A Disabled Woman Wanted to Starve Herself to Death. The State Wouldn't Let Her. A New Doc Looks at Her Case (Exclusive)
Director Reid Davenport's new documentary Life After examines the right-to-die question through the experiences of disabled people
Reid, who has cerebral palsy, uses the case of Elizabeth Bouvia, a young woman with cerebral palsy, as the centerpiece of the film
Bouvia was denied the right to starve herself in 1983Allowing a person with a dire health diagnosis or an unbearable level of pain to die might seem like an act of mercy to some people.
But what would happen if the government were to decide that anyone with a disability deserves the right to die? Filmmaker Reid Davenport confronts this question in his new documentary Life After, primarily through the story of Elizabeth Bouvia, a California woman with cerebral palsy who, at the age of 26, sought the legal right to starve herself to death.
This was in 1983, and some TV news broadcasts questioned why someone who was young and beautiful would want to end her life. She said she wanted to die because she hadn't been given the right to live in a society with a healthcare structure that valued the bottom line over her well-being.
Davenport, who also has cerebral palsy, and his producing partner at Multitude Films, Colleen Cassingham, kept hearing similar reasoning while making Life After, which is now playing in select theaters.
Bouvia articulated her argument well when her case moved to court — she was in pain, tired and bogged down by bureaucracy — but the state eventually sided with the hospital, which said it could not betray its oath to first do no harm. So what happened to this so-called pioneer in the right-to-die movement after the case ended?
That is the question Davenport set out to answer when he started working on Life After. Framed by Bouvia's story, the documentary explores expanded Canadian policies that allow nearly anyone with a disability to apply to die, why some disabled people have made the tough choice to die and how advocates for MAiD (medical aid in dying) defend the expansion of the policies from people with a terminal diagnosis to anyone with a disability.
The film amplifies varied voices and points of view, like Melissa Hickson, who says her husband Michael Hickson was denied lifesaving care because doctors decided his quality of life was too low, and Catherine Frazee, a professor who posits that you cannot address human suffering by killing people. One participant, Michal Kaliszan, details how he considered assisted dying after his mother, who was his primary caretaker, died, and he could no longer afford the care he needed.
While working on the documentary, Cassingham had to navigate a shift in taking right-to-die activism at face value as progressivism to fully understanding the implications of applying it to all disabled people.
"I thought assisted dying was really about personal choice and bodily autonomy, values that I'm deeply committed to," she tells PEOPLE. "And in learning from Reid and in working on this film, I realized there's so much more to the picture of how it actually works in society, and it's deeply linked with the ways that we do and don't value certain lives, and a deep-seated ableism that underpins so much of society."
Over the course of Life After, as Davenport searches for Bouvia's family and seeks to find out if she is still living, two themes emerge: that the focus on right-to-die policies ignores that so many disabled people are not given the right to live and that any one person deciding what a good quality of life is for someone else can be tricky.
"The themes at the heart of this film are not niche; they're not particular to the disability community. Things like healthcare, isolation and the way that we value other human lives are universal," Cassingham says. "Everyone has a stake in the fight for a society that is invested in care and in upholding each other's dignity in the systems that we build and live within."
Eventually, Davenport locates Bouvia's sisters, Teresa and Rebecca, and convinces them to appear on camera to talk about their sibling, who died in 2014. Encouraging the pair to open up about Bouvia was not easy, but Davenport's authenticity and transparency helped win them over.
"Their main concern was that Elizabeth's reputation and decisions were going to be questioned again, and we ensured that was not our intention," Davenport says. "Basically, trying to, with the audience, meet them where they were at, and not force them."
As Teresa and Rebecca share stories of Bouvia's life after the 1980s while the film visits people who have used or are considering using MAiD, it becomes clear that assisted dying may have its place in the medical system. However, as Davenport sees it, discussions about it should be handled carefully when the focus is on people with disabilities.
"We should be asking, 'How can we enable disabled people to live?' And support them, and allow them opportunities," he says. "There's this sinister perspective that we are a burden, that we suck up money. So there's this underlying incentive for the health industry to allow people to choose assisted suicide."
He continues, "What I would encourage people to do is to look at how we can better the lives of people with disabilities rather than leave them to die."
Near the end of the film, Davenport fills out the application for Canada's MAiD program to see how easy or hard it would be for him to qualify. What starts as a funny exercise becomes scary when he passes with flying colors. He reflects on this and on all the people he has met who have gone down the same path and says he can't imagine how different he would feel about his life without the support, care and passion he has.
In one particularly poignant moment, Cassingham agrees that her quality of life would also be greatly reduced without these things, but because she doesn't have a disability, she wouldn't be given the option to die because of it.
"Quality of life doesn't have much to do with the abilities of our bodies. When someone becomes disabled or is aging, there's a real grappling with what that means, because society has told us that what makes us productive and able to enjoy life revolves around our bodies and our ability to do certain things," she says. "But for me, I've experienced a real reframing of disability as a natural part of the fabric of human experience."
"I'm learning that quality of life resides somewhere else, and it involves the people around you, it involves being loved, and giving love and care," Cassingham adds. "And those are things we all have access to if we live in a society where care is fostered and relationships and interdependency is valued and fostered."
While Bouvia's life after her landmark court case quickly fell out of the news cycle, Davenport's film reappraises the right-to-die question — through the sweet recollections of Bouvia's sisters, home video footage and the context of many others who are choosing to die or questioning why it is even an option.
