logo
The long-range weapons Ukraine could begin using against Russia

The long-range weapons Ukraine could begin using against Russia

Euronews28-05-2025
Ukraine is no longer prohibited from using long-range weapons on targets within Russia in the ongoing effort to repulse its invasion, one of its key European allies signalled on Monday.
In the past, Ukraine received long-range missiles from the US, UK, Germany, and France, but was only allowed to use them against any Russian forces that were in occupied Ukrainian territory.
German Chancellor Friedrich Merz told journalists that the lifting of restrictions - which, he later clarified, was a decision made months ago - will make "the decisive difference in Ukraine's warfare".
"A country that can only oppose an attacker on its own territory is not defending itself adequately," he said.
Following Merz's comments, Euronews Next takes a look at which weapons Ukraine can now use unrestricted, and how they might impact the course of the war now in its fourth year.
The Army Tactical Missile Systems (ATACMS) is a long-range surface-to-surface missile artillery weapon system that strikes targets "well beyond the range of exising Army canons," according to US manufacturer Lockheed Martin.
The missiles on the system are "all-weather adaptable, stealthy firepower" against targets up to 300 km away.
The missiles are fired either from the High Mobility Artillery Rocket System (HIMARS) or MLRS M270 platforms, both produced by Lockheed Martin.
The Russian Defence Ministry confirmed in November 2024 that it had shot down some of the first foreign-made long-range missiles fired directly into their territory, including six US-made Army Tactical Missile Systems (ATACMS).
But it was not the first time Ukraine had fired them. Reports from as far back as October 2023 suggest Ukraine fired ATACMS missiles that reportedly destroyed nine helicopters at Russian bases in the eastern part of the country.
The Storm Shadow, or SCALP to the French, is a long-range missile jointly manufactured between France and the UK that weighs 1,300 kg and has a range "in excess" of 250 km.
European multinational manufacturer MBDA said the missile works well for pre-planned attacks against stationary targets, like hardened bunkers or key infrastructure.
The missile is described by MBDA as offering a high-precision strike day or night because it combines GPS, onboard guidance systems, and terrain mapping to find its target.
Once the Storm Shadow missile approaches a target, an infrared device matches an image of the target with stored pictures on its onboard hard drive to make sure the target matches its mission, MBDA said.
The missile's warhead has a first charge that allows it to penetrate a bunker or clear soil, then after it lets out a fuze to control how the ordnance detonates.
It's already in service with the UK, French, and Italian militaries, MBDA said.
In Germany, much of the conversation has centred on supplying Ukraine with Taurus missiles.
The Taurus KEPD 350, manufactured jointly by Swedish company Saab and MBDA Deutschland, is an "incomparable modular standoff missile" that can land precision strikes on stationary targets like bunkers and high-value targets like large radar stations.
The Taurus flies at low terrain to penetrate thick air defenses and shoot down targets with a 481 kg warhead system called the MEPHISTO.
The air-to-surface missile system has a range of over 500 km and weighs 1400 kg.
Before Germany's last federal election held in February, Merz, as leader of the Christian Democratic Union (CDU) party, had called for the delivery of Taurus missiles to Ukraine.
Merz has now signalled that Ukraine and Germany would produce the "This will be a cooperation on an industrial level, which can take place both in Ukraine and here in Germany," Merz said.
While restrictions on long-range weapons have been lifted, Merz declined to confirm if Germany would be delivering Taurus missiles to Kyiv or not.
In the early morning of April 29, people in Kourou, French Guiana, were woken up by the roar of the Vega-C rocket as it carried Biomass, the latest satellite from the European Space Agency (ESA), successfully into space.
The Biomass mission not only represents a leap forward in the scientific understanding of tropical forests, but its launch also marked a major step toward securing Europe's independent access to space.
Euronews Tech Talks was on site in Kourou for the launch, and with this second special episode on Biomass, we bring you behind the scenes of the launch preparations.
The operations on the day of the launch of a satellite, also referred to as D-Day, are just the tip of the iceberg in a long process to get it into space.
In the case of Biomass, the project started more than a decade ago and involved several professionals who dedicated their competencies to building the satellite, developing the rocket, and coordinating every step up to and after April 29.
Launch preparations began as early as March 7, when Biomass arrived in French Guiana after a two-week voyage across the Atlantic Ocean.
Upon arrival in Kourou, the satellite was transported to the spaceport, removed from its shipping container, and thoroughly inspected for any potential damage.
Next, Biomass was fuelled and attached to the adapter that would connect it to the Vega-C rocket, enabling its journey into orbit.
On April 14, Biomass was placed inside the fairing, the top part of the rocket, then transferred to the launch pad at the Tangara site.
There, the fairing containing the satellite was placed on the Vega C launcher, followed by more checks and a practice run known as the dress rehearsal.
With all checks completed, it was time for the first weather forecast, a crucial step in the process.
"We need good weather conditions to authorise the launch," explained Jean Frédéric Alasa, launch range operations director at CNES, the French Space Agency.
"The rain is not a major constraint, it's more about the wind. If the launcher were to explode, we want to make sure the debris falls far from the populated areas," he continued.
Luckily, on April 29, the wind was very mild, and the satellite launch was authorised.
Vega C lifted off at 6:15:52 AM local time in Kourou. This time was precisely calculated and had to be respected to bring the satellite into the correct orbit.
"For all the SSO missions, there is no launch window, but just one time at which the satellite can be lifted off," Fabrizio Fabiani, head of the Vega programme at Arianespace, explained.
"Each day could be a good day, but at the same instant".
SSO stands for sun-synchronous orbit, a special type of orbit where the satellite maintains the same position relative to the Sun. Essentially, Biomass passes over the same location on Earth at the same time every day.
This orbit is ideal for monitoring changes over time, which is why it is commonly used for several Earth observation satellites.
Biomass's launch was successful and greeted with great excitement by those who worked on it for years.
When the satellite and rocket fully separated, the team erupted into cheers, celebrating the mission's success.
"I've indeed been working for 12 years on that mission and now, at the end of it, I would say the predominant sentiment is that I'm super grateful and humbled that I was allowed to do that job," Michael Fehringer, ESA's Biomass project manager, told Euronews.
"I feel relieved... that's all we could ask for, that's the best result we could have," Justin Byrne, Airbus head of science and Mars programmes, shared with us.
But while most celebrated, one team remained focused on the mission. Which team was it, and why?
Listen to Euronews Tech Talks to find out the answer.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Fourteen member states oppose the Commission's EU budget overhaul
Fourteen member states oppose the Commission's EU budget overhaul

