From 'incompetent and treasonous' to 'dried out "prune,"' Bruce Springsteen and Donald Trump trade barbs in latest feud
President Trump and rock icon Bruce Springsteen are currently engaged in a public feud after Springsteen condemned Trump during the inaugural show of his European tour.
While it's not the first time Springsteen, 75, has spoken out against the president, this latest fight stems from comments Springsteen made onstage in Manchester, England, on May 14.
'In my home, the America I love, the America I've written about, that has been a beacon of hope and liberty for 250 years, is currently in the hands of a corrupt, incompetent and treasonous administration,' Springsteen said.
In response, Trump wrote on Truth Social, 'I see that Highly Overrated Bruce Springsteen goes to a Foreign Country to speak badly about the President of the United States.'
The two have continued to trade insults, and on Monday, Trump even threatened to investigate Springsteen and other Democrat-supporting musicians. Here's how we got here.
Springsteen, who's in the Rock & Roll Hall of Fame, kicked off his 2025 Land of Hope and Dreams European tour last Wednesday in Manchester, telling those in the crowd 'who believe in democracy and the best of our American experience to rise with us, raise your voices against authoritarianism and let freedom ring.'
Later on in the performance, before singing 'My City of Ruins,' Springsteen voiced more personal concerns about the political situation in the United States.
'There's some very weird, strange and dangerous shit going on out there,' he said. 'In America, they are persecuting people for using their right to free speech and voicing their dissent. This is happening now. In America, the richest men are taking satisfaction in abandoning the world's poorest children to sickness and death. This is happening now.'
Trump responded in a post on Truth Social two days later, calling Springsteen 'dumb as a rock.'
'This dried out 'prune' of a rocker (his skin is all atrophied!) ought to KEEP HIS MOUTH SHUT until he gets back into the Country, that's just 'standard fare,'' Trump wrote.
The following night, while performing again in Manchester, Springsteen continued to criticize Trump.
'A majority of our elected representatives have failed to protect the American people from the abuses of an unfit president and a rogue government,' Springsteen said. A transcript of Springsteen's remarks was later posted to his website.
Taylor Rogers, the White House assistant press secretary, also commented on Springsteen's speech, saying, 'The 77 million Americans that elected President Trump disagree with elitist and out-of-touch celebrities like Bruce Springsteen. Bruce is welcome to stay overseas while hard-working Americans enjoy a secure border and cooling inflation thanks to President Trump.'
In the aftermath of Springsteen's comments, Trump posted early Monday morning that he plans to call for a 'major investigation' into appearances made by Springsteen and other artists on behalf of former Vice President Kamala Harris's 2024 presidential campaign, suggesting they may constitute an unlawful campaign contribution.
'HOW MUCH DID KAMALA HARRIS PAY BRUCE SPRINGSTEEN FOR HIS POOR PERFORMANCE DURING HER CAMPAIGN FOR PRESIDENT?' Trump wrote. 'This was a very expensive and desperate effort to artificially build up her sparse crowds. IT'S NOT LEGAL! For these unpatriotic 'entertainers,' this was just a CORRUPT & UNLAWFUL way to capitalize on a broken system.'
Springsteen's remarks on May 14 were not the first he's made about Trump. Throughout his long-running music career, Springsteen has also spoken out about several other Republican political figures, including former President Ronald Reagan and former New Jersey Gov. Chris Christie.
In addition to campaigning for Trump's opponents in the 2016, 2020 and 2024 elections, Springsteen has openly criticized Trump himself in the past. In 2016, Springsteen publicly called Trump a 'flagrant toxic narcissist.' Four years later, during the 2020 election, Springsteen said that 'a good portion of our fine country, to my eye, has been thoroughly hypnotized, brainwashed by a con man from Queens.'
The American Federation of Musicians issued a statement on May 16 in support of Springsteen as well as singer Taylor Swift, who Trump had insulted the same day in a post on Truth Social.
'The American Federation of Musicians of the United States and Canada will not remain silent as two of our members — Bruce Springsteen and Taylor Swift — are singled out and personally attacked by the President of the United States,' the AFM statement reads. 'Musicians have the right to freedom of expression, and we stand in solidarity with all our members.'
