logo
Fifteen Maoists killed in Chhattisgarh's Bijapur: Police

Fifteen Maoists killed in Chhattisgarh's Bijapur: Police

The Hindu07-05-2025
At least 15 Maoists were killed by the security forces on Wednesday (May 7, 2025) in an anti-Maoists operation being conducted along the Karegutta hills in Chhattisgarh's Bijapur, said police sources.
The said operation, Operation Sankalp, has been continuing since April 21 and till Tuesday, four alleged Maoists had been gunned down.
A police source said that the casualties on Wednesday could be around 15 to 18 so far and it might increase as and when search progresses.
'Today, good operational outcomes are expected in the ongoing *Operation Sankalp. All security forces are safe and fully committed to ensuring a safe and secure Bastar region,' said the source
With this, the total number of Maoists purportedly being killed in Chhattisgarh this year has crossed 150.
Further details are awaited.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Bittersweet homecoming for Jalgaon man acquitted in 2006 Mumbai train blasts case
Bittersweet homecoming for Jalgaon man acquitted in 2006 Mumbai train blasts case

The Hindu

time3 hours ago

  • The Hindu

Bittersweet homecoming for Jalgaon man acquitted in 2006 Mumbai train blasts case

Asif Khan, one of the 12 accused acquitted by the Bombay High Court in the 2006 Mumbai train blasts case on July 21, walked out of Pune's Yerwada jail the next day around 10.30 p.m. after spending 19 long years behind bars. The reunion at his home in Maharashtra's Jalgaon on Wednesday morning was an emotional one, marked by tears, hugs, and a sense of disbelief. His mother, Husna Bano Bashir Khan, 70, couldn't contain her emotions as she spoke about her son's ordeal. 'Asif was always innocent; he lost 19 years of his life. This delayed justice can never compensate for that,' she said. On July 11, 2006, a series of seven bomb blasts occurred in the first-class compartments of seven suburban local trains in Mumbai between 6:23 p.m. and 6:29 p.m., resulting in the tragic loss of 187 lives and leaving 824 people injured. Mr. Asif was 33 years old when he was arrested in connection with the blasts, leaving behind his wife, Nishat, and three children, who were aged six, four, and two at the time. Then he was working in a construction company as a civil engineer in Mumbai's Kandivali area. 'After securing a diploma in civil engineering, he was working in Jalgaon for a year with a small company. In 2000, he got the job in Mumbai. Three years into the job, he found a rented home in Mira Road and moved there with his wife and children for a better life,' recalled his mother. The investigation into the blasts led to the registration of seven separate FIRs across different police stations in Mumbai, which were later consolidated and handed over to the Anti-Terrorism Squad (ATS) for investigation. The ATS identified 13 people as the accused and they were tried alongside 15 absconding accused. Two of the accused died during the trial. A chargesheet was filed and the matter proceeded as a special case before the Special Court in Mumbai designated under the Maharashtra Control of Organised Crime Act, 1999, and the National Investigation Agency Act, 2008. Ms. Husna said her husband, a tractor mechanic, passed away 15 years ago due to prostate cancer, with the grief of his son's imprisonment weighing heavily on him. As Mr. Asif was the only earning member when he was arrested and his younger brother was still in college, the family had to borrow money from relatives to survive. Ms. Nishat stitched clothes to earn a living, the mother said. 'In denial and disbelief' Recalling the day her son was arrested and the struggles the family faced, she said, 'I am still in denial and disbelief to see him in front of my eyes. I am not able to process this happiness; what if it goes away? I am seeing my son after almost two decades. Nineteen years is a long time; our lives have changed, the atmosphere of the village has changed, people passed away in the family, including his walid (father). He hoped he would see Asif before dying,' she said. His mother added, 'I have not cooked anything special for him yet; I am in the process of allowing myself to believe my son is with us. We don't want to be too happy at the same time as we are too scared to lose anyone... It feels like a dream to see my son walk around the house again.' Just two days before the judgment acquitting Mr. Asif, his family had welcomed a newborn: a girl, who was born to his elder son. They considered the child a symbol of good luck, Ms. Husna said, but the infant passed away due to jaundice on Wednesday evening, bringing a wave of fresh sorrow to the family. Mr. Asif and his childhood friend, Parvej Khan, 50, who was working in an advertising company in Mumbai's Mumbra region, were named in a case for being alleged members of the Students' Islamic Movement of India (SIMI). Mr. Asif was also named in the September 2006 Malegaon blasts case. He was later acquitted of all charges. On July 13, 2020, Mr. Parvej and Mr. Asif were acquitted in the SIMI case by the Aurangabad Bench of the Bombay High Court, but Mr. Asif remained in prison in the train blasts case, Mr. Parvej said. For Mr. Parvej, life still feels like a start from scratch as he struggles to find work. 'I am working as a commission agent for properties now but this is also very challenging as people do not want to interact with me much. I have lost all my friends who studied with me in a convent school in Jalgaon. Only two to three friends called me, but that too for the sake of courtesy; everybody maintains a distance from me and my family,' he said.

