‘Overly harsh': Backlash after Chinese university expels female student over alleged liaison with Ukrainian gamer
Dalian Polytechnic University in Liaoning province published the expulsion notice on its website on Jul 8, fully naming the female student, who is surnamed Li.
'Your inappropriate behavior on December 16, 2024, has caused a severe negative impact,' read the notice issued by the school's student affairs office.
'You are hereby subject to expulsion from our university,' it said.
In December, former Ukrainian esports player Danylo Teslenko, known as Zeus, claimed in a video to his fan group that he had engaged in a sexual relationship with a Chinese girl, who was allegedly Li, according to China Daily.
The university cited disciplinary regulations stating that students who engage in improper relationships with foreigners that undermine national dignity and the school's reputation may face a demerit or more serious disciplinary action, depending on the circumstances, as reported by the Global Times.
The university's announcement went viral on Chinese social media, stirring up fierce debate over Li's privacy and public shaming.
The hashtag 'disciplined student should not be publicly shamed' has been one of the top trending topics on the Sina Weibo microblogging site, with article shares and threads garnering over 57 million views.
'The decision to expel is overly harsh and unjustified and also raises concerns about abuse of authority,' wrote a Weibo user with the handle tintinwt23 in a comment that drew thousands of likes.
Others noted how Li's image still remained online, with her identity 'plastered across the internet'.
Weibo user Ono's melon field, said that while Li's actions were wrong, the school's decision to expel her remained questionable.
'If having improper relations with a foreigner undermines national dignity and the school's reputation, what about having improper relations with a Chinese national?'
Others noted how there was far less backlash surrounding the 38-year-old Teslenko and said publicly shaming Li for the incident was akin to being 'paraded on the streets'.
'Anger is being unfairly directed to the wrong person,' a Weibo user said.
The Paper, a digital newspaper from Shanghai, said that while Li was an 'imperfect' victim amid accusations, her behaviour did not warrant expulsion according to official clauses under Chinese higher education law.
Citing China's Civil Code, which protects citizens' personal data, Global Times said there was 'unlawful disclosure' of Li's private details.
'The current frenzy of sharing her intimate footage and personal data far exceeds the reasonable consequence she should bear for her misconduct,' it added.
Some users have also lashed out at mainstream media coverage deemed to be insensitive.
'(These outlets) talk about privacy, have they cared about the person's privacy? Let's not talk about independent outlets, some mainstream outlets have named her openly,' the user, going by the handle xiping junyushi, wrote on Weibo.
'Now that (these media outlets) have earned enough views and internet traffic, they're u-turning to talk about privacy, where's the shame?'
In posts to his X account on Sunday, Teslenko said that there was 'no explicit content or anything disrespectful' in videos he posted with Li.
He clarified that he was not married or in a relationship and refuted speculation about him having a wife or children.
'The only unfortunate thing is that the girl never mentioned she had a boyfriend,' said Teslenko.
Teslenko said he has since deleted the videos, adding that he 'never meant to hurt anyone'. He also appealed to people to 'stop the hate' and said everybody makes mistakes - and that he had learnt from his.
'At the time, it felt like just a normal moment from life. I didn't (realise how it) could affect someone's personal situation.'