Euronews

time33 minutes ago

  • Euronews

Fourteen member states oppose the Commission's EU budget overhaul

With the proposal for the next EU budget after 2027 just around the corner, the political landscape is far from calm. The latest sign of unrest: fourteen member states have endorsed a non-paper opposing the European Commission's plans to centralise the management and distribution of EU funds. 'Only a distinct and robust budget and a region-based allocation methodology, reflecting the different development levels of regions, together with a stand-alone Cohesion Policy dedicated legislation, can ensure that the next Multiannual Financial Framework (MFF) will deliver long-term unity, competitiveness and convergence across EU regions,' states the document. Bulgaria, Czechia, Greece, Spain, Hungary, Italy, Latvia, Lithuania, Poland, Portugal, Romania, Slovenia and Slovakia signed the non-paper on 'Cohesion Policy in the Future MFF,' aiming to secure a separate pot for narrowing the socio-economic gap between the richest and poorest European regions. The call from more than half of the member states comes in response to a leak about the Commission's plans to create a single funding pot for each EU country (covering around 530 programmes) and to link the receipt of funds to the fulfilment of policy objectives. The potential centralisation of the management and access to EU money would give greater power to national governments and Brussels, while proving detrimental to regions and other departments within the European Commission. European Commission president Ursula von der Leyen is expected to present the budget proposal for the next long-term financial period (2028–2034) on July 16 — but criticism from regions, member states, MEPs, and industry representatives continues to mount. Both Poland and the centre-left Socialists and Democrats (S&D) group in the European Parliament have raised concerns about the Commission's intention to merge dozens of individual funding streams into a single cash pot per member state, as detailed in their respective position papers on the next MFF. 'We will strongly oppose the 'one national plan per member state' approach, as well as the possibility for national plans to be underpinned by a 'payments against reforms' rule,' the Socialists wrote in a letter to von der Leyen sent on Monday. The Socialists — the second-largest group in the Parliament — also called on the Commission chief to propose a larger and more ambitious long-term budget, exceeding the current 1% of the EU's GDP, which is equivalent to around €1.2 trillion. Poland's conservative government, meanwhile, emphasized that future reforms should not lead to further centralisation or the merging of funding instruments. 'Regions should remain at the core of cohesion policy,' its position paper, dated 1 July, states. The EU's Common Agricultural Policy (CAP) and cohesion policy together account for more than two-thirds of the total EU budget — and Poland, which receives the most funding from cohesion policy, insists that their combined share in the MFF should not be less than it is currently. 'One of the priorities of the next MFF should be increasing the importance of economic, social, and territorial cohesion within the EU and striving for convergence,' Poland defends in its position paper. 'Competitiveness and cohesion are the two sides of the same coin,' they conclude.