Pearl Jam frontman Eddie Vedder offered support for Springsteen at a concert in Pittsburgh over the weekend, saying, 'Bruce has always been a true American with his values of freedom and liberty and his justice has always remained intact.' While Vedder did not name Trump specifically, he added, 'Part of free speech is open discussion, part of democracy is healthy public discourse. The name-calling is so beneath us.' Pearl Jam also covered Springsteen's 'My City of Ruins' during the show.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
USA Today
29 minutes ago
- USA Today
Did Trump's big tax bill pass? Live updates as Senate enters fourth day of voting battle
Debates on and off the Senate floor stretched through a third consecutive night as the House GOP gets ready to push for its own floor vote. President Donald Trump's tax, spending and policy bill remains stuck in limbo heading into a fourth day of Senate debate - including a couple of all-nighters - as Republicans scramble to find the votes and meet a self-imposed July 4 deadline to turn the controversial measure into law. Vice President JD Vance arrived at the U.S. Capitol shortly after sunrise on July 1, as senators approached nearly 24 hours of consecutive floor debate on a series of amendments to legislation that includes provisions on Medicaid reform, increased border security funding and limits to taxes on tips and overtime wages. The outcome in Congress is expected to be either a defining legislative win for Trump or a major setback early in his second term. Asked if Senate Republicans would reach a final vote on Tuesday, Vance told reporters, 'We're going to find out.' More: Medicaid cuts, no taxes on tips and overtime: What's in the Trump-backed Senate megabill? There are at least two Republican senators out of 53 who are expected to vote no on the legislation's final passage. With no Democrats expected to offer support, Majority Leader John Thune can only afford one more detractor. In that event of a 50-50 split, Vance will offer the tie-breaking vote. Despite working through the weekend, senators continued to hash out disputes on and off the floor of the Senate throughout the night June 30 and into the morning of July 1. Thune, R-South Dakota, has told reporters in the Capitol Republicans are "close" to nailing down a deal. If and when the Senate passes Trump's mega bill, it must then be reconciled in the House, where an original version passed by the smallest of margins in May. Votes in the House are tentatively planned for July 2, pending the outcome in the Senate. Trump threatens to unleash DOGE on Musk's companies President Trump said he might order the Department of Government Efficiency that Elon Musk previously led to review the government subsidies that go to Musk's companies as their rift resurfaced while the Senate took up Trump's tax and budget bill. Making the threat personal, Trump said the billionaire tech mogul would probably have to return to his native South Africa without the government's financial assistance. Trump's attack in a 12:34 a.m. ET July 1 post on Truth Social came after Musk, the world's richest man, resumed his criticism of Trump's so-called "big, beautiful bill" in a flurry of X posts on Monday. It included a warning from Musk that he would boost primary challenges to defeat Republican lawmakers who vote for the legislation. "Elon may get more subsidy than any human being in history, by far, and without subsidies, Elon would probably have to close up shop and head back home to South Africa. No more Rocket launches, Satellites, or Electric Car Production, and our Country would save a FORTUNE," Trump said. "Perhaps we should have DOGE take a good, hard, look at this? BIG MONEY TO BE SAVED!!!" Musk, CEO of Tesla and SpaceX, has pointed to the bill's projections to raise the national debt by $3.3 trillion over the next decade as the reason for his hostility. But Trump has claimed Musk only opposes the bill because the legislation would end a program under former President Joe Biden that offers consumer tax credit for buyers of electric vehicles. Musk's various companies have benefited from billions of dollars in U.S. government contracts over the past two decades, including SpaceX through its relationships with the Department of Defense and the National Aeronautics and Space Administration. In all, Musk and his businesses have received at least $38 billion in government contracts, loans, subsidies and tax credits, often at critical moments, a Washington Post analysis found. - Joey Garrison Senate nears a full day of debate, breaks their own record Senators have carried on debate over amendments to the sweeping legislation for almost 24 hours now. Throughout June 30 and into the morning of July 1, lawmakers have considered and voted on 45 amendments – a record number in what is known in Washington as a vote-a-rama. The previous record for this marathon-style series of votes was set in 2008 at 44 amendments. - Savannah Kuchar Has the 'big, beautiful bill' passed yet? Not yet. Despite working through the weekend, Senate Republicans continue wading through disputes and sticking points, including over proposed Medicaid reforms. At least two Republicans, Sens. Rand Paul of Kentucky and Thom Tillis of North Carolina, are expected to vote no. Majority Leader Thune met with Sen. Lisa Murkowski, R-Alaska, earlier this morning, as she continues to be a key swing vote in the process. - Savannah Kuchar
New York Post
30 minutes ago
- New York Post
Elon Musk escalates Trump feud, vows to back Rep. Thomas Massie
Elon Musk escalated his feud with President Trump, announcing that he would be backing one of the commander in chief's biggest foes in congress, Rep. Thomas Massie — the libertarian-leaning House lawmaker who Trump has vowed to see defeated in the midterm election. Musk signaled he would donate to the Kentucky Republican's 2026 reelection campaign on X when he responded 'Me' to a post asking who would be backing Massie's congressional bid. Trump, meanwhile, had pledged to support whichever candidate runs in the primary against Massie, who the president lambasted as a 'loser' and 'Third Rate Congressman' in an online tirade last week. 3 Elon Musk announced that he would be supporting Rep. Thomas Massie, a foe of President Trump. AFP via Getty Images 3 Rep. Massie is a libertarian-leaning House lawmaker who Trump has vowed to see defeated in the midterm election. CQ-Roll Call, Inc via Getty Images Massie, 54, has been vocally opposed to the One Big Beautiful Bill, which is Trump's sweeping domestic policy bill, and has slammed the US strikes on Iran as unconstitutional. The Kentucky Republican additionally teamed up with Rep. Ro Khanna (D-Calif.) on a bipartisan war powers resolution to stop the US from getting involved in the Israel-Iran conflict. The war of words between Trump and Musk erupted after the world's richest man renewed his sharp criticisms of the One Big Beautiful Bill, calling it 'utterly insane' and 'political suicide.' The Tesla boss had raged against the massive spending bill — on which Trump's major policy agenda hangs — on social media ahead of the Senate vote. Trump on Monday night responded with fury, threatening to unleash DOGE against Musk, the department's founder and former head, to investigate his companies' government subsidies. 3 Musk criticized the One Big Beautiful Bill, calling it 'utterly insane' and 'political suicide.' AFP via Getty Images He also warned his former ally that he may have 'to close up shop and head back home to South Africa.' 'Elon may get more subsidy than any human being in history, by far, and without subsidies, Elon would probably have to close up shop and head back home to South Africa,' Trump wrote.
