Explainer: Here's why Ramaphosa's address on SAPS turmoil was delayed on Sunday night
Image: IOL Graphics
President Cyril Ramaphosa on Sunday announced that Police Minister Senzo Mchunu has been placed on leave of absence, as the president establishes a judicial commission of inquiry to investigate claims by KwaZulu-Natal provincial police commissioner, Lieutenant General Nhlanhla Mkhwanazi.
IOL reported that during a media briefing held on July 6, Mkhwanazi claimed that Mchunu and senior police leadership are linked to a criminal syndicate with ties to drug cartels.
On Sunday night, Ramaphosa acknowledged that South Africans were concerned about corruption and the rise of criminality in the country.
However, Ramaphosa's address to the nation was scheduled to start at 7 pm but was delayed by more than 30 minutes. The Presidency announced on Thursday that Ramaphosa would deliver his address at 7 pm on Sunday.
Just four minutes before 7 pm on Sunday, the Presidency issued another advisory, stating that Ramaphosa would speak at 7:30pm.
Ramaphosa's spokesperson, Vincent Magwenya, explained that the briefing was delayed because of different reasons - including the president having to call leaders of political parties in the Government of National Unity.
Video Player is loading.
Play Video
Play
Unmute
Current Time
0:00
/
Duration
-:-
Loaded :
0%
Stream Type LIVE
Seek to live, currently behind live
LIVE
Remaining Time
-
0:00
This is a modal window.
Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window.
Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan
Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan
Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Window Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan
Transparency Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque
Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Dropshadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps
Reset
restore all settings to the default values Done
Close Modal Dialog
End of dialog window.
Advertisement
Next
Stay
Close ✕
Ad loading
'We were late for two reasons. One, we decided to go through the text again, and make sure that the president is happy,' Magwenya spoke to broadcaster Newzroom Afrika at the Union Buildings after Ramaphosa's address.
'More importantly, the president called some of the GNU leaders - not all of them, but he managed to get hold of some of them, to just share with them and to get them into his confidence on the announcement he was about to make. It was appropriate in the context of the partnership in the GNU for him to do so.
'He spent a bit of time doing that, and then we had to do a technical test before we started,' he said.
IOL reported on Sunday that while Ramaphosa's move to place Police Minister Senzo Mchunu on special leave was applauded, his decision to establish a commission of inquiry into allegations regarding law enforcement agencies has been criticised.
Political analysts said that the commission could be a waste of time and resources, like the Zondo commission, which was established to investigate the allegations of State Capture in 2019.
Ramaphosa announced his decision to establish the commission of inquiry and place Mchunu on special leave following allegations made by Mkhwanazi, who accused Mchunu of sabotaging a probe into political killings by seizing 121 open case files in March and pushing to disband the team tasked with the probe.
jonisayi.maromo@iol.co.za
IOL News

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Daily Maverick
41 minutes ago
- Daily Maverick
We will have to swallow bitter medicine to fix the financial health of our education system
This time last year, I took an oath to assume the office of South Africa's Minister of Basic Education. I did so with a clear conscience that I would hold this office with dignity and to the very best of my abilities. My first order of business was to listen deeply, to be guided by the evidence, and to reform strategically. Over the last 12 months, I have travelled the length and breadth of our country. I have, on average, visited one school per week. I've met provincial leaders and officials, school principals, teachers, parents and, most importantly, learners. Their stories and realities have shaped everything we have done since. Our work has been guided by a simple, yet powerful statistic: 80% of children in South Africa cannot read for meaning in any language by Grade 4. This has told me that we need to get the basics right. If our children cannot read for meaning by age 10, if they face unsafe sanitation, if they come to school hungry or unsupported in their earliest years, then everything else we do will fall apart as it is based on weak foundations. Strategic reorientation of the basic education system Based on the low levels of literacy and numeracy, we launched a major shift in how the Department of Basic Education approaches its work: the strategic reorientation towards improving the quality of foundational learning. Chasing surface metrics, such as the matric pass rate, will not move