How could the US-China trade rearrangement affect Europe?
How could the US-China trade rearrangement affect Europe?

Euronews

timean hour ago

  • Euronews

How could the US-China trade rearrangement affect Europe?

Since United States President Donald Trump's inauguration, he has announced more than 50 new or revised tariffs, including pauses, backdowns, escalations and de-escalations. As the state of US-China trade relations remains uncertain, many US firms are considering alternative sources of supply. Without a shift to different sources, prices may rise, and US companies and consumers might need to reduce or replace one product with another, virtually similar one. In this scenario, Europe could play a key role, both as an exporter and an importer. "Europe faces an increasingly difficult challenge: how to transition from being a recipient of decisions made by China and the US to actively shaping its own future," stated Francesca Ghiretti, director of the RAND Europe China Initiative, in a commentary piece. On average, Europe already supplies 55% of the available global export market for products which the US imports from China. According to nine varied simulations conducted by the global management consulting firm McKinsey & Company, the European Union, along with Norway, Switzerland, and the UK, could potentially replace about 30% to 65% of US imports from China with its exports, even in the face of high US tariffs on European goods. In each simulation, it is assumed that the value of US imports from China for each product falls to zero, and that instead, the US sources each product from other exporters. Products trade Europe's role in this scenario is most pronounced when it comes to electronics, other manufacturing, and textiles. The US has $191 billion, $52 billion, and $45 billion within each of these industries to rearrange, respectively. These are the same sectors for which the US currently imports mainly from China. In electronics, especially, Europe could be the primary substitute supplier in the US market. Another example is toys. Europe could supply the US market with Czech and German toys, replacing those made in China. This could see European consumers increasingly buy Chinese-made toys. As Europe has increased its exports to the US, it has also become a significant destination for Chinese exports, absorbing up to 55% of China's current shipments to the US. This shift could lead to deeper trade interdependence between Europe and China, as well as geopolitical tensions. "The next months and years will challenge whether Europe can stay the course, or it will lose itself trying to respond to ongoing challenges," said Francesca Ghiretti.

Merz faces Pride flag fallout after saying Bundestag 'not a circus'
Merz faces Pride flag fallout after saying Bundestag 'not a circus'

Euronews

time3 hours ago

  • Euronews

Merz faces Pride flag fallout after saying Bundestag 'not a circus'

German Chancellor and CDU party leader Friedrich Merz is facing significant backlash from his political opponents after rejecting calls to fly a Pride flag at the Bundestag, which he said was "not a circus tent where any flag could be hoisted". In an appearance on public broadcaster ARD on Tuesday, Merz defended his party's lawmakers and Bundestag President Julia Klöckner — who previously declined to display the rainbow flag for Christopher Street Day on 26 July — saying the banner should only be flown on 17 May, the International Day Against Homophobia. "On all other days, the German flag and the European flag are flown at the German Bundestag and no other. And this decision is the right one," he said. In Germany, Christopher Street Day is observed in memory of the 1969 Stonewall riots in New York — the first major LGBTQ+ community uprising against persecution — and is typically marked by Pride events across the country. In previous years, the rainbow flag was displayed at the Bundestag building during Pride events, and prior chancellors have participated in Christopher Street Day celebrations. Merz's words have sparked considerable criticism from the opposition. Sophie Koch, the government's queer commissioner and centre-left SPD lawmaker questioned whether the statement implied LGBTQ+ community were "circus animals". Green Party leader in the Bundestag, Katharina Dröge, stated that the rainbow flag represents "a group that is increasingly affected by hostility, violence and hatred" and thus has its place in parliament. Green-led lawmakers also staged a protest in the Bundestag chamber, wearing clothes that collectively formed the rainbow flag.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store