Could Pam Bondi have prosecuted Jeffrey Epstein when she was Florida's top legal officer?
Legally, yes, she could have, legal experts say. The bigger question, however, is whether she should have felt compelled to do so.
Bondi's Justice Department announced on July 7 that there was no evidence of an Epstein "client list" and that no further documents on the late wealthy Palm Beacher and sexual predator would be released, despite her earlier promises.
President Donald Trump has been trying to weather the ensuing political firestorm after some of his MAGA supporters call for more transparency in the Epstein case.
More: MAGA supporters Trump is calling 'weaklings' over Jeffrey Epstein files: Here's a list
What happened in the Palm Beach County Jeffrey Epstein case?
Epstein was charged in 2006 by a Palm Beach County grand jury with a single count of solicitation of prostitution despite having heard from only two underage victims.
Then-State Attorney Barry Krischer's prosecutors had tanked their own case during the secret proceeding, telling the girls during questioning that they themselves were the criminals, the transcripts show. The Palm Beach Post fought in court for nearly five years to make the transcripts public. They were released in July 2024.
Palm Beach police had found dozens of girls and young women who told similar stories of sexual abuse at Epstein's island mansion. When then-Police Chief Michael Reiter saw that Krischer's prosecution was not in line with the case his department had built, he sent his evidence to the feds. Had the charges reflected that evidence, Epstein would have faced decades in prison.
In the end, Epstein pleaded guilty to only two prostitution-related felonies in 2008 in a "deal of the century" arranged by both Krischer and federal prosecutors. He was sentenced to 18 months in the county jail, of which he served 13. He was out in July 2009.
Who is Pam Bondi?
Bondi took office as Florida's first female attorney general in 2011. She served until 2019 and later that year represented Trump during his first impeachment proceeding.
Born in the Tampa area, she worked as an assistant state attorney for Hillsborough County, prosecuting among other cases Major League pitcher Dwight Gooden for violating his probation after he pleaded guilty to charges of speeding away from a police DUI traffic stop in 2005.
Was it negligent of Pam Bondi not to investigate Epstein?
Despite the fact that Epstein had already been convicted of Palm Beach County crimes, federal prosecutors in New York leveled sex trafficking charges against Epstein in July 2019. Epstein was found dead in his Manhattan jail cell less than a month after his arrest.
Should Bondi have looked into Epstein's crimes between the time of his jail release in 2009 and the filing of the criminal charges in 2019, when many have alleged that he sexually assaulted hundreds more?
Not necessarily, says Robert Jarvis, a law professor at Nova Southeasten University.
Unless someone brought it to Bondi, "there was no reason to start a new investigation,' he said, after one had already been concluded by both federal and state prosecutors.
Some of the 2019 cases were also based in Florida. At least two Palm Beach County victims testified in the Ghislaine Maxwell case.
"The federal government and the state government, of course, are two different political entities, and both have the power to try the same person for the same crime, using their respective laws," Jarvis said. "Thus, Pam Bondi could have tried Epstein."
But would she?
"I would not criticize her for not doing anything for what seem to be a case that had already been adjudicated and dealt with and punishment handed out," Jarvis said.
Holly Baltz is an editor at The Palm Beach Post. You can reach her at hbaltz@pbpost.com.
This article originally appeared on Palm Beach Post: Could Pam Bondi have prosecuted Jeffrey Epstein as Florida AG?
