The Hoax of Decline in Poverty in India
The decline is fairly rapid: 2.05 percentage point decline per year between the year 2011-12 and 2023-24. The World Bank also shows in its recent paper that at the poverty line of USD 2.15 (at 2017 PPP) per day, India's extreme poverty has declined from 16.2% in 2011-12 to 2.3% in 2022-23. That means about 170 million people have been lifted above the extreme poverty line in India during this period.
The depth of poverty analysis by Rangarajan and Dev's paper also show that 50% of the poor lie between the 3rd and 4th quarter of the poverty line, both in 2011-12 and 2023-24. This means, most of the poor are concentrated around the poverty line.
As regards the causes of this decline, the paper observes that this is due to rapid economic growth and safety nets, including free food grains to 81.35 crore people.
However, they also observe that economic growth is important in this decline in poverty between 2022-23 (9.5%) and 2023-24 (4.9%) as there is no significant change in the welfare expenditure of the government during this period.
It is too early to call this last decline a trend, with data for only two years.
Concepts of poverty line
The concepts of poverty used by both the sources are different. The Rangarajan Committee has defined the poverty line as simultaneous satisfaction of all three nutrient-norms, namely, a full range of policies and programmes for child nutrition support, public provisioning of a range of public goods and services aimed at the amelioration of the disease environment facing the population.
The committee also preferred NSSO's estimates and decided not to use the NAS estimates and price relatives derived from the Consumer Price Indices. According to the committee (2014), the poverty line was Rs 972 for rural areas and Rs 1,407 for urban areas. The poverty lines computed as per capita monthly consumption expenditure for 2023-24 are Rs 1,940 for rural areas and Rs 2,736 for urban areas.
This comes to Rs 64.66 per capita per day consumption expenditure for rural areas and Rs. 91.2 for urban areas.
The concept of extreme poverty of the World Bank is defined slightly differently. The World Bank defines extreme poverty as 'deprivation in wellbeing'. The poor is one who does not have enough income or consumption, or who is below some adequate minimum threshold.
According to the UN Guiding Principles on 'extreme poverty', extreme poverty is characterised by social exclusion and by an accumulation of insecurities in many areas of life, such as lack of identity papers, unsafe housing, insufficient food and lack of access to health care and to education.
However, the World Bank also adds that it is extremely difficult to measure poverty in a rigorous way, and every country sets its own standards for what is necessary for basic living. This definition is translated into different amounts at different levels of development.
For low income countries, the World Bank sets the extreme poverty line at USD 2.15 PPP, while it is USD 3.65 PPP for lower middle income level countries and USD 6.85 PPP for upper middle income countries.
Some critical questions
The World Bank has used USD 2.15 PPP while computing the extreme poverty in India, and based on it, it observed that 170 million people have crossed the poverty line. This is surprising because India is a lower middle income country, and its extreme poverty line is USD 3.65 PPP. If this poverty line was used, the number of people crossing it would be much less.
Again, the poverty line of Rs. 64.4 (rural areas) and 91.1 (urban areas) computed by the Rangarajan-Dev paper also appears to be too low. No poverty can be measured by such low poverty lines. How can anyone live on these poverty lines at these consumption expenditures?
Despite more than 806 million people getting free food grains, India's rank in global hunger index is at 105 out of 127 countries and the value of the hunger index is 27.3. This is declared as an 'alarming condition' by the Global Hunger Report, 2024.
Again, when about 13.7% of the population in India is clearly undernourished and not getting minimum nourishment, how can the incidence of poverty be just 4.9, as suggested by the Rangarajan-Dev paper? How can 35.5% children under 5 years be stunted and 18.7% wasted if the poverty is just 4.9%?
The latest NFHS survey-5 (National Health and Family Survey) also supports this data. Again, as per the latest data (PLFS 2023-24), about 20% of the Indian population is illiterate, and about 45% of the population has studied barely up to the Class 5, and here, there are serious problems about the quality of education. Consequently, more than 90% of the labour force is found in the informal economy getting low wages and poor social protection.
To conclude, though India's GDP is growing at a 6-7% rate, people's vulnerability is declining extremely slowly. The incidence of poverty at 4.9% just does not match with the vulnerability of the Indian population.
It appears that India should now totally discard this concept of '(extreme) poverty line' presented by the earlier committee.
Indira Hirway is Director and Professor of Economics, Centre for Development Alternatives (CFDA), Ahmedabad.
The Wire is now on WhatsApp. Follow our channel for sharp analysis and opinions on the latest developments.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


