Mass. organization among groups suing Justice Department to reverse hundreds of grant cancellations
Advertisement
The lawsuit argues that the grant terminations did not allow due process to the organizations, lacked sufficient clarity, and that Henneberg's office lacked 'constitutional, statutory, and regulatory authority' to terminate the grants. The lawyers also argue that the move violated the constitutional separation of powers clause that gives Congress appropriation powers.
Get Starting Point
A guide through the most important stories of the morning, delivered Monday through Friday.
Enter Email
Sign Up
The lawsuit notes that all the grant recipients that had money rescinded received the same form letter announcing the cancellation, with identical words saying the grant programs no longer met the agency's priorities.
Lawyers argue in the lawsuit that the new agency priorities noted in the form letter are not articulated in policy or law, and that federal regulations do not allow for cancellations when the agency's priorities change 'post-award.' They said the rule only allows for cancellations of grants that no longer meet the agency's goals as stated when the grants were awarded.
Advertisement
The lawsuit says the Office of Justice Programs 'is permitted to terminate an award based on agency priorities only if that basis for termination was specifically permitted by the terms and conditions of the award.' That did not happen, it argues.
A spokesperson for the Justice Department did not return a message seeking comment on the lawsuit Thursday.
Representatives from Vera said the nonprofit received notice on April 4 that five awards worth more than $7 million were being cancelled. The other named plaintiffs, along with hundreds of other groups, received identical notices on April 22 that they should cease any activities under the grants and that they would lose access to the federal funding system.
The grants cover a wide swath of programing across the Justice Department. Among other goals, they are for community violence intervention work, combatting hate crimes, providing assistance to crime survivors and survivors of domestic or sexual abuse, improving juvenile justice, and training for law enforcement agencies.
The lawsuit says none of the organizations had previously had grants terminated and many had received grants for various programs under both Democratic and Republican presidential administrations.
Many of the organizations that lost the federal money said the unexpected cancellations mid-grant had meant layoffs, program closures and loss of community partnerships. In addition to staying the cancellations and reinstating the awards, lawyers also ask a judge to require state reports every 30 days to ensure compliance.
'The sudden and unlawful termination of these public safety grants makes neighborhoods everywhere less safe and does irreparable harm to communities across the country,' said Skye Perryman, president and CEO of Democracy Forward.
Advertisement
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Hill
23 minutes ago
- The Hill
Trump, Noem, Powell and Democrats: Five takeaways from the Hill Nation Summit
Wednesday's Hill Nation Summit was packed with lawmakers and major figures on both sides of the aisle, and made clear that President Trump has an iron grip on the Republican Party. Republican speakers were notably deferent to and confident in Trump, while Democrats struggling to coalesce around a strategy to come back from their crushing 2024 defeat outlined their own ideas. Here are five takeaways from the summit. Trump is king for GOP Six months into Trump's second term, it is clear that his grip on other Republicans is the strongest it's ever been. Republicans at the Hill Nation Summit gave the president high marks for his term so far — and resisted any hint at criticism. Rep. John James (R-Mich.), who is running for governor, declined to criticize President Trump's tariffs despite representing an area heavily dependent on auto manufacturing. 'I have every reason to believe, when I talk to people in my district who are saying, 'We're getting more business than we've ever gotten before,' … that's a result of President Trump, a businessman who knows what he's doing,' James said. House Judiciary Committee Chairman Jim Jordan (R-Ohio) said there was a 'huge distinction' between President Biden's policies around social media and Trump's pressure campaign on major law firms. 'It's not censorship,' Jordan said, arguing that the firms were not directed to take down particular posts or speech from their websites. House Budget Committee Chairman Jodey Arrington (R-Texas) said that the pressure Trump exerts on members is actually helpful to help unify Republicans in Congress. 