Musk's X sues to block New York social media transparency law
The complaint, filed in a federal court in Manhattan, seeks to halt the law, which X argues violates the First Amendment by forcing platforms to disclose sensitive information about their content moderation practices.
"Today, @X filed a First Amendment lawsuit against a New York law, NY S895B," X's Global Government Affairs team posted Tuesday, adding that it had successfully challenged a similar law in California.
"X is the only platform fighting for its users by challenging the law, and we are confident we will prevail in this case as well," the company said.
The New York law requires social media companies with over $100 million in annual revenue to submit semiannual reports detailing how they define and moderate hate speech, racism, extremism, disinformation and harassment.
Companies face fines of $15,000 per day for violations, which can be sought by the attorney general's office.
X says the law is "an impermissible attempt by the State to inject itself into the content-moderation editorial process" and seeks to pressure platforms into restricting constitutionally protected speech.
- 'Stop Hiding Hate' -
Reporters Without Borders said in a statement that asking X "account for their actions against misinformation is by no means an infringement of freedom of expression, but the bare minimum to clean up the digital space."
"Freedom of expression does not come without responsibilities," it added.
The lawsuit comes after X successfully challenged a nearly identical California law last year, according to the filing. New York's law is "a carbon copy" of the California provisions that were struck down, the filing adds.
X claims New York lawmakers refused to discuss changes to the bill after the California ruling, with sponsors saying they declined to meet because of content on X promoted by owner Musk that "threatens the foundations of our democracy."
The company argues this indicated "viewpoint discriminatory motives" behind the law's passage.
Senator Brad Hoylman-Sigal and Assembly member Grace Lee -- who introduced the law -- said in a statement that their act "does not infringe upon the First Amendment rights of social media companies, nor does it conflict with federal law."
"Instead, the Stop Hiding Hate Act requires narrowly tailored disclosures by social media companies to allow consumers to better decide which social media platforms they utilize," they added.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
IOL News
9 hours ago
- IOL News
Witness recounts chilling details of murder trial linked to July 2021 unrest in Phoenix
An emotional State witness has described to the Durban High Court how some July unrest victims were brutally attacked in phoenix Image: Nomonde Zondi Durban High Court heard on Wednesday morning that one of the victims of the 2021 July unrest in Phoenix was hit on his head by a rock and a hammer. This is after one of the four Indian men was heard saying that they needed to put heat on the 'darkie ous'. Four men, Ravine Naidoo, 67, from Phoenix, Trevor Gopal, 52, from La Mercy, Tyreece Govender, 21, from Phoenix, and Timothy Govender, 46, from Phoenix, are on trial for murder, attempted murder, malicious damage to property, and public violence. Additionally, Gopal is also charged with incitement to commit public violence. Video Player is loading. Play Video Play Unmute Current Time 0:00 / Duration -:- Loaded : 0% Stream Type LIVE Seek to live, currently behind live LIVE Remaining Time - 0:00 This is a modal window. Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window. Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Window Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Dropshadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps Reset restore all settings to the default values Done Close Modal Dialog End of dialog window. Advertisement Next Stay Close ✕ Ad loading The State is alleging that the four men killed Njabulo Allen Dlamini by hitting him with golf sticks, an iron rod, a sjambok, and setting him alight. It also alleges that the accused attempted to kill Nkosikhona Madlala and Sandile Colin Sambo by hitting them with golf sticks, baseball bats, putting wooden pallets on their bodies, and pouring fuel on them with the intent to burn them to death. The State alleges that Gopal had addressed his co-accused and some community members to attack black Africans outside his tavern. A State witness, Anard Chetty, who said he used to reside at Gopal's tavern after he lost his job during Covid-19, told the court that on July 12, 2021, when the victims were attacked, Tyreece hit Dlamini with a rock on his head. He stated that Dlamini arrived at the tavern in a taxi bearing the Africa Touch logo, accompanied by others. Chetty testified that Gopal used to sell alcohol illegally, as it was banned during that time because of Covid-19 lockdown restrictions. He said a female and two males had alighted from the taxi to go to the tavern, and within minutes, they came back running. At that time, a lot of vehicles came, with one being driven by Gopal's brother, blocking the taxi. He said the taxi occupants, including Dlamini, who were left inside, were told to come out and lie down on the floor. He said there was resistance from the taxi occupants and stated that the people who had come in vehicles had sticks and they assaulted the victims. He said they ran in different directions. 'A female and one male ran to the container behind the tavern and came out the next day around 6.00 in the morning,' Chetty said. He said that when Dlamini jumped out of the taxi, he was tripped by Gopal's brother, and he fell. 'More people came to assault him,' he added. Additionally, Chetty, who would constantly get emotional and cry, said that as Dlamini was being assaulted, Tyreece picked up a rock and hit him with it. 'After the third accused (Tyreece) picked up the big rock, Accused Four (Timothy) took the hammer and beat him with it. Those are the two fatal blows that ended that guy. He couldn't move,' he said, crying. Additionally, Chetty told the court that Dlamini was his friend. He said Tyreece is the son of Timothy. During his testimony, Judge Mluleki Chili kept on reminding him to slow down as they took notes. At some stages, when Chetty got emotional, he would tell him to drink water and take a minute. All the accused are out on bail. The trial continues.