News18
33 minutes ago
- News18
General Motors profit, revenue drops, but it maintains lowered full year outlook
Agency: PTI Last Updated: Detroit, Jul 22 (AP) General Motors' profit and revenue declined in its second-quarter but the automaker easily topped expectations and the company stuck by its full-year financial outlook that it lowered in May. GM CEO Mary Barra also said in a letter to shareholders on Tuesday that the automaker is attempting to 'greatly reduce our tariff exposure", citing USD 4 billion of new investment in its US assembly plants. 'In addition to our strong underlying operating performance, we are positioning the business for a profitable, long-term future as we adapt to new trade and tax policies, and a rapidly evolving tech landscape," she said. For the three months ended June 30, GM earned USD 1.89 billion, or USD 1.91 per share. A year earlier the company earned USD 2.93 billion, or USD 2.55 per share. Stripping out certain items, earnings were USD 2.53 per share. That handily beat the USD 2.34 per share analysts polled by FactSet were calling for. Shares still declined 3 per cent before the opening bell Tuesday. Barra remains optimistic about the electric vehicle market. 'Despite slower EV industry growth, we believe the long-term future is profitable electric vehicle production, and this continues to be our north star," she wrote. 'As we adjust to changing demand, we will prioritize our customers, brands, and a flexible manufacturing footprint, and leverage our domestic battery investments and other profit-improvement plans." The company maintained its full-year financial forecast. In May General Motors lowered its profit expectations for the year as the carmaker braced for a potential impact from auto tariffs as high as USD 5 billion in 2025. The Detroit automaker said at the time that it anticipated full-year adjusted earnings before interest and taxes in a range of USD 10 billion to USD 12.5 billion. The guidance includes a current tariff exposure of USD 4 billion to USD 5 billion. A month later GM announced plans to invest USD 4 billion to shift some production from Mexico to US manufacturing plants. The company said at the time that the investment would be made over the next two years and was for its gas and electric vehicles. President Donald Trump signed executive orders in April to relax some of his 25 per cent tariffs on automobiles and auto parts, a significant reversal as the import taxes threatened to hurt domestic manufacturers. Automakers and independent analyses have indicated that the tariffs could raise prices, reduce sales and make US production less competitive worldwide. Trump portrayed the changes as a bridge toward automakers moving more production into the United States. The tariffs ordered by Trump are hitting the entire auto sector, which sends vehicles and parts across the northern and southern borders of the US repeatedly as they are assembled. The Centre for Automative Research says that a uniform 25 per cent tariff on all trading partners would have an increased cost of USD 107.7 billion to all US automakers and an increased cost of USD 41.9 billion for the Big Three automakers in Detroit, Stellantis, GM and Ford. GM reported its financial results a day after Jeep maker Stellantis said that its preliminary estimates show a 2.3 billion euros (USD 2.68 billion) net loss in the first half of the year due to US tariffs and some hefty charges. Stellantis will release its financial results for the first half of the year on July 29. (AP) SKS SCY SCY view comments First Published: July 22, 2025, 19:45 IST Disclaimer: Comments reflect users' views, not News18's. Please keep discussions respectful and constructive. Abusive, defamatory, or illegal comments will be removed. News18 may disable any comment at its discretion. By posting, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy.


News18
33 minutes ago
- News18
Escape Plan raises Rs 45 cr seed funding from investors
Agency: PTI New Delhi, Jul 22 (PTI) Escape Plan, a Bengaluru-based lifestyle startup, has raised USD 5 million (about Rs 45 crore) in seed funding led by clutch of investors including Jungle Ventures and Fireside Ventures. The funding will be utilised to expand the company's retail footprint, accelerate customer acquisition, and strengthen its quick-commerce integrations, Escape Plan said in a statement. Over the next 18-24 months, Escape Plan plans to launch over 100 offline stores across India, it said. The company also plans to integrate with quick-commerce and travel discovery platforms to offer 1-hour delivery in key markets, addressing the growing need for last-minute travel solutions and gifting. 'Our aim is to build a platform that offers curated, functional, and design-forward products for this rapidly growing consumer base and elevate the experience of people while travelling," said Escape Plan founder & CEO Abhinav Pathak. Escape Plan offers a curated multi-brand ecosystem of travel gear — including luggage, duffels, backpacks, slings, pouches, and modular accessories — combining style, function, and accessibility. PTI DP HVA Disclaimer: Comments reflect users' views, not News18's. Please keep discussions respectful and constructive. Abusive, defamatory, or illegal comments will be removed. News18 may disable any comment at its discretion. By posting, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy.
&w=3840&q=100)

Business Standard
an hour ago
- Business Standard
India needs $2.4 trn to build climate-resilient infra by 2050: World Bank
India would need an estimated investment of over $2.4 trillion by 2050 and $10.9 trillion by 2070 to meet climate-resilient infrastructure and service needs for around 951 million people living in its urban centres, the World Bank said on Tuesday. With India's urban population expected to nearly double from 480 million in 2025 to 951 million by 2050, the report stated that climate change events, such as erratic rainfall, heatwaves, and rising sea levels, could leave urban areas in the world's most populous nation increasingly vulnerable. In its report titled Towards Resilient and Prosperous Cities in India, prepared in collaboration with the Ministry of Housing and Urban Affairs, the international financial institution recommended that the central government develop a dedicated national urban and state resilience programme addressing flood risks and extreme heat. It recommended the implementation of integrated urban flood risk management at national and state levels, with sustainable stormwater management at the city level, along with heat mitigation actions. 'Such plans across Indian cities could increase the gross domestic product (GDP) by up to 0.4 per cent and save up to 130,000 lives a year by 2050,' the report added. The World Bank claimed that India has yet to build over 50 per cent of the urban infrastructure required for 2050, providing it with a critical opportunity to drive resilient urban infrastructure development. Highlighting the high cost of retrofitting urban infrastructure, the Bank also emphasised the need for cities to strengthen defences against climate shocks while embedding resilience into future growth. Such a shift, it said, is essential to improving quality of life and ensuring sustained economic momentum. To counter this, the government has been advised to improve access to urban finance through better private sector engagement. 'Invest in resilient infrastructure and municipal services, energy-efficient and resilient housing, modernise solid waste management, and make urban transport flood resilient,' it added. The report also proposes setting up a national multisectoral task force consisting of representatives from key ministries to develop a new national programme on urban resilience. 'The task force can assess ongoing policies and schemes at the central, state, and municipal levels, and assess what works well and what can be improved,' it added. The Bank, however, warned of severe consequences if timely action is not taken. 'Cities could face escalating losses from more frequent and intense climate events such as floods, extreme heat, and water scarcity,' it stated. The report projects that urban pluvial or stormwater flooding-related losses, which currently cost between 0.5 and 2.5 per cent of the country's GDP annually, could double under a global high-emission scenario.