Associated Press
30 minutes ago
- Associated Press
Iran assesses the damage and lashes out after Israeli and US strikes damage its nuclear sites
DUBAI, United Arab Emirates (AP) — Iran is assessing the damage and lashing out over the American and Israeli airstrikes on its nuclear sites, though Tehran kept open the possibility Tuesday of resuming talks with the Washington over its atomic program. The comments by government spokesperson Fatemeh Mohajerani also included another acknowledgment that the American strikes at Fordo, Isfahan and Natanz — key sites within Iran's program — had been 'seriously damaged' by the bombing. Iran's state-run IRNA news agency quoted Mohajerani as making the remarks at a briefing for journalists. That acknowledgment comes as Iran's theocracy has slowly begun to admit the scale of the damage wrought by the 12-day war with Israel, which saw Israeli fighter jets decimate the country's air defenses and conduct strikes at will over the Islamic Republic. And keeping the door open to talks with the United States likely shows Tehran wants to avoid further economic pain as another deadline over U.N. sanctions loom. 'No date (for U.S. talks) is announced, and it's not probably very soon, but a decision hasn't been made in this field,' Mohajerani said. Iran offers rising death toll Israeli airstrikes, which began June 13, decimated the upper ranks of Iran's powerful Revolutionary Guard and targeted its arsenal of ballistic missiles. The strikes also hit Iran's nuclear sites, which Israel claimed put Tehran within reach of a nuclear weapon. U.S. intelligence agencies and the International Atomic Energy Agency had assessed Iran last had an organized nuclear weapons program in 2003, though Tehran had been enriching uranium up to 60% — a short, technical step away from weapons-grade levels of 90%. On Monday, Iranian judiciary spokesman Asghar Jahangir offered a sharply increased, government-issued death toll from the war. He said that the Israeli attacks killed 935 'Iranian citizens,' including 38 children and 102 women, IRNA reported. 'The enemy aimed to change the country's circumstances by assassinating military commanders and scientists, intending to spread fear and exert pressure,' Jahangir added. However, he asserted — like others up to 86-year-old Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei — that Iran had 'won' the war. Iran has a long history of offering lower death counts around unrest over political considerations. The Washington-based Human Rights Activists group, which has provided detailed casualty figures from multiple rounds of unrest in Iran, has put the death toll at 1,190 people killed, including 436 civilians and 435 security force members. The attacks wounded another 4,475 people, the group said. Activity seen at Iran's Fordo facility Meanwhile, it appears that Iranian officials now are assessing the damage done by the American strikes conducted on the three nuclear sites on June 22, namely those at Fordo, a site built under a mountain about 100 kilometers (60 miles) southwest of Tehran. Satellite images from Planet Labs PBC analyzed by The Associated Press show Iranian officials at Fordo on Monday likely examining the damage caused by American bunker busters. Trucks could be seen in the images, as well as at least one crane and an excavator at tunnels on the site. That corresponded to images shot Sunday by Maxar Technologies similarly showing the ongoing work. The tunnels likely had been filled in by Iran before the strikes to protect the facility. The presence of trucks before the attacks has raised questions about whether any enriched uranium or centrifuges had been spirited away before the attack, something repeatedly claimed by Iranian officials. Even before the strikes, the IAEA warned that its inspectors had lost their 'continuity of knowledge' regarding the program, meaning material could be at undeclared sites in the country. Iran hasn't said what work is ongoing at the sites, though it has said that the Atomic Energy Organization of Iran planned to issue a report about the damage done by the strikes. Hard-liners lash out Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi, whose profile sharply rose during the war, also has kept open the possibility of talks with the U.S. However, hard-liners within Iran are increasingly criticizing any effort at negotiations or cooperation with the West. Iran's hard-line Kayhan newspaper, in a piece written by its Khamenei-appointed managing editor Hossein Shariatmadari, mocked any possible talks Tuesday by saying being a 'traitor or stupid are two sides of the same coin.' Shariatmadari's newspaper on Saturday also suggested that the IAEA Director-General Rafael Mariano Grossi, should be 'tried and executed' if he visited Iran — something that drew immediate criticism from European nations and others.