the needle in terms of the number of learners leaving the system with the skills needed to pursue further studies or enter the world of work. We need to get the foundations right if we are to see improved education outcomes across the system. Foundational learning cannot be a peripheral concern and must therefore be the centrepiece of our basic education reform agenda. Early childhood development: laying the first brick in the foundation In February 2025, I co-convened the Bana Pele Roadmap Summit with Business Leadership South Africa, which was opened by President Cyril Ramaphosa. This was a seminal moment in mobilising stakeholders around the importance of early learning. In partnership with Takalani Sesame, we are rolling out the Bana Pele Mass Registration Drive – a national campaign to register, formalise and support early childhood development centres, especially in the most underprivileged communities. Our goal here is bold: we want to register 10,000 centres by the end of the current financial year, to formalise them and to support them to comply with their local government health and safety requirements. We will furthermore subsidise them with R17 per child per day to ensure their financial viability. This is proposed to increase to R24 in the new budget. We won't stop there. We will also support them with age-appropriate learning and teaching materials required for children to follow a structured curriculum. Finally, we will then upskill practitioners to acquire a teaching qualification that would allow them to deliver a quality curriculum. In the Foundation Phase, we have continued rolling out the Mother Tongue-based Bilingual Education programme, training teachers in bilingual methods and providing quality support materials. The Funza Lushaka Bursary Scheme and teacher development efforts are being augmented to prioritise Foundation Phase teaching, aligned to our focus on literacy and numeracy. Furthermore, we are reviewing Post Provisioning Norms to improve teacher distribution and buffer provinces against budget pressures. We are also updating the National Catalogue for grades 1 to 3 to ensure learners receive high-quality, curriculum-aligned materials. Without these foundations, a child will face challenges taking on and excelling in gateway subjects like mathematics and science, or technical, vocational and occupational subjects. This, in turn, impacts on their ability to pursue higher learning and meaningful work opportunities. The mere introduction of entrepreneurship education, coding and robotics and the like is no magic wand. These subjects become accessible only when learners are literate and numerate. Nutrition reform with integrity We made a bold decision to halt a R10-billion per year tender that would have hyper-centralised the National School Nutrition Programme in the hands of a single service provider, thereby risking the wellbeing of 9.6 million learners who depend on the NSNP for their daily meal. The current model of delivering school nutrition will continue, and we will strengthen provincial capacity to deliver while we work on a revised, balanced delivery strategy. Infrastructure justice: sanitation first We are turning the page on pit toilets and moving away from one of the most painful chapters in our country: when children would fall and drown in pit toilets in democratic South Africa. In April, I announced that 96% of the pit latrines identified by the 2018 Safe Initiative audit had been eradicated. Today, that has increased to 97%. This eradication project is about dignity, safety, and our moral obligation to learners and their teachers. The work of identifying and eradicating unsafe sanitation facilities not identified by the Safe Initiative must continue by provincial education departments (PEDs). What the DBE is doing to support this: (a) Safe Schools Act; (b) focus on maintenance; (c) supporting PEDs with planning, development and maintenance; and (d) reviewing the Regulations on the Minimum Uniform Norms and Standards. A hard look at provincial finances In September 2024, we undertook a deep financial analysis of all nine provincial education departments. I will not hide the reality of our financial situation from the people of South Africa. In November 2024, I shared the findings of that analysis and informed the public that we are facing a fiscal crisis. Ten years of austerity measures have left our sector with a deep financial hole. If the current funding levels continue, we will see seven of the nine PEDs fall into the red and be unable to fund their budgets by 2028. I can assure South Africans that we will not fold our arms and lament the poor financial decisions of the previous administration. We are putting in place financial recovery plans and we are working with provincial and national treasuries to protect education funding and to ensure that provincial education departments can get back on their feet. I must again be honest with South Africans, this will be a painful exercise; we will have to swallow bitter medicine to fix the financial health