‘Danger on our streets': Allan government accused of putting Victorians ‘at risk' with massive cuts budgets for courts and police
The Allan government has been accused of putting the Victorian public 'at risk' after it cut funding to Victoria's police and courts in the midst of a crime crisis.
The state government's latest budget, handed down on Tuesday, included a $50 million cut to Victoria Police's 2025-26 budget, a $30 million cut to Victoria's courts, and a $169 million reduction in court-related capital expenditure.
Speaking to reporters on Thursday, shadow attorney-general Michael O'Brien said it didn't make any sense to cut funding to police and the courts while Victoria is grappling with a crime crisis.
'When you cut cops and cut courts, you increase danger and you cut community safety. That is exactly what Labor has done in this budget,' Mr O'Brien said.
'By the government cutting Court Services Victoria by $30 million, it means more backlogs in courts. It means more violent offenders getting bail, and it means more danger on our streets for every single Victorian.
'This is a government whose budget says it's focused on what matters most. Well, clearly this government isn't focused on community safety.'
The Allan government has promoted it's budget by claiming it 'invests more than more than $2 billion in additional funding for the criminal justice system, courts and emergency services' – a figure that includes all funding over forward estimates.
But the budget papers show that funding for 'Policing and Community Safety' has been reduced from $4.55 billion spent in 2024-25 to $4.5 billion for 2025-26.
This is despite 1,100 police positions currently being vacant and 43 police stations across the state having closed or reduced their hours since November 2023.
Funding for the Courts to deliver 'fair, timely and efficient dispensing of justice' has been reduced from $864 million to $834 million, while Court Services Victoria's capital expenditure has been cut from $318 million to $149 million – a reduction of 53 per cent.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Sky News AU
24 minutes ago
- Sky News AU
‘Frightening': Victoria government plotting Voice to Parliament
Sky News host Steve Price has weighed in on Victoria planning to push through its own Voice to Parliament. However, Victorian Premier Jacinta Allan has stated that, unlike the 2023 referendum, the state version was not aimed at changing the constitution. 'If legislated … it will advise on the impact of laws and policies affecting not all Victorians, but just Indigenous Victorians,' Mr Price said. 'A Voice in other words for one group and not anyone else.'
Sky News AU
25 minutes ago
- Sky News AU
‘Very divisive': Voice to Parliament will split ‘Victorians by race'
IPA Executive Director Scott Hargreaves says the Victorian Voice to Parliament will 'divide Victorians by race'. 'It is truly terrible that after the overwhelming rejection of a divisive Voice to Parliament … we are now seeing its junior cousin, a very divisive state Voice to Parliament being foisted upon us by the Allan government,' Mr Hargreaves told Sky News host Steve Price. "Something that is going to divide Victorians by race.'
Herald Sun
an hour ago
- Herald Sun
Libs will axe Victorian Voice to parliament
Don't miss out on the headlines from Victoria. Followed categories will be added to My News. The Herald Sun revealed on Monday the Allan government was working to establish its own Voice to parliament – by making permanent the taxpayer-funded body advising on Treaty, and giving it the job of offering policy advice on behalf of Indigenous Victorians. But plans to bin the policy if elected to government are being explored by the state opposition, with shadow cabinet expected to formally consider the proposal. Until then no formal position can be announced but multiple Liberal MPs, speaking anonymously, said it was an obvious move given the party's staunch opposition to the plan. Premier Jacinta Allan doubled down on plans to introduce the Voice to parliament, saying it would deliver better outcomes for Indigenous Victorians who were lagging in key areas including education, homelessness and health. 'We know that Indigenous people here in this state continue to be significantly behind the rest of the population, and that's not fair,' she said. 'The significant change is that it will be a body that we'll be listening, taking on their advice. That's how you get an improvement in those key indicators. 'The system is not working and we have to change it,' she said. But Opposition Leader Brad Battin said the Coalition would vehemently oppose the introduction of legislation to enshrine the Voice to parliament. 'The Liberals' and Nationals' position is clear – we do not support a state-based treaty or a Victorian Voice to parliament,' he said. 'Victorians delivered a clear verdict in the referendum, and we are listening. 'Jacinta Allan is now trying to push ahead with her own version, without transparency and without a mandate. 'Any decision I make will always be in the best interests of all Victorians, not just to grab headlines.' The government would likely have no problem passing legislation through parliament with the likely support of the Greens and Legalise Cannabis. However crossbench MP David Limbrick said he would not support race-based laws. 'After Victorians rejected the federal version of this less than two years ago, they are fully justified in feeling that the government is ignoring their wishes,' the Libertarian MP said. 'We have already gotten a taste of how disastrous race-based politics can be with climbing bans in the Grampians. All the Indigenous bureaucracies have done so far is created division and resentment. 'Bureaucracy is not the answer, it is a massive part of the problem. Many millions of dollars are spent on Indigenous services every year, and yet people rarely see any benefit, and the gap on several indicators never closes. 'Victorians would be far better off to have bureaucracies like these shut down, and the money put back in their pockets.' The national Voice proposal was voted down by 60.06 per cent of Australians, including 54.15 per cent of Victorians. Ms Allan said: 'The key difference to the referendum that was put nationwide a couple of years ago is that was changing the Constitution. This is not changing the Victorian Constitution, it is simply taking a commonsense approach.' But Margaret Chambers, research fellow at the Institute of Public Affairs, said pushing ahead with such laws at a Victorian level was despite an 'overwhelming democratic rejection by Victorians of the Voice proposal'. 'It is unbelievable Premier Jacinta Allan is set to divide the community with a state-based body,' she said. 'The Allan government's proposal is a slap in the face of every Victorian that exercised their democratic right to vote No.'