Daily Maverick
a day ago
- Daily Maverick
US appeals court will not lift limits on Associated Press access to White House
AP access limited for continuing to use Gulf of Mexico AP says it will remained focused on free speech rights Trump executive order changed name to 'Gulf of America' By Mike Scarcella The full U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit kept in place a June 6 decision by a divided three-judge panel that the administration could legally restrict access to the AP to news events in the Oval Office and other locations controlled by the White House, including Air Force One. The D.C. Circuit order denied the AP's request that it review the matter, setting up a possible appeal to the U.S. Supreme Court. The Associated Press in a statement on Tuesday said it was disappointed by the court's decision and will remain focused on free speech rights as the case continues. 'As we've said throughout, the press and the public have a fundamental right to speak freely without government retaliation,' the AP said. The White House did not immediately respond to a request for comment on Tuesday. In a lawsuit filed in February, the AP argued that the limitations on its access imposed by the administration violated the U.S. Constitution's First Amendment protections against government abridgment of free speech. Trump in January signed an executive order officially directing federal agencies to refer to the Gulf of Mexico as the Gulf of America. The AP sued after the White House restricted its access over its decision not to use 'Gulf of America' in its news reports. The AP Stylebook states that the Gulf of Mexico has carried that name for more than 400 years. AP said that as a global news agency, it will refer to the body of water by its longstanding name while acknowledging the new name Trump has chosen. Reuters and the AP both issued statements denouncing the access restrictions, which put wire services in a larger rotation with about 30 other newspaper and print outlets. Other media customers, including local news outlets with no presence in Washington, rely on real-time reports by the wire services of presidential statements, as do global financial markets. The Trump administration has said the president has absolute discretion over media access to the White House. The AP won a key order in the trial court when U.S. District Judge Treevor McFadden, who was appointed by Trump during his first term, decided that if the White House opens its doors to some journalists it cannot exclude others based on their viewpoints, citing the First Amendment. The D.C. Circuit panel in its 2-1 ruling in June paused McFadden's order. The two judges in the majority, Neomi Rao and Gregory Katsas, were appointed by Trump during his first term in office. The dissenting judge, Cornelia Pillard, is an appointee of Democratic former President Barack Obama.
