logo
Rafizi: Refile charges without further delay

Rafizi: Refile charges without further delay

The Star21-06-2025
Day in court: Najib arriving at the Kuala Lumpur Courts Complex. — Bernama
PETALING JAYA: As Datuk Seri Najib Razak hails as relief the temporary discharge of his money laundering case involving RM27mil, a lawmaker urges swift refiling of the charges.
Pandan MP Datuk Seri Rafizi Ramli urged the Attorney General's Chambers (AGC) to clarify how it would refile the charges involving RM27mil from SRC International Sdn Bhd against the former prime minister without further delay.
Rafizi made the call following the High Court granting Najib a discharge not amounting to an acquittal (DNAA) order for all three charges in the case.
A DNAA releases an accused from a charge without clearing them of the offence, meaning they can still be prosecuted later.
Rafizi said it was unacceptable that, despite Najib being charged in 2019, the trial has yet to begin due to the prosecution's failure to complete the required documentation.
'I urge the prosecution to refile the charges as soon as possible and prepare the necessary documents so the case can proceed,' the former Economy Minister said in a statement.
While acknowledging Najib's right to seek a discharge, Rafizi questioned the prolonged delay, especially as the former was already serving a prison sentence in another case involving SRC International funds.
The AGC in an immediate response to the development said it will examine and consider all aspects before taking any further action on the case.
The AGC said there were some documents which are material for the current SRC International trial, and the prosecution has no choice but to wait until the relevant material documents were obtained after the 1MDB trial proceedings are completed.
'It should be emphasised that the material documents are already available but are being used as evidence in the ongoing 1MDB trial,' the AGC said.
'The prosecution has requested time to gather all relevant mate­rial documents to be presented as evidence and testimony in the second SRC trial. This delay is not intentional but is to ensure that the integrity of the documents as evidence in the trial is always maintained.
It said the case was postponed several times namely due to the Movement Control Order linked to the Covid-19 pandemic, requests by Najib's counsel and the prosecution as the documents was used in the then ongoing first SRC case and the currently ongoing 1MDB case.
'This department emphasises that the allegations by certain parties that this department carries out 'defective prosecution' are completely unfounded. This department always maintains the highest level and quality in line with expectations of the people.
'This department remains committed to upholding the rule of law and will continue to carry out its responsibilities under the Federal Constitution with integrity, fairness and respect for the judicial process,' it said.
Meanwhile, Najib's lawyer, Tan Sri Muhammad Shafee Abdullah, said his client welcomed the court's decision, noting that it reduced the number of active cases against him.
'He's very happy and can now concentrate on the 1MDB trial, which is set for submissions in October,' Shafee told reporters after the court granted the DNAA order.
Shafee explained that the AGC cannot appeal the DNAA but may choose to refile the case.
'But we hope they don't,' he added.
With the DNAA order, Najib now faces only one active criminal trial – the RM2.28bil 1MDB case, scheduled to resume in October.
Najib was acquitted from the 1MDB audit tampering case in March 2023, and a DNAA in the RM6.6bil IPIC-related case last November.
He is currently serving a prison sentence for his conviction in the RM42mil SRC International graft case.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Bar lauds Federal Court decision on Peceaful Assembly Act provision
Bar lauds Federal Court decision on Peceaful Assembly Act provision

New Straits Times

time6 hours ago

  • New Straits Times

Bar lauds Federal Court decision on Peceaful Assembly Act provision

KUALA LUMPUR: The Malaysian Bar welcomed the Federal Court's declaration today that Section 9(5) of the Peaceful Assembly Act 2012 was unconstitutional. Its president, Mohamad Ezri Abdul Wahab, said the provision, which criminalises failure to provide prior notice to the police before holding an assembly, has long been the subject of concern within the legal and civil society communities. He said the Malaysian Bar had consistently opposed criminalisation of peaceful assemblies due to procedural irregularities. "We have held that the requirement to notify the police should be administrative in nature, not punitive. "This decision vindicates that position. Criminal sanctions for failure to notify authorities are not only excessive but have had a chilling effect on public participation and freedom of expression," he told the New Straits Times. Meanwhile, former Bar president Salim Bashir called the ruling "groundbreaking and progressive". He said the Federal Court characterised the notice requirements as prohibitory rather than restrictive. Restrictions which are necessary or expedient in the interest of the security of the federation or any part of the federation or public order are allowed under Article 10(2)(b) of the Federal Constitution, he said. Earlier today, the apex court declared it unconstitutional to criminalise the failure to notify the police five days in advance before holding a peaceful assembly. Delivering the unanimous decision by a five-member bench, Chief Justice Tengku Maimun Tuan Mat said Section 9(5) of the Peaceful Assembly Act 2012 imposes a penalty that goes beyond what is allowed under Article 10(1)(b) of the Federal Constitution, which guarantees the freedom of speech, assembly and association.