of our education system. We will conduct nationwide audits to root out ghost teachers and ghost learners in our system; we will have to right-size departments to ensure personnel costs go back to under 80% of the budget. We find ourselves in a mess not of our making, but the mess is ours to resolve. Institutional and policy reform: the National Education and Training Council To enhance policy development in the sector, we are operationalising the National Education and Training Council. This advisory body will provide evidence-based recommendations to me as minister on a range of complex school education-related issues. These will include a review of the resourcing model applicable to schooling; exploring ways to reduce administrative burdens on teachers; and considering whether the progression and promotion requirements remain fit for purpose. This is not just another council of government. It is a structure provided for in law comprising specialists from a variety of disciplines related to education who will volunteer their expertise, knowledge and experience to ensure that national education policies are responsive to the realities on the ground. Looking ahead This first year in office has laid the groundwork and shown our strategic intent. But reform is about action, not just intent. It will take political courage and cross-sector partnerships to make this strategic reorientation a success. We must be willing to break resistance to the reforms the sector so desperately needs. We must accelerate support for teachers, scale early learning innovations and stabilise provincial spending. My message to every parent, teacher, learner and policymaker is this: we are building strong foundations for our schooling system that must work for our children. Let's walk this road together. DM


The South African
5 hours ago
- The South African
Jayden-Lee Meek's mother likened to Kelly Smith after THIS comment
South Africans are comparing the actions of Jayden-Lee Meek's mother, Tiffany, to those of Kelly Smith, the mother of missing Saldanha Bay girl, Joslin Smith. This after the woman accused of murdering her 11-year-old son made similar comments that her child's appearance had made them internet famous. Like Kelly, Tiffany initially appeared as a concerned mother. However, both women were later accused of duping the public through soliciting sympathy. Kelly is currently serving a life sentence for kidnapping and child trafficking, while Tiffany will make her second court appearance on charges of murder, defeating the ends of justice and crimen injuria. In an interview with Newzroom Afrika just two days after Jayden-Lee Meek's death, Tiffany raised 'red flags' when she said: 'My child wanted to go viral. Unfortunately, this is the way it had to happen'. She added: 'His biggest thing was he was going to be a star, and he will remain a star in my life'. The clip recently resurfaced on social media, where many South Africans compared Tiffany's comments to those made by Joslin Smith's mother, Kelly. @tezzbarry: 'What did Kelly say? Joshlin made me famous. And now Tiffany says Jayden-Lee Meek always wanted to go viral 🙄biggest red flag' @renepillay888: 'She took everyone for a ride … Tiffany and Kelly, same WhatsApp group'. @simba000: 'She can now join Kelly Smith for life in prison. No mother in the right sense of mind will harm her own children'. @ Replying to @Lisa_p 🌹 #justiceforjayden #jaydenleemeek #jaydenlee #sanews #newsupdate #news ♬ original sound – Roxanne Bloem Like Jayden-Lee Meek's tragic case, Kelly Smith's sentencing made headlines around the country. During the kidnapping and trafficking trial, the court heard how the mother-of-three made shocking comments about her daughter before and after her disappearance. According to the testimony of Saldanha SAPS station commander, Lieutenant Colonel Lincoln Sebola, Kelly's behaviour 'concerned' him. He said: 'When she came into the charge office, she was communicating with a SAPS officer whom she knew. She was acting like it was normal that her child was not there. What concerned me was when she said in her own words: 'My child Joslin made me famous'. That made me worry. Especially as a parent'. Jayden-Lee Meek's mother Tiffany has been compared to Kelly Smith. Images via Facebook/ eNCA Similar words were made by fellow witness, community activist, Shakeera Ganief, also known as 'Shakes Warrior'. Shakes said of her liaison with Kelly: 'Something very disturbing took place that day. 'It was the moment the Temple Boys were performing a song for the kids [during a church service for Joslin Smith]. Kelly was busy dancing and having a good time, and she was just on top of the world that day, when she made reference again, Yoh, my kind [child] maak [making] my [me] famous.' Let us know by leaving a comment below, or send a WhatsApp to 060 011 021 1 . Subscribe to The South African website's newsletters and follow us on WhatsApp , Facebook , X, and Bluesky for the latest news.


Daily Maverick
5 hours ago
- Daily Maverick
Can SA forge a new consensus at G20 summit?
