DFA Rejects China's Student Safety Warning, Says PH Is Safe for Foreign Nationals
In a statement, the DFA stressed that the Philippine government is actively addressing all incidents of crime—whether involving Chinese nationals or other foreigners—and that law enforcement authorities are handling these matters properly.
'All instances of crimes, including those involving Chinese and other foreign nationals as well as those perpetrated by foreign nationals against their own, are being addressed by relevant law enforcement authorities,' the DFA said.
The advisory in question was issued by China's Ministry of Education on July 18. It called on Chinese students to 'assess the security risks' of studying in the Philippines, citing rising incidents of crime, stop-and-search operations, and alleged harassment.
Chinese Foreign Ministry spokesperson Lin Jian defended the advisory, calling it a 'legitimate measure' meant to protect Chinese students abroad. He also urged the Philippines to take more steps to ensure their safety and rights.
But the DFA countered these claims, saying they've already raised concerns over the inaccuracies in the advisory through diplomatic channels and urged China to make the 'necessary corrections.'
'The Philippine Government has been engaging with foreign embassies, including the Chinese Embassy, regarding these cases in good faith,' the DFA added, reaffirming its openness to continued constructive dialogue.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Gulf Today
8 hours ago
- Gulf Today
The wisdom of ending wind and solar subsidies
Diana Furchtgott-Roth and Ryan Strasser, Tribune News Service The recently passed One Big Beautiful Bill Act signals a major shift in federal energy policy. Among its provisions, the law accelerates the phase-out of tax credits for new wind and solar projects and eliminates long-term subsidies for renewable developers on public land. The law revives a principle that should guide all energy policy: Let the best ideas win on their own merit. Rolling back the subsidies should relieve pressure to use valuable land for solar and wind farms. Consider the direct land use involved in today's energy sector. Wind projects take up approximately 30,000 acres to produce the same amount of electricity as a 2,500-acre coal plant. Solar is also land-intensive, requiring about 5,000 acres for equivalent output. However, when government subsidies reduce the use of public land for renewable energy sources, investors are no longer incentivised to look at the tradeoffs of their land-use footprint. Land is a finite and valuable resource. Using it for energy comes at the expense of other potential uses. When developers receive subsidies, they do not have to account for the value of alternative uses for the land. If an energy source requires more land, it should pay for that land. Communities across the country are voicing concerns, objecting to large-scale wind and solar developments that disrupt local land use, strain water resources, and alter rural landscapes. According to Robert Bryce's Renewable Rejection Database, more than 800 wind and solar projects have been rejected or restricted by local governments in the United States since 2015. One example of the disadvantages of large-scale renewable energy projects is the Spotsylvania Solar Energy Center in Virginia, a solar facility that spans over 6,300 acres, one of the largest solar projects east of the Rockies. Locals raised their concerns over the project's environmental effects, particularly the clearing of 3,500 acres of forested land, which involved the removal of around a million trees. Residents feared toxic substances leaching from panels into groundwater, in addition to the heat generated by the installation of 1.8 million solar panels, manufactured by Chinese companies. Despite the opposition, full operation began in 2021. Virginians' average electricity rates rose from 10 cents per kilowatt hour (kWh) in 2019 to 15 cents/kWh in June 2025. This 50% rise in energy prices over less than 6 years underscores that wind and solar projects generally don't save money and entail serious environmental and community costs of their own. Supporters of climate-change subsidies often argue that a rapid shift to renewable energy is necessary as they believe resource depletion or environmental harm is on the horizon. Even though America still holds centuries' worth of recoverable fossil fuels, this argument is flawed in its understanding of energy production. Coal, oil, and gas are the most efficient and profitable energy sources available. Over the past 20 years, wind and solar have received global subsidies of $9 trillion. The most recent data from the Energy Information Administration show that renewable energy sources received over $15 billion in federal subsidies in 2024, compared to $3 billion for fossil fuels. If renewable energy is truly the cheapest and most competitive option, why do its supporters call for lavish government support? Some argue that without such incentives, renewable energy investment will dry up. However, when the government gives special financial help to one type of energy, it makes it harder to see which energy sources are the best and most affordable. This distorts fair competition. If wind and solar energy are the future of America's energy sector, they should compete without the crutch of federal aid. Subsidizing large-scale land for renewable energy development raises electricity prices and uses public, taxpayer-owned lands. The result is not cleaner and more reliable energy, but misallocated resources. Spain offers a cautionary tale. With over half of its grid supplied by renewables and a national push toward 100% by 2050, the country suffered a 12-hour blackout on April 28. Two solar panels in southwest Spain went down, and the grid had insufficient inertia, or backup, to continue operating. The One Big Beautiful Bill Act represents more than just a shift in federal spending; it reflects a renewed commitment to competitive land use in America's energy sector. By phasing out preferential tax treatment and below-market land deals, the law encourages energy developers to compete on merits and meet America's rising energy demands with an approach rooted in efficiency, reliability, and competition.