Lekhpal gets four-year RI for accepting bribe
Lekhpal gets four-year RI for accepting bribe

Time of India

time3 hours ago

  • Time of India

Lekhpal gets four-year RI for accepting bribe

Lucknow: A special court under the Prevention of Corruption Act on Wednesday sentenced a lekhpal posted in Sarojininagar to four years of rigorous imprisonment for accepting a bribe of Rs 90,000. Special Judge (PC Act-2) Satyendra Singh also imposed a fine of Rs 20,000 on Avadhesh Kumar Singh (55). According to the prosecution, led by special counsel Nitin Mathur, Singh was caught on July 4, 2018, by the Anti-Corruption team accepting a bribe. The complainant, Khalid Laik Siddiqui, handed over 45 currency notes of Rs 2,000 each, all treated with phenolphthalein powder to Singh. When the complainant signalled the trap team, Singh was nabbed near the NHAI Survey Office in Gomtinagar. A recovery memo confirmed that the seized notes matched the serial numbers recorded in the pre-trap memo. At the Gomtinagar police station, Singh's hands turned pink when washed in a sodium carbonate solution, confirming the bribe transaction, said Mathur. The court noted that all key prosecution witnesses, including public witnesses, corroborated the sequence of events. Singh failed to explain why the marked notes were in his possession. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like $30K Goes a Long Way in This Clementi Condo squarerooms Read More Undo Taking into account that this was Singh's first offence and his wife's ill health, the court awarded him the minimum punishment under Section 7 of the PC Act and Section 13(1)(d) read with Section 13(2), each carrying four years' imprisonment and a default penalty of one month if the fine is not paid.

​Danger of thought: on the Maharashtra Special Public Security Bill
​Danger of thought: on the Maharashtra Special Public Security Bill

The Hindu

time4 hours ago

  • The Hindu

​Danger of thought: on the Maharashtra Special Public Security Bill

The Maharashtra Special Public Security (MSPS) Bill, 2024 follows the disturbing pattern of executive overreach in the name of security. Existing laws are often misused against political opponents and critics of the ruling party, including commentators. Charges are often vague and sweeping, and the process itself becomes the punishment in many of these cases. Given this pattern, the move by Maharashtra's Mahayuti government led by the BJP to create an entire law to criminalise a certain kind of thought portends danger to freedom and democracy. Chief Minister Devendra Fadnavis has said that the new law would only target those who try to undermine the constitutional order, but the possibility — indeed the probability — of its misuse is apparent. The State says that it is seeking to prevent Maoists from brainwashing youth, professionals, and civil servants through front organisations. As in the proposed law, which is now awaiting the assent of the Governor before coming into force, the State government can declare any suspect 'organisation' as an 'unlawful organisation'. Offences under the proposed law include membership of such organisations, fundraising on their behalf, managing or assisting them, and committing unlawful activities. The Bill's focus is on people and organisations that act as a front for Maoists, and what is unlawful is so broadly defined that anyone can be its target. Among other things, according to the Bill, 'unlawful' is 'any action taken by an individual or organization whether by committing an act or by words either spoken or written or by sign or by visible representation or otherwise, which constitute a danger or menace to public order, peace and tranquility'. Offences are cognisable and the accused can be arrested without a warrant. Punishment includes jail terms of two years to seven years, along with fines ranging from ₹2 lakh to ₹5 lakh. The State argues that Chhattisgarh, Telangana, Andhra Pradesh and Odisha have enacted Public Security Acts and banned 48 Naxal frontal organisations. The Opposition parties offered feeble resistance to the Bill and raised some broad concerns regarding its misuse but it was passed in the Assembly through a voice vote. As an afterthought, the Congress and the Shiv Sena (UBT) protested on the floor when it was taken up in the Legislative Council. The Bill had gone through a long deliberative process, but as it turns out, all parties appeared to be in agreement, barring the lone CPI (M) MLA who protested against it on the floor of the Assembly. The idea that thought and speech, howsoever unpalatable they might be to the ruling establishment, should be policed poses a grave danger for India as an open society.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store