'Later I found out the girl was in a relationship and she faced a lot of hate because of it. I truly regret that things turned out this way.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Independent Singapore
2 hours ago
- Independent Singapore
Woman trailed to Pilates class by stranger with phone, netizens debate legality
SINGAPORE: In a current viral Reddit post, a young woman narrated a troubling happenstance: a man she didn't know and had never seen before trailed her all the way to her Pilates class, with a camera phone in hand, purportedly taking photos of her. She labelled him as a 'pervert,' distressed by the fact that even in a public space, she felt anything but safe. But the story didn't end with her embarrassment. In the comment section of that Reddit post, there was a torrent not just of empathy, but of piercing discussions, legal opinions, and painful truths about how people navigate shared spaces in the era of smartphones. 'It's legal – but is it right?' A repeated theme from netizens was this: taking photos of people in public, while scary, isn't prohibited. 'As vile or repulsive as one may find it, taking photos of others in a public space is not an offence,' one user said. 'It's a big stretch to prove harassment.' Legally speaking, they're correct. In most territories, the right to privacy doesn't cover public situations. If someone's out in the open, photos can be taken of them, whether they're aware of it or not, or if they are comfortable with it. That reality was unsettling to many readers, particularly in a situation where a woman feels followed and objectified. 'Imagine you're just using your phone and someone thinks your angle looks suspicious—and suddenly people pin you down,' another commenter remarked, alluding to that the man in question was confronted physically. 'Those guys are lucky they didn't get charged.' When behaviour crosses a line However, others were quick to point out that there's a difference between taking a photo in a leisurely manner and following someone around. 'This is textbook stalking,' a commenter stressed. 'Nobody should be alarmed if they had their photo taken by a stranger in public. But if that stranger starts following them around, anybody would feel threatened.' There certainly is a key difference. While the law might not plainly outline this grey zone, informally and ethically speaking, the responses were far more unified. Trailing someone for a long period alters a permissible act into one of danger. One user even questioned why the man hadn't been detained, saying that constant following could be viewed as aggravation and harassment in many other legal systems. Freedom of expression or lack of respect? Another aspect of the conversation spun around clothes and permission, a theme as old as the public decorum dispute itself. Some contended that if a woman is donning form-fitting clothes in public, she tacitly invites attention. 'The same liberty that allows you to dress how you want,' one person claimed, 'also extends to others being able to photograph you.' Another commenter chimed in, 'If you don't think your outfit is too sexual, then the photos of it shouldn't be either.' But many discussants were quick to call this reasoning defective and risky. The notion that someone's clothing choices one way or another reduce their right to feel safe is a fragment of a bigger societal problem, one that has long beleaguered discussions about consent. 'There's a difference between looking and leering, between existing and stalking,' one netizen snapped. 'Not her fault, but…' – A troubling perspective As anticipated in situations like this, some remarks faintly deviated into victim-blaming. One user wrote: 'Not blaming her for her dressing or anything, but it's not an offence to take pictures. So, I don't get what she's so upset about.' Another weighed in, 'If this keeps happening to her, maybe she's unlucky—or maybe she's drawing attention with how she dresses.' Such views, while often outlined as concern or reason, echo a societal inclination to place responsibility on women to foil wicked actions from others, instead of holding the wrongdoers liable. The bigger picture This Reddit thread mirrors more than just one person's bad day. It's a picture of a society grappling with the restrictions of what is legal and what is decent, amidst the changing standards of a digital world. Yes, public spaces are shared, and yes, people have the right to take pictures of what they see. But when the camera lens turns into an instrument for terrorisation, or when people feel panic-stricken rather than observed, the conversation needs to shift.
