logo
‘Chic' is dead, says Vogue. Is it time to revive ‘jazzy', ‘snazzy' and ‘swish'?

‘Chic' is dead, says Vogue. Is it time to revive ‘jazzy', ‘snazzy' and ‘swish'?

The Guardian02-06-2025
Vogue has spoken: chic is dead. Not being it, but the word. Chic has, Lauren O'Neill argues, lost its essence, co-opted to cover whatever glazed-doughnut-skinned influencers on TikTok decide it should, from monogrammed lip balm to iced matchas. 'Chic has come to be mistaken for certain monied strains of taste, rather than the sort of unique je ne sais quoi that I think the word at its purest actually means.'
Baudelaire – the 19th century's Nicky Haslam, given how many things he disapproved of: photography, Belgium, Victor Hugo – would have agreed. He called chic an 'awful and bizarre word'. Are he and Vogue right?
I'm not that troubled by chic. Certainly not as an aspiration – I'm currently wearing the stained puffer jacket I share with my most eccentric hen, who lays eggs in the sleeve – but also as a word. I find it far less objectionable than 'luxurious', which has been similarly overused into vapid meaninglessness but takes longer and feels creepy to say – to me, it feels like one of those awful massages that is just feathery stroking. 'Chic' is just a bit dull (unless used in conjunction with 'le freak', of course).
Still, I'm gratefully chastened when someone tries to hold us to higher creative standards. I tried to check how many times I had used 'chic' in print and was appalled at the vast list of results, before realising most of them were actually the word 'chickens'. I did, however, use it twice in something I wrote just yesterday without even realising.
To further linguistic plurality and make life more interesting, maybe we need to rehabilitate some alternatives. My suggestion: let's start describing stuff like baffled elderly fathers opining on outfits. I'd love to see the return of 'snazzy', 'trendy', 'swish', and other dad-jectives; let's have influencers calling their baby-blue crocodile Hermès handbags 'jazzy'.
I fear, however, we're too far gone – chic is so ingrained, so ubiquitous and so damn useful, it will outlive us. I fully anticipate the last mutated giant post-apocalyptic cockroaches will be complimenting each other on the way their shells glitter in the burning wasteland – so chic!
Emma Beddington is a Guardian columnist
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

RNLI rescues 19 migrants from English Channel after dinghy capsizes
RNLI rescues 19 migrants from English Channel after dinghy capsizes

The Independent

time11 minutes ago

  • The Independent

RNLI rescues 19 migrants from English Channel after dinghy capsizes

Dramatic footage released by the Royal National Lifeboat Institution (RNLI) shows volunteers rescuing migrants from the English Channel after their small boat capsized in 2024. The never-before-seen footage, released on Tuesday, depicts the Dover RNLI crew responding to a mayday call when a dinghy with 19 individuals onboard sank. All of the migrants were successfully rescued from the water by the volunteers, who threw flotation devices and helped them onto the lifeboat. The RNLI reported responding to 114 separate crossing incidents in 2024, saving the lives of 58 migrants, including children. Watch the video in full above.

Sneak peek at new rollercoaster coming to Blackpool Pleasure Beach
Sneak peek at new rollercoaster coming to Blackpool Pleasure Beach

The Independent

time11 minutes ago

  • The Independent

Sneak peek at new rollercoaster coming to Blackpool Pleasure Beach

Blackpool Pleasure Beach has released CGI footage of its new rollercoaster, Aviktas, which is set to be the tallest of its kind in the UK. The £8.72 million pendulum ride, scheduled to open in 2026, will stand at 138ft high. Aviktas will seat 40 riders and is designed to sway 120 degrees from side to side, simulating the motion of flying. Upon its launch, the gyro swing will surpass Drayton Manor 's 74ft Maelstrom as the highest in the UK. Watch the video in full above.

Alleged ‘con queen of Hollywood' loses High Court challenge against extradition
Alleged ‘con queen of Hollywood' loses High Court challenge against extradition

The Independent

time11 minutes ago

  • The Independent

Alleged ‘con queen of Hollywood' loses High Court challenge against extradition

A man who was nicknamed the 'con queen of Hollywood ' after allegedly impersonating movie executives and defrauding hundreds of people has lost a court bid to challenge his extradition to the United States. Hargobind Tahilramani is accused of conning over 300 victims – including actors, screenwriters and photographers – over the course of seven years. Tahilramani would allegedly convince entertainment industry professionals to travel to Indonesia at their own expense for non-existent projects. They were then allegedly charged exorbitant expenses which were never repaid. The 45-year-old is wanted in the US to face eight charges, including conspiracy to commit wire fraud, two counts of wire fraud and five counts of aggravated identity theft. He faced extradition proceedings in 2022, and in June 2023 Chief Magistrate Paul Goldspring approved Tahilramani's extradition, which was later ordered by the Home Secretary. Tahilramani brought an appeal to the High Court in London in April. Judge Mr Justice Sweeting dismissed the bid in a decision on Tuesday. Tahilramani's lawyers argued that the chief magistrate had been wrong to allow his extradition, considering his mental health and risk of suicide. They also said the judge was wrong to find that extraditing Tahilramani would be compatible with his human rights given the risk of inhuman and degrading treatment, including sexual assault. Mr Justice Sweeting said in a 28-page ruling: 'The applicant's case is that he would almost certainly face confinement alone in protective custody due to his sexual orientation and effeminate demeanour.' The judge found that any differences in treatment Tahilramani could face in prison would be aimed at preventing inter-prisoner violence, and that the previous judge was right to conclude that it 'would not be oppressive due to his physical or mental condition to extradite him'. Mr Justice Sweeting concluded: 'The differential treatment claimed by the applicant, even if established, would relate to protective measures taken due to vulnerability, and not as a result of a discriminatory intent or practice based on his sexual orientation. 'Such measures … are not inhuman or degrading and serve a legitimate purpose within the US penal system.'

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store