'I think too often we're all we're all carrot and no stick. And I think in life in general, and in business, to many audience members, I think you have to have equal parts carrot and stick, and that's generally the best way to incentivize the outcomes and the behavior we want,' Arrington said. Trump is winning, and his first six in months have underscored his willingness to hit back hard at his opponents in either party. The remarks from Republicans on Wednesday suggested they like the winning. But Republicans also aren't interested, for the most part, in getting on the president's bad side. Powell's future hangs over event Did we just say something about staying on Trump's good side? One person who isn't on his good side is Federal Reserve Chairman Jerome Powell, who is under a severe pressure campaign from the president. In the first hour of the confab, Peter Navarro, the White House senior counselor for trade and manufacturing, unloaded on Powell at the summit, labeling him the 'worst Fed chair in history' — without, notably, calling for his ouster. All I want is a Fed chair who understands how economies work, and Powell ain't that,' he said. 'We're in the endgame now for Powell.' During the event, reports surfaced that Trump, during an Oval Office meeting with House Republicans on Tuesday, indicated that he would likely fire Powell 'soon,' according to a senior White House official. Trump later said it was 'not true' and 'highly unlikely,' but noted 'I don't rule out anything.' One of the GOP lawmakers in the meeting, Rep. Byron Donalds (R-Fla.), sat down for an interview at the Hill Nation Summit shortly after. Donalds refused to disclose details from the gathering — 'I'm not gonna get into the details of that conversation' — but notably said he was not, and likely would never be, in favor of pushing Powell. 'I'm not there yet, but I'll tell you that the president doesn't rule anything out,' Donalds said. 'It's pretty clear the president is frustrated about where short-term interest rates are.' 'I think the greater issue is Congress being smart with the people's money,' he added. Asked if he would ever get to a moment where he believes Powell should be fired, Donalds responded: 'For me, probably won't get to that point.' Democrats debate how to make comeback Democrats attending the Hill Nation Summit all had something to say about how their party can make a comeback and regain power in Washington. But there were some differences over how to do so. Activist David Hogg, 25, who has sought to pressure his party into shifting toward the left and allowing a new generation of leaders to take hold, said it is vital for his party to make big changes. He joked that he was confident he'd eventually win out since he'd 'out-live' many of those on the other side of the debate, and more seriously compared the Democratic Party to the Soviet Union when it came to aging leaders holding on. Other speakers, such as Rep. Glenn Ivey (D-Md.), said they thought age was overrated, even as they said the party needed to rethink some things. Rep. Ro Khanna (D-Calif.) said that one of the problems Democrats are facing is that 'we were way too judgmental' of people who voted for President Trump in the 2024 presidential election. Khanna, a prominent House progressive, recently visited South Carolina, a crucial stop on the road to the Democratic nomination, but said he hadn't made a decision on running for president in 2028. 'Whether I run or whether I get behind someone and have a network that can then support them, I haven't decided,' Khanna said. 'But I do know this: the Democratic Party has not had a compelling economic vision for years. I have a compelling economic vision.' Rep. Ted Lieu (D-Calif.) said his state's governor, Gavin Newsom, would be a great 2028 candidate. He also predicted Republicans would pay for their 'big, beautiful' bill's cuts to Medicaid, noting Sen. Josh Hawley's (R-Mo.) bill seeking to undo parts of the legislation's Medicaid provisions. 'One thing the bill does is for any Republican that's been saying, 'Oh, these weren't actually cuts to Medicaid,' it shows a lie to that,' Lieu said at the Hill Nation Summit. 'Our messaging is, if you want to elect the same person who voted for the cuts, you can do that, or you can elect a Democrat that's going to stop the cuts.' And while Hogg was pushed out of his unpaid role at the Democratic National Committee earlier this year, he said he is still interested in working with the committee in the future, adding that he still has a 'good' relationship with the DNC Chair Ken Martin. 