CNA
3 hours ago
- CNA
Nvidia's resumption of AI chips to China is part of rare earths talks, says US
WASHINGTON: Nvidia's planned resumption of sales of its H20 AI chips to China is part of US negotiations on rare earths, Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick said on Tuesday (Jul 15), and comes days after its CEO met President Donald Trump. "We put that in the trade deal with the magnets," Lutnick told Reuters, referring to an agreement Trump made to restart rare earth shipments to US manufacturers. He did not provide additional details. Nvidia said late on Monday that it is filing applications with the US government to resume sales to China of its H20 graphics processing unit, and has been assured by the US it will get the licences soon. The planned resumption is a reversal of an export restriction imposed in April that is designed to keep the most advanced AI chips out of Chinese hands over national security concerns, an issue that has found rare bipartisan support. It drew swift questions and criticism from US legislators on Tuesday. The decision "would not only hand our foreign adversaries our most advanced technologies, but is also dangerously inconsistent with this Administration's previously-stated position on export controls for China", Democratic Representative Raja Krishnamoorthi, ranking member of the House of Representatives Select Committee on China, said in a statement. Republican John Moolenaar, chair of that committee, said in a statement he would seek "clarification" from the Commerce Department. "The H20 is a powerful chip that, according to our bipartisan investigation, played a significant role in the rise of PRC AI companies like DeepSeek," Moolenaar said, referring to a Chinese startup that claims to have built AI models at a fraction of the cost paid by US firms such as OpenAI. "It is crucial that the US maintain its lead and keep advanced AI out of the hands of the CCP." Shares of Nvidia, the world's most valuable firm, closed up 4 per cent and were nearly unchanged in after-market trading. Nvidia had estimated that the curbs would cut its revenue by US$15 billion. Nvidia's plan to resume sales has set off a scramble at Chinese firms to buy H20 chips, two sources told Reuters. The chips that Nvidia will resume selling are the best it can legally offer in China, but lack much of the computing power of the versions for sale outside of China because of previous restrictions put in place by Trump's first administration and then President Joe Biden's administration. But critically, H20 chips work with Nvidia's software tools, which have become a de facto standard in the global AI industry. CEO Jensen Huang has argued that Nvidia's leadership position could slip away if the company cannot sell to Chinese developers being courted by Huawei Technologies with chips produced in China. The significance of the shift depends on the volume of H20 chips that the US allows to be shipped to China, said Divyansh Kaushik, an AI expert at Beacon Global Strategies, a Washington-based advisory firm. "If China is able to get a million H20 chips, it could significantly narrow, if not overtake, the US lead in AI," he said. CHINA IS CRUCIAL "The Chinese market is massive, dynamic, and highly innovative, and it's also home to many AI researchers," Huang told Chinese state broadcaster CCTV on Tuesday. China generated US$17 billion in revenue for Nvidia in the fiscal year ending Jan 26, or 13 per cent of total sales, based on its latest annual report. Internet giants ByteDance and Tencent are also in the process of submitting applications for H20 chips, the sources familiar with the matter said. Central to the process is an approved list put together by Nvidia for Chinese companies to register for potential purchases, one of the sources said. Tencent did not respond to a request for comment. ByteDance denied in a statement that it is currently submitting applications. Nvidia declined to comment on the approved list system. Asked at a regular foreign ministry briefing in Beijing about Nvidia's plans to resume AI chip sales, a spokesperson said: "China is opposed to the politicisation, instrumentalisation and weaponisation of science, technology and economic and trade issues to maliciously blockade and suppress China." China halted exports of rare earths in March following a trade spat with Trump that has shown some signs of easing. It dominates the market for rare earths, a group of 17 metals used in cellphones, weapons, electric vehicles, and more. Huang's visit is being closely watched in both China and the United States, where a bipartisan pair of senators last week sent the CEO a letter asking him to abstain from meeting companies working with military or intelligence bodies. The senators also asked Huang to refrain from meeting with entities named on the United States' restricted export list. Rival AI chipmaker AMD also said the Department of Commerce would review its licence applications to export its MI308 chips to China; it plans to resume those shipments when licences are approved, it said. Its shares gained 7 per cent in trading on Tuesday.
