Senate GOP nails down deals on DOGE cuts in bid to avoid tax bill tumult
A number of rank-and-file members indicated in recent days that they hoped leadership would do everything possible to sidestep the tumult that engulfed the conference days before July 4 and limit the side deals that were being worked out at the last minute.
All indications Tuesday were that leaders were attempting to do just that. They resolved two key issues — protecting the President's Emergency Plan for AIDS Relief (PEPFAR) program and some rural broadcasters — a day before a key vote-a-rama is set to happen.
Congress has until Friday to send the bill, known as a rescissions package, to President Trump's desk. It contains a request to claw back $9 billion in already appropriated funds for foreign aid and public broadcasting.
'Thune's been really transparent on all of this,' Sen. Shelley Moore Capito (R-W.Va.) said, pointing to the pre-vote-a-rama effort and push to limit potential side deals.
The White House and Senate GOP members made massive strides Tuesday toward a potential final green light to pass the bill.
Early in the day, Sen. Mike Rounds (R-S.D.) announced he was on board with the package after striking a deal to ensure radio stations in tribal communities continue to receive funding. He had been concerned about the effect cuts to the Corporation for Public Broadcasting — which helps fund NPR and PBS — would have on Native American areas that rely on those stations.
Rounds told reporters that the administration is reallocating Biden-era 'Green New Deal money' to fund those broadcasters, unlocking his vote in the process.
'I think it was caught in the crossfire,' Rounds said about the provision. 'They understood my concern. They recognized this is not something people necessarily wanted to cut out. These were not part of the targeted groups that a lot of folks have problems with, and they provide a real service in rural areas.'
The bigger news came hours later, when negotiators announced that planned PEPFAR cuts were out of the bill entirely, potentially unlocking the support of multiple moderates who had fretted about their inclusion, including Sens. Susan Collins (R-Maine) and Lisa Murkowski (R-Alaska).
Neither moderate has said how they will vote.
The move also strips $400 million from the bill, bringing the rescissions total down from $9.4 billion to $9 billion.
'White House is supportive. Everybody's on the same page,' Sen. Eric Schmitt (R-Mo.), the lead sponsor of the bill, told reporters.
The news emerged after Office of Management and Budget Director Russell Vought appeared at the weekly Senate GOP luncheon to discuss the package, which statutorily must be completed by Friday.
'It's substantially the same package, and the Senate has to work its will and we've appreciated the work along the way to get to a place where they've got the votes,' Vought said after lunch. 'There is a substitute amendment that does not include the PEPFAR rescission and we're fine with that.'
Murkowski and Collins were the foremost opponents of the cuts to PEPFAR, which was launched by former President George W. Bush more than two decades ago.
Collins had already shown her potential independence by voting against the Trump tax bill last week, while Murkowski demanded a number of last-minute deals to secure her vote.
Senate Majority Leader John Thune (R-S.D.) told reporters after lunch that there was 'a lot of interest' in making PEPFAR changes, labeling it a 'small modification.' He also believes the change will not cause issues across the Capitol — because the Senate is making changes to the bill, it must return to the House before heading to Trump's desk.
'I wouldn't say anything's prebaked,' Thune said when asked if the topic was run by Speaker Mike Johnson (R-La.). 'Obviously, it's something we've been working closely with the administration on, and my assumption is that the level of coordination that we've had … that they [the House] would take [it] up.'
Rank-and-file Senate GOP members still hope leaders limit further changes by the time it hits the lower chamber.
'It would be nice if we didn't have to inflict so much pain on ourselves,' Sen. Kevin Cramer (R-N.D.) told The Hill. 'How bad can it be?'
'Some people want to refine the rescissions a bit. They want more detail,' he continued. 'I'm with it as it is. … It's just time to rein some of that back in.'
Nevertheless, some members are seeking further changes via the amendment process.
'Sure, in an ideal world. But this is legislating,' Sen. Josh Hawley (R-Mo.) said about the prospect of cutting out side deals.
Hawley noted plans to file an amendment that would add $5 billion more in cuts to the package in a bid to slash a 'Green New Deal loan' that would affect his state, though he said he wasn't even sure it complies with the rules of the pending vote-a-rama.
'I'd like to make it bigger,' he added.
Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


