
Consumers brace for steeper bills and lower credit scores from Trump's financial deregulation
Rob Haskell was hoping a new rule would shield his credit report from thousands of dollars in bills for recent heart procedures. Instead, he's bracing for impact from President Donald Trump's push to slash financial regulations.
'I've always had medical debt hanging over me but, you know, it's just completely unmanageable,' Haskell said in late May. He was speaking to NBC News from a hospital bed at PeaceHealth St. Joseph Medical Center in Bellingham, Washington, days before an open heart surgery that threatened to yield another steep bill.
'So, to the moon on that one,' he sighed.
A lot of people don't necessarily know about the CFPB and may not understand how it's being attacked, but they will be affected.
Adam Rust, consumer federation of america
The 58-year-old contractor said he has battled a series of heart and kidney issues for most of his life. Despite having health insurance, his medical needs have resulted in thousands of dollars in debt.
Haskell recently paid off a $5,000 bill that knocked his credit score 21 points lower — debt that might have been spared from his report under a rule instituted in the final days of the Biden-era Consumer Financial Protection Bureau. The CFPB estimated at the time that the measure would have spared $49 billion in bills from hitting the reports of 15 million people.
But in April, Trump-appointed leadership at the consumer watchdog reversed its position and threw its support behind credit unions and consumer reporting companies seeking to block the rule in a Texas federal court. After twice delaying the policy's March start date, the judge is expected to rule within days.
Haskell used some retirement savings to pay off his last operation, in 2024. Before his heart surgery last month, he'd hoped the medical debt rule would finally help smooth out his finances, boost his credit score above 700, and improve his chances of buying property to build a home. That now appears unlikely.
'There really was very little information about the whole thing,' Haskell said of the CFPB's about-face. 'I was really surprised.'
The change adds to the financial risks consumers increasingly face from months of cuts and policy rollbacks at the agency, advocates say, contributing to broader economic uncertainty stoked by Trump's trade war. Since January, CFPB leadership has attempted to fire nearly all of the agency's 1,700 workers, halted standard supervisory and enforcement actions and blocked rules aimed at buttressing consumers' wallets.
The actions have stunned consumer advocates who just months ago had expected at least some of the Biden-era guidance to remain untouched. Some pointed to the populist economic message that propelled Trump back into the Oval Office, even though the CFPB — itself a byproduct of populist frustrations churned up by the 2008 financial crisis — has drawn GOP ire since its inception.
'These rules generally are very politically popular,' said Chi Chi Wu, a senior attorney at the National Consumer Law Center, a nonprofit group that stepped in to defend both the medical debt rule and a separate one capping overdraft fees at large banks at $5. The latter measure was voided in early May when Trump signed House Republicans' resolution repealing it. When federal agencies' policies are nullified under the Congressional Review Act, they're prevented from issuing substantially similar ones in the future.
'They're actively harming regular, hard-working Americans so that their billionaire buddies can profit,' Wu said of administration officials. 'There's really no other way to look at it.'
Spokespeople for the CFPB and the White House didn't respond to requests for comment.
The Trump administration has cast its changes as efforts to combat government overreach. In remarks to the American Bankers Association in April, Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent, who was appointed acting director of the CFPB in late January, described Biden-era rules as politically biased and criticized their 'compliance costs' that could impede 'responsible lending and risk-taking.'
'The associated mission drift can lend itself to political ends,' he said at the time.
The consumer banking industry has applauded efforts to rein in the agency.
'How do we take politics out of regulation, where it never should have been?' Lindsey Johnson, president and CEO of the Consumer Bankers Association, said at a recent industry event. She also thanked Trump in a statement last month cheering the elimination of the overdraft rule 'for protecting consumer choice and access to a deeply valued financial tool utilized by millions of Americans in times of need.'
Republican policymakers, both at the CFPB and in Congress, have taken steps to unwind other recent financial regulations.
In April, a Biden-era rule capping most credit card late fees at $8 was eliminated. So was a policy aimed at tightening regulations around the sale of consumers' financial data and Social Security numbers. The CFPB has also abandoned a lawsuit against the three big banks that operate the digital payments platform Zelle, which was accused of mishandling users' fraud complaints totaling more than $870 million since 2017.
Gone, too, are oversight powers over big tech companies offering payment tools and plans to hold Buy Now, Pay Later services — which have rapidly become many consumers' default choice of credit — to the same regulations as card issuers.
'A lot of people don't necessarily know about the CFPB and may not understand how it's being attacked, but they will be affected,' said Adam Rust, director of financial services at the Consumer Federation of America. 'Partisanship is what is driving these actions, both by Congress and the CFPB, and it strikes me as an inside-the-Beltway game that ignores the effect on regular people.'
In the meantime, some advocates are shifting focus to state and municipal safeguards. New York City Comptroller Brad Lander published a report this week outlining how the city and the state can fill the void left by a CFPB 'in crisis,' recommending a consumer restitution fund and bank overdraft caps. In January, California instituted its own prohibitions on health care providers and debt collectors from reporting medical debt to credit agencies.
Still, Armen Meyer, a financial policy consultant who has served as both a fintech executive and a bank regulator, said he expects 'many, many consumers will be harmed no matter how much the states stand up.'
When you're broke, you're broke. You just do what you can to survive.
George Curlee, Garland, Texas
George Curlee, 51, is keenly aware of how the CFPB's policy reversals threaten his finances.
In 2023, the Garland, Texas, resident underwent an emergency toe amputation that resulted in $61,000 in total medical debt despite the insurance he'd purchased on an Affordable Care Act marketplace. Around the same time, he was fired from his retail job and his credit score plunged 60 points.
Curlee said he has since managed to whittle the debt down to about $50,000 and found part-time work in March. The job pays less than half his previous $40,000 annual salary, and he's been living with two of his brothers to save money.
'When you're broke, you're broke,' he said. 'You just do what you can to survive.'
Curlee now fears worse to come because of House Republicans' so-called Big Beautiful Bill, which the Congressional Budget Office estimates would push at least 16 million people off health insurance by 2034 — including those who pay for ACA coverage like him. He has since joined advocates to lobby policymakers against the proposed cuts and in favor of preserving the medical debt rule.
'I really wish that politicians would take the politics out of these bills and do what's right for the American people,' he said. 'This is a little insane.'
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


