence system. The Defence Department would have $1 billion for border security. How to pay for it? Cuts to Medicaid and other programmes To help partly offset the lost tax revenue and new spending, Republicans aim to cut back some long-running government programmes: Medicaid, food stamps, green energy incentives and others. It's essentially unravelling the accomplishments of the past two Democratic presidents, Biden and Barack Obama. Republicans argue they are trying to rightsize the safety net programs for the population they were initially designed to serve, mainly pregnant women, the disabled and children, and root out what they describe as waste, fraud and abuse. The package includes new 80-hour-a-month work requirements for many adults receiving Medicaid and food stamps, including older people up to age 65. Parents of children 14 and older would have to meet the programme's work requirements. There's also a proposed new USD 35 co-payment that can be charged to patients using Medicaid services. Some 80 million people rely on Medicaid, which expanded under Obama's Affordable Care Act, and 40 million use the Supplemental Nutritional Assistance Programme. Most already work, according to analysts. What's the final cost? Altogether, keeping the existing tax breaks and adding the new ones is expected to cost USD 3.8 trillion over the decade, the CBO says in its analysis of the House bill. An analysis of the Senate draft is pending. The CBO estimates the House-passed package would add USD 2.4 trillion to the nation's deficits over the decade. Or not, depending on how one does the math. Senate Republicans are proposing a unique strategy of not counting the existing tax breaks as a new cost because those breaks are already current policy. Senators say the Senate Budget Committee chairman has the authority to set the baseline for the preferred approach. Under the Senate GOP view, the tax provisions cost USD 441 billion, according to the congressional Joint Committee on Taxation. Democrats and others say this is magic math that obscures the true costs of the GOP tax breaks. The Committee for a Responsible Federal Budget puts the Senate tally at USD 4.2 trillion over the decade.
India Today
an hour ago
- India Today
G7 strikes deal to spare US, UK firms from higher global taxes
The United States and its G7 partners have endorsed a new proposal that would exempt American companies from parts of a global tax deal, the Group of Seven said in a statement on proposal introduces a 'side-by-side' approach, recognising the US minimum tax system, and was made possible after the Biden administration agreed to withdraw Section 899, a contentious retaliatory tax provision included in President Donald Trump's tax and spending bill. The statement was released by Canada, which currently holds the G7's rotating G7 said the plan recognises existing US minimum tax laws and aims to bring more stability to the international tax system. The US Treasury Department said that following the removal of Section 899 from the US Senate version of the tax and spending bill, there is a shared understanding that a side-by-side system could preserve important gains made by jurisdictions inside the Inclusive Framework in tackling base erosion and profit shifting."We look forward to discussing and developing this understanding within the Inclusive Framework," the Department said in a post on X on businesses are also spared higher taxes after the removal of Section 899 from President Donald Trump's tax and spending said businesses would benefit from greater certainty and stability following the agreement. Some British businesses had in recent weeks said they were worried about paying substantial additional tax due to the inclusion of Section 899, which has now been agreement provides much-needed certainty and stability for those businesses after they had raised their concerns," finance minister Rachel Reeves said in a statement, adding that more work was needed to tackle aggressive tax planning and avoidance.G7 officials said that they look forward to discussing a solution that is "acceptable and implementable to all".In January, through an executive order, Trump declared that the global corporate minimum tax deal was not applicable in the US, effectively pulling out of the landmark 2021 arrangement negotiated by the Biden administration with nearly 140 also vowed to impose a retaliatory tax against countries that impose taxes on US firms under the 2021 global tax agreement. This tax was considered detrimental to many foreign companies operating in the US.- EndsTune InMust Watch