KDN to Table Peaceful Assembly Act amendments this month
KDN to Table Peaceful Assembly Act amendments this month

The Sun

time6 hours ago

  • The Sun

KDN to Table Peaceful Assembly Act amendments this month

KUALA LUMPUR: The Home Ministry (KDN) will table amendments to Section 11 of the Peaceful Assembly Act 2012 (Act 736) in the upcoming parliamentary sitting this month, said Minister Datuk Seri Saifuddin Nasution Ismail. In a statement, Saifuddin Nasution said the MADANI Government remains committed to upholding democratic principles and the supremacy of the Constitution by protecting the people's right to peaceful assembly. He said that Prime Minister Datuk Seri Anwar Ibrahim, as the key driver of the MADANI Government's reform agenda, takes the issue of freedom of assembly seriously, announcing the Cabinet decision to impose a moratorium on prosecutions under Section 9(5) of the Peaceful Assembly Act 2012 as an initial step towards comprehensive reform of laws related to the right to assemble. On the Federal Court's ruling that a provision under Section 9(5) of the Peaceful Assembly Act 2012 is unconstitutional, Saifuddin Nasution said the ministry acknowledges the decision and will scrutinise it for appropriate action. He said this includes considering proposed amendments to the affected legal provisions to ensure they are in line with the Federal Constitution and consistent with the country's highest court's decisions. 'The MADANI Government will continue to ensure a balance between individual freedom and the need to maintain public order and security. It is a priority of the MADANI Government to ensure that every right guaranteed by the Constitution is exercised in a peaceful, orderly and responsible manner,' he added. Earlier, the Federal Court's five-member bench ruled that a provision under Section 9(5) of the Peaceful Assembly Act 2012, which penalised an organiser who failed to provide the police with a five-day prior notice before holding an assembly, is unconstitutional. Chief Justice Tun Tengku Maimun Tuan Mat, who chaired the panel, stated that it is inconsistent with Article 10(2)(b) read in conjunction with Article 8(1) of the Federal Constitution (equality before the law).

Home Ministry to table Peaceful Assembly Act amendments this month, says Saifuddin Nasution
Home Ministry to table Peaceful Assembly Act amendments this month, says Saifuddin Nasution

The Star

time7 hours ago

  • The Star

Home Ministry to table Peaceful Assembly Act amendments this month, says Saifuddin Nasution

KUALA LUMPUR: The Home Ministry will table amendments to Section 11 of the Peaceful Assembly Act 2012 (Act 736) in the upcoming parliamentary sitting this month, says Datuk Seri Saifuddin Nasution Ismail. In a statement, the Home Minister said the Madani government remained committed to upholding democratic principles and the supremacy of the Constitution by protecting the people's right to peaceful assembly. He said that Prime Minister Datuk Seri Anwar Ibrahim, as the key driver of the Madani government's reform agenda, took the issue of freedom of assembly seriously, announcing the Cabinet decision to impose a moratorium on prosecutions under Section 9(5) of the Peaceful Assembly Act 2012 as an initial step towards comprehensive reform of laws related to the right to assemble. On the Federal Court's ruling that a provision under Section 9(5) of the Peaceful Assembly Act 2012 is unconstitutional, Saifuddin Nasution said the ministry acknowledged the decision and would scrutinise it for appropriate action. He said this includes considering proposed amendments to the affected legal provisions to ensure they are in line with the Federal Constitution and consistent with the country's highest court's decisions. "The Madani government will continue to ensure a balance between individual freedom and the need to maintain public order and security. It is a priority of the Madani government to ensure that every right guaranteed by the Constitution is exercised in a peaceful, orderly and responsible manner,' he added. Earlier, the Federal Court's five-member bench ruled that a provision under Section 9(5) of the Peaceful Assembly Act 2012, which penalised an organiser who failed to provide the police with a five-day prior notice before holding an assembly, is unconstitutional. Chief Justice Tun Tengku Maimun Tuan Mat, who chaired the panel, stated that it is inconsistent with Article 10(2)(b) read in conjunction with Article 8(1) of the Federal Constitution (equality before the law).- Bernama

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store