CNBC
13 minutes ago
- CNBC
Union Pacific in mega US railroad merger talks with rival Norfolk
Union Pacific said on Thursday it was in advanced discussions with rival Norfolk Southern for a possible mega merger that would create a transcontinental railroad behemoth. Norfolk shares were up 3.5%, while Union Pacific fell 2.3% in premarket trading. A deal, if it goes through, will combine Union Pacific's dominant position in the Western two-thirds of the U.S. with Norfolk's 19,500-mile route predominantly spanning 22 eastern states. Norfolk has a market value of about $63.2 billion, while Union Pacific was valued at around $138 billion, according to LSEG data. There can be no assurances as to whether an agreement for a transaction will be reached or as to its terms, Union Pacific said. The North American railroad industry has struggled with volatile freight volumes, rising labor and fuel costs, and growing pressure from shippers over service reliability. If the two companies agree to a deal, it would be largest-ever buyout in the sector. It would also shape up as a key test of the Trump administration's appetite for big-ticket mergers and faces a plethora of regulatory hurdles. The first challenge would be securing approval from the Surface Transportation Board (STB), the federal agency that oversees railroads, currently led by Patrick Fuchs, a Trump appointee named to the post in January. It would also require the support of worker unions and might invite scrutiny from several other federal bodies. Major railroad unions have long pushed back against consolidation, warning that such deals threaten jobs and risk throwing rail service into disarray. The last major consolidation in the industry was the $31 billion merger between Canadian Pacific and Kansas City Southern, which created the first and only single line rail network connecting Canada, the United States and Mexico. The deal, which closed in 2023, faced intense regulatory pushback over concerns it would stifle competition, eliminate jobs and disrupt service but was eventually approved.


The Hill
15 minutes ago
- The Hill
RFK Jr. sued over a task force by the anti-vaccine group he founded
The anti-vaccine organization founded by Health and Human Services (HHS) Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. is now funding a lawsuit against him, arguing Kennedy has failed to establish a task force on the safety of childhood vaccines. 'Our first priority will ALWAYS be children's health. Sec. Kennedy has FAILED 'to establish a task force dedicated to making childhood vaccines safer, as mandated by federal law,' so we WILL be holding him accountable,' Children's Health Defense (CHD) posted on social platform X. The lawsuit claims Kennedy is violating the National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986, which requires the HHS secretary to stand up a task force consisting of the director of the National Institutes of Health (NIH), the commissioner of the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and the director of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). The law also requires the health secretary to provide Congress with progress reports every two years. CHD contends that the steps taken to make vaccines safer has never been reported to lawmakers. Kennedy and his allies have been interested in the panel for years, arguing that its absence shows the government has not taken appropriate steps to ensure vaccines are safe for children. While he was part of Children's Health Defense in 2018, Kennedy — along with fellow vaccine critic and adviser Del Bigtree — filed a Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) request for copies of the reports from HHS. When no reports were found, Kennedy and Bigtree sued HHS to produce them, part of an effort to bolster their misleading narrative about vaccine safety A task force was created in the wake of the law's passage and produced reports. It was short-lived and made its final report to Congress in 1998. During a 2019 Senate hearing about vaccines and rising rates of preventable disease, then-Sen. Lamar Alexander (R-Tenn.) noted the Health, Education Labor and Pensions (HELP) Committee received two reports from HHS about vaccine safety in 1988 and 1989. Alexander said the law only required HHS to submit a report to Congress 'within two years.' The former lawmaker during the hearing blasted 'internet fraudsters' for 'preying on the unfounded fears and daily struggles of parents' by convincing them vaccines aren't safe. Dorit Reiss, a law professor at UC Law San Francisco and expert on vaccine litigation, said she thinks the CHD lawsuit is 'performative,' and doesn't mean Kennedy's former group has turned on him. Reiss noted that the lawsuit could be a way to give Kennedy cover to set up the vaccine safety panel he's been floating for years. Ray Flores, the CHD attorney who filed the complaint, indicated that is exactly what the group wants to do. 'It may appear as though we are being unfriendly to Mr. Kennedy. On the contrary, we're helping him to have an excuse to do his job,' Flores said in an interview with CHD TV.


The Hill
15 minutes ago
- The Hill
Flake: ‘All of us should be concerned' by Columbia, CBS deals with Trump
Former Sen. Jeff Flake (R-Ariz.) on Wednesday said the public should be concerned about the Trump administration's recent settlements with Columbia University and CBS. Columbia on Wednesday agreed to pay $221 million to the Trump administration so it can recoup federal funding, while CBS's parent company, Paramount Global, signed a $16 million settlement with the president earlier this month over editorial content decisions made in former Vice President Harris's interview with '60 Minutes.' 'I think all of us should be concerned where this goes,' Flake said during a Wednesday appearance on CNN's 'NewsNight with Abby Phillip.' 'I wouldn't want Donald Trump, I wouldn't want Joe Biden, I wouldn't want anybody, any president, to be the arbiter of what is truth and what is not, and what universities have to do to be able to attract foreign students or what not,' he added. Columbia's acting university President Claire Shipman said the deal with the Trump administration would allow the school to maintain its independence and restore funding after a period of 'institutional uncertainty.' However, Flake said the White House's influence is becoming overarching with recent agreements seeped in directives at schools, news companies and law firms. 'This has gone too far in many areas, particularly with the law firms, basically telling them they've got to pay up or pony up, or they're going to be investigated or left aside,' Flake told Phillip.