'There's obviously disagreements that we have at the end of the day, but I think that we all still have good relationships. I still have, you know, enormous respect for all my fellow vice chairs, for the other officers of the DNC,' Hogg said. McCarthy opens door to return to politics Former Speaker Kevin McCarthy (R-Calif.), who has joined the speech-giving circuit since he was ousted from the Speakership and left Congress, had previously ruled out taking a role in the Trump administration — but cracked that door back open at the Hill Nation Summit. Asked if he would be open to serving in the Trump administration or another government role, McCarthy said: 'Oh, yeah. I talk to the president often. I will do whatever I can to help this president, I will do whatever I can to help this country be successful.' But McCarthy indicated he is happy, at least for now, with being outside the government. 'I think there's things I do now that do that in a way that I don't have to take a paycheck from the government, I think that's more helpful to the taxpayer,' McCarthy said, adding: 'I don't have to go back into government — but I will always help individuals.' Noem defends, attacks and surprises The Department of Homeland Security is a large enterprise that gives its secretary, Kristi Noem, power and influence over a host of issues. At Wednesday's summit, that was underlined as Noem defended the administration's record, went on offense on immigration and surprised, at least a bit, with some news on security at airports. Noem, commenting on the immigration raid on a California marijuana farm where protesters clashed with federal officers, said, 'We will go places where we know there are known criminals, where we've built a case to go get those individuals.' That signaled Noem and the administration have no intention of backing down on an issue that has been a huge strength of Trump's, though the known criminals part of Trump's wording could also suggest the administration will be less focused on migrants without criminal records who may be working on farms. Noem separately said the Trump administration might not spend all of the money allocated to it to build a wall on the southern border. That funding was included in the tax and spending megabill earlier this month. She said the funding might not need to be spent given the significant drop in border-crossing numbers since President Trump came into office. 'Maybe you don't need all that money for the wall because we've done such a great job securing the border. We'll look at all of that,' Noem told NewsNation's Blake Burman. Noem separately suggested changes could be coming to the size of liquid containers allowed for passengers boarding flights in the United States. Noem said such changes were one of the things the Transportation Security Administration (TSA), which reports to Noem, is weighing. 'But I will tell you — I mean the liquids — I'm questioning. So that may be the next big announcement is what size your liquids need to be,' Noem told NewsNation's host Blake Burman at the Hill Nation Summit. 'We're looking at, you know, our scanners.' Noem's comments came about a week after the DHS, which oversees the TSA, announced travelers flying domestically will be allowed to keep their shoes on while passing through TSA screening. Currently, liquids like juices, bottled water and coffee as well as aerosols, creams, gels and pastes all under 3.4 ounces are allowed in carry-on bags. Noem spoke about streamlining the experience for domestic travelers at airports, revealing that the DHS is in discussions with 'several' companies about making it happen 'Well, hopefully the future of an airport where I'm looking to go is that you walk in the door with your carry-on suitcase, you walk through a scanner and go right to your flight,' Noem said Wednesday, adding that it could take just 'one' minute to get to the gate.
Axios
23 minutes ago
- Axios
Exclusive: Democratic challenger to GOP Rep. Scott Perry raises $500k in 2 days
Janelle Stelson, a Pennsylvania Democrat who narrowly lost to Rep. Scott Perry (R-Pa.) in 2024, raised more than $500,000 in the first 48 hours since announcing for 2026, Axios has learned. Why it matters: For a candidate essentially asking donors for a second chance, those are encouraging numbers. Bombshell fundraising announcements can also make other potential Democratic hopefuls think twice about jumping into the primary. "We are building the coalition needed to win this seat and it's clear that momentum is on our side," Stelson said in a statement to Axios. What we're watching: Stelson, like other 2024 retreads, still needs to get through a 2026 primary process, which could get messy. The Democratic party is still processing Zohran Mamdani's shock win in New York City, with even established incumbents wondering if they'll be victims of a progressive insurgency. Zoom in: Repeat candidates bring certain advantages to a rematch, including name ID and a donor list that can be resuscitated. But they also enter the race having been rejected the previous cycle. Still, Democratic