Solve the daily Crossword
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Hill
3 minutes ago
- The Hill
Tulsi Gabbard is setting Trump's base up for the next Epstein disappointment
Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard is sowing the seeds for MAGAs next Jeffrey Epstein moment and perpetuating a dangerous retaliatory cycle. She has accused former senior government officials of directing a treasonous conspiracy to undermine President Trump's 2016 campaign. Nothing Gabbard has released proves that assertion, including the 2017 House Intelligence Committee report questioning the intelligence community assessment that Russia wanted Trump to win the 2016 election. That 2017 conclusion is at odds with the unanimous and bipartisan findings of the Senate Select Committee on Intelligence that found Russia did in fact try to influence the campaign in Trump's favor but those efforts did not affect the outcome. Gabbard's claims reinforce a long-standing narrative prevalent among MAGA supporters that Democrats sought to destroy Trump's candidacy, and then undermine his presidency, by manipulating information about Russian interference in the 2016 election. Gabbard's unsubstantiated conclusions will come back to bite the Trump administration the same way Attorney General Pam Bondi's inability to release the Epstein client list has upset the president's supporters. Unless the Trump administration is prepared to fabricate evidence, it's unlikely enough new information will ever be discovered to prove a conspiracy of the magnitude suggested by Gabbard. MAGA supporters will be waiting for the mass arrest and imprisonment of Obama administration officials that never comes. Gabbard, and ultimately Trump, will be left to weakly explain why the conspirators aren't coming to justice. Gabbard's powerful assertions came at a delicate moment for a Trump administration already caught in the middle of a similar storm of their own making about Epstein. From the start, the investigations and public communications about Russian interference in the 2016 election were mishandled. It's important to acknowledge that fact upfront. President Obama didn't have to release the government's conclusions about Russian interference a month before the 2016 election, conclusions that lent an air of legitimacy to accusations against Trump being discussed publicly by supporters of Hillary Clinton. The FBI's probe into alleged collusion between the Trump campaign and Russia was itself predicated on flimsy information. Even if Gabbard's wild assertions aren't true, and there's no evidence so far to suggest they are, the judgement exercised by parts of the government during and after the 2016 campaign still left a lot to be desired. The Trump campaign had been the primary victim of the government's poor judgement, but former FBI Director James Comey evened the score a bit when he announced the opening of an FBI probe into Clinton's use of an unclassified email server days before the 2016 election. Democrats botched the messaging around Russia's interference with the 2016 election, either accidentally or intentionally inflating its role and falsely insinuating the Trump campaign had been involved. But Gabbard is now recreating their mistakes with her reckless accusations. Now that both sides have weaponized intelligence for political purposes, what matters is to restore trust in the intelligence community. Gabbard would say she's doing that by leveling her accusations in the name of transparency, but her aggressive assertions go beyond where the facts are leading and perpetuate an overblown narrative of government conspiracy. Already, Democrats aren't inclined to believe what she's saying, just as most Republicans never bought into the Steele dossier or the assertions about Trump's collusion with Russia. Beyond the trust gap with Democrats, Gabbard is setting the conditions for a major falling out with the MAGA faithful. After Epstein, this will be the second time that Trump administration officials allege a massive conspiracy but aren't able to produce evidence to support their claims. Trump's core supporters believe these conspiracies are real because their leaders, officials like Bondi and Gabbard, keep telling them that proof exists. They'll demand action over Gabbard's accusations, the way they are with Epstein, then be left with no choice but to assume the Trump administration is complicit in the coverup when no action comes. This is a distraction Trump doesn't need. He would do well to direct Gabbard to tone down her assertions rather than egg her on. Going forward, the intelligence community, elected officials, the Justice Department and the government in general should take a lesson from former President Gerald Ford. Ford understood that prosecuting President Richard Nixon would divide the country and create more problems than it solved. He made the hard decision to allow what was probably criminal conduct to go unpunished to allow the nation to heal. Except in cases of the most egregious crimes supported by the strongest evidence, the U.S. government should take a break from seeking to prosecute former government officials. Democrats spent years rooting for Trump to go to jail or actively trying to put Trump in jail for perceived crimes. Gabbard seems intent on doing the same in reverse. This is a bad place for the country to be, with the intelligence community being used against former officials and sensitive information being declassified when it suits a political purpose. This type of behavior will have a chilling effect on everything the intelligence community does and further divide our country. The Trump administration should be the grown-up in the room and break this dangerous cycle now.
Yahoo
24 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Jeffrey Epstein accomplice Ghislaine Maxwell set to meet today with DOJ