Zawya
21 hours ago
- Zawya
US House panel subpoenas JPMorgan, Bank of America CEOs over IPO of China's CATL
WASHINGTON - The U.S. House of Representatives Select Committee on China said on Thursday it sent subpoenas addressed to JPMorgan Chase CEO Jamie Dimon and Bank of America CEO Brian Moynihan over their banks' roles in underwriting the initial public offering of Chinese battery manufacturer CATL. The U.S. government has alleged that CATL, the world's largest electric vehicle battery maker, works with China's military. In January, Washington added CATL to a list of companies that it alleged aided Beijing's military. CATL says it was "not engaged in any military-related activities." The congressional panel asked the banks' executives to comply by August 8. The committee said it requested information from the banks in April. Bank of America produced 10 documents, nine of them public, while JPMorgan produced one public document, the House panel said, adding it has not received all of the requested details. "We've had constructive engagement with the committee and will continue to engage," a Bank of America spokesperson said. JPMorgan declined to comment. Earlier this year, Republican U.S. Representative John Moolenaar, who chairs the House Select Committee on China, urged the U.S. banks to pull out of underwriting the Hong Kong IPO of the Chinese firm. Washington and Beijing have had tensions for years spanning issues such as trade tariffs, technology, cybersecurity and geopolitics.
Arabian Post
a day ago
- Arabian Post
Why SCO Summit At Tianjin On August 31 Is Crucial For India-China Relations?
By Nitya Chakraborty The recent months have not been comfortable for India with its two neighbours Pakistan and India, but as regards the third most powerful neighbouring county China, th scenario has turned different. India-China ties which became bitter at the time of clashes in Galwan valley in 2020, started softening from last year and the process of normalization got more effective after the bilateral meeting between Prime Minister Narendra Modi and the Chinese President Xi Jinping at the BRICS meeting in Kazan, Russia in October 2024. There are hopes in New Delhi that this normalization process may get further boost after the coming meeting between the two leaders at the Shanghai Cooperation Organisation (SCO) summit at Tianjin in China on August 31 and September 1. Only on Wednesday, July 23, India announced resumption of tourist visas for Chinese nationals which were stopped since the 2020 clash. This was long overdue but the decision as also China's satisfaction at the outcome of India-China diplomatic talks on border situation, have created an environment for further improvement of bilateral relations in a situation of global turmoil. Already China has given permission for the Kailash Mansarovar yatra. This people to people approach agreed to by both governments has definitely prepared the base for a much bigger breakthrough in sorting out some of the other issues on which differences persist. The coming bilateral summit between Narendra Modi and Xi Jinping may give some positive direction to that end. SCO dominated by China and Russia has presently ten members-China, Russia, India, Pakistan, Uzbekistan, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Tajikistan, Iran and Belarus. The observers are Iran, Turkey, Azerbaijan, Turkmenistan, Mongolia, Qatar and UAE. China is hosting the SCO meeting for the fifth time and the most important thing is that Russian President Vladimir Putin is also expected to attend the August summit. That way, PM Modi can have a bilateral meeting with President Putin also. President Putin is scheduled to visit India by the end of this year. The SCO summit will give the Indian PM an opportunity to discuss India-Russia elations in the context of the latest global developments. As China sees SCO 2025 summit as a host, the Summit will stay true to its founding mission and carry forward the Shanghai Spirit. Mutual trust, mutual benefit, equality, consultation, respect for diversity of civilisations and pursuit of common development illustrate what a new type of international relations should be. The deliberations at the Summit will focus on the consolidation of the security of the member nations. Interestingly, Chinese foreign minister Wang Yi hinted at USA without naming it by saying that a certain country puts its own interests over the international public good, undermining the common interests of the international community. The SCO should take the 80th anniversary of the founding of the United Nations (UN) as an opportunity to champion the common values of humanity, safeguard the legitimate rights and interests of member states, and work for a more just and equitable global governance system. The SCO declaration is expected to contain a charter for the next development decade. On July 15 at a meeting with the SCO foreign ministers, President Xi Jinping said that China has always prioritised the SCO in its neighbourhood diplomacy and is committed to making the SCO more substantive and stronger, safeguarding regional security and stability, promoting the development and prosperity of member states, and building a closer community with a shared future. Xi Jinping stressed that in the face of a turbulent and changing international landscape, the SCO must stay focused, remain confident, act efficiently and play a more proactive role in injecting greater stability and positive energy into the world. Xi is expected to have a meeting with President Putin also at the Tianjin Summit. Similarly, Indian PM Narendra Modi will have the opportunity to talk to President Putin also and discuss India-Russia relations in the context of latest global developments. Significantly, the Chinese media is taking a positive view of the India- China bilateral relations in recent days. The Chinese official daily Global Times said in its July 23 issue that the resumption, in June, of Indian pilgrims visiting Xizang Autonomous Region's 'sacred mountain and lake' reflects the goodwill and reliability of the Chinese side. India's easing of tourism visa restrictions is also a natural, reciprocal step. Official sources indicate that relevant departments in both countries are working toward the resumption of direct air links, and the routes will reopen soon. Lifting unreasonable restrictions on Chinese students, scholars and journalists, as well as removing investment and operational barriers for Chinese companies in India, must also be prioritized without delay by the Indian side, says Global Times editorial. According to GT, India's move is only a starting point. Therefore, while this 'progress' is welcomed, it remains important to watch whether India will take more substantial steps in areas such as visa approval rates, tourist services and safety, and the possible relaxation of visa requirements going forward. India should do more to build mutual trust, bridge perception gaps, and foster goodwill among the two peoples. The main issue in India-China relations is trust and perception. This can be tackled only at the highest level of the leadership of the two countries. If both Narendra Modi and Xi Jinping can initiate a process for further normalizing the bilateral relations, that will be a major event in the Asian diplomacy. (IPA Service)