party strategists are convinced that the midterm electorate will be more forgiving to their candidates with President Trump off the ballot. They are betting that tough losses in a presidential year can turn into tight wins in the off-year. Zoom out: The Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee tends to encourage repeat candidates more than their GOP counterparts, with 10 Democratic challengers running for a second time in competitive seats in 2024. Two of them – Rep. Adam Gray (D-Calif.) and Josh Riley (D-N.Y.) – ended up prevailing in their rematches. Rep. Tom Souzi, who left his seat to run for governor in 2022, recaptured it in a special election in 2024 and then won a full term in November. Republicans mocked the tactic, likening it to microwaving "crusty lasagna". Between the lines: This year, both parties already have a handful of retread candidates looking for redemption. Former Iowa state Rep. Christina Bohannan is challenging Rep. Mariannette Miller-Meeks (R-Iowa) for a third time after losing by 799 votes in 2024. In Wisconsin, Rebecca Cooke wants to take another shot at Rep. Derrick Van Orden (R-Wis.). In California, Joe Kerr, a retired firefighter, plans to run against Rep. Young Kim (R-Calif.) again. Former Rep. Yadiro Caraveo is laying the groundwork to take back her Colorado seat from Rep. Gabe Evans (R-Colo.). And former state Rep. Amish Shah and Marlene Galán-Woods are both running in the Democratic primary to face Rep. David Schweikert in Arizona. Shah lost in 2024 in the general election. The other side: In Ohio, Kevin Coughlin is looking for a rematch against Rep. Emilia Sykes (D-Ohio). And Derek Merrin is making a second run at Rep. Marcy Kaptur (D-Ohio). Former Stockton Mayor Kevin Lincoln wants to again challenge Rep. Josh Harder (D-Calif.) in the Central Valley. Two Nevada Republicans — Marty O'Donnell and David Flippo — who didn't advance past the primary last cycle are also running again in NV-03 and NV-04. The bottom line: Second-time candidates — and even third-time candidates — know how to dial for dollars, but they'll still face well-financed incumbents in November.
The Hill
23 minutes ago
- The Hill
Crypto bills stall amid GOP infighting
A procedural vote to advance the three crypto measures — meant to run for just five minutes — remained open more than three hours later as lawmakers from across the GOP's ideological spectrum shuffled in and out of meetings with leadership to discuss the stalled legislation. As of publication, seven Republicans had voted 'no' on clearing the procedural hurdle, including Reps. Lauren Boebert (Colo.), Tim Burchett (Tenn.), Michael Cloud (Texas), Marjorie Taylor Greene (Ga.), Scott Perry (Pa.), Chip Roy (Texas) and Keith Self (Texas) — enough to sink the vote in the GOP's narrow majority. Lawmakers had appeared poised to approve a series of procedural votes for the bills Wednesday, after President Trump announced a deal Tuesday night with a contingent of Republican hardliners who torpedoed a vote earlier in the day. The situation, however, quickly descended into disarray Wednesday, as Trump's deal failed to appease the entire hardline group, while seemingly alienating key leaders on the House Financial Services Committee. Three hardliners — Roy, Self and Greene — initially cast 'no' votes on an early procedural motion before switching to 'yes' and allowing the measure to pass. Rep. Andy Harris (R-Md.), the chairman of the conservative House Freedom Caucus, announced in a post on X during the vote that his caucus would back the rule after reaching an agreement with the president. 'Under this agreement, the Rules Committee will reconvene later today to add clear, strong anti–Central Bank Digital Currency (CBDC) provisions to the CLARITY legislation,' Harris said, referring to a bill laying out regulatory rules for the crypto industry. 'This is an important step to ensure Americans are protected from government overreach into their financial privacy,' he continued. 'We remain committed to securing these critical protections in the final legislation and ensuring they are preserved as the bill moves through the Senate and into law,' Harris added. Leadership appeared to put that plan in motion Wednesday, alerting a 4 p.m. meeting for the House Rules Committee. Just after 4 p.m., however, that gathering was canceled. Drama continued in the next vote — the final procedural hurdle before a final vote — when Roy and Greene once again cast 'no' votes. Rep. Bill Huizenga (R-Mich.), vice chair of the House Financial Services Committee, also initially voted against the measure. Johnson huddled with members in his office off the House floor, after which Huizenga switched his vote to 'yes,' while five other hardliners joined Roy and Greene and changed their votes to 'no.'