WASHINGTON − Deputy Attorney General Todd Blanche plans to meet with convicted sex trafficker Ghislaine Maxwell on July 24 to find out what more she can say about her dealings with disgraced financier Jeffrey Epstein, according to news reports. CNN, ABC and NBC News reported the expected meeting with the former British socialite, who is serving a 20-year prison sentence for trafficking a minor to Epstein for sexual abuse. News of the meeting date comes as President Donald Trump continues to try and contain the growing backlash over the Epstein saga and his administration's recent decision not to release Epstein investigative files in the custody of the Justice Department. DOJ officials had no comment on whether Blanche was meeting with Maxwell. Who is Ghislaine Maxwell? DOJ turns to Jeffrey Epstein's ex-partner The meeting comes as many Trump supporters, Democratic lawmakers and even some Republicans demand the release of more information about the accused sex trafficker, who died in prison in 2019 while awaiting trial on sex-trafficking charges. Maxwell is also reportedly set to meet on Aug 11. with congressional lawmakers after the House Oversight Committee subpoenaed her on July 23. In a social media post Tuesday, Blanche – who is Trump's former personal defense lawyer – said that if 'Ghislane Maxwell has information about anyone who has committed crimes against victims, the FBI and the DOJ will hear what she has to say.' This is a developing story and will be updated. This article originally appeared on USA TODAY: DOJ meeting with Ghislaine Maxwell set for today over Epstein saga Solve the daily Crossword
Yahoo
30 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Why Tulsi Gabbard's 'treasonous conspiracy' case against Obama is absurd
As President Donald Trump tries to quiet a rebellion from his own base over his administration's decision to withhold the release of the complete Jeffrey Epstein files, his director of national intelligence, Tulsi Gabbard, is going on offense. Through memos and documents released both last week and this week, Gabbard is attempting to advance the evidence-free claim that officials in former President Barack Obama's administration engaged in a 'treasonous conspiracy' and 'coup' attempt in 2016. Gabbard alleges the Obama administration manipulated intelligence assessments that found that Russia sought to tip the election in favor of Trump, with the purported goal of destroying Trump politically. Gabbard has recommended criminal charges, including against Obama himself, while pushing this nonsensical narrative. While the reports bring a bit of new information to light about U.S. intelligence operations, they don't dislodge the many well-substantiated assessments indicating Russia intervened in 2016 to hurt Hillary Clinton and boost Trump. The timing of the release does suggest, however, that Gabbard is scrambling to find some way to satisfy people in the MAGA base hungry for a new conspiracy theory as the administration tries to leave the Epstein story behind. Gabbard's maneuvering appears to be an attempt to put meat on the bones of Trump's longtime narrative that all the investigations showing Russia tried to help Donald Trump win the 2016 election were a 'hoax.' On Friday, she released a memo, emails and intelligence documents that she effectively claimed were proof that Russia didn't try to interfere in the 2016 election. But as CNN points out, her main argument rested on a sleight of hand: She cited an intelligence document that purportedly said Russia 'did not attempt to affect the outcome of the election.' In fact, that document — a President's Daily Brief, or his daily intelligence report — merely said Russia hadn't impacted the election results 'by conducting malicious cyber activities against election infrastructure.' 'It was referring narrowly to a very specific (and severe) type of potential election interference. The Obama administration never alleged such interference took place or that Russia manipulated actual votes that were cast.' In other words, Gabbard used a cherry-picked quote to conflate the idea that Russia didn't actually target election infrastructure and attempt to alter vote counts with the idea that Russia didn't interfere at all. On Wednesday, Gabbard announced a new document release, which included a declassified report put together by Republicans on the House Intelligence Committee in 2020 about the 2017 intelligence community assessment of Russian interference. As NBC News reports, 'The Republican report was emphatically rejected at the time by Democratic lawmakers on the panel who played no role in its creation.' NBC News explains that the report found that even the deeply partisan Republican report found most of the 2017 intelligence community assessment on Russian interference in the election 'sound,' but it took issue with the reliability of the sources it depended on to come to the conclusion that Russian President Vladimir Putin 'aspired' to help Trump. That's fine to document for the historical record, but it's hardly some kind of smoking gun of a conspiracy. And Gabbard conveniently skips over the fact that an incredibly rigorous bipartisan Senate investigation released the same year landed somewhere different. As NBC News summarizes it: The 2020 Senate investigation, which spanned three years, involved more than 200 witnesses and reviewed more than a million documents, endorsed the intelligence agencies' assessment that Russia had spread disinformation online and leaked stolen emails from the Democratic National Committee to undermine Clinton's candidacy and bolster Trump's prospects. Trump's current secretary of state, Marco Rubio, was the acting chair of the Intelligence Committee at the time. He and every other member of the committee, both Republicans and Democrats, endorsed the report's findings.' The Obama administration and intelligence community's approach to the matter was also covered extensively through a Justice Department report in 2019, special counsel Robert Mueller's report in 2019 and a report by special counsel John Durham in 2023. If there was some grand conspiracy by Obama officials to mess with the intelligence assessment and destroy Trump, both Republicans and Democrats had plenty of opportunity to find it. The sloppiness of what Gabbard is presenting only confirms what has been widely suspected about her actions: that it's a weapon of distraction. And it doesn't seem like a coincidence that she claims to have uncovered evidence of a shadowy 'conspiracy' at the exact moment that Trump is being accused by both Democrats and Republicans of covering one up. It all looks like an attempt to find some red meat for the base. Fox News appears to be taking the bait, pushing the unsubstantiated Obama conspiracy theory on its shows at a far greater rate than the Epstein story. The appetite of Trump's base, however, is less predictable on this story. At the same time, Gabbard's new anti-Obama offensive also functions as an opportunity for her to move to the center of things in the White House, particularly after she clashed with Trump over Iran. As my colleague Steve Benen noted, 'If the DNI were looking for a way to return to the president's good graces, she apparently found one.' What better way to excite her boss than with a brand-new conspiracy theory? This article was originally published on
