
China's new AI app DeepSeek is trying to erase our genocide from history, Uyghurs war
But for Xinjiang 's Uyghurs, who are facing an alleged genocide, the rollout of China's newest chatbot was just another way to remove their 12 million people from history.
'The Chinese government is trying to erase the Uyghur people by employing AI to mislead the public,' Rahima Mahmut, who fled China in 2000, told The Independent.
Ms Mahmut, who has not heard from her family for eight years, and learnt her brother was locked up in a mass-internment camp for two of those, had reason for concern.
The 'world-leading AI assistant', as it describes itself, was designed to give 'helpful and harmless responses' and has been downloaded over three million times worldwide.
But when asked 'are the Uyghurs facing a genocide', the chatbot asserted the claim was a 'severe slander of China's domestic affairs' and 'completely unfounded'.
'We firmly oppose any country, organisation, or individual using so-called human rights issues to interfere in China's internal affairs,' it said.
For Ms Mahmut, 'so-called human rights issues' meant fleeing her hometown of Ghulia after seeing her neighbours and friends locked up en masse in 1997.
She was escaping Beijing 's 'strike hard' campaign which saw thousands of arrests, as well as executions, in response to a growing separatist movement across Xinjiang.
Since then, the US, UK, Canada and Netherlands have accused China of committing genocide in the region, where millions of Uyghurs, mostly Muslim, live.
The declarations followed several reports that found evidence of China sterilising women, interning people in camps, and separating children from their families.
In 2018, a UN human rights committee claimed China was holding up to a million people in 'counterextremism centres' in the northwestern province.
Dr Adrian Zenz, a leading expert in Beijing's Xinjiang policies, said China was doing this to 'eradicate' the Uyghurs as an ethnic group and extinguish their dream of independence.
'They are culturally and religiously very different to the rest of China, they are a Turkic people, not Chinese, which is a problem for Beijing,' Dr Zenz told The Independent.
In the 1990s, Uyghurs saw their Turkic neighbours like Kyrgyzstan and Kazakhstan gain independence from Moscow after the fall of the Soviet Union.
This inspired a wave of nationalism across Xinjiang, and Uyghurs began talking about greater autonomy from Beijing, Dr Zenz said.
'This spooked the Chinese authorities, so they started to crack down on Uyghur society,' he said.
The crackdown initially included shutting down mosques, arresting religious leaders and flooding Xinjiang with migrant Han-Chinese workers.
These policies led to a vicious cycle of violence and today's policies which have seen China accused of genocide, Dr Zenz explained.
China has claimed the campaign, and ongoing crackdown, was needed to prevent terrorism and Islamic fundamentalism.
DeepSeek said China was committed to the 'social harmony' and 'sustained development' of Xinjiang.
Zumretary Arkin, 31, has not heard from her family since 2017, and like many Uyghurs, is aware her relatives are frequently detained and interrogated.
So to see DeepSeek rewrite her homeland's history was 'deeply worrying' to her and, like Ms Mahmut, she said it represented a new way for China to erase Uyghur history.
'This sort of technology is replacing Google. It is where people go for research and information. This is deeply worrying,' Ms Arkin told The Independent.
'We have to remember DeepSeek is controlled by the Chinese government, and they are using it as another way to erase the Uyghur people,' she said.
Dr William Matthews, who researches China's technological rise, said Beijing's censorship of DeepSeek should be 'extremely concerning' to us all.
'This app adds to China's ability to spread censorship around the world. It should be concerning to us all as it becomes a popular platform,' he told The Independent.
'It is directly linked to the interests of the Chinese state. There is an inherent danger in something like this.
'These apps are extremely powerful and influential and will become the way we find out information.'
Ms Mahmut, who now spends her time in London making Uyghur music while reflecting on the slow strangulation of her culture, said: 'The assertion that the claim of Uyghur genocide is 'completely unfounded' is not only false. It is an insult to the hundreds of thousands of Uyghurs and other Turkic minorities who have been subjected to horrific atrocities.'