For the second time this year, the world's most powerful finance ministers have gathered in South Africa, this time at the lush resort of Zimbali north of Durban. But one minister will once again be conspicuous by his absence: that from the US. Scott Bessent, the mercurial US Treasury Secretary, has once again skipped the G20, choosing instead to send Michael Kaplan, the acting undersecretary for international affairs at the US Treasury. It all started when Secretary of State Marco Rubio refused to participate due to the host's vision of this year's G20 presidency being about 'Solidarity, Equality and Sustainability' — principles the current US administration theatrically rejects. In one sense, the timing of this South African presidency of the G20 could not be worse. Faced with the anti-globalist, protectionist bent of the US, what is usually a processional opportunity for showcasing a nation's soft power and producing vacuous missives about global cooperation has become a near impossible job of managing diplomatic fallout. As the first country from Africa to host the G20, South Africa had hoped to push issues vital for the very developing nations that stand to lose the most from the US president's trade war. With US aid budgets cut to virtual non-existence, and with tariffs about to decimate the export industries that, until now, had been the only hope for small African developing countries to build some semblance of a manufacturing sector, South Africa now finds itself managing the wreckage of international consensus. The G20 is a relatively new arrival to the international global system of forums and talk shops. Established as a response to the global financial crisis in 2008, the whole point was for countries like the US, the UK and the EU to include the faster growing nations of the Global South, which were becoming increasingly critical to the global economy. That promise now looks increasingly hollow. US vs the world: SA salvages G20 How naïve and quaint that looks, from the perspective of the realpolitik of 2025. In addition to Trump's threat of crippling levies on key trading partners from 1 August 2025, the US president has taken aim at the BRICS bloc of emerging economies — which includes host nation South Africa — threatening an extra 10% tariff for 'anti-American' policies. South African President Cyril Ramaphosa, following the BRICS summit in Rio last week, was the first of the group to hit back. 'The president of the US must recognise that multiple centres of power now define the global landscape,' he said. Ramaphosa is still trying to convince Trump to attend a G20 leaders' summit in Johannesburg in November, where he is due to hand over the presidency of the group to the US. But hopes that Trump will support any of South Africa's G20 initiatives have largely been extinguished. Under fire from corruption scandals at home, Ramaphosa's efforts are increasingly looking to be in vain. The G20 international outreach also follows a highly publicised Oval Office dressing-down, where Trump repeated false claims about a so-called genocide against white South African farmers. Still, despite Washington's aggressions, South Africa has no option but to press ahead with this week's meetings, which culminate on Thursday and Friday with sessions led by finance ministers and central bank governors. South African Reserve Bank governor Lesetja Kganyago and Finance Minister Enoch Godongwana will, at least, be in the limelight as opposed to the embattled president. The EU is now in the firing line It is not only developing countries that have been targeted by Trump. On Saturday, the EU received a typically condescending letter from Trump, threatening blanket tariffs on European goods. In a message that appeared to be copied and pasted from the one sent to South Africa and countless other recipients, Trump invited the EU to 'participate in the extraordinary Economy of the United States, the Number One Market in the World', while warning of sweeping new levies. His parting line, as ever: 'Thank you for your attention to this matter!' The proposed 30% tariff rate, together with existing sectoral duties and an expected levy on critical goods, would take the increase in the US effective tariff rate on the EU to a brutal 26%. According to estimates from Goldman Sachs, if implemented and sustained, it would lower euro area GDP by 1.2% by the end of 2026. The US is the largest trade partner of the EU, with the sum of exports from the EU totalling $815-billion in 2024. The EU understands that such a trade restriction with its biggest partner is nothing short of an existential challenge. In response, the bloc is actively seeking to diversify its trade ties. Besides Canada and Japan, the bloc is now fast-tracking agreements with India and other Asia-Pacific nations. Speaking from Beijing, EU competition chief Teresa Ribera confirmed that discussions with India are expected to conclude by year's end. 'We need to explore how far, how deep we can go in the Pacific area with other countries.' Africa will undoubtedly be next. Can South Africa lead a G19 without the US? Where the tariff war ends is anyone's guess. But with the US — the architect of the post-war global order — now acting as a destabilising force, the need for alternative alliances and renewed multilateralism between other parties has never been clearer. Already, the US absence has drawn others closer. After Rubio's withdrawal, the EU publicly endorsed South Africa's G20 agenda. Within weeks, the EU and South Africa held their first summit since 2018, marking a thaw in previously strained relations. Strangely then this year's G20 could prove to be its most consequential since its inception. Will it become the moment when the rest of the world reaffirms a commitment to open markets, trade and mutually beneficial cooperation? Or will it cement the beginning of the end for the rules-based global economy? In that sense therefore the timing of South Africa's G20 presidency could not be better. As a nation that once symbolised the post-Cold War liberal ideals of inclusion and equality, it is perhaps fitting that it should fall to us to rally the Global South and like-minded powers toward a new consensus. But the challenge is enormous. Can Ramaphosa — wounded politically and isolated diplomatically — rise to the occasion? Can South Africa lead a meaningful G19 in the absence of the US? To quote Tennyson's Ulysses, while 'death closes all, some work of noble note may yet be done'. The South African president may identify with the itinerant Greek after his own interminable political odyssey. Given his patchy track record in office, the answer may not be encouraging. And yet, history never asks whether leaders are ready. It simply presents the moment. Ramaphosa now faces his. DM