The Herald Scotland
22 minutes ago
- The Herald Scotland
Senate pushes ahead on Trump's tax break and spending cut plan
Voting had come to a standstill, dragging on for more than three hours, with holdout senators huddling for negotiations and taking private meetings off the Senate floor. In the end, two Republicans opposed the motion to move ahead on Mr Trump's signature domestic policy plan, joining all 47 Democrats. 'Tonight we saw a GREAT VICTORY in the Senate,' Mr Trump said in a social media post afterwards. Republicans are using their majorities in Congress to push aside Democratic opposition, but they have run into a series of political and policy setbacks. Not all Republicans are on board with proposals to reduce spending on Medicaid, food stamps and other programmes as a way to help cover the cost of extending some 3.8 trillion dollars (£2.77 trillion) in Trump tax breaks. Mr Trump had threatened to campaign against one Republican, senator Thom Tillis, who had announced he could not support the Bill because of Medicaid cuts that he worried would leave many without health care in his state. A new analysis from the nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office said the Senate version of the Bill would increase by 11.8 million the number of people without health insurance in 2034. Mr Tillis and senator Rand Paul voted no. Renewed pressure to oppose the 940-page bill came from billionaire entrepreneur Elon Musk, who called it 'utterly insane and destructive'. Ahead for senators now will be an all-night debate and amendments. If they are able to pass it, the Bill would return to the House for a final round of votes before it could reach the White House. With the narrow Republican majorities in the House and Senate, leaders need almost every lawmaker on board. Senate Democratic leader Chuck Schumer of New York said Republicans released the bill 'in the dead of night' on Friday and were rushing through before the public fully knew what was in it. He forced a full reading of the text that began late on Saturday and continued into Sunday morning. At its core, the legislation would make permanent many of the tax breaks from Mr Trump's first term that would otherwise expire by year's end if Congress fails to act, resulting in a potential tax increase on Americans. The Bill would add new breaks, including no taxes on tips, and commit 350 billion dollars (£255 billion) to national security, including for Mr Trump's mass deportation agenda. But the cutbacks to Medicaid, food stamps and green energy investments are also causing dissent within republican ranks. Senator Ron Wyden said the environmental rollbacks would amount to a 'death sentence' for America's wind and solar industries.

Western Telegraph
23 minutes ago
- Western Telegraph
Senate pushes ahead on Trump's tax break and spending cut plan
By a 51-49 tally and with vice president JD Vance at the Capitol to break a potential tie, the Senate cleared a key procedural step on Saturday as midnight approached. Voting had come to a standstill, dragging on for more than three hours, with holdout senators huddling for negotiations and taking private meetings off the Senate floor. In the end, two Republicans opposed the motion to move ahead on Mr Trump's signature domestic policy plan, joining all 47 Democrats. 'Tonight we saw a GREAT VICTORY in the Senate,' Mr Trump said in a social media post afterwards. Republicans are using their majorities in Congress to push aside Democratic opposition, but they have run into a series of political and policy setbacks. Not all Republicans are on board with proposals to reduce spending on Medicaid, food stamps and other programmes as a way to help cover the cost of extending some 3.8 trillion dollars (£2.77 trillion) in Trump tax breaks. Mr Trump had threatened to campaign against one Republican, senator Thom Tillis, who had announced he could not support the Bill because of Medicaid cuts that he worried would leave many without health care in his state. A new analysis from the nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office said the Senate version of the Bill would increase by 11.8 million the number of people without health insurance in 2034. Mr Tillis and senator Rand Paul voted no. Renewed pressure to oppose the 940-page bill came from billionaire entrepreneur Elon Musk, who called it 'utterly insane and destructive'. Ahead for senators now will be an all-night debate and amendments. If they are able to pass it, the Bill would return to the House for a final round of votes before it could reach the White House. With the narrow Republican majorities in the House and Senate, leaders need almost every lawmaker on board. Senate Democratic leader Chuck Schumer of New York said Republicans released the bill 'in the dead of night' on Friday and were rushing through before the public fully knew what was in it. He forced a full reading of the text that began late on Saturday and continued into Sunday morning. At its core, the legislation would make permanent many of the tax breaks from Mr Trump's first term that would otherwise expire by year's end if Congress fails to act, resulting in a potential tax increase on Americans. The Bill would add new breaks, including no taxes on tips, and commit 350 billion dollars (£255 billion) to national security, including for Mr Trump's mass deportation agenda. But the cutbacks to Medicaid, food stamps and green energy investments are also causing dissent within republican ranks. Senator Ron Wyden said the environmental rollbacks would amount to a 'death sentence' for America's wind and solar industries.


NBC News
25 minutes ago
- NBC News
Sen. Mullin says young children of deported adults should ‘go with the parents': Full interview
Sen. Markwayne Mullin (R-Okla.) talks about the Senate's late night vote on President Trump's tax cuts and spending bill, the Supreme Court's ruling on nationwide injunctions, and the American attack on Iran's nuclear program, during an exclusive interview with Meet the Press.