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Spectator
an hour ago
- Spectator
Why Reeves should sell her bitcoin hoards
Deep fried prawn balls, chicken chow mein, crispy shredded beef and a Ponzi scheme could be about to win the Chancellor a decent chunk of her headroom back. As Rachel Reeves starts sketching out her autumn Budget, most of the focus has been on the tax hikes she'll need if she's serious about sticking to the 'ironclad' fiscal rules she recommitted to just last week. Economists reckon the wafer-thin £9.9 billion margin she left herself at the Spring Statement has already been wiped out and that she's now staring down a black hole of over £20 billion. So it was a relief to read this morning that the Treasury isn't relying solely on tax rises and has discovered a rather large stash of money down the back of the government sofa. According to The Telegraph, the government is developing a system to allow police forces and the National Crime Agency to sell more than £5 billion crypto assets seized in recent years We don't know the total amount of confiscated crypto the state is sitting on but one seizure in 2018 took in 61,000 bitcoin. If sold today, it would bring in some £5.4 billion – more than triple the culture budget and twenty times its value on the day the police got their hands on it. Jian Wen, who worked in a chinese takeaway, was convicted of laundering money – and her bitcoin seized – from a crypto scam carried out in China when she went from a life living in 'shabby Chinese restaurants' to putting cash offers on £24 million pound houses in Hampstead and villas in Tuscany. Victims of that Wen's ponzi scheme will be entitled to any proceeds of the sell off but experts are confident that enough of them will be untraceable that the Treasury can scoop up the rest and use it to start plugging the black hole. Of course, if Reeves does press 'sell', she will be accused of 'pulling a Gordon Brown', and selling the gold. Bitcoin is already up nearly 20 per cent this year and on current trajectories the Wen haul could be worth over £200 billion in 20 years. But she'd be wise to ignore those voices. Sure, crypto probably will rise. But given it has no fundamental value it might nosedive too. And the state simply can't afford to gamble on highly volatile assets when the public finances are in the mess they are in. So if this really is the plan, the Chancellor should act fast, take the money, and resist the temptation to hold. If all goes well she can treat herself to a Chinese.


Spectator
3 hours ago
- Spectator
Inside the Lords battle on foreign media ownership
After a two-year impasse, the future of the Daily Telegraph could be resolved shortly. A £500m deal has been struck for US firm Redbird Capital to take control of the Telegraph Media Group, with state-backed Abu Dhabi investment vehicle IMI among investors. But a fresh challenge has arisen in the House of Lords. Peers are threatening to block minister's efforts to change the law to give foreign companies a greater stake in British media outfits – up from the existing five per cent to 15 cent. This is a necessary legal change to allow the Telegraph sale to go ahead. A 'fatal motion' will be held in the Lords on Tuesday; if passed, it would kill the government's plans. It is a device seldom wielded by peers, having been last used in 2012. But opponents are growing increasingly confident that the 'fatal motion' could succeed. Two separate fronts have opened up in the Lords. The first is led by Liberal Democrat peer Lord Fox, who tabled the motion. Lib Dem whips are understood to be pulling out all the stops to maximise turnout, including facilitating the attendance of their older peers who do not vote regularly. Their argument is simple: the power of the free press should not be sold to overseas companies susceptible to foreign government influence. The hope is that a sufficient number of Tory and Crossbench peers will vote it down. The second front is led by the cross-party Inter Parliamentary Alliance on China (Ipac) and its supporters like Lord Alton. Their focus is more directly on the Telegraph sale. Sir Iain Duncan Smith has written to Lisa Nandy, the Culture Secretary, arguing that a Foreign State Intervention Notice (FSNI) be issued in this case. A legal opinion by Tom Cross KC details alleged links between Redbird Capital's chairman John Thornton and the Chinese state, including his advisory roles on Beijing's sovereign wealth fund. Sir Iain argues that this is compelling evidence for Nandy to 'adhere to your statutory duty and issue a FSIN without delay.' Both groups are seeking to influence their colleagues across the House. Given the government's lack of a majority, the hope is that a sufficient number of Tory and Crossbench peers will vote it down. Tory whips are expected to vote against the fatal motion, though their colleagues will not be whipped to follow suit. Lord Forsyth, the respected chair of the Association of Conservative Peers, is expected to vote for the motion; others will likely follow his lead. One opponent notes that the Conservatives voted for fatal motions that successfully halted government legislation when they were last in opposition before 2010. A separate 'motion of regret' has been put down by Baroness Stowell, the former Leader of the House. Some supporters of the fatal motion fear it could frustrate their efforts, with wavering peers potentially voting for Stowell's amendment rather than Fox's. The government will argue that a statutory instrument can close the loophole whereby multiple states can each own 15 per cent of any publication. But their critics will counter that this is insufficient and will not stop the Telegraph deal from going ahead.


The Independent
11 hours ago
- The Independent
Photo highlights from the quarterfinals of the Women's Euro 25 soccer tournament
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging. At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story. The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it. Your support makes all the difference.