Straits Times
4 hours ago
- Straits Times
Chinese university expels student for ‘harming nation's dignity' after one-night stand with gamer
BEIJING - A Chinese university said that it would expel a student because she had had 'improper contact with a foreigner' and 'damaged national dignity', after videos circulated online that suggested she had been intimate with a Ukrainian video gamer. The announcement set off heated debate in China. Some commentators applauded the decision and said that Chinese people – particularly women – were too enamoured of foreigners. But others said the expulsion smacked of sexism and paternalism, and compared it to examples of people accused of rape or sexual harassment on campus who had been punished more lightly. Many also criticised the university, Dalian Polytechnic University, in northeastern China, for publicly shaming the student by posting its expulsion notice on its website last week and identifying the student by her full name. 'If there is anyone who truly undermined national dignity in this case, it was not the woman whose privacy rights were violated,' Dr Zhao Hong, a professor of law at Peking University in Beijing, wrote in an opinion column, 'but the online spectators who frantically humiliated an ordinary woman under the banner of so-called justice, and the educational institution that used stale moral commandments.' The university said the student's conduct, in an incident it said took place on Dec 16, had 'caused a negative impact'. It gave no details, but said the student was being punished in accordance with a university regulation about 'civic morality'. That regulation reads: 'Those who have improper contact with foreigners and damage the national dignity and the reputation of the school shall be given a demerit or above, depending on the circumstances.' Top stories Swipe. Select. Stay informed. Singapore July BTO launch to have over 4,600 balance flats, 2 BTO projects with under than 3-year wait Business US tariffs may last well after Trump; crucial for countries to deepen trade ties: SM Lee Asia Indonesia police detain 12 suspects over baby trafficking ring linked to Singapore Singapore 'Kpods broke our marriage, shattered our children': Woman on husband's vape addiction Singapore Las Vegas Sands' new development part of S'pore's broader, more ambitious transformation: PM Wong Multimedia Telling the Singapore story for 180 years Life Walking for exercise? Here are tips on how to do it properly Singapore 'Nobody deserves to be alone': Why Mummy and Acha have fostered over 20 children in the past 22 years Chinese social media users quickly linked the announcement to videos shared on that date by a Ukrainian professional video gamer Danylo Teslenko, who goes by the nickname Zeus. Mr Teslenko, who had been visiting Shanghai for an esports tournament, had posted videos of himself with a Chinese woman to his Telegram channel, where he currently has about 43,000 subscribers. He has since deleted the videos. Screenshots and recordings still circulating online show the two apparently in a hotel room, with the woman seemingly aware she is being filmed, but do not show any sexually explicit behaviour. In an emailed response to questions, Mr Teslenko said that he deleted the videos when he realized they were spreading on Chinese social media. 'I understood that these clips, although not intimate in nature, were too personal and inappropriate for public sharing,' he wrote. 'That was my mistake, and I sincerely apologise for it.' Mr Teslenko also addressed the outcry in two posts on the social platform X on July 13, after news of the expulsion spread. He wrote that he had believed he was sharing 'just a normal moment from life', not anything 'disrespectful'. But on Chinese social media, there was general agreement among commenters that there had been disrespect. The only question was by whom. Users who cheered the university's decision said that the woman had shamed China by making it seem as if Chinese women were promiscuous, especially with white men. A tech blogger with 14 million followers wrote on the platform Weibo that 'fawning over foreigners' would never bring respect, and that 'some mistakes are unforgivable'. Some state media outlets also shared the woman's full name. But others asked why the vitriol seemed to be directed primarily at the woman, rather than at Mr Teslenko, for sharing the videos. Mr Teslenko frequently makes crude jokes, including about women, online; in posts to his subscribers on Telegram accompanying the Shanghai videos he had indicated that he would show photos of her if his posts drew enough likes. Other users criticised the university for trying to enforce outdated moral standards. According to the university regulations, other behaviour that could lead to censure included listening to music too loudly and any premarital sexual activity. The woman could not be reached for comment. The university did not return requests for comment. Some people also pointed out that Chinese men who post on social media seeking or showing off Caucasian wives are often hailed as national heroes and paragons of masculinity. Others highlighted the case of a male student who was found guilty of rape and put on probation by his university, or that of a male professor who was allowed to keep teaching after sexually harassing students. Some prominent legal scholars encouraged the female student to sue the university for infringing on her rights to privacy and an education. 'As an adult woman, whether she has a sexual relationship with others is entirely within her right to sexual autonomy,' Dr Zhao wrote. Some official media outlets also offered measured defences of the woman. The Global Times, a tabloid controlled by the ruling Chinese Communist Party, wrote a commentary that said 'problem students' should be 'guided to recognise their mistakes', but in private. Others noted that the expulsion was not final – the notice said the student had 60 days to appeal – but that the revelation of her identity was irreversible. NYTIMES