Daily Maverick
a day ago
- Daily Maverick
Showdown over future of Nelson Mandela Bay city manager expected on Thursday
Notices for a council meeting to discuss the future of Nelson Mandela Bay city manager Noxolo Nqwazi were issued on Tuesday as the political fallout over last week's abandoned council meeting continued. A new Nelson Mandela Bay city council meeting was called for Thursday, a week earlier than planned, with political pressures rising for a decision on city manager Dr Noxolo Nqwazi's future within the metro. The fallout from last week's meeting, which was scheduled to discuss the issue but abandoned because the reports were 'not ready', continues. ACDP councillor Lance Grootboom has written to the acting city manager, Ted Pillay, to ask why money spent on the abandoned meeting should not be classified as fruitless and wasteful expenditure. He said the abrupt abandonment of the meeting was 'deeply concerning'. Meanwhile, a legal opinion provided to the Nelson Mandela Bay metro by advocate Olav Ronaasen SC has advised the council to abandon its disciplinary hearing of Nqwazi. She was put on precautionary suspension in late 2023 and again in early 2024, pending disciplinary action which had been instituted against her. Ronaasen said he has been asked to advise on the viability of the disciplinary proceedings against Nqwazi and the status of the criminal proceedings against her to enable the council to reach an informed decision as to whether it should persist with the disciplinary proceedings or withdraw them and continue to pursue a settlement with her, in terms of which her employment with the municipality would terminate. The disciplinary hearing against her has been put on hold pending negotiations for a settlement, but the National Treasury has refused to approve a departure which would allow a settlement to be paid, suggesting that the disciplinary proceedings should first be pursued to completion. Nqwazi was arrested by the Hawks in September 2022, along with the metro's former human settlements director Norman Mapu, businessman Xolani Masela, his spouse Nwabisa, former Democratic Alliance councillors Trevor Louw, Neville Higgins and Victor Manyathi, and Nelson Mandela Bay ANC secretary Luyolo Nqakula. They face charges of corruption, money laundering, fraud and contravening the Municipal Finance Management Act. It is alleged that kickbacks for a toilet tender awarded during the 2020 Covid-19 pandemic were used to reward Louw, Higgins and Manyathi for voting for a motion of no confidence against former DA mayor Athol Trollip. However, an application is pending for Nqwazi to be discharged after the close of the State's case, with her legal team arguing that the State had failed to lead any evidence against her. Different charges She is facing different charges at her disciplinary hearing. It is alleged that she misled the council by failing to disclose that a PWC forensic report did not support allegations of financial misconduct against Anele Qaba — now CEO of the Mandela Bay Development Agency — which meant his suspension was unwarranted and should have been lifted. Nqwazi's alleged failure, according to Ronaasen's opinion, was that she did not fully inform the council of the situation, which resulted in unauthorised and wasteful expenditure when a R3-million settlement was paid to Qaba. The second charge against her is that she unsuccessfully took a Special Investigating Unit report about the toilet tender on legal review, resulting in unauthorised and wasteful expenditure for the municipality. However, Ronaasen pointed out that Nqwazi performed both of these tasks under instruction from the council. As a result, he said, there was little chance of the disciplinary proceedings succeeding. He advised the council to revisit its decision, withdraw the proceedings (subject to the Treasury's approval), and formalise the in-principle settlement reached with Nqwazi. 'It would be financially irresponsible to pursue prolonged disciplinary proceedings,' he said. 'I suggest that this opinion be submitted to the National Treasury as part of the municipality's motivation as to why the disciplinary proceedings should be withdrawn.' However, Deputy Mayor Gary van Niekerk — who was frequently in conflict with Nqwazi during his tenure as mayor — said in a media statement issued on Tuesday that the city was at a crossroads 'for clean governance, accountability and the rule of law'. He issued the statement just a day after Executive Mayor Babalwa Lobishe said in a memorandum that all communications from the political leadership in the metro must go through her. She did not respond to a Daily Maverick request for comment. 'Efforts by opposition actors to engineer the return of suspended (and criminally charged) municipal manager Noxolo Nqwazi risk reversing the progress made towards stabilising governance in the metro,' said Van Niekerk. 'Legal wrangling over her suspension has dragged on while she has continued to draw a salary, and contests over her status have become a rallying point in broader power plays in council.' Van Niekerk himself is facing criminal charges after allegedly using a council letterhead to obtain legal services for himself while he was speaker of the council — after Nqwazi had declared his seat vacant due to disputes in his former party, the Northern Alliance. He was found guilty at a disciplinary hearing, but earlier this week the MEC for cooperative governance, Zolile Williams, decided against removing Van Niekerk as a councillor and instead issued a reprimand. Van Niekerk said the legal fees for Nqwazi's disputes with the council had reached R800,000, while 'the municipality spent more than R5-million paying her salary and those of successive acting city managers appointed during her suspension'. DM