Life After is now playing in select theaters
Read the original article on People
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Associated Press
an hour ago
- Associated Press
Public health notice: Outbreak of Salmonella infections linked to various brands of salami and cacciatore products
July 19, 2025: Update This outbreak investigation is ongoing. The public health notice will be updated as the investigation evolves. OTTAWA, ON, July 19, 2025 /CNW/ - At a glance Do not consume, use, sell, serve or distribute recalled salami and cacciatore products. For details on recalled product brand names and lot codes, please consult the Recalls and Safety Alerts website. Over 65 products have been recalled. These products may have been used in prepared products like sandwiches or sold at deli counters. Recalled food Recall warnings have been issued for various salami and cacciatore products, including products from brands: These products were distributed to: These products may have been used and sold in prepared products like sandwiches or at deli counters. These warnings were triggered by findings from the food safety investigation. For more information on the recalled products, including all product names, descriptions and lot codes, please consult the CFIA's notices on the Recalls and Safety Alerts website. Rea brand Genoa Salami and Bona brand Genova Salami recalled due to Salmonella Rea brand Soppressata Salami Sweet recalled due to Salmonella Various brands of Salami and Cacciatore recalled due to Salmonella How to protect your health Salmonellosis is a foodborne bacterial illness that can affect anyone exposed to a contaminated food product, including the recalled product. People who are infected with Salmonella bacteria can spread Salmonella to other people several days to several weeks after they have become infected, even if they don't have symptoms. The following advice applies to individuals, as well as retailers, distributors and food service establishments such as specialty markets, delis, and cafes across Canada: Most people who become ill from a Salmonella infection will recover fully after a few days without treatment, but it can also cause severe illness and hospitalization. The Salmonella strain associated with this outbreak investigation is multi drug-resistant, which means it's resistant to certain antibiotics (streptomycin, kanamycin, ampicillin, and sulfisoxazole). Other antibiotics are available to treat illnesses associated with this outbreak strain, if antibiotic treatment is considered necessary. Those at higher risk for serious illness include: Symptoms Salmonellosis has a wide range of symptoms. You may not get sick at all. However, if you do get sick, symptoms usually start within 6 to 72 hours after exposure. You may experience: Most symptoms end within 4 to 7 days. While most people recover completely on their own, some people may have a more serious illness that: Salmonellosis (Salmonella) Food safety for vulnerable populations Investigation summary There are 87 laboratory-confirmed cases of Salmonella I 4,[5],12:i:- illness linked to this outbreak in: The illness reported in British Columbia is related to travel to Alberta. People became sick between mid-April and late-June 2025. Of the cases reported, nine people have been hospitalized and there have been no deaths. Many people who became sick reported eating salami in prepared sandwiches or purchased from deli counters where the recalled products were served. People who became sick are between 1 and over 100 years of age. More recent illnesses may continue to be reported in the outbreak because there is a period between when a person becomes ill and when the illness is reported to public health officials. For this outbreak, the illness reporting period is between 11 and 45 days. This outbreak may not be limited to the provinces with known illnesses. The recalled products were distributed to: For more details on distribution please consult CFIA's notices on the Recalls and Safety Alerts website. Related links SOURCE Public Health Agency of Canada


New York Times
an hour ago
- New York Times
You Said ‘Yes' to Being an Organ Donor. What Exactly Does That Mean?
If there is a small red heart with the words 'organ donor' at the bottom of your driver's license, that puts you in a group of over 173 million Americans who are in the national organ donor registry. Organ donation has wide public support, but medical ethicists say there is still confusion about what it looks like and how it affects patients and families. How do you become an organ donor? Any adult can register. In most states, teenagers as young as 15 may also express their intent to donate, though parents can revoke that decision. Today, around 90 percent of donors join their state registry at their local D.M.V. Others sign up while registering to vote, or through an online form linked to their local organ procurement organizations, known as O.P.O.s, which are nonprofit federal contractors in each state that coordinate transplants. Donate Life America, an advocacy organization, maintains a nationwide list of online registries. Donors can sign up or change their status at the D.M.V. or online, though residents of some states have had trouble removing themselves from the registry. Is the decision legally binding? It depends on how you die. If you are declared legally dead after testing shows no signs of neurological activity — known colloquially as being 'brain-dead' — then the organ donor status on your license is legally binding, even if your family disagrees. In these cases, patients are kept on a ventilator until their organs are retrieved. Want all of The Times? Subscribe.


New York Times
an hour ago
- New York Times
A Push for More Organ Transplants Is Putting Donors at Risk
Last spring at a small Alabama hospital, a team of transplant surgeons prepared to cut into Misty Hawkins. The clock was ticking. Her organs wouldn't be usable for much longer. Days earlier, she had been a vibrant 42-year-old with a playful sense of humor and a love for the Thunder Beach Motorcycle Rally. But after Ms. Hawkins choked while eating and fell into a coma, her mother decided to take her off life support and donate her organs. She was removed from a ventilator and, after 103 minutes, declared dead. A surgeon made an incision in her chest and sawed through her breastbone. That's when the doctors discovered her heart was beating. She appeared to be breathing. They were slicing into Ms. Hawkins while she was alive. Across the United States, an intricate system of hospitals, doctors and nonprofit donation coordinators carries out tens of thousands of lifesaving transplants each year. At every step, it relies on carefully calibrated protocols to protect both donors and recipients. But in recent years, as the system has pushed to increase transplants, a growing number of patients have endured premature or bungled attempts to retrieve their organs. Though Ms. Hawkins's case is an extreme example of what can go wrong, a New York Times examination revealed a pattern of rushed decision-making that has prioritized the need for more organs over the safety of potential donors. Share your story about the organ transplant system We will not publish any part of your submission without contacting you first. We may use your contact information to follow up with you. Want all